Te Anau Bridge Club : Detailed data for Stuart Pairs

View by:

NS pairs

EW pairs

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Stuart Pairs 10 September

NS pair 1

Section b

Maggie Stratford
David Fortune

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1	2 NT	N	3	+2	1	180	01 - 00
2	1	4	N	4	+3	1	710	00.9 - 00.1
3	1	2	W	Q	+1	1	-140	00.7 - 00.3
4	1	2 NT	N	K	+1	1	150	00.8 - 00.2
5	2	2	N	T	+3	6	200	00.9 - 00.1
6	2	1 NT	W	Q	=	6	-90	00.1 - 00.9
7	2	2	W	A	+1	6	-140	00.7 - 00.3
8	2	3 NT	W	T	+2	6	-460	00.1 - 00.9
9	3	1 NT	E	3	=	5	-90	00.6 - 00.4
10	3	1 NT	N	4	=	5	090	00.5 - 00.5
11	3	3	W	9	-1	5	050	00.3 - 00.7
12	3	4	W	T	-1	5	050	00.5 - 00.5
13	4	3 NT	W	J	+4	4	-720	00.2 - 00.8
14	4	4	N	A	=	4	420	00.9 - 00.1
15	4	5	N	Q	=	4	600	00.6 - 00.4
16	4	1	W	Q	+1	4	-90	01 - 00
17	5	3	S	J	+1	3	130	00.1 - 00.9
18	5	4	S	K	=	3	620	01 - 00
19	5	3	E	K	-1	3	100	00.4 - 00.6
20	5	4	N	T	-1	3	-100	00.5 - 00.5
21	6	5	E	J	-1	2	050	01 - 00
22	6	4	S	8	=	2	420	00.7 - 00.3
23	6	6	S	Q	-1	2	-100	00 - 01
24	6	4	S	A	-1	2	-50	00.4 - 00.6

NS pair 2

Section b

Roy Reid
Tania Ward

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	6	3	N	2	+1	3	130	00.8 - 00.2
2	6	4	N	Q	+2	3	680	00.5 - 00.5
3	6	2	W	Q	+1	3	-140	00.7 - 00.3
4	6	3	N	9	-3	3	-300	00.2 - 00.8
5	1	2	N	K	+3	2	200	00.9 - 00.1
6	1	1 NT	W	Q	-1	2	100	00.8 - 00.2
7	1	2	W	A	+3	2	-200	00.3 - 00.7
8	1	5	E	9	-2	2	100	01 - 00
9	2	2 NT	E	3	+1	1	-150	00 - 01
10	2	2	N	K	+3	1	150	01 - 00
11	2	3	S	6	+1	1	130	00.8 - 00.2
12	2	2 NT	W	T	-2	1	100	01 - 00
13	3	5 NT	W	3	+2	6	-720	00.2 - 00.8
14	3	4	N	A	-1	6	-50	00.1 - 00.9
15	3	5	N	Q	=	6	600	00.6 - 00.4
16	3	1	W	Q	+2	6	-110	00.5 - 00.5
17	4	4	N	2	+1	5	450	00.9 - 00.1
18	4	4 x	S	K	-1	5	-200	00.2 - 00.8
19	4	5	W	J	-2	5	200	00.9 - 00.1
20	4	3	N	A	-1	5	-100	00.5 - 00.5
21	5	4	E	J	=	4	-420	00.1 - 00.9
22	5	3	S	3	+2	4	200	00.4 - 00.6
23	5	3 x	W	A	-2	4	500	01 - 00
24	5	4	S	6	-1	4	-50	00.4 - 00.6

NS pair 3

Section b

Bruce Campbell
Trevor Lyall

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	5	5	N	6	-2	5	-100	00.2 - 00.8
2	5	4	N	4	+1	5	650	00.1 - 00.9
3	5	4	S	A	-2	5	-100	01 - 00
4	5	2	E	2	-3	5	300	01 - 00
5	6	2	N	8	=	4	110	00.4 - 00.6
6	6	1 NT	W	4	=	4	-90	00.1 - 00.9
7	6	3 x	W	A	+1	4	-930	00 - 01
8	6	3	E	6	=	4	-110	00.8 - 00.2
9	1	2 NT	E	Q	=	3	-120	00.2 - 00.8
10	1	2	S	3	-1	3	-100	00.2 - 00.8
11	1	5	S	6	-1	3	-50	00 - 01
12	1	4	E	2	=	3	-420	00 - 01
13	2	3 NT	W	3	+3	2	-690	00.6 - 00.4
14	2	4	N	A	-1	2	-50	00.1 - 00.9
15	2	6	S	A	-1	2	-100	00 - 01
16	2	1	W	Q	+2	2	-110	00.5 - 00.5
17	3	3	S	5	+1	1	170	00.4 - 00.6
18	3	2	N	Q	+1	1	140	00.7 - 00.3
19	3	2	E	3	-2	1	200	00.9 - 00.1
20	3	2	N	A	=	1	110	00.8 - 00.2
21	4	4	E	4	=	6	-420	00.1 - 00.9
22	4	3 NT	N	2	-1	6	-50	00 - 01
23	4	3 x	W	A	-1	6	200	00.7 - 00.3
24	4	4	S	7	-2	6	-100	00 - 01

NS pair 4

Section b

Marg Cockburn
Sue Chartres

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	3	2	N	A	+1	2	110	00.5 - 00.5
2	3	4	N	K	+3	2	710	00.9 - 00.1
3	3	3	W	Q	+1	2	-170	00.3 - 00.7
4	3	2 NT	S	8	=	2	120	00.6 - 00.4
5	4	2	S	3	+1	1	140	00.6 - 00.4
6	4	2	N	9	-1	1	-50	00.4 - 00.6
7	4	3	W	Q	=	1	-140	00.7 - 00.3
8	4	3 NT	W	J	=	1	-400	00.4 - 00.6
9	5	3 NT	E	3	-1	6	100	00.9 - 00.1
10	5	1 NT	S	3	=	6	090	00.5 - 00.5
11	5	3	W	T	-1	6	050	00.3 - 00.7
12	5	4	E	7	-1	6	050	00.5 - 00.5
13	6	3 NT	W	J	+4	5	-720	00.2 - 00.8
14	6	3	N	A	=	5	140	00.5 - 00.5
15	6	5	S	A	=	5	600	00.6 - 00.4
16	6	1	W	9	+3	5	-130	00 - 01
17	1	3 NT	S	A	+1	4	430	00.6 - 00.4
18	1	3	S	3	=	4	140	00.7 - 00.3
19	1	2	E	K	=	4	-110	00 - 01
20	1	2	N	2	+1	4	140	01 - 00
21	2	5	N	T	-1	3	-100	00.8 - 00.2
22	2	4	S	K	=	3	420	00.7 - 00.3
23	2	3 NT	E	7	-2	3	200	00.7 - 00.3
24	2	4	S	Q	=	3	420	00.9 - 00.1

NS pair 5

Section b

Linda Bolger
Janet Ciaffoni

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	2	3 NT	N	2	-3	4	-150	00 - 01
2	2	4	N	4	+1	4	650	00.1 - 00.9
3	2	4	W	J	=	4	-620	00 - 01
4	2	1 NT	N	5	-4	4	-400	00 - 01
5	3	2	S	T	=	3	090	00.2 - 00.8
6	3	2	W	J	-1	3	100	00.8 - 00.2
7	3	2 NT	S	2	=	3	120	01 - 00
8	3	2 NT	E	4	+4	3	-240	00.6 - 00.4
9	4	2	W	9	=	2	-110	00.4 - 00.6
10	4	1 NT	N	6	-2	2	-200	00 - 01
11	4	3	S	4	=	2	110	00.6 - 00.4
12	4	4	E	7	-1	2	050	00.5 - 00.5
13	5	2 NT	W	8	+5	1	-270	00.8 - 00.2
14	5	3	N	9	=	1	140	00.5 - 00.5
15	5	5	N	Q	=	1	600	00.6 - 00.4
16	5	1	W	J	+1	1	-110	00.5 - 00.5
17	6	3	S	K	+1	6	130	00.1 - 00.9
18	6	5 x	S	5	-2	6	-500	00 - 01
19	6	3	E	K	-1	6	100	00.4 - 00.6
20	6	3	E	Q	=	6	-140	00.2 - 00.8
21	1	3	W	Q	+1	5	-170	00.5 - 00.5
22	1	3	S	2	+1	5	170	00.2 - 00.8
23	1	3	W	A	-1	5	100	00.2 - 00.8
24	1	4	S	6	-1	5	-50	00.4 - 00.6

NS pair 6

Section b

Joan Cockburn
Margaret Henderson

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1	3	N	6	=	6	110	00.5 - 00.5
2	1	4	N	4	+2	6	680	00.5 - 00.5
3	1	3	W	Q	+1	6	-170	00.3 - 00.7
4	1	1 NT	N	6	=	6	090	00.4 - 00.6
5	2	3	S	6	-1	5	-100	00 - 01
6	2	2 NT	W	4	-1	5	100	00.8 - 00.2
7	2	3	W	2	+2	5	-200	00.3 - 00.7
8	2	3 NT	W	2	+2	5	-460	00.1 - 00.9
9	3	3	E	3	-1	4	100	00.9 - 00.1
10	3	2	N	K	=	4	110	00.8 - 00.2
11	3	5	S	A	=	4	400	01 - 00
12	3	4	E	5	-1	4	050	00.5 - 00.5
13	4	3	E	7	+4	3	-190	01 - 00
14	4	4	N	A	=	3	420	00.9 - 00.1
15	4	5	N	Q	=	3	600	00.6 - 00.4
16	4	2	E	T	=	3	-110	00.5 - 00.5
17	5	4	S	A	+1	2	450	00.9 - 00.1
18	5	5	W	A	-2	2	100	00.4 - 00.6
19	5	3	E	K	-1	2	100	00.4 - 00.6
20	5	4 x	N	T	-3	2	-800	00 - 01
21	6	3	E	J	+1	1	-170	00.5 - 00.5
22	6	4	S	2	+1	1	450	01 - 00
23	6	2 NT	N	A	+1	1	150	00.4 - 00.6
24	6	4	S	6	=	1	420	00.9 - 00.1