Cromwell Bridge Club : Detailed data for Championship Pairs

View by:

EW pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Championship Pairs 20 August

EW pair 1

Section y

Lynne Ellis
Carole Bee

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1	3 NT	W	4	-3	1	150	0
2	1	2	N	5	+2	1	170	3
3	1	2	W	5	+1	1	-110	4
4	1	3	E	7	-1	1	100	4
5	1	3	N	K	-1	1	-100	8
6	4	1	S	A	+1	4	110	3
7	4	1 NT	W	6	=	4	-90	2
8	4	2	S	J	-2	4	-100	3
9	4	4	S	K	=	4	420	2
10	4	2	S	8	-1	4	-100	1
11	2	1 NT	E	5	=	2	-90	1
12	2	3	N	3	-2	2	-200	8
13	2	3	E	Q	-2	2	200	0
14	2	2 NT	N	2	+1	2	150	8
15	2	3 NT	E	8	+3	2	-490	7
16	5	5 NT	E	4	=	5	-660	6
17	5	1 NT	N	3	=	5	090	4
18	5	3	E	7	-1	5	050	3
19	5	4	S	K	=	5	420	2
20	5	1	E	5	+1	5	-110	2
21	3	2	N	K	+2	3	130	0
22	3	3	W	K	=	3	-110	0
23	3	6	S	8	=	3	1430	0
24	3	3	S	8	-1	3	-50	7
25	3	3 NT	N	6	+2	3	460	3

EW pair 2

Section y

Julia Smith
Jan Guise

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	3	3 NT	W	T	-1	4	050	2
2	3	2	N	5	+2	4	170	3
3	3	3	W	J	=	4	-110	4
4	3	1	E	4	+1	4	-90	7
5	3	2	E	5	-2	4	100	3
6	1	1	S	5	+2	2	140	0
7	1	4	N	7	-2	2	-200	8
8	1	2	N	A	-2	2	-100	3
9	1	2	S	2	+2	2	170	8
10	1	3 NT	S	5	-2	2	-200	5
11	4	2	E	7	=	5	-90	1
12	4	2	N	J	+2	5	130	2
13	4	2	W	4	+1	5	-110	2
14	4	2	N	9	+2	5	170	6
15	4	6 NT	E	K	-1	5	050	1
16	2	4	W	Q	=	3	-620	2
17	2	3	S	5	-1	3	-50	7
18	2	1 NT	E	5	-2	3	100	0
19	2	4	S	J	=	3	420	2
20	2	1	E	5	=	3	-80	0
21	5	3	N	A	=	1	110	2
22	5	3	S	2	-4	1	-200	8
23	5	4	S	7	+2	1	680	4
24	5	3	S	T	+1	1	170	0
25	5	6 NT	N	9	-1	1	-50	8

EW pair 3

Section y

Geraldine Barrie
Jane Lancaster

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	5	4	E	5	=	2	-420	8
2	5	2	S	T	+1	2	110	8
3	5	2	W	J	+1	2	-110	4
4	5	4	E	5	-2	2	200	1
5	5	2	E	8	-1	2	050	6
6	3	1	S	9	+1	5	110	3
7	3	3	E	T	+1	5	-130	5
8	3	2	E	8	-4	5	200	0
9	3	4	S	8	+1	5	450	0
10	3	2	N	8	-1	5	-100	1
11	1	1 NT	E	5	+2	3	-150	8
12	1	2	N	3	+2	3	130	2
13	1	2	W	3	+2	3	-130	6
14	1	2	N	2	+3	3	200	2
15	1	6 NT	W	A	-1	3	050	1
16	4	3 NT	E	5	+1	1	-630	4
17	4	2	N	8	=	1	110	1
18	4	2	E	J	-1	1	050	3
19	4	4	S	A	=	1	420	2
20	4	1 NT	S	8	-3	1	-300	8
21	2	3	N	A	-2	4	-200	6
22	2	1 NT	E	4	+2	4	-150	3
23	2	4	S	9	+2	4	680	4
24	2	2	S	T	+1	4	140	2
25	2	3 NT	N	8	+2	4	460	3

EW pair 4

Section y

Hugh Derham
Murray Jaquiery

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	2	3	E	6	+1	5	-130	4
2	2	1	N	5	+3	5	170	3
3	2	1	W	3	+2	5	-110	4
4	2	1	E	A	+1	5	-90	7
5	2	1 NT	N	A	+2	5	150	0
6	5	4	N	T	-1	3	-50	6
7	5	3	E	T	+1	3	-130	5
8	5	2	S	J	-3	3	-150	6
9	5	3	S	A	+2	3	200	5
10	5	3	S	5	-2	3	-200	5
11	3	1 NT	E	5	+1	1	-120	5
12	3	2	N	2	+2	1	130	2
13	3	4	W	J	=	1	-130	6
14	3	2	N	Q	+3	1	200	2
15	3	2 NT	W	2	+4	1	-240	4
16	1	3 NT	E	5	-1	4	100	0
17	1	2	N	6	=	4	110	1
18	1	1	W	4	+1	4	-90	6
19	1	5	S	A	-1	4	-50	6
20	1	1	E	2	+2	4	-140	5
21	4	3	E	5	-2	2	100	4
22	4	3	S	2	-3	2	-150	3
23	4	4	S	7	+2	2	680	4
24	4	4	S	K	-1	2	-50	7
25	4	3 NT	N	3	+2	2	460	3

EW pair 5

Section y

Alan McKay
Sharon Mactavish

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	4	5	E	6	=	3	-400	6
2	4	2	N	6	+2	3	170	3
3	4	3	W	5	=	3	-110	4
4	4	3	E	4	-2	3	200	1
5	4	2	E	K	-2	3	100	3
6	2	3 NT	S	5	-4	1	-200	8
7	2	2	N	K	+1	1	140	0
8	2	4 x	S	Q	-2	1	-300	8
9	2	2	S	A	+3	1	200	5
10	2	3	N	8	-3	1	-300	8
11	5	1 NT	E	3	+1	4	-120	5
12	5	PASS	N			4	0	6
13	5	2	E	2	+2	4	-130	6
14	5	2	N	2	+3	4	200	2
15	5	5 NT	W	6	+1	4	-490	7
16	3	3 NT	E	T	+3	2	-690	8
17	3	2	N	Q	-1	2	-50	7
18	3	2	E	J	=	2	-110	8
19	3	4	S	A	-6	2	-300	8
20	3	1	E	2	+2	2	-140	5
21	1	4	N	A	-3	5	-300	8
22	1	1 NT x	E	6	=	5	-180	6
23	1	3 NT	N	A	-3	5	-300	8
24	1	1	S	K	+1	5	110	4
25	1	3 NT	N	6	+2	5	460	3