Taieri Bridge Club : Detailed data for Casual: Learners

View by:

NS pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Casual: Learners 11 June

NS pair 1

Section g

Abigail Fergus
Alec Weavers

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1	2	E	6	+1	1	-110	00.8 - 00
2	1	2	N	4	=	1	110	00.2 - 00.6
3	1	1	E	A	+2	1	-140	00.2 - 00.6
4	1	1 NT	W	7	+5	1	-240	00.2 - 00.6
5	2	2 NT	S	2	=	5	120	00.4 - 00.4
6	2	3 NT	S	8	-1	5	-50	00.1 - 00.7
7	2	3	W	A	-2	5	200	00.5 - 00.3
8	2	1 NT	S	8	=	5	090	00.4 - 00.4
9	3	3	S	2	=	4	110	00.4 - 00.4
10	3	4	E	2	=	4	-620	00.6 - 00.2
11	3	2 NT	S	7	-1	4	-50	00.4 - 00.4
12	3	1 NT	S	9	+1	4	120	00.6 - 00.2
13	4	4	W	A	=	3	-620	00.4 - 00.4
14	4	4	W	8	+2	3	-480	00.4 - 00.4
15	4	3	E	A	-2	3	100	00.8 - 00
16	4	3	S	A	=	3	110	00.2 - 00.6
17	5	4	W	A	-1	2	050	00.8 - 00
18	5	4	S	Q	+2	2	680	00.6 - 00.2
19	5	3	W	A	+2	2	-150	00.8 - 00
20	5	2	S	5	-2	2	-200	00.5 - 00.3

NS pair 2

Section g

Raylene Wilson
Derek Tingle

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	5	3 NT	E	3	+1	3	-430	00.2 - 00.6
2	5	4	N	K	-1	3	-100	00 - 00.8
3	5	2	E	A	+1	3	-140	00.2 - 00.6
4	5	3	E	K	+3	3	-170	00.5 - 00.3
5	1	2	E	J	-2	2	100	00.2 - 00.6
6	1	3 x	W	8	-1	2	200	00.4 - 00.4
7	1	3	W	8	-2	2	200	00.5 - 00.3
8	1	3	N	A	=	2	110	00.7 - 00.1
9	2	4	E	A	-3	1	300	00.8 - 00
10	2	4	E	2	+1	1	-650	00.2 - 00.6
11	2	3 NT	S	7	-1	1	-50	00.4 - 00.4
12	2	2	E	2	-2	1	100	00.4 - 00.4
13	3	2 NT	E	5	+1	5	-150	00.6 - 00.2
14	3	4	W	J	+1	5	-450	00.7 - 00.1
15	3	2	E	8	-1	5	050	00.2 - 00.6
16	3	2	W	Q	-2	5	200	00.5 - 00.3
17	4	3	W	8	+2	4	-200	00 - 00.8
18	4	2	N	5	+2	4	170	00.4 - 00.4
19	4	4	E	2	+1	4	-650	00 - 00.8
20	4	2	S	4	-2	4	-200	00.5 - 00.3

NS pair 3

Section g

Anne Tamati
Marie Kean

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	4	3 NT	W	2	+1	5	-430	00.2 - 00.6
2	4	2	N	4	+2	5	170	00.7 - 00.1
3	4	2	E	A	+1	5	-140	00.2 - 00.6
4	4	2	S	A	=	5	110	00.8 - 00
5	5	1 NT	N	7	+2	4	150	00.7 - 00.1
6	5	3 NT	N	5	+1	4	430	00.6 - 00.2
7	5	3	W	A	=	4	-140	00.2 - 00.6
8	5	2	W	4	+1	4	-110	00 - 00.8
9	1	4	S	T	-2	3	-100	00 - 00.8
10	1	4	E	J	+1	3	-650	00.2 - 00.6
11	1	4	S	8	-3	3	-150	00 - 00.8
12	1	PASS	N			3	0	00.1 - 00.7
13	2	3	W	7	=	2	-140	00.8 - 00
14	2	3 NT	W	5	+3	2	-490	00.2 - 00.6
15	2	3	E	8	-1	2	050	00.2 - 00.6
16	2	2	W	8	-3	2	300	00.8 - 00
17	3	4	S	A	-2	1	-100	00.6 - 00.2
18	3	4	S	T	+3	1	710	00.8 - 00
19	3	4	E	Q	=	1	-620	00.2 - 00.6
20	3	3	S	J	-3	1	-300	00.2 - 00.6

NS pair 4

Section g

Barbara Wilkes
Louise Stevenson-Wright

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	3	3 NT	E	7	+1	2	-430	00.2 - 00.6
2	3	2	N	4	+2	2	170	00.7 - 00.1
3	3	2	W		=	2	-110	00.7 - 00.1
4	3	5	E	9	+1	2	-620	00 - 00.8
5	4	1 NT	N	3	-1	1	-100	00 - 00.8
6	4	3 NT	S	Q	-1	1	-50	00.1 - 00.7
7	4	2 x	N	4	=	1	670	00.8 - 00
8	4	3	N	A	-1	1	-50	00.2 - 00.6
9	5	2 NT	E	T	-1	5	100	00.2 - 00.6
10	5	2	N	2	-2	5	-200	00.8 - 00
11	5	2	S	7	=	5	090	00.8 - 00
12	5	PASS	N			5	0	00.1 - 00.7
13	1	3 NT	E	9	+1	4	-630	00.2 - 00.6
14	1	4	W	5	+1	4	-450	00.7 - 00.1
15	1	1	N	5	=	4	080	00.6 - 00.2
16	1	2	W	2	-2	4	200	00.5 - 00.3
17	2	2	W	A	=	3	-110	00.4 - 00.4
18	2	2	S	T	=	3	110	00 - 00.8
19	2	5	W	A	=	3	-600	00.4 - 00.4
20	2	3 NT	E	J	=	3	-600	00 - 00.8

NS pair 5

Section g

Kitty Caldwell
Laurie Smeijers

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	2	2 NT	E	4	+3	4	-210	00.6 - 00.2
2	2	2	S	4	+1	4	140	00.4 - 00.4
3	2	2	E	A	=	4	-110	00.7 - 00.1
4	2	3	E	Q	+3	4	-170	00.5 - 00.3
5	3	1 NT	N	7	+2	3	150	00.7 - 00.1
6	3	3 NT	S	Q	+3	3	490	00.8 - 00
7	3	3 x	N	Q	-1	3	-200	00 - 00.8
8	3	3	N	A	=	3	110	00.7 - 00.1
9	4	3	E	K	-2	2	200	00.6 - 00.2
10	4	4	W	A	+1	2	-650	00.2 - 00.6
11	4	3 NT	N	5	-1	2	-50	00.4 - 00.4
12	4	2	W	7	-3	2	150	00.8 - 00
13	5	4	W	7	+1	1	-650	00 - 00.8
14	5	6	W	9	=	1	-980	00 - 00.8
15	5	2	E	5	-1	1	050	00.2 - 00.6
16	5	1	W	9	=	1	-80	00 - 00.8
17	1	3	W	7	=	5	-140	00.2 - 00.6
18	1	3	S	3	=	5	140	00.2 - 00.6
19	1	3	E	Q	+4	5	-260	00.6 - 00.2
20	1	3	E	9	-2	5	200	00.8 - 00