Te Anau Bridge Club : Detailed data for Livingstone Pairs (2024)

View by:

NS pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Livingstone Pairs (2024) 21 August

NS pair 1

Section b

Maggie Stratford
Brian McCandless

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1	4 x	E	T	-1	1	100	12
2	1	2	E	8	=	1	-110	2
3	1	3 NT	N	6	+1	1	430	11
4	2	4	S	8	+1	8	650	4
5	2	4 x	N		-1	8	-200	1
6	2	2 NT	N	5	+1	8	150	12
7	3	2	N	A	+1	7	140	12
8	3	4	E	9	+3	7	-510	0
9	3	6	S	3	-1	7	-50	0
10	4	3 NT	N	6	-2	6	-200	0
11	4	4	W	A	+1	6	-150	8
12	4	3 NT	N	T	+1	6	630	11
13	5	5 x	W	A	-1	5	200	12
14	5	3	S	A	-2	5	-100	10
15	5	4	N	4	-1	5	-100	12
16	6	2	E	J	-4	4	400	12
17	6	3 NT	S	Q	=	4	400	7
18	6	4	E	A	-1	4	050	12
19	7	3 NT	S	6	+2	3	460	10
20	7	4	S	K	=	3	620	5
21	7	3	N	J	-1	3	-100	3
22	8	4	E	T	-1	2	100	8
23	8	3 NT	W	5	+4	2	-720	2
24	8	3 NT	W	6	+1	2	-430	4

NS pair 2

Section b

Marie Galland
Jill McChlery

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	8	4	S	7	-1	3	-50	8
2	8	2	E	A	+1	3	-110	2
3	8	4	N	A	=	3	420	8
4	1	6	N	J	=	2	1430	12
5	1	3	N	J	=	2	140	8
6	1	3	S	A	+1	2	130	6
7	2	1	N	A	+1	1	110	8
8	2	5	E	9	+1	1	-480	3
9	2	4	N	A	+1	1	450	6
10	3	2 NT	N	8	+3	8	210	10
11	3	5	W	6	=	8	-400	1
12	3	3 NT	N	3	=	8	600	7
13	4	2	S	3	-1	7	-100	8
14	4	4	S	A	-2	7	-100	10
15	4	4	E	Q	+1	7	-450	7
16	5	3	E	T	-2	6	200	10
17	5	3 NT	S	5	+1	6	430	10
18	5	3	E	A	=	6	-140	8
19	6	3	N	8	-1	5	-50	0
20	6	4	S	K	+1	5	650	10
21	6	4	S	K	=	5	620	9
22	7	4 x	W	7	-1	4	200	12
23	7	3 NT	W	2	+2	4	-660	10
24	7	2	W	3	+1	4	-110	9

NS pair 3

Section b

Alan Jacobson
Margaret Henderson

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	7	1	E	J	+3	5	-170	2
2	7	2	E	8	=	5	-90	7
3	7	2	S	3	+1	5	140	2
4	8	6 NT	N	2	-1	4	-100	1
5	8	4 xx	S	K	=	4	1080	12
6	8	3	N	5	+1	4	130	6
7	1	2	N	7	=	3	110	8
8	1	6	E	3	-1	3	050	12
9	1	4	N	A	+1	3	450	6
10	2	2	W	5	-2	2	200	8
11	2	2 NT	E	7	-1	2	050	12
12	2	3 NT	N	3	=	2	600	7
13	3	4	S	3	-3	1	-300	5
14	3	2	E	3	+2	1	-130	6
15	3	5	E	Q	=	1	-450	7
16	4	2	E	T	=	8	-110	1
17	4	2 NT	S	6	+2	8	180	4
18	4	3	W	T	+1	8	-170	5
19	5	2 NT	S	5	+2	7	180	4
20	5	4	S	K	-1	7	-100	0
21	5	3 NT	N	3	=	7	600	6
22	6	4	E	T	=	6	-620	3
23	6	4	E	4	+2	6	-680	7
24	6	5	W	6	-1	6	050	12

NS pair 4

Section b

David Fortune
Jan Jacobson

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	6	3	E	A	=	7	-140	5
2	6	2	E	8	=	7	-110	2
3	6	2	N	6	+3	7	150	4
4	7	4	S	8	+3	6	710	10
5	7	4	N	9	-1	6	-100	5
6	7	3	N	5	+1	6	130	6
7	8	1 NT	E	2	=	5	-90	3
8	8	4	E	9	+1	5	-450	7
9	8	4	N	J	+2	5	480	12
10	1	4	N	8	=	4	620	12
11	1	2	N	A	-2	4	-100	10
12	1	2	W	K	-2	4	100	2
13	2	4 x	S		-3	3	-800	2
14	2	2	W	4	+1	3	-140	3
15	2	4	E	Q	+1	3	-450	7
16	3	2	N	5	-2	2	-100	4
17	3	3 NT	S	T	+2	2	460	12
18	3	4	E	A	=	2	-420	2
19	4	4	S	5	=	1	420	6
20	4	4	S	K	+1	1	650	10
21	4	2 NT	N	4	-1	1	-100	3
22	5	4	E	5	+1	8	-650	0
23	5	4	E	7	+2	8	-680	7
24	5	3 NT	E	T	+2	8	-460	1

NS pair 5

Section b

Ken Hamilton
Bill Verrall

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	4	3 x	E	A	=	2	-530	0
2	4	3	E	8	-2	2	100	12
3	4	3 NT	N	9	+1	2	430	11
4	5	4	S	5	+2	1	680	7
5	5	3	N	J	+1	1	170	10
6	5	3	S	A	+1	1	130	6
7	6	2	N	Q	=	8	110	8
8	6	4	E	2	+2	8	-480	3
9	6	4	N	A	+1	8	450	6
10	7	3 NT	N	6	-1	7	-100	2
11	7	2 NT	E	7	+4	7	-240	4
12	7	2	N	T	+2	7	170	4
13	8	5 x	W	A	=	6	-850	0
14	8	4	S	6	-2	6	-100	10
15	8	4 x	E	Q	+1	6	-690	0
16	1	2	E	T	-1	5	100	7
17	1	2	N	2	+1	5	110	2
18	1	5	N	A	-1	5	-100	10
19	2	3 NT	S	9	+2	4	460	10
20	2	4	S	J	=	4	620	5
21	2	4	S	K	+1	4	650	12
22	3	4	E	2	-1	3	100	8
23	3	6	E	K	+1	3	-1460	0
24	3	3 NT	E	T	+2	3	-460	1

NS pair 6

Section b

Roy Reid
Diana Burrows

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	3	3	E	J	=	4	-140	5
2	3	1	E	4	+1	4	-90	7
3	3	3 NT	N	7	-1	4	-50	0
4	4	6 NT	S	5	-1	3	-100	1
5	4	3 x	N	J	-1	3	-200	1
6	4	2	N	J	+1	3	110	0
7	5	1 NT	E	2	=	2	-90	3
8	5	4	E	3	+1	2	-450	7
9	5	4	N	A	+1	2	450	6
10	6	3	N	8	=	1	140	4
11	6	3 NT	E	K	=	1	-400	1
12	6	3 NT	N	3	+1	1	630	11
13	7	4	W	A	-1	8	100	10
14	7	2	W	2	+1	8	-140	3
15	7	5 x	W	A	=	8	-650	2
16	8	2	W	2	=	7	-110	1
17	8	3 NT	S	5	=	7	400	7
18	8	3	E	A	+1	7	-170	5
19	1	3 NT	S	5	+2	6	460	10
20	1	4	S	T	+1	6	650	10
21	1	4	S	T	=	6	620	9
22	2	4	E	3	-1	5	100	8
23	2	4	W	2	+3	5	-710	4
24	2	2	W	6	+3	5	-150	6

NS pair 7

Section b

Norma McDonald
Trevor Lyall

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	2	3	E	3	-1	6	050	10
2	2	3	E	8	-1	6	050	10
3	2	3	W	A	-2	6	200	6
4	3	4	S	Q	+2	5	680	7
5	3	3	N	J	-1	5	-100	5
6	3	2	S	A	+2	5	130	6
7	4	2	E	2	=	4	-110	0
8	4	3	W	A	+1	4	-130	10
9	4	4	S	J	+1	4	450	6
10	5	2	N	3	+2	3	170	6
11	5	1 NT	W	8	+4	3	-210	6
12	5	3	N	T	-1	3	-100	0
13	6	4	S	A	-3	2	-300	5
14	6	2	E	4	+2	2	-170	0
15	6	4	E	Q	+1	2	-450	7
16	7	3	E	3	-1	1	100	7
17	7	3 NT	S	5	-1	1	-50	0
18	7	5 x	S	A	-2	1	-500	0
19	8	2 NT	S	7	=	8	120	2
20	8	2	S	T	+2	8	170	2
21	8	3 NT	N	7	-3	8	-300	0
22	1	4	E	9	=	7	-620	3
23	1	2	E	7	+3	7	-150	12
24	1	2	E	2	=	7	-110	9

NS pair 8

Section b

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1					8	–	-9999
2	1					8	–	-9999
3	1					8	–	-9999
4	2					7	–	-9999
5	2					7	–	-9999
6	2					7	–	-9999
7	3					6	–	-9999
8	3					6	–	-9999
9	3					6	–	-9999
10	4					5	–	-9999
11	4					5	–	-9999
12	4					5	–	-9999
13	5					4	–	-9999
14	5					4	–	-9999
15	5					4	–	-9999
16	6					3	–	-9999
17	6					3	–	-9999
18	6					3	–	-9999
19	7					2	–	-9999
20	7					2	–	-9999
21	7					2	–	-9999
22	8					1	–	-9999
23	8					1	–	-9999
24	8					1	–	-9999