Te Anau Bridge Club        

Back to event

---

View by:

board

NS pairs

EW pairs

---

Hand records



Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Kepler Pairs (2018) 31 October

NS pair 1 Section a Jill McChlery David Fortune	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 1 5 W J +1 1 -420 70 2 1 2 E 3 +1 1 -140 0 3 1 1 S A +3 1 170 100 4 1 4 S A +1 1 650 70 5 2 4 N A +1 7 650 80 6 2 2 E A = 7 -110 100 7 2 3 N A = 7 140 120 8 2 4 x S A -1 7 -100 40 9 3 4 N 8 = 6 130 60 10 3 3 NT W Q -1 6 100 100 11 3 3 N 5 -2 6 -100 40 12 3 2 x E A -2 6 300 60 13 4 3 N 3 +2 5 200 50 14 4 5 S 9 +1 5 420 90 15 4 4 x N A +2 5 1190 120 16 4 4 W 4 +3 5 -710 70 17 5 3 N Q = 4 140 80 18 5 2 W 2 +2 4 -170 60 19 5 2 NT S Q -3 4 -150 30 20 5 1 NT S 3 -3 4 -300 20 21 6 3 NT E 8 -2 3 100 110 22 6 2 E 2 +2 3 -170 80 23 6 5 N 2 +1 3 620 110 24 6 1 NT E 3 +1 3 -120 60 25 7 3 W 9 -3 2 300 120 26 7 4 W 8 +1 2 -650 60 27 7 4 W 6 +1 2 -450 30 28 7 3 NT E 3 -1 2 050 100
NS pair 2 Section a Olwyn Brown Phil Denny	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 7 5 W T +1 3 -420 70 2 7 2 W A -1 3 050 70 3 7 2 S 7 +3 3 200 120 4 7 4 S A = 3 620 10 5 1 4 N A +1 2 650 80 6 1 2 E 9 +1 2 -140 40 7 1 4 x S Q -2 2 -500 0 8 1 3 S A +1 2 170 110 9 2 3 W 3 -1 1 100 40 10 2 4 E A = 1 -620 50 11 2 2 N Q +1 1 140 120 12 2 2 N A +1 1 140 40 13 3 3 N K +2 7 200 50 14 3 3 E A -2 7 100 20 15 3 3 E T = 7 -140 0 16 3 4 W 8 +3 7 -710 70 17 4 4 N K -1 6 -50 20 18 4 3 NT W 2 = 6 -400 10 19 4 3 S Q -1 6 -50 60 20 4 2 NT S 2 -4 6 -400 0 21 5 4 W +2 5 -480 30 22 5 PASS N 5 0 100 23 5 PASS N 5 0 40 24 5 PASS N 5 0 80 25 6 2 E T = 4 -110 30 26 6 4 W T +2 4 -680 10 27 6 4 W A +1 4 -450 30 28 6 2 E 6 = 4 -110 80
NS pair 3 Section a Joanna Mundie Richard Mundie	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 6 3 NT E A +2 5 -460 10 2 6 2 N J -1 5 -100 40 3 6 4 S 7 -2 5 -100 30 4 6 4 S A +1 5 650 70 5 7 4 N A = 4 620 40 6 7 2 NT S A -4 4 -200 0 7 7 3 E A = 4 -110 40 8 7 5 W 7 -1 4 050 60 9 1 2 NT x S A +1 3 590 100 10 1 4 E 9 = 3 -620 50 11 1 4 N Q -2 3 -100 40 12 1 3 NT N 7 = 3 600 80 13 2 1 NT W 4 -1 2 100 0 14 2 5 S Q +1 2 420 90 15 2 4 E 5 -1 2 050 20 16 2 6 W 8 +1 2 -1460 0 17 3 3 W 3 -1 1 050 40 18 3 2 NT E 2 +3 1 -210 40 19 3 4 S A -3 1 -150 30 20 3 3 N 3 -1 1 -100 70 21 4 4 E 8 +2 7 -480 30 22 4 4 E A +1 7 -650 10 23 4 5 N 9 -1 7 -100 20 24 4 4 W 4 = 7 -420 30 25 5 2 E J +1 6 -140 0 26 5 4 W 5 +1 6 -650 60 27 5 4 W 5 -1 6 050 110 28 5 3 W 5 = 6 -140 60
NS pair 4 Section a Roy Reid Trevor Scott Smith	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 5 3 NT E A +2 7 -460 10 2 5 2 NT E A -2 7 100 100 3 5 4 S A -2 7 -100 30 4 5 5 N 9 +2 7 710 120 5 6 6 S 3 -1 6 -100 20 6 6 2 E A = 6 -110 100 7 6 2 S A -1 6 -100 60 8 6 2 W 2 +2 6 -130 10 9 7 5 x S 2 -4 5 -800 0 10 7 4 E A = 5 -620 50 11 7 3 S 2 +1 5 130 100 12 7 4 S 3 -1 5 -100 10 13 1 4 N 3 = 4 620 100 14 1 4 E A -3 4 150 40 15 1 4 N A +1 4 650 60 16 1 4 W 2 +3 4 -710 70 17 2 3 NT S 6 -3 3 -150 0 18 2 1 NT E 3 -1 3 050 100 19 2 3 S Q = 3 110 80 20 2 1 NT S 3 -2 3 -200 40 21 3 2 NT E K +1 2 -150 80 22 3 4 E A = 2 -620 40 23 3 5 N K -2 2 -200 0 24 3 4 E 3 = 2 -420 30 25 4 2 E 9 = 1 -110 30 26 4 3 W 8 +2 1 -200 110 27 4 4 W 6 +1 1 -450 30 28 4 3 NT E 3 = 1 -400 30
NS pair 5 Section a Ruth Slee Fraser Elder	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 4 5 W J = 2 -400 100 2 4 2 E 8 -1 2 050 70 3 4 3 N 7 -1 2 -50 80 4 4 4 S A +1 2 650 70 5 5 6 x S Q -1 1 -200 0 6 5 2 E A +1 1 -140 40 7 5 4 E A -1 1 100 80 8 5 3 S A +1 1 170 110 9 6 4 x N 6 +1 7 610 120 10 6 4 E A -2 7 200 120 11 6 3 NT S 9 -2 7 -100 40 12 6 4 N A = 7 620 100 13 7 3 N 3 +1 6 170 20 14 7 2 E A +1 6 -140 0 15 7 4 x N A = 6 790 80 16 7 4 W 3 +3 6 -710 70 17 1 2 E 4 -2 5 100 60 18 1 3 NT E 3 -1 5 050 100 19 1 2 N S 5 = 5 120 110 20 1 3 S 4 = 5 140 110 21 2 3 NT E 8 -2 4 100 110 22 2 4 E 2 -1 4 100 120 23 2 5 N A +1 4 620 110 24 2 3 NT E 4 -1 4 050 110 25 3 2 S 2 = 3 110 80 26 3 3 W 4 +2 3 -200 110 27 3 4 W 6 +1 3 -450 30 28 3 3 NT W 2 = 3 -400 30
NS pair 6 Section a Janet Ciaffoni Tim Smith	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 3 4 W 5 +1 4 -450 40 2 3 2 W A +1 4 -110 20 3 3 4 S A -2 4 -100 30 4 3 4 S A +1 4 650 70 5 4 4 N 9 +1 3 650 80 6 4 2 E 2 +1 3 -140 40 7 4 2 N 2 = 3 110 100 8 4 3 W Q +1 3 -130 10 9 5 5 N 8 -2 2 -100 20 10 5 4 E 3 +1 2 -650 0 11 5 2 NT S 9 = 2 120 80 12 5 4 N 3 -1 2 -100 10 13 6 4 N K = 1 620 100 14 6 5 x E A -2 1 300 60 15 6 4 x N K +1 1 990 100 16 6 4 W 2 +3 1 -710 70 17 7 3 E 4 -3 7 150 110 18 7 3 NT E 3 -1 7 050 100 19 7 4 NT x S Q -6 7 -1400 0 20 7 2 N 3 +1 7 140 110 21 1 4 W 4 +2 6 -480 30 22 1 3 NT W 2 = 6 -600 60 23 1 3 N A = 6 110 60 24 1 4 E 4 -1 6 050 110 25 2 2 S J -1 5 -50 60 26 2 4 W 8 +1 5 -650 60 27 2 4 W 4 -1 5 050 110 28 2 3 NT E 3 +1 5 -430 0
NS pair 7 Section a Linda Brown Kathleen Meredith	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 2 2 NT E 7 +3 6 -210 120 2 2 3 NT W A -3 6 150 120 3 2 4 S 5 -2 6 -100 30 4 2 4 S A = 6 620 10 5 3 4 N A +2 5 680 120 6 3 2 E 2 = 5 -110 100 7 3 4 E A +1 5 -150 20 8 3 3 NT W Q -2 5 100 80 9 4 3 W A -3 4 300 80 10 4 4 E 9 = 4 -620 50 11 4 4 N Q -4 4 -200 0 12 4 4 N A +1 4 650 120 13 5 4 N T = 3 620 100 14 5 5 N 3 +2 3 440 120 15 5 3 N 7 +2 3 200 40 16 5 4 W T +3 3 -710 70 17 6 2 NT S 8 +1 2 150 110 18 6 3 NT E 3 = 2 -400 10 19 6 2 NT S 5 = 2 120 110 20 6 3 S 4 -1 2 -100 70 21 7 4 W J +2 1 -480 30 22 7 4 E A +1 1 -650 10 23 7 3 N K +2 1 150 80 24 7 4 E 3 +1 1 -450 0 25 1 2 E 5 -2 7 200 100 26 1 4 W 4 +2 7 -680 10 27 1 4 W 6 = 7 -420 80 28 1 4 E 4 -2 7 100 120