Cromwell Bridge Club : Detailed data for LINDIS

View by:

EW pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

LINDIS 28 May

EW pair 1

Section y

Sharon Mactavish
Julia Smith

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1	1	S	7	=	1	080	1
2	1	2	S	3	=	1	110	0
3	1	3	S	A	=	1	110	8
4	1	2	W	6	=	1	-110	6
5	1	3 NT	E	T	+3	1	-490	8
6	4	3 NT	W	8	-1	4	100	2
7	4	4	S	Q	=	4	620	2
8	4	2	N	7	+3	4	150	5
9	4	3	S	A	-1	4	-50	7
10	4	3	E	A	=	4	-140	2
11	2	3 NT	W	J	+1	2	-430	5
12	2	3	S	A	-1	2	-100	4
13	2	2	S	8	+1	2	140	0
14	2	2	W	J	-1	2	050	1
15	2	2	S	7	+1	2	140	2
16	5	1	E	4	+2	5	-140	0
17	5	3 NT	N	3	+2	5	460	2
18	5	3 NT	S	7	+3	5	690	0
19	5	4	S	3	-1	5	-50	4
20	5	3 NT	W	5	-2	5	200	5
21	3	4	E	9	=	3	-420	6
22	3	3	N	A	=	3	140	2
23	3	1 NT	E	4	+2	3	-150	8
24	3	1	E	T	+5	3	-170	8
25	3	4	N	4	+1	3	450	1

EW pair 2

Section y

Hugh Derham
Pat Holder

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	3	1	S	3	-1	4	-50	5
2	3	3 NT	S	6	-1	4	-100	5
3	3	4	N	K	+1	4	450	0
4	3	3 NT	E	4	-2	4	200	3
5	3	2 NT	W	5	-1	4	050	1
6	1	2 NT	W	6	-1	2	100	2
7	1	4	S	3	+2	2	680	0
8	1	4	N	2	+2	2	480	1
9	1	3	E	T	-3	2	300	0
10	1	1 NT	E	A	-3	2	300	0
11	4	2	S		-2	5	-100	0
12	4	2 NT	W	J	-2	5	100	0
13	4	1 NT	S	4	+1	5	120	2
14	4	2	W	J	-1	5	050	1
15	4	3 NT	N	8	-3	5	-300	8
16	2	2	W	8	+2	3	-170	3
17	2	3 NT	N	3	+2	3	460	2
18	2	3 NT	S	4	+2	3	660	4
19	2	3	S	3	=	3	140	2
20	2	3 NT	W	2	-4	3	400	0
21	5	3 NT	E	2	=	1	-400	2
22	5	4	E	7	+1	1	-650	8
23	5	2 NT	E	T	=	1	-120	6
24	5	3	W	3	-1	1	050	3
25	5	4	N	2	-1	1	-50	8

EW pair 3

Section y

Elaine Moir
Liz Macavoy

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	5	1	S	9	=	2	080	1
2	5	2 NT	N	4	-1	2	-100	5
3	5	3	S	5	+2	2	150	6
4	5	2 NT	E	6	+2	2	-180	8
5	5	3	W	K	+3	2	-170	5
6	3	4	E	J	-1	5	100	2
7	3	2	S	K	+3	5	200	5
8	3	4	N	4	+2	5	480	1
9	3	2	N	K	=	5	110	4
10	3	4	E	A	=	5	-620	8
11	1	3 NT	W	5	+1	3	-430	5
12	1	2	E	K	+1	3	-140	7
13	1	2	N	T	-2	3	-200	8
14	1	1 NT	S	A	-1	3	-50	4
15	1	2 NT	N	5	+1	3	150	0
16	4	4	W	8	=	1	-620	8
17	4	1	N	3	+2	1	110	8
18	4	3	S	7	=	1	140	8
19	4	3	E	4	+2	1	-150	6
20	4	5 NT	W	Q	-3	1	300	2
21	2	4	W	A	=	4	-420	6
22	2	2	E	Q	+2	4	-170	6
23	2	3	W	9	-1	4	100	0
24	2	3 NT	E	4	-1	4	050	3
25	2	4	N	8	=	4	420	5

EW pair 4

Section y

Michelle O'Connell
Trevor McNamara

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	2	3	S	2	-3	5	-150	8
2	2	3 NT	N	4	-1	5	-100	5
3	2	5	S	A	=	5	400	3
4	2	3	W	3	-2	5	200	3
5	2	2	W	8	+4	5	-170	5
6	5	4	E	4	=	3	-620	7
7	5	3	S	K	+1	3	170	8
8	5	2	N	T	+3	3	150	5
9	5	2	N	5	+2	3	170	2
10	5	4	S	5	-2	3	-200	5
11	3	3 NT	W	5	+3	1	-490	8
12	3	2	E	2	+1	1	-140	7
13	3	1	N	T	-1	1	-100	6
14	3	2	N	Q	-3	1	-150	8
15	3	3	N	8	-2	1	-200	6
16	1	3	W	Q	+2	4	-200	6
17	1	3 NT	N	3	=	4	400	6
18	1	3 NT	N		+2	4	660	4
19	1	4	W	5	=	4	-620	8
20	1	5	E	7	-2	4	200	5
21	4	4	E	9	=	2	-420	6
22	4	5	S	2	=	2	400	0
23	4	1 NT	E	Q	=	2	-90	2
24	4	3 NT	E	6	-3	2	150	0
25	4	4	N	8	+1	2	450	1

EW pair 5

Section y

Alan McKay
Jill Marshall

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	4	1	S	A	-1	3	-50	5
2	4	3 NT	N	4	-1	3	-100	5
3	4	5	S	A	=	3	400	3
4	4	4	W	7	-3	3	300	0
5	4	3 NT	E	9	-1	3	050	1
6	2	4	W	7	=	1	-620	7
7	2	2	E	2	-2	1	200	5
8	2	3	N	A	-1	1	-50	8
9	2	3	S	5	-1	1	-50	7
10	2	2	W	T	+3	1	-200	5
11	5	2 NT	W	5	+1	4	-150	2
12	5	4	E	2	-1	4	050	2
13	5	2	S	4	=	4	090	4
14	5	2	W	8	+1	4	-140	6
15	5	4	S	A	-1	4	-100	4
16	3	3	W	Q	+1	2	-170	3
17	3	3 NT	N	3	+2	2	460	2
18	3	3 NT	N	2	+2	2	660	4
19	3	4	S	Q	=	2	420	0
20	3	3 NT	W	2	-1	2	100	8
21	1	4	W	A	-1	5	050	0
22	1	5	N	A	-1	5	-50	4
23	1	2	N	6	-1	5	-100	4
24	1	4	E	A	+1	5	-150	6
25	1	4	N	J	=	5	420	5