Cromwell Bridge Club : Detailed data for Lindis Pairs (2018)

View by:

NS pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Lindis Pairs (2018) 17 May

NS pair 1

Section a

Trevor McNamara

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1	2	W	A	-1	1	050	80
2	1	4	E	6	-1	1	050	60
4	1	4	N	7	-2	1	-200	0
5	2	3	N	3	+2	6	200	0
6	2	4	E	6	-1	6	100	90
7	2	3	E	7	-1	6	100	100
8	2	4	W	A	-1	6	050	20
9	3	4	E	6	+1	5	-650	30
10	3	2	S	A	+1	5	140	100
11	3	2	E	A	+1	5	-110	50
12	3	1 N	S	2	+1	5	120	80
13	4	3 N	E	2	-2	4	200	80
14	4	3	W	2	=	4	-140	20
15	4	3	E	3	-1	4	050	50
16	4	3 N	W	3	=	4	-600	0
17	5	2	N	A	+3	3	200	50
18	5	2 N	W	6	-1	3	050	70
19	5	2	N	K	=	3	110	60
20	5	3	W	A	=	3	-140	20
21	6	3	N	J	+1	2	130	40
22	6	3 N	S	2	+2	2	460	60
23	6	1 N	S	Q	=	2	090	40
24	6	2 N	S	5	-2	2	-100	20

NS pair 2

Section a

Anne Robertson
Wendy Van Rensburg

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	6	3	N	A	=	3	-430	0
2	6	6	S	2	-1	3	050	60
3	6	1 N	S	Q	+1	3	0	30
4	6	2	S	A	=	3	140	60
5	1	4	N	3	+1	2	650	50
6	1	4	E	3	+1	2	-650	20
7	1	4	W	J	+2	2	-680	30
8	1	2	W	A	=	2	-110	0
9	2	4	E	6	+1	1	-650	30
10	2	2	N	3	=	1	110	70
11	2	2	S	A	-3	1	-150	0
12	2	1 N	N	6	-1	1	-100	20
13	3	3 N	E	Q	-3	6	300	100
14	3	3	N	T	-2	6	-100	50
15	3	4	W	K	-2	6	100	90
16	3	2 N	W	9	+1	6	-150	50
17	4	4	N	A	=	5	420	90
18	4	3	W	6	=	5	-110	20
19	4	2	E	A	-1	5	100	40
20	4	3 N	E	2	-4	5	400	100
21	5					4	110	20
22	5					4	-50	30
23	5					4	090	40
24	5					4	110	80

NS pair 3

Section a

Dominick Geoffrey
Elwyn Hughes

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	5	2	W	J	-1	5	050	80
2	5	4	E	T	-1	5	050	60
3	5	2	S	A	=	5	090	80
4	5	3	N	3	=	5	140	60
5	6	4	N	7	+1	4	650	50
6	6	4	E	A	+1	4	-650	20
7	6	4	W	6	+2	4	-680	30
8	6	4	N	3	=	4	130	100
9	1	3	E	3	=	3	-140	100
10	1	2	N	9	=	3	110	70
11	1	3	E	A	=	3	-110	50
12	1	1 N	S	4	+1	3	120	80
13	2	3	E	Q	=	2	-110	20
14	2	4	S	T	-2	2	-100	50
15	2	4	E	3	-1	2	050	50
16	2	3	W	4	=	2	-110	100
17	3	3	N	5	+1	1	170	10
18	3	3	W	6	-2	1	100	100
19	3	2	N	5	+2	1	170	100
20	3	2	N	K	+1	1	110	80
21	4	3	N	A	+2	6	150	70
22	4	7 N	S	2	=	6	1520	100
23	4	3 N	S	9	-1	6	-100	0
24	4	2	N	2	=	6	110	80

NS pair 4

Section a

Nigel McKinlay
Joy McDonald

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	3	3	E	A	=	2	-110	20
2	3	4	E	T	-1	2	050	60
3	3	3 N	N	4	=	2	400	100
4	3	4 x	N	7	=	2	790	100
5	4	4	N	3	+2	1	680	100
6	4	4	E	J	-1	1	100	90
7	4	2	E	9	=	1	-90	80
8	4	3	W	A	-2	1	100	60
9	5	3	E	9	+1	6	-170	80
10	5	4	N	2	-2	6	-200	10
11	5	2	W	Q	+1	6	-110	50
12	5	1 N	S	3	-1	6	-100	20
13	6	3 N	W	9	-1	5	100	60
14	6	4 x	S	T	-4	5	-800	0
15	6	3	E	T	-2	5	100	90
16	6	2 N	W	9	=	5	-120	80
17	1	4	N	5	=	4	420	90
18	1	1 N	E	5	=	4	-90	40
19	1	3	N	K	-1	4	-50	10
20	1	2	N	K	=	4	090	60
21	2	3	E	8	=	3	-140	0
22	2	6 N	N	J	=	3	990	80
23	2	2	N	2	+1	3	110	80
24	2	4	N	9	-3	3	-150	0

NS pair 5

Section a

Carol Young
Carolyn Schwass

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	2	5	E	A	-1	4	050	80
2	2	4	E	8	-1	4	050	60
3	2	PASS	N		=	4	0	30
4	2	3	N	7	=	4	140	60
5	3	5	N	2	=	3	650	50
6	3	4	E	A	+1	3	-650	20
7	3	4	W	J	+2	3	-680	30
8	3	4	W	A	-2	3	100	60
9	4	4	E	2	=	2	-620	60
10	4	3	N	9	-1	2	-100	40
11	4	3	E	A	-1	2	050	100
12	4	2	S	3	-1	2	-100	20
13	5	2 N	E	T	+2	1	-180	0
14	5	2	S	5	-1	1	-50	80
15	5	2	E	T	=	1	-110	20
16	5	2 N	W	9	+2	1	-180	20
17	6	1	N	4	+4	6	200	50
18	6	2 N	W	5	=	6	-120	0
19	6	2	N	3	+1	6	140	80
20	6	2	E	2	=	6	-90	40
21	1	3	N	4	+2	5	150	70
22	1	7 N	S	2	-2	5	-100	0
23	1	1 N	S	Q	+2	5	150	100
24	1	2	S	A	=	5	110	80

NS pair 6

Section a

Elaine Moir
Jan Ireland

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1	3	S	J	-1	6	-50	40
2	1	2	W	4	+1	6	-110	0
3	1	PASS	N		=	6	0	30
4	1	4	N	3	-1	6	-100	20
5	2	4	N	2	+1	5	650	50
6	2	4	E	6	=	5	-620	60
7	2	4	W	J	+2	5	-680	30
8	2	3	W	A	-2	5	100	60
9	3	4	E	6	+2	4	-680	0
10	3	4	N	8	-2	4	-200	10
11	3	3	E	K	=	4	-110	50
12	3	1 N	N	J	+1	4	120	80
13	4	2	S	K	-1	3	-100	40
14	4	2	S	A	=	3	110	100
15	4	4	S	T	-2	3	-200	0
16	4	2 N	W	9	+1	3	-150	50
17	5	2	S	2	+2	2	170	10
18	5	1	E	2	-1	2	050	70
19	5	3	N	K	-1	2	-50	10
20	5	2 x	E	3	=	2	-180	0
21	6	2	N	3	+4	1	170	100
22	6	7 N	S	4	-1	1	-50	30
23	6	1 N	S	9	=	1	090	40
24	6	3	N	6	-1	1	-50	40