Te Anau Bridge Club : Detailed data for Luxmore Pairs

View by:

NS pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Luxmore Pairs 22 April

NS pair 1

Section b

Marie Galland
Glyn Saunders

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1	4	E	T	-1	1	050	8
2	1	2	E	Q	-2	1	100	5
3	1	4 x	N		-2	1	-300	2
4	1	3 NT	N	Q	=	1	600	8
5	2	1 NT	S	5	+2	6	150	10
6	2	2	N	K	-1	6	-50	6
7	2	2 NT	N	6	+3	6	210	10
8	2	3	S	9	-1	6	-50	8
9	3	3 NT	S	8	-2	5	-100	0
10	3	4	E	A	-2	5	200	10
11	3	3	S	3	-1	5	-50	8
12	3	4	S	J	=	5	620	0
13	4	3 NT	E	3	+1	4	-630	2
14	4	4	E	J	=	4	-420	7
15	4	3	N	A	-1	4	-100	6
16	4	2	S	6	=	4	110	6
17	5	2	S	Q	+1	3	140	9
18	5	4	W	4	-2	3	100	10
19	5	3 NT	E	2	-2	3	200	8
20	5	1 NT	S	A	-1	3	-100	3
21	6	4	E	6	+1	2	-450	2
22	6	6	E	8	+1	2	-1390	0
23	6	3 NT	E	4	=	2	-600	4
24	6	4	W	3	-1	2	050	7

NS pair 2

Section b

Roy Reid
Jan Ludemann

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	6	2	W	8	+1	3	-140	2
2	6	3	S	K	+1	3	130	8
3	6	3	S	A	-1	3	-50	9
4	6	3 NT	S	Q	-2	3	-200	2
5	1	1 NT	W	2	-2	2	100	8
6	1	1 NT	W	2	+2	2	-150	2
7	1	2 NT	S	5	=	2	120	6
8	1	2 NT	E	5	+1	2	-150	0
9	2	3 x	W	7	-2	1	500	10
10	2	2	E	A	+2	1	-170	2
11	2	1	W	A	+2	1	-140	5
12	2	4	S	9	+1	1	650	6
13	3	1	E	2	+3	6	-170	7
14	3	2	E	5	+2	6	-170	10
15	3	1	E	4	+1	6	-110	2
16	3	2 NT	E	4	-4	6	400	10
17	4	2	S	Q	=	5	110	2
18	4	3	W	4	-1	5	050	8
19	4	4	W	J	-4	5	400	10
20	4	1 NT	S	A	-1	5	-100	3
21	5	3 NT	E	6	=	4	-400	8
22	5	3 NT	W	2	+1	4	-630	4
23	5	3 NT	E	3	-1	4	100	8
24	5	2	W	3	+1	4	-140	3

NS pair 3

Section b

Adrienne Lush
Dot McKay

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	5	3	W	3	=	5	-140	2
2	5	3 NT	N	A	-1	5	-100	2
3	5	2	N	Q	-4	5	-200	4
4	5	3 NT	N	Q	-1	5	-100	5
5	6	1	E	K	-1	4	050	5
6	6	2	W	2	=	4	-90	4
7	6	2	N	6	-1	4	-100	3
8	6	3	E	9	=	4	-110	5
9	1	4	W	7	-1	3	100	3
10	1	4	E	9	-1	3	100	8
11	1	2	W	3	+1	3	-140	5
12	1	4	N	T	+1	3	650	6
13	2	4	E	J	+1	2	-650	0
14	2	4	E	Q	+1	2	-450	2
15	2	3	E	T	-1	2	050	8
16	2	4	E	3	-3	2	300	8
17	3	1 NT	N	5	+1	1	120	6
18	3	3 NT	W	9	+1	1	-430	0
19	3	3 NT	E	J	+1	1	-630	0
20	3	2	W	Q	-1	1	100	6
21	4	2 NT	E	K	+2	6	-180	10
22	4	2	W	2	+1	6	-140	8
23	4	2	W	A	-1	6	100	8
24	4	3	N	A	=	6	110	10

NS pair 4

Section b

David Fortune
Janet Ciaffoni

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	3	3 NT	W	Q	-1	2	050	8
2	3	3 NT	E	3	-5	2	250	10
3	3	4 x	S	A	-3	2	-500	0
4	3	3 NT	S	5	-3	2	-300	0
5	4	1	E	A	-1	1	050	5
6	4	2	N	A	+1	1	140	10
7	4	2	N	A	-3	1	-300	0
8	4	3	E	9	=	1	-110	5
9	5	3 NT	S	Q	+1	6	430	8
10	5	3	E	T	=	6	-140	5
11	5	3	W	K	-1	6	050	10
12	5	4	S	2	+1	6	650	6
13	6	3	E	J	+1	5	-170	7
14	6	4	E	T	+1	5	-450	2
15	6	2	E	A	=	5	-110	2
16	6	3	S	8	-1	5	-50	3
17	1	2	S	4	=	4	110	2
18	1	4	W	4	=	4	-420	2
19	1	1 NT	E	2	+4	4	-210	4
20	1	2	S	A	=	4	110	8
21	2	4	E	K	=	3	-420	6
22	2	6 NT	E	5	-1	3	100	10
23	2	3 NT	W	4	-1	3	100	8
24	2	2	W	6	+1	3	-140	3

NS pair 5

Section b

Joan Cockburn
Margaret Henderson

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	2	2	W	Q	-1	4	050	8
2	2	2	E	A	-2	4	100	5
3	2	2	N	Q	-1	4	-50	9
4	2	3 NT	S	6	-1	4	-100	5
5	3	1 NT	W	2	+1	3	-120	0
6	3	3 NT	W	2	+2	3	-660	0
7	3	1 NT	S	J	+2	3	150	8
8	3	2	W	A	-1	3	050	10
9	4	4	W	Q	-1	2	100	3
10	4	3 NT	W	8	+1	2	-630	0
11	4	1	W	3	+4	2	-200	2
12	4	4	S	9	+1	2	650	6
13	5	3	E	Q	+1	1	-170	7
14	5	4	E	T	=	1	-420	7
15	5	4	E	5	-2	1	100	10
16	5	4	S	6	-3	1	-150	0
17	6	2	S	3	=	6	110	2
18	6	2	W	4	=	6	-110	6
19	6	2	W	9	+2	6	-130	6
20	6	2	W	3	-2	6	200	10
21	1	4	E	K	+1	5	-450	2
22	1	3 NT	E	8	+2	5	-660	2
23	1	4	E	3	+1	5	-650	0
24	1	2	E	A	-1	5	050	7

NS pair 6

Section b

Linda Staunton
Kathy Singleton

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1	2	W	3	+1	6	-140	2
2	1	2	W	3	=	6	-110	0
3	1	4	S	K	-2	6	-100	6
4	1	3 NT	S	T	+1	6	630	10
5	2	1	E	9	=	5	-80	2
6	2	2	N	8	=	5	090	8
7	2	2	N	A	-1	5	-100	3
8	2	4	E	9	=	5	-130	2
9	3	3 x	W	7	-1	4	200	6
10	3	3	E	9	=	4	-140	5
11	3	4	W	K	=	4	-420	0
12	3	4	S	6	+1	4	650	6
13	4	2	E	2	+2	3	-170	7
14	4	4	E	T	+1	3	-450	2
15	4	2	E	A	=	3	-110	2
16	4	2	S	A	-1	3	-50	3
17	5	2	S	Q	+1	2	140	9
18	5	3	W	4	=	2	-140	4
19	5	3 NT	E	2	=	2	-600	2
20	5	1 NT	W	3	+1	2	-120	0
21	6	4	E	K	+1	1	-450	2
22	6	2	E	K	+3	1	-150	6
23	6	4	E	3	=	1	-620	2
24	6	5	S	6	-3	1	-150	0