Te Anau Bridge Club : Detailed data for Te Anau NZW Pairs (2023)

View by:

EW pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Te Anau NZW Pairs (2023) 10 November

EW pair 1

Section b

Sherril Harries
Maggie Stratford

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1	4	N	A	=	1	130	8
2	1	3	W	3	-1	1	050	4
3	1	6	W	3	-1	1	100	2
4	1	4	W	A	-1	1	100	0
5	4	2 NT	N	8	-1	4	-100	7
6	4	3 NT	W	A	+2	4	-660	10
7	4	3	N	5	=	4	140	2
8	4	5	N	4	+1	4	420	6
9	2	1 NT	E	A	=	2	-90	9
10	2	4	W	A	=	2	-620	8
11	2	3	N	J	+2	2	200	6
12	2	1 NT	E	2	+2	2	-150	6
13	5	3 NT	N	7	=	5	600	7
14	5	2 NT	W	6	+2	5	-180	10
15	5	2	W	A	=	5	-110	8
16	5	4	W	A	-1	5	100	1
17	3	3	N	2	+2	3	200	2
18	3	3 NT	W	9	-1	3	050	2
19	3	6 NT	S	8	+1	3	1020	1
20	3	2 NT	N	A	+2	3	180	9
21	6	5 x	E	A	-2	6	300	0
22	6	2	S	K	=	6	090	2
23	6	4	E	A	=	6	-620	10
24	6	3 NT	W	5	+3	6	-490	10

EW pair 2

Section b

Trevor Lyall
Sherron Tamatea-Scown

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	3	4	E	7	-4	4	200	2
2	3	3	N	5	-1	4	-100	7
3	3	3	W	7	+2	4	-200	4
4	3	2	E	J	=	4	-90	2
5	1	3 NT	S	4	+1	2	630	0
6	1	2	W	A	+2	2	-130	4
7	1	2	N	7	+2	2	170	0
8	1	6	S	5	=	2	920	1
9	4	1 NT	W	4	=	5	-90	9
10	4	4	W	A	=	5	-620	8
11	4	3 NT	N	3	+1	5	430	2
12	4	3 NT	W	7	-3	5	150	1
13	2	3 NT	N	4	+1	3	630	3
14	2	4 x	W	K	-3	3	500	2
15	2	2	S	7	+4	3	230	6
16	2	2	W	5	+1	3	-140	7
17	5	2 NT	S	9	=	6	120	6
18	5	1	E	5	+4	6	-150	7
19	5	6	N	2	=	6	920	4
20	5	3 NT	S	7	=	6	600	3
21	6	2	S	T	+2	1	170	2
22	6	2	N	3	-2	1	-100	9
23	6	3	S	6	+2	1	200	2
24	6	4	W	3	+1	1	-450	4

EW pair 3

Section b

Linda Brown
Kathy Singleton

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	6	5	N	A	=	2	400	0
2	6	4	N	4	=	2	620	1
3	6	4	W	3	=	2	-620	8
4	6	2	E	J	+1	2	-140	5
5	3	2 NT	N	8	-2	5	-200	10
6	3	2	W	A	+2	5	-130	4
7	3	3	E	5	+1	5	-170	10
8	3	4	S	2	+2	5	170	8
9	1	2	S	K	=	3	110	0
10	1	4	W	6	-2	3	200	0
11	1	3 NT	N	5	-2	3	-100	10
12	1	3 NT	E	2	=	3	-400	9
13	4	3 NT	N	7	=	6	600	7
14	4	4	S	A	-2	6	-100	8
15	4	4	S	A	+1	6	650	2
16	4	2	W	5	+1	6	-140	7
17	5	4	N	2	=	1	420	0
18	5	1 NT	E	5	=	1	-90	4
19	5	6 NT	N	4	+1	1	1020	1
20	5	3 NT	N	7	+1	1	630	0
21	2	5	E	A	-1	4	050	7
22	2	2	E	2	-1	4	100	0
23	2	4	S	2	=	4	620	0
24	2	3 NT	W	A	+2	4	-460	7

EW pair 4

Section b

Bill Verrall
Marie Galland

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	2	2	N	3	+3	5	150	4
2	2	4	S	6	-1	5	-100	7
3	2	3 NT	E	5	=	5	-600	6
4	2	4	E	4	+2	5	-680	10
5	6	4	S	3	-1	3	-100	7
6	6	3	W	7	+1	3	-130	4
7	6	3	W	3	+1	3	-130	8
8	6	6 NT	S	4	-1	3	-50	10
9	3	3	E	A	-1	6	100	2
10	3	4	W	6	=	6	-620	8
11	3	4	S	4	=	6	420	4
12	3	5	W	3	=	6	-400	9
13	4	3 NT	N	7	+2	1	660	0
14	4	3	E	A	-3	1	150	4
15	4	4	S	A	+1	1	650	2
16	4	3	W	J	=	1	-140	7
17	1	4	S	K	-1	4	-50	9
18	1	3	E	8	+2	4	-150	7
19	1	3 NT	S	4	+4	4	520	8
20	1	3 NT	W	A	-3	4	300	6
21	5	4	E	9	-1	2	050	7
22	5	1 NT	E	4	=	2	-90	6
23	5	4	S	K	-1	2	-100	6
24	5	3 NT	W	5	+2	2	-460	7

EW pair 5

Section b

Norma McDonald
Ruth Slee

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	5	3	N	A	+1	3	130	8
2	5	4	N	4	=	3	620	1
3	5	4	W	3	+1	3	-650	10
4	5	2	E	J	+1	3	-140	5
5	2	2	S	8	+2	6	170	2
6	2	3	S	T	-1	6	-50	0
7	2	3	N	A	-1	6	-100	5
8	2	5	S	6	+2	6	440	4
9	3	4	S	A	-1	1	-50	5
10	3	3	E	K	-1	1	100	2
11	3	4	N	3	+2	1	480	0
12	3	3 NT	W	T	-3	1	150	1
13	6	2 NT	S	5	+2	4	180	10
14	6	4 x	W	2	-4	4	800	0
15	6	2 NT	N	K	-2	4	-200	10
16	6	3	W	5	-1	4	100	1
17	4	2	N	2	+2	2	170	4
18	4	5	E	Q	=	2	-400	10
19	4	3 NT	S	5	+4	2	520	8
20	4	3 NT	S	5	=	2	600	3
21	1	4	E	9	-1	5	050	7
22	1	2	N	A	-1	5	-50	4
23	1	4	S	A	-1	5	-100	6
24	1	2 NT	W	5	+3	5	-210	0

EW pair 6

Section b

David Fortune
Glenda Chalmers

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1	2	N	3	+2	6	130	8
2	1	4	N	K	-2	6	-200	10
3	1	4 NT	E	5	-2	6	200	0
4	1	2	E	4	+3	6	-200	8
5	2	2	N	5	+1	1	140	4
6	2	4 x	N	A	-3	1	-500	8
7	2	4	N	2	-1	1	-100	5
8	2	6	S	9	=	1	920	1
9	5	3	S	K	-1	4	-50	5
10	5	3	W	2	+1	4	-170	4
11	5	2 NT	S	5	+2	4	180	8
12	5	3 NT	W	7	-2	4	100	4
13	3	3 NT	N	7	+1	2	630	3
14	3	1	S	A	-1	2	-50	6
15	3	4	S	A	+1	2	650	2
16	3	3	W	J	=	2	-140	7
17	6	4	S	K	-1	5	-50	9
18	6	4	W	9	-2	5	100	0
19	6	3 NT	S	5	+4	5	520	8
20	6	2 NT	N	A	+2	5	180	9
21	4	4	E	9	-1	3	050	7
22	4	3	S	8	-2	3	-100	9
23	4	4	S	A	-1	3	-100	6
24	4	5	W	A	+1	3	-420	2