Taieri Bridge Club        

Back to event

---

View by:

board

NS pairs

EW pairs

---

Hand records



Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Monday: Labour Day Fun Night (2020) 26 October

EW pair 1 Section a Laurie Smeijers Kathryn Fagg	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 1 2 S A +3 1 200 73 2 12 4 W 3 +1 12 -450 226 3 2 3 NT S A +1 2 430 61 4 13 3 E Q +1 13 -130 155 5 3 2 E 4 +2 3 -130 132 6 18 3 S A = 10 140 96 7 4 3 NT S 5 -1 4 -100 238 8 19 1 NT S 4 +2 11 150 49 9 5 1 NT E 6 = 5 -90 96 10 20 12 – -9999 11 6 3 NT E 2 = 6 -400 167 12 21 13 – -9999 13 7 2 NT W 2 -1 7 100 60 14 14 4 S 7 +1 1 450 20 15 8 3 W A +1 8 -170 160 16 15 3 NT S J +2 2 460 140 17 9 2 NT S 5 +2 9 180 80 18 16 3 NT E 2 +1 3 -430 170 19 10 1 NT E 7 +2 10 -150 200 20 17 3 NT E J = 4 -600 228 21 11 3 E Q +2 11 -150 144
EW pair 2 Section a Judith Smeijers Gaynor Brown	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 11 2 S 2 +1 12 140 108 2 1 5 W J = 2 -450 226 3 12 3 NT S 3 +2 13 460 2 4 2 2 S 3 = 3 110 73 5 18 2 S 6 +2 9 170 25 6 3 3 NT S 2 -3 4 -150 179 7 19 3 NT S 3 +3 10 690 37 8 4 2 S 3 +1 5 140 85 9 20 11 – -9999 10 5 4 W 3 -1 6 100 61 11 21 12 – -9999 12 6 3 NT S J +1 7 630 142 13 13 2 NT E 6 = 1 -120 150 14 7 5 S Q = 8 450 20 15 14 2 W 8 +1 2 -140 80 16 8 3 NT S 5 +3 9 490 40 17 15 3 NT S 7 = 3 400 40 18 9 1 NT E J +2 10 -150 40 19 16 3 S 9 = 4 140 50 20 10 3 NT E J -3 11 300 1 21 17 3 E J +2 5 -150 144
EW pair 3 Section a Patsy Williams Judy Bevin	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 17 3 S 5 -1 6 -50 226 2 11 5 W 3 -1 13 050 49 3 1 3 NT S = 3 400 120 4 18 3 N K = 8 140 14 5 2 2 N 7 +2 4 170 25 6 19 2 S Q +2 9 170 25 7 3 4 S Q +2 5 680 73 8 20 10 – -9999 9 4 1 S 3 -2 6 -100 191 10 21 11 – -9999 11 5 3 W 4 +2 7 -200 120 12 12 4 N 7 +1 1 650 88 13 6 2 W 6 = 8 -90 120 14 13 3 NT N 3 -3 2 -150 230 15 7 4 W 2 -1 9 050 30 16 14 3 NT S 5 +2 3 460 140 17 8 3 N 7 = 10 110 130 18 15 4 W 4 = 4 -420 100 19 9 2 S A = 11 110 100 20 16 5 W 2 -1 5 100 44 21 10 2 E 4 +2 12 -130 73
EW pair 4 Section a Alan Lewthwaite Ian Van Delft	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 10 1 S J +1 13 110 155 2 17 4 W 6 = 7 -420 155 3 18 2 NT S 3 +2 7 180 167 4 1 2 N 5 = 4 110 73 5 19 3 E 4 +1 8 -130 132 6 2 3 W J = 5 -140 144 7 20 9 – -9999 8 3 1 NT S 6 +3 6 180 2 9 21 10 – -9999 10 4 4 W A = 7 -620 203 11 11 1 NT E 3 +1 1 -120 49 12 5 2 N 4 +5 8 260 196 13 12 3 NT W 4 = 2 -600 240 14 6 4 S T = 9 420 70 15 13 4 W 9 -1 3 050 30 16 7 3 NT S 3 +2 10 460 140 17 14 3 N J +1 4 130 100 18 8 5 NT E J = 11 -460 230 19 15 2 N 4 -1 5 -50 160 20 9 3 W 2 +1 12 -130 131 21 16 5 E 4 = 6 -400 215
EW pair 5 Section a Annette Ellwood Alice Thomson	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 16 4 S A = 7 420 25 2 18 4 E 5 = 6 -420 155 3 17 3 N J +2 8 200 144 4 19 3 N Q = 7 140 14 5 1 4 E J -1 5 050 96 6 20 8 – -9999 7 2 3 NT S 5 +2 6 660 120 8 21 9 – -9999 9 3 2 E T = 7 -90 96 10 10 2 W A +2 1 -170 120 11 4 3 NT E 2 -2 8 100 14 12 11 3 NT S 2 +3 2 690 12 13 5 2 NT W J = 9 -120 150 14 12 2 NT N 3 -1 3 -50 170 15 6 4 W 5 = 10 -420 230 16 13 6 NT S 5 = 4 990 0 17 7 3 NT S 8 +1 11 430 0 18 14 3 NT W 4 +1 5 -430 170 19 8 3 NT E 2 = 12 -600 240 20 15 5 W 2 -1 6 100 44 21 9 3 E 7 +1 13 -130 73
EW pair 6 Section a Sue Johnstone Christine Kerr	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 18 2 S J +1 5 140 108 2 16 4 W 3 = 8 -420 155 3 19 2 N 6 +2 6 170 203 4 17 2 N A -2 9 -200 203 5 20 7 – -9999 6 1 2 S Q +1 6 140 96 7 21 8 – -9999 8 2 3 S 6 +1 7 170 25 9 9 1 NT N T = 1 090 2 10 3 4 E 2 -2 8 200 2 11 10 3 NT E T = 2 -400 167 12 4 3 NT S J +3 9 690 12 13 11 2 NT W A +2 3 -180 210 14 5 4 S K = 10 420 70 15 12 2 W J +2 4 -170 160 16 6 3 NT S 3 +2 11 460 140 17 13 3 N 3 = 5 110 130 18 7 6 W 5 -1 12 050 20 19 14 1 NT E 5 -3 6 300 0 20 8 2 W 2 +3 13 -150 185 21 15 3 NT W 2 +2 7 -460 238
EW pair 7 Section a Elizabeth White Dianne Carruthers	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 15 3 W 7 -2 8 100 191 2 19 6 W 4 -1 5 050 49 3 16 3 S = 9 140 238 4 20 6 – -9999 5 17 4 E Q +1 10 -150 191 6 21 7 – -9999 7 1 3 NT S 6 +2 7 660 120 8 8 4 S 9 -1 1 -50 179 9 2 1 NT E 8 = 8 -90 96 10 9 5 NT E A -1 2 100 61 11 3 3 E T +1 9 -170 96 12 10 1 S J +2 3 140 239 13 4 2 NT W 6 -1 10 100 60 14 11 5 W -1 4 050 140 15 5 4 W 2 = 11 -420 230 16 12 3 NT S 3 +3 5 490 40 17 6 3 NT S 6 = 12 400 40 18 13 3 NT E 2 +1 6 -430 170 19 7 1 NT E 7 -1 13 100 120 20 14 4 W 2 +1 7 -150 185 21 18 4 E 7 = 4 -130 73
EW pair 8 Section a Patricia Enright Lyn Clark	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 19 4 S A = 4 420 25 2 15 6 W 2 -1 9 050 49 3 20 5 – -9999 4 16 3 N T -1 10 -100 120 5 21 6 – -9999 6 17 2 W J +3 11 -200 238 7 7 3 NT S J +4 1 720 2 8 1 4 S 3 -2 8 -100 226 9 8 1 E 8 +1 2 -90 96 10 2 4 W 2 = 9 -620 203 11 9 4 E 2 -2 3 100 14 12 3 2 NT S J +4 10 240 218 13 10 4 W 5 -1 4 100 60 14 4 5 S K -2 11 -100 200 15 11 2 W +2 5 -170 160 16 5 5 N 9 +1 12 480 80 17 12 4 S 8 -1 6 -50 190 18 6 3 NT W 5 +1 13 -430 170 19 13 3 S A = 7 140 50 20 18 4 W 4 = 3 -130 131 21 14 2 NT W 4 +3 8 -210 191
EW pair 9 Section a Jennifer Rennell Barbara Wilkes	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 14 4 S 6 = 9 420 25 2 20 4 – -9999 3 15 2 N 2 +2 10 170 203 4 21 5 – -9999 5 16 4 E 4 +1 11 -150 191 6 6 2 S Q +2 1 170 25 7 17 4 S 2 +1 12 650 167 8 7 3 NT N 8 -2 2 -100 226 9 1 2 N A -4 9 -200 238 10 8 4 W J = 3 -620 203 11 2 3 NT E 2 = 10 -400 167 12 9 5 N 6 = 4 650 88 13 3 3 NT W 6 -2 11 200 0 14 10 3 S K = 5 140 120 15 4 3 W 5 = 12 -140 80 16 11 3 NT S K +1 6 430 200 17 5 3 NT N 3 -2 13 -100 240 18 12 6 NT E J -2 7 100 0 19 18 3 S A -1 2 -50 160 20 13 2 S A = 8 090 88 21 19 3 E 4 +2 3 -150 144
EW pair 10 Section a Val Wilson Dale Cameron	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 20 3 – -9999 2 14 6 W 3 -1 10 050 49 3 21 4 – -9999 4 15 3 N 5 -3 11 -300 238 5 5 4 x W 4 = 1 -510 238 6 16 2 S A +1 12 140 96 7 6 3 NT S 6 +1 2 630 191 8 17 2 W A -2 13 100 144 9 7 1 E 5 = 3 -70 25 10 1 4 W A = 10 -620 203 11 8 3 NT E T +3 4 -490 238 12 2 4 N 9 +1 11 650 88 13 9 2 NT W A +2 5 -180 210 14 3 4 N -1 12 -50 170 15 10 3 W 2 +1 6 -170 160 16 4 3 NT S 5 +3 13 490 40 17 11 3 NT S 6 = 7 400 40 18 18 3 NT E J = 1 -400 60 19 12 1 NT E 5 +3 8 -180 220 20 19 5 W J -1 2 100 44 21 13 3 NT E 4 -1 9 050 14
EW pair 11 Section a Peggy Rowe Kim Stewart	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 13 3 N 3 -1 10 -50 226 2 21 3 – -9999 3 14 3 NT S 5 +1 11 430 61 4 4 3 E Q +1 1 -130 155 5 15 3 N 5 = 12 140 73 6 5 3 S Q -3 2 -150 179 7 16 2 N 9 +3 13 200 215 8 6 2 N 2 = 3 110 120 9 18 2 S 4 -2 13 -100 191 10 7 6 S A -4 4 -400 144 11 1 2 W 4 +1 11 -140 73 12 8 3 NT N 6 +1 5 630 142 13 2 2 W 6 -1 12 100 60 14 9 3 S K +1 6 170 100 15 3 2 W A +2 13 -170 160 16 10 6 NT S 2 -1 7 -50 240 17 17 4 N 6 -1 1 -50 190 18 11 4 W 2 = 8 -420 100 19 19 3 S A -1 1 -50 160 20 12 5 W 2 = 9 -600 228 21 20 2 – -9999
EW pair 12 Section a Christine Samson Christine Wither	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 21 2 – -9999 2 13 4 E A = 11 -420 155 3 3 3 NT S 5 +1 1 430 61 4 14 3 N K -2 12 -200 203 5 4 2 E 8 +3 2 -150 191 6 15 2 W 7 +2 13 -170 215 7 5 3 NT S 6 +2 3 660 120 8 18 3 S 6 = 12 140 85 9 6 1 NT E Q = 4 -90 96 10 19 4 W A -1 13 100 61 11 7 3 NT E 2 +1 5 -430 215 12 1 4 N 9 = 12 620 174 13 8 3 NT W 2 -1 6 100 60 14 2 3 NT N 3 -3 13 -150 230 15 9 3 S = 7 140 0 16 16 3 NT S 5 +2 1 460 140 17 10 3 N J -1 8 -50 190 18 17 3 NT E J +2 2 -460 230 19 11 2 S A +1 9 140 50 20 20 1 – -9999 21 12 5 E J -1 10 050 14
EW pair 13 Section a Cathy Ferguson Jan Methers	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 12 3 N 3 = 11 110 155 2 2 4 W J -1 1 050 49 3 13 3 NT S 4 +1 12 430 61 4 3 2 N T = 2 110 73 5 14 3 S 3 +1 13 170 25 6 4 1 S A +3 3 170 25 7 18 3 NT S J +3 11 690 37 8 5 3 N 3 -1 4 -50 179 9 19 2 S 2 -2 12 -100 191 10 6 4 W 8 -1 5 100 61 11 20 13 – -9999 12 7 3 NT S 5 +2 6 660 44 13 1 3 W A = 13 -140 180 14 8 4 S 4 +1 7 450 20 15 15 3 W A = 1 -140 80 16 9 3 NT S 5 = 8 400 220 17 16 4 S 9 -1 2 -50 190 18 10 4 W 9 = 9 -420 100 19 17 2 S A +1 3 140 50 20 11 4 W J = 10 -130 131 21 21 1 – -9999