Te Anau Bridge Club        

Back to event

---

View by:

board

NS pairs

EW pairs

---

Hand records



Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Manapouri Pairs (2017) 24 May

EW pair 1 Section a Linda Bolger Nolene Adam	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 1 3 W K +1 1 -130 30 2 1 2 NT N J +2 1 180 40 3 1 2 N A -1 1 -50 60 4 5 4 N A +1 5 650 20 5 5 5 x E T -1 5 100 10 6 5 4 x W Q -2 5 500 10 7 2 1 N Q -1 2 -100 40 8 2 3 NT E T +1 2 -430 40 9 2 2 x N Q +2 2 670 0 10 6 2 N 5 -3 6 -300 20 11 6 4 S 8 -2 6 -100 120 12 6 5 W A -1 6 050 30 13 3 1 NT W 4 +3 3 -180 100 14 3 2 W A = 3 -110 10 15 3 2 NT E 2 -1 3 050 20 16 7 2 NT E 9 = 7 -120 90 17 7 6 NT S 7 = 7 990 0 18 7 4 E 7 +1 7 -450 50 19 4 2 x W K -1 4 200 10 20 4 4 N Q -2 4 -200 100 21 4 5 W A +1 4 -420 80 22 8 8 – -9999 23 8 8 – -9999 24 8 8 – -9999
EW pair 2 Section a Diana Burrows Ann Carran	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 4 1 NT x N 8 -4 5 -800 100 2 4 3 NT S 3 = 5 600 0 3 4 3 N 6 -3 5 -150 100 4 1 4 N 2 -1 2 -100 80 5 1 3 NT W A +1 2 -430 120 6 1 5 S 4 -1 2 -50 120 7 5 1 NT W 4 +2 6 -150 120 8 5 3 NT E 3 +4 6 -520 120 9 5 4 N 4 -1 6 -50 90 10 2 3 NT W 5 = 3 -600 50 11 2 3 NT S 2 +3 3 490 20 12 2 1 W A +2 3 -110 80 13 6 1 NT N 6 -3 7 -300 120 14 6 1 NT E 5 +2 7 -150 90 15 6 2 NT E 3 = 7 -120 80 16 3 3 N A -1 4 -50 40 17 3 4 S 5 -1 4 -50 90 18 3 4 E 5 +1 4 -450 50 19 7 8 – -9999 20 7 8 – -9999 21 7 8 – -9999 22 8 3 NT S 9 +1 1 430 20 23 8 1 NT W 4 -2 1 200 0 24 8 6 NT W 2 = 1 -990 120
EW pair 3 Section a Jan Ludemann Joan Cockburn	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 8 3 NT x N 8 -5 2 -1100 120 2 8 2 S 7 = 2 110 90 3 8 2 N 6 -3 2 -150 100 4 4 4 N 6 -1 6 -100 80 5 4 4 E T -2 6 100 10 6 4 3 NT S J +3 6 490 50 7 1 1 NT W 8 -1 3 100 0 8 1 5 E K = 3 -400 0 9 1 4 N A = 3 420 40 10 5 1 NT W Q +3 7 -180 0 11 5 4 S 8 = 7 420 90 12 5 1 W 2 +3 7 -130 100 13 2 2 E 3 = 4 -110 80 14 2 2 W A = 4 -110 10 15 2 3 NT W 3 = 4 -400 110 16 6 8 – -9999 17 6 8 – -9999 18 6 8 – -9999 19 7 1 NT x E K -1 1 200 10 20 7 4 W Q -2 1 200 40 21 7 3 NT W 6 -1 1 050 10 22 3 4 S Q = 5 130 60 23 3 1 NT W 4 -1 5 100 60 24 3 3 NT E 5 +3 5 -490 90
EW pair 4 Section a Marg Hughes Marg Cockburn	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 3 3 W 6 +1 6 -130 30 2 3 2 S 8 = 6 110 90 3 3 2 N 6 -3 6 -150 100 4 8 4 N T -2 3 -200 120 5 8 2 N Q -4 3 -400 90 6 8 5 S J +1 3 420 80 7 4 1 NT W 4 +1 7 -120 70 8 4 3 NT E 3 +3 7 -490 80 9 4 4 N A -1 7 -50 90 10 1 5 E K = 4 -600 50 11 1 4 S 8 = 4 420 90 12 1 2 NT W 4 -2 4 100 0 13 5 8 – -9999 14 5 8 – -9999 15 5 8 – -9999 16 6 2 E 9 = 1 -90 60 17 6 6 S K -2 1 -100 120 18 6 4 E 4 +2 1 -480 100 19 2 3 N 3 -3 5 -150 100 20 2 3 W J -3 5 300 0 21 2 5 W A +1 5 -420 80 22 7 2 S 9 = 2 090 100 23 7 1 NT E 3 -1 2 100 60 24 7 5 NT E 7 +1 2 -490 90
EW pair 5 Section a June Birmingham Kathleen Meredith	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 7 3 NT N 7 -4 3 -200 60 2 7 4 S A -2 3 -200 120 3 7 5 E 4 -1 3 100 10 4 3 4 N A -1 7 -100 80 5 3 3 NT W A = 7 -400 90 6 3 5 S A = 7 400 100 7 8 1 NT W 9 = 4 -90 20 8 8 3 NT E 2 +3 4 -490 80 9 8 4 N A = 4 420 40 10 4 8 – -9999 11 4 8 – -9999 12 4 8 – -9999 13 5 3 E K -1 1 100 20 14 5 2 W 3 +1 1 -140 50 15 5 2 NT E 3 -2 1 100 0 16 1 3 NT E 4 -2 5 200 0 17 1 7 NT N 3 -1 5 -50 90 18 1 5 E 5 -1 5 050 10 19 6 2 NT N T = 2 120 50 20 6 3 NT E 5 -2 2 200 40 21 6 5 W A +1 2 -420 80 22 2 1 W A +3 6 -170 120 23 2 1 NT E 3 -1 6 100 60 24 2 5 NT W 5 -4 6 200 0
EW pair 6 Section a Ken Hamilton David Fortune	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 2 4 x N 8 -3 7 -500 80 2 2 1 NT N 6 +2 7 150 60 3 2 PASS N 7 0 40 4 7 4 N A +1 4 650 20 5 7 2 S A -1 4 -100 60 6 7 4 x W Q -2 4 500 10 7 3 8 – -9999 8 3 8 – -9999 9 3 8 – -9999 10 4 3 NT W Q +1 1 -630 100 11 4 3 NT S 2 +3 1 490 20 12 4 5 W A -1 1 050 30 13 8 2 W 9 -2 5 200 0 14 8 2 E 5 +1 5 -140 50 15 8 3 NT E Q = 5 -400 110 16 5 2 NT E 4 -1 2 100 20 17 5 4 N 2 +1 2 150 50 18 5 4 E 2 +2 2 -480 100 19 1 3 NT N 6 -5 6 -250 120 20 1 4 E Q = 6 -620 120 21 1 5 W A +1 6 -420 80 22 6 3 W A -2 3 200 40 23 6 2 W T -1 3 100 60 24 6 5 W J +1 3 -420 60
EW pair 7 Section a Bruce Campbell Allan Youldon	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 6 4 W A -2 4 100 0 2 6 2 NT S 4 +3 4 210 20 3 6 3 W Q -1 4 100 10 4 2 8 – -9999 5 2 8 – -9999 6 2 8 – -9999 7 3 2 E K +2 1 -130 100 8 3 5 E K +1 1 -420 20 9 3 3 NT S 4 -5 1 -250 120 10 7 3 NT W Q +1 5 -630 100 11 7 4 N A +1 5 450 60 12 7 1 W J = 5 -70 60 13 4 2 S K = 2 090 50 14 4 1 NT E A +2 2 -150 90 15 4 2 E 2 = 2 -110 50 16 8 3 N 3 -3 6 -150 120 17 8 3 N 2 +2 6 150 50 18 8 4 E 7 +2 6 -480 100 19 5 2 W K -1 3 100 80 20 5 4 W J -2 3 200 40 21 5 7 W A -1 3 050 10 22 1 3 S A = 7 110 80 23 1 1 E 3 +1 7 -90 120 24 1 2 NT E 2 +4 7 -240 20
EW pair 8 Section a Norma McDonald Ruth Slee	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 1 8 – -9999 2 1 8 – -9999 3 1 8 – -9999 4 2 4 N T +1 1 650 20 5 2 3 E T -1 1 050 40 6 2 4 NT S J +2 1 490 50 7 6 1 NT E K +1 5 -120 70 8 6 3 NT E 3 +3 5 -490 80 9 6 4 N A = 5 420 40 10 3 3 NT W 3 +1 2 -630 100 11 3 3 NT S 8 +3 2 490 20 12 3 2 NT W 2 +2 2 -180 120 13 7 2 S J = 6 090 50 14 7 2 E T +2 6 -170 120 15 7 3 W A = 6 -110 50 16 4 1 NT W 4 +1 3 -120 90 17 4 5 N 2 +1 3 420 20 18 4 5 E T -1 3 050 10 19 8 2 NT N A = 7 120 50 20 8 3 W J -1 7 100 80 21 8 5 W A +1 7 -420 80 22 5 3 x W A -4 4 1100 0 23 5 1 NT E 3 -1 4 100 60 24 5 5 W 8 = 4 -400 40