Taieri Bridge Club        

Back to event

---

View by:

board

NS pairs, sec g

EW pairs in section g

NS pairs, sec w

EW pairs in section w

---

Hand records



Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Monday: Three Night Individual (2021) 8 February

EW pair 1 Section g Ian Van Delft Kim Stewart	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 1 2 NT E 3 -2 1 100 9 2 1 3 NT S 4 -1 1 -100 12 3 7 2 E 3 +1 7 -140 21 4 7 2 E A -3 7 300 2 5 2 2 150 1 6 2 2 -50 13 7 8 3 E A +1 8 -170 22 8 8 2 NT N 6 +1 8 150 2 9 3 2 E T -2 3 200 2 10 3 5 E 3 +1 3 -620 20 11 9 2 NT S T -1 9 -50 18 12 9 2 NT W 4 = 9 -120 14 13 4 3 W 3 -2 4 200 4 14 4 4 E A -1 4 050 7 15 10 3 W A -1 10 050 3 16 10 1 NT W 3 +1 10 -120 13 17 5 2 S 4 +2 5 130 14 18 5 5 N 6 -1 5 -100 21 19 11 2 S 9 -2 11 -100 14 20 11 4 E 7 +1 11 -650 21 21 6 3 N K +1 6 130 4 22 6 4 S 7 -1 6 -50 16
EW pair 2 Section g Pamela Wood Judy Hinton	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 6 1 NT E A -1 7 050 13 2 6 3 N T = 7 140 1 3 1 2 120 2 4 1 2 090 19 5 7 3 NT N 7 -2 8 -200 21 6 7 3 S 3 -2 8 -100 19 7 2 2 E 6 +1 3 -140 20 8 2 3 W 2 -2 3 100 6 9 8 2 N K -3 9 -150 20 10 8 5 E A = 9 -600 17 11 3 2 NT S T = 4 120 10 12 3 2 NT W 6 = 4 -120 14 13 9 3 W 4 -1 10 100 15 14 9 2 NT E 4 -1 10 050 7 15 4 4 W 8 -1 5 050 3 16 4 2 E A = 5 -110 7 17 10 2 N 2 +2 11 170 9 18 10 5 S J -1 11 -100 21 19 5 3 S 4 -3 6 -150 19 20 5 4 E 9 +1 6 -650 21 21 11 3 N 8 -2 1 -200 16 22 11 3 W A -1 1 100 12
EW pair 3 Section g Jill Reid Avril Power	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 11 2 – -9999 2 11 2 – -9999 3 6 2 E 8 -1 8 100 9 4 6 3 N 7 +1 8 170 4 5 1 2 N 7 +1 3 110 9 6 1 2 NT E 2 -4 3 400 0 7 7 2 NT S A +1 9 150 4 8 7 3 N 5 -4 9 -200 20 9 2 2 E 4 -3 4 300 0 10 2 2 NT S A = 4 120 8 11 8 3 NT S A -1 10 -50 18 12 8 2 NT W 5 -1 10 050 10 13 3 2 W 9 -1 5 100 15 14 3 2 NT E 4 -1 5 050 7 15 9 3 W T = 11 -140 16 16 9 2 NT E A = 11 -120 13 17 4 3 NT S 6 +1 6 430 0 18 4 4 S A = 6 620 9 19 10 2 NT N 2 +2 1 180 0 20 10 3 E T +3 1 -230 14 21 5 3 NT N K -3 7 -300 20 22 5 2 S 5 +1 7 140 6
EW pair 4 Section g Carol Adler-Morgan Robert Morgan	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 5 3 NT E K -4 8 200 0 2 5 5 S A -2 8 -200 20 3 11 2 S 6 +1 3 110 6 4 11 2 N 9 -1 3 -100 22 5 6 3 N T -1 9 -100 17 6 6 2 NT N 9 +1 9 150 6 7 1 3 S A -1 4 -100 14 8 1 3 W 2 -2 4 100 6 9 7 3 N K -3 10 -150 20 10 7 3 W A -3 10 300 2 11 2 2 W 2 -1 5 050 12 12 2 4 x N T -1 5 -200 18 13 8 1 NT W 3 -1 11 100 15 14 8 1 NT W 7 -1 11 050 7 15 3 2 E 3 +1 6 -140 16 16 3 2 E A +1 6 -140 20 17 9 2 N 8 +2 1 170 9 18 9 4 S 4 = 1 620 9 19 4 2 NT S 6 -2 7 -100 14 20 4 4 E K = 7 -620 17 21 10 2 -300 20 22 10 2 420 1
EW pair 5 Section g Hilary Bisset Judy Bevin	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 10 2 E 2 = 3 -90 19 2 10 3 S 6 -1 3 -100 12 3 5 1 NT N 4 -2 9 -100 16 4 5 2 N 8 +1 9 140 10 5 11 2 N 7 +1 4 110 9 6 11 2 S 3 -2 4 -100 19 7 6 4 E A -2 10 200 2 8 6 2 N 5 -3 10 -150 18 9 1 3 W A -1 5 100 4 10 1 3 E Q +2 5 -150 14 11 7 3 NT S Q = 11 400 2 12 7 2 NT W A +3 11 -210 21 13 2 2 E 8 -2 6 200 4 14 2 4 E 4 -4 6 200 0 15 8 4 W T -1 1 050 3 16 8 3 W T = 1 -110 7 17 3 3 NT S 6 -1 7 -50 21 18 3 4 N 2 = 7 620 9 19 9 2 120 3 20 9 2 100 5 21 4 2 N K +2 8 130 4 22 4 3 NT W 4 -1 8 100 12
EW pair 6 Section g Gail Williams Jan Methers	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 4 1 E 3 +1 9 -90 19 2 4 3 S 3 -1 9 -100 12 3 10 2 E A = 4 -110 18 4 10 2 N 4 +1 4 140 10 5 5 2 NT S 2 = 10 120 5 6 5 2 S 3 -2 10 -100 19 7 11 4 S 2 -1 5 -100 14 8 11 2 S 6 -1 5 -50 10 9 6 2 N Q -3 11 -150 20 10 6 3 N Q +2 11 200 5 11 1 3 NT S 7 +1 6 430 0 12 1 2 S A +1 6 140 1 13 7 2 W 9 -1 1 100 15 14 7 1 E 4 = 1 -80 15 15 2 2 W A = 7 -90 8 16 2 3 W 3 -1 7 100 0 17 8 2 170 9 18 8 2 650 2 19 3 2 NT S 4 -1 8 -50 9 20 3 3 E K -1 8 100 5 21 9 1 NT S 6 = 3 090 10 22 9 3 W A -1 3 100 12
EW pair 7 Section g Mavis Hastie Judy Moore	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 9 2 S 6 = 4 110 3 2 9 3 S 3 +1 4 130 6 3 4 1 NT N 8 = 10 090 13 4 4 2 NT S A +1 10 150 6 5 10 5 N 2 -1 5 -100 17 6 10 2 E A -2 5 200 3 7 5 2 NT S A = 11 120 8 8 5 4 x N A -3 11 -500 22 9 11 2 W A +1 6 -110 15 10 11 5 x E J -1 6 200 5 11 6 3 NT S T -1 1 -50 18 12 6 2 W A -2 1 100 6 13 1 3 NT W 7 -1 7 100 15 14 1 2 E J -1 7 050 7 15 7 2 -140 16 16 7 2 -100 2 17 2 3 NT S 3 = 8 400 2 18 2 4 N 2 +1 8 650 2 19 8 2 S 3 -1 3 -50 9 20 8 4 E T = 3 -620 17 21 3 2 NT N 7 = 9 120 8 22 3 2 S T = 9 110 8
EW pair 8 Section g David Larsen Alec Weavers	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 3 2 NT E 3 -2 10 100 9 2 3 3 S 6 +1 10 130 6 3 9 2 S 6 = 5 090 13 4 9 2 E 9 -1 5 100 16 5 4 2 N T = 11 090 13 6 4 2 NT N K = 11 120 8 7 10 3 S A -1 6 -100 14 8 10 2 W 2 = 6 -110 16 9 5 2 E A +1 1 -110 15 10 5 5 x E A = 1 -750 22 11 11 2 NT S Q +2 7 180 4 12 11 2 NT W A = 7 -120 14 13 6 2 200 4 14 6 2 -140 21 15 1 3 E 3 = 8 -140 16 16 1 2 E 5 +1 8 -140 20 17 7 1 NT S 4 +1 3 120 17 18 7 3 N 2 +2 3 200 16 19 2 3 NT S 3 -4 9 -200 22 20 2 3 E 7 +2 9 -200 12 21 8 2 N 8 +1 4 140 0 22 8 2 W 4 +2 4 -130 22
EW pair 9 Section g Christine Wither Diane Lawlor	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 8 1 E K = 5 -70 15 2 8 2 N 9 +1 5 140 1 3 3 1 NT N 8 +1 11 120 2 4 3 2 N K +1 11 140 10 5 9 1 NT S 7 = 6 090 13 6 9 2 N A +1 6 110 10 7 4 2 S 6 +1 1 140 6 8 4 3 N 5 -2 1 -100 13 9 10 3 NT N K -2 7 -100 12 10 10 3 NT W 2 -5 7 500 0 11 5 2 150 7 12 5 2 100 6 13 11 2 W 9 -1 8 100 15 14 11 1 E J = 8 -80 15 15 6 1 E 3 +1 3 -110 10 16 6 1 E 2 +2 3 -140 20 17 1 1 NT S 3 +3 9 180 4 18 1 3 S 4 +3 9 230 14 19 7 1 N 2 +1 4 110 6 20 7 3 W A -2 4 200 0 21 2 2 N K -1 10 -100 13 22 2 2 W A = 10 -90 18
EW pair 10 Section g Peggy Rowe Rose Markby	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 2 2 NT E 3 -2 11 100 9 2 2 3 NT N 3 -2 11 -200 20 3 8 2 E 8 -1 6 100 9 4 8 2 S 5 +1 6 110 14 5 3 2 NT N 7 = 1 120 5 6 3 2 S 2 -2 1 -100 19 7 9 2 NT E 7 -3 7 300 0 8 9 4 N 8 -2 7 -100 13 9 4 2 -50 7 10 4 2 -100 11 11 10 3 NT N 3 -1 8 -50 18 12 10 3 S 3 = 8 140 1 13 5 1 NT W 7 +1 3 -120 22 14 5 3 E 8 -1 3 050 7 15 11 3 W T -1 9 050 3 16 11 3 W T +1 9 -130 16 17 6 2 NT S 3 -1 4 -50 21 18 6 3 W K -1 4 050 18 19 1 2 NT S 2 -2 10 -100 14 20 1 3 E K +1 10 -170 10 21 7 2 N 7 +2 5 130 4 22 7 3 S 8 +1 5 170 4
EW pair 11 Section g Fiona Ellis Brian Ellis	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 7 1 E 2 +2 6 -110 22 2 7 3 NT N 2 -2 6 -200 20 3 2 2 E 5 +1 1 -140 21 4 2 4 N K = 1 620 0 5 8 4 N 2 -2 7 -200 21 6 8 2 E 6 -2 7 200 3 7 3 2 -100 14 8 3 2 200 0 9 9 2 W A = 8 -90 10 10 9 5 E A = 8 -600 17 11 4 2 S 2 -1 3 -50 18 12 4 2 NT W 2 +3 3 -210 21 13 10 3 W 9 -2 9 200 4 14 10 2 NT E 4 = 9 -120 18 15 5 4 W A = 4 -420 22 16 5 2 E A = 4 -110 7 17 11 2 NT S 6 = 10 120 17 18 11 4 S 4 = 10 620 9 19 6 3 NT S 6 -3 5 -150 19 20 6 4 E K -1 5 100 5 21 1 5 N K -1 11 -100 13 22 1 3 W A = 11 -110 20