Te Anau Bridge Club : Detailed data for Luxmore Pairs

View by:

EW pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Luxmore Pairs 24 April

EW pair 1

Section b

Johnny Angell
Sherron Tamatea-Scown

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1	3	N	Q	-1	1	-50	00.8 - 00.4
2	1	2 NT	N	2	-1	1	-100	00.1 - 01.1
3	1	3	S	A	=	1	140	00.6 - 00.6
4	5	2	E	3	+1	5	-110	00.8 - 00.4
5	5	2	E	3	=	5	-110	00 - 01.2
6	5	3 NT	W	5	-2	5	200	01.2 - 00
7	2	4	S	5	+1	2	650	00.8 - 00.4
8	2	2	E	Q	+2	2	-170	00.7 - 00.5
9	2	2	N	A	+1	2	110	00.8 - 00.4
10	6	1 NT x	W	8	-1	6	200	01.2 - 00
11	6	3 NT	W	6	-2	6	100	00.5 - 00.7
12	6	2	W	7	-1	6	050	00.9 - 00.3
13	3	3	S	8	+1	3	130	01.2 - 00
14	3	4	W	K	-2	3	100	00.6 - 00.6
15	3	4	E	J	-2	3	100	01.1 - 00.1
16	7	5	W	K	=	7	-650	00.5 - 00.7
17	7	3	N	3	-1	7	-50	01 - 00.2
18	7	4 x	E	K	-2	7	300	01.2 - 00
19	4	3 NT	E	2	+1	4	-630	00 - 01.2
20	4	3 NT	N	Q	+3	4	690	00.9 - 00.3
21	4	5 x	N	A	-2	4	-500	00.1 - 01.1
22	8					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
23	8					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
24	8					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9

EW pair 2

Section b

Janet Ciaffoni
Bruce Campbell

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	4	4	W	A	-1	5	050	01.2 - 00
2	4	1 NT	N	2	=	5	090	00.4 - 00.8
3	4	4	S	4	=	5	420	01 - 00.2
4	1	4	S	A	-2	2	-200	00.2 - 01
5	1	3	E	3	-1	2	050	00.4 - 00.8
6	1	3 NT	E	2	=	2	-600	00.3 - 00.9
7	5	3	S	7	+1	6	170	00.2 - 01
8	5	3	E	J	=	6	-140	01.2 - 00
9	5	3	E	J	=	6	-140	00.1 - 01.1
10	2	1 NT	W	8	+4	3	-210	00.9 - 00.3
11	2	4	E	3	-2	3	100	00.5 - 00.7
12	2	2	W	A	=	3	-110	00.3 - 00.9
13	6	3	W	Q	-1	7	100	00.8 - 00.4
14	6	3	W	6	-1	7	050	00.4 - 00.8
15	6	3	N	A	-2	7	-200	00.3 - 00.9
16	3	5	W	K	=	4	-650	00.5 - 00.7
17	3	1 NT	W	3	=	4	-90	00.6 - 00.6
18	3	5 x	N	A	-2	4	-500	00 - 01.2
19	7					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
20	7					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
21	7					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
22	8	4	S	2	=	1	420	00.9 - 00.3
23	8	3	S	3	+1	1	130	00 - 01.2
24	8	1 NT	W	3	+1	1	-120	00.8 - 00.4

EW pair 3

Section b

Alan Jacobson
Ken Hamilton

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	8	3	W	A	+1	2	-130	00 - 01.2
2	8	3	S	4	=	2	110	00.6 - 00.6
3	8	4	E	K	-1	2	100	00.4 - 00.8
4	4	4	W	6	=	6	-620	00 - 01.2
5	4	1 NT	N	3	+1	6	120	01.2 - 00
6	4	4	W	9	-1	6	100	00.8 - 00.4
7	1	4	S	7	+1	3	650	00.8 - 00.4
8	1	2	E	T	+2	3	-170	00.7 - 00.5
9	1	3	N	4	=	3	110	00.8 - 00.4
10	5	4	E	8	=	7	-620	00.6 - 00.6
11	5	4	E	3	-3	7	150	01.1 - 00.1
12	5	4	W	A	-2	7	100	01.2 - 00
13	2	2	W	Q	=	4	-110	00.3 - 00.9
14	2	4	N	4	+1	4	150	01 - 00.2
15	2	3	W	K	-1	4	050	00.8 - 00.4
16	6					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
17	6					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
18	6					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
19	7	3 NT	W	T	-1	1	100	00.8 - 00.4
20	7	4 x	S	J	+2	1	1190	01.2 - 00
21	7	1 NT	N	3	+1	1	120	00.8 - 00.4
22	3	3	S	9	=	5	140	00.2 - 01
23	3	2	S	3	+4	5	170	00.2 - 01
24	3	1 NT	W	3	=	5	-90	01.2 - 00

EW pair 4

Section b

Marie Galland
Caryl Marshall

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	3	2	W	A	+1	6	-110	00.2 - 01
2	3	2 NT	N	2	+1	6	150	01 - 00.2
3	3	3	E	8	=	6	-140	00 - 01.2
4	8	3 NT	E	9	-1	3	100	01.1 - 00.1
5	8	1 NT	N	3	-1	3	-100	00.2 - 01
6	8	2 NT	E	2	-1	3	100	00.8 - 00.4
7	4	4	S	9	+2	7	680	01.2 - 00
8	4	4 x	S	J	-2	7	-300	00.2 - 01
9	4	3	S	Q	=	7	110	00.8 - 00.4
10	1	2 NT	W	2	+3	4	-210	00.9 - 00.3
11	1	6	W	2	-3	4	150	01.1 - 00.1
12	1	2	W	A	+1	4	-140	00 - 01.2
13	5					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
14	5					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
15	5					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
16	6	4 x	S	A	-1	1	-100	01.1 - 00.1
17	6	3	N	3	-1	1	-50	01 - 00.2
18	6	4	N	A	-2	1	-200	00.5 - 00.7
19	2	4	W	4	-1	5	100	00.8 - 00.4
20	2	3 NT	N	4	+1	5	630	00.4 - 00.8
21	2	5 x	S	A	-2	5	-500	00.1 - 01.1
22	7	2	S	J	+2	2	170	00.4 - 00.8
23	7	3 NT	S	3	+2	2	660	01 - 00.2
24	7	1	W	K	+3	2	-170	00.4 - 00.8

EW pair 5

Section b

Jan Jacobson
Marg Hughes

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	7	3	N	Q	-2	3	-100	00.4 - 00.8
2	7	1 NT	N	2	+1	3	120	00.8 - 00.4
3	7	4	S	3	=	3	420	01 - 00.2
4	3	3	E	9	+1	7	-130	00.6 - 00.6
5	3	3	E	3	-2	7	100	00.8 - 00.4
6	3	3 NT	E	5	+1	7	-630	00 - 01.2
7	8	4	S	9	=	4	620	00.4 - 00.8
8	8	2	E	7	+2	4	-170	00.7 - 00.5
9	8	3	S	Q	=	4	110	00.8 - 00.4
10	4					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
11	4					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
12	4					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
13	5	3	W	Q	-1	1	100	00.8 - 00.4
14	5	2	W	4	=	1	-110	00.2 - 01
15	5	2 NT	N	A	-1	1	-100	00.6 - 00.6
16	1	5 x	S	A	-1	5	-100	01.1 - 00.1
17	1	3	N	3	-2	5	-100	00.4 - 00.8
18	1	3	N	A	-1	5	-100	00.8 - 00.4
19	6	4	W	4	-2	2	200	01.2 - 00
20	6	3 NT	N	Q	+1	2	630	00.4 - 00.8
21	6	4	S	J	-2	2	-200	00.4 - 00.8
22	2	3 NT	N	5	=	6	400	00.6 - 00.6
23	2	3 NT	S	3	=	6	600	00.4 - 00.8
24	2	3	S	A	-2	6	-100	01 - 00.2

EW pair 6

Section b

Jan Ludemann
Bill Verrall

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	2	3	S	A	-1	7	-50	00.8 - 00.4
2	2	3 NT	S	4	=	7	600	01.2 - 00
3	2	4	S	3	=	7	420	01 - 00.2
4	7	3	E	5	-1	4	100	01.1 - 00.1
5	7	3	E	3	-2	4	100	00.8 - 00.4
6	7	3 NT	W	2	-1	4	100	00.8 - 00.4
7	3					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
8	3					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
9	3					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
10	4	3 NT	E	2	+1	1	-630	00.2 - 01
11	4	4	W	5	-2	1	100	00.5 - 00.7
12	4	3	S	K	-1	1	-100	00.6 - 00.6
13	8	2	W	3	+1	5	-140	00 - 01.2
14	8	4	N	J	=	5	130	00.8 - 00.4
15	8	1 NT	E	7	-2	5	100	01.1 - 00.1
16	5	5	W	K	+1	2	-680	00.1 - 01.1
17	5	5	W	K	=	2	-400	00 - 01.2
18	5	3	N	A	=	2	140	01 - 00.2
19	1	4	W	A	-1	6	100	00.8 - 00.4
20	1	3 NT	N	4	+3	6	690	00.9 - 00.3
21	1	1 NT x	N	3	=	6	180	01 - 00.2
22	6	4	S	9	=	3	420	00.9 - 00.3
23	6	3 NT	N	5	+2	3	660	01 - 00.2
24	6	1	W	K	+3	3	-170	00.4 - 00.8

EW pair 7

Section b

Maggie Stratford
David Fortune

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	6	3	N	Q	-1	4	-50	00.8 - 00.4
2	6	3 NT	N	2	-1	4	-100	00.1 - 01.1
3	6	4 x	S	A	-1	4	-100	00.2 - 01
4	2					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
5	2					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
6	2					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
7	3	4	S	7	-1	1	-100	00 - 01.2
8	3	4	E	Q	=	1	-420	00 - 01.2
9	3	2	E	K	+1	1	-140	00.1 - 01.1
10	7	3 NT	E	2	+1	5	-630	00.2 - 01
11	7	4	E	3	-2	5	100	00.5 - 00.7
12	7	3	W	7	-1	5	050	00.9 - 00.3
13	4	2	W	K	-1	2	100	00.8 - 00.4
14	4	3	W	K	=	2	-140	00 - 01.2
15	4	4	W	A	=	2	-420	00 - 01.2
16	8	5	E	K	+1	6	-680	00.1 - 01.1
17	8	4	W	K	+2	6	-170	00.2 - 01
18	8	4	W	Q	=	6	-420	00.2 - 01
19	5	1	W	4	+2	3	-140	00.4 - 00.8
20	5	3 NT	N	Q	+1	3	630	00.4 - 00.8
21	5	1 NT x	N	3	+2	3	580	01.2 - 00
22	1	4 x	S	2	=	7	590	01.2 - 00
23	1	3 NT	S	3	+1	7	630	00.6 - 00.6
24	1	4	W	K	=	7	-420	00 - 01.2

EW pair 8

Section b

Brian McCandless
Glenda Chalmers

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
2	1					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
3	1					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
4	2	3	E	5	+2	1	-150	00.4 - 00.8
5	2	2	W	4	-2	1	100	00.8 - 00.4
6	2	3 NT	E	2	=	1	-600	00.3 - 00.9
7	6	4	S	9	+1	5	650	00.8 - 00.4
8	6	1	E	Q	+3	5	-170	00.7 - 00.5
9	6	3	S	Q	=	5	110	00.8 - 00.4
10	3	3 NT	E	2	+1	2	-630	00.2 - 01
11	3	3 NT	W	2	=	2	-400	00 - 01.2
12	3	2	W	A	=	2	-110	00.3 - 00.9
13	7	2	W	8	=	6	-110	00.3 - 00.9
14	7	5 x	N	A	=	6	550	01.2 - 00
15	7	3	N	A	-2	6	-200	00.3 - 00.9
16	4	5 x	S	A	-2	3	-300	00.8 - 00.4
17	4	3	N	3	-1	3	-50	01 - 00.2
18	4	3	N	4	-2	3	-200	00.5 - 00.7
19	8	2	W	4	+2	7	-170	00.2 - 01
20	8	6 NT	N	Q	-2	7	-200	00 - 01.2
21	8	3	S	2	-1	7	-100	00.6 - 00.6
22	5	4	S	2	-1	4	-50	00 - 01.2
23	5	3 NT	N	T	+2	4	660	01 - 00.2
24	5	1	W	K	+3	4	-170	00.4 - 00.8