Te Anau Bridge Club : Detailed data for Livingstone Pairs

View by:

EW pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Livingstone Pairs 19 August

EW pair 1

Section b

Adrienne Lush
Johnny Angell

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1	3 NT	N	3	+2	1	460	0
2	1	5 x	N	J	-2	1	-500	8
3	1	2	E	Q	+1	1	-140	4
4	1	4	S	9	=	1	620	2
5	1	4	W	T	-4	1	200	0
6	4	1 NT	E	4	-1	4	100	1
7	4	2	W	5	+1	4	-140	8
8	4	5 x	S	A	-3	4	-500	8
9	4	4	W	8	=	4	-130	0
10	4	2	W	K	+1	4	-140	2
11	2	3 NT	W	Q	-2	2	100	6
12	2	1	S	A	-2	2	-200	6
13	2	1 NT	W	K	=	2	-90	4
14	2	4	S	J	+1	2	450	7
15	2	2 NT	W	2	-2	2	100	0
16	5	2 NT	E	A	-1	5	100	3
17	5	3	S	A	=	5	140	3
18	5	1 NT	W	5	-1	5	050	1
19	5	4	N	T	-1	5	-50	5
20	5	5 x	N	A	=	5	750	0
21	3	2	S	7	=	3	090	4
22	3	3 NT	N	7	+1	3	430	2
23	3	1	S	J	+1	3	110	8
24	3	2	W	3	+1	3	-140	8
25	3	3	W	J	-3	3	300	2

EW pair 2

Section b

Lathee Verrall
Sherron Tamatea-Scown

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	3	3 NT	N	9	-1	4	-50	5
2	3	4	E	4	+1	4	-450	5
3	3	3 NT	E	5	=	4	-600	8
4	3	4	S	8	-1	4	-100	6
5	3	1 NT	W	4	+1	4	-120	8
6	1	1 NT	E	4	-1	2	100	1
7	1	1 NT	W	3	=	2	-90	4
8	1	3	E	A	+1	2	-170	4
9	1	3 NT	E	2	=	2	-600	5
10	1	3 NT	E	Q	=	2	-600	6
11	4	2	S	7	+1	5	140	1
12	4	3 NT	W	7	-2	5	100	0
13	4	1 NT	W	K	+1	5	-120	7
14	4	4	S	6	+1	5	450	7
15	4	1 NT	E	3	=	5	-90	5
16	2	2 NT	E	T	-2	3	200	0
17	2	5	S	J	-2	3	-100	8
18	2	2	W	2	=	3	-110	5
19	2	3	S	5	-1	3	-50	5
20	2	5 x	N	A	-2	3	-500	6
21	5	3	W	A	-1	1	050	7
22	5	3 NT	N	7	+1	1	430	2
23	5	3 NT	N	9	+2	1	660	1
24	5	3	W	A	-1	1	050	2
25	5	5	N	A	=	1	400	0

EW pair 3

Section b

Dot McKay
Trish Rehutai

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	5	3 NT	N	K	+1	2	430	2
2	5	3	W	K	+2	2	-200	0
3	5	2 NT	W	4	-4	2	400	1
4	5	2	E	T	-3	2	300	4
5	5	1	E	3	=	2	-80	4
6	3	1 NT	S	3	-2	5	-100	4
7	3	1	S	4	=	5	070	2
8	3	1	S	2	+1	5	090	0
9	3	3 NT	W	6	=	5	-600	5
10	3	3	N	K	-1	5	-100	0
11	1	2	E	A	-2	3	100	6
12	1	2	W	5	-1	3	050	2
13	1	1 NT	W	3	+1	3	-120	7
14	1	3 NT	N	J	+2	3	460	3
15	1	3	S	6	-1	3	-100	8
16	4	2	N	5	-2	1	-100	8
17	4	2	N	A	+2	1	170	0
18	4	1 NT	W	5	-1	1	050	1
19	4	4	S	5	=	1	420	0
20	4	3	N	J	=	1	110	2
21	2	3	W	A	-1	4	050	7
22	2	3 NT	N	Q	+1	4	430	2
23	2	3 NT	S	4	+1	4	630	5
24	2	3	W	A	-1	4	050	2
25	2	2 NT	N	K	+1	4	150	5

EW pair 4

Section b

Trevor Lyall
Shirley Whyte

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	2	4 NT	N	7	-1	5	-50	5
2	2	4	W	K	=	5	-420	2
3	2	2	E	5	+2	5	-170	6
4	2	4	S	4	-2	5	-200	8
5	2	3	E	3	-3	5	150	2
6	5	2	S	J	-3	3	-150	8
7	5	2	W	3	=	3	-110	6
8	5	5	S	A	-3	3	-150	2
9	5	3	E	2	+2	3	-200	2
10	5	4	E	T	=	3	-620	8
11	3	2	E	A	-2	1	100	6
12	3	1	S	A	-2	1	-200	6
13	3	1	S	A	+1	1	110	0
14	3	3 NT	N	5	+2	1	460	3
15	3	1	E	4	=	1	-80	2
16	1	1 NT	E	A	-1	4	100	3
17	1	2	N	A	+1	4	140	3
18	1	1	E	4	+1	4	-110	5
19	1	4	N	T	-1	4	-50	5
20	1	3	W	A	+2	4	-200	4
21	4	3	W	A	-2	2	100	2
22	4	2	W	A	-4	2	400	6
23	4	3 NT	S	9	+1	2	630	5
24	4	2	W	A	=	2	-110	6
25	4	2	W	K	-1	2	100	8

EW pair 5

Section b

Diana Burrows
Margaret Henderson

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	4	5 NT	N	K	-2	3	-100	8
2	4	4	E	A	+1	3	-450	5
3	4	3 NT	E	5	-4	3	400	1
4	4	4	S	T	+1	3	650	0
5	4	2	N	A	-1	3	-100	6
6	2	2	E	9	=	1	-110	6
7	2	1 NT	S	3	=	1	090	0
8	2	3	E	A	+2	1	-200	6
9	2	3 NT	E	2	+1	1	-630	8
10	2	1 NT	E	T	+2	1	-150	4
11	5	2	S	2	+1	4	140	1
12	5	2	N	K	-2	4	-200	6
13	5	1 NT	W	K	-1	4	100	2
14	5	3 NT	N	4	+3	4	490	0
15	5	1 NT	E	3	=	4	-90	5
16	3	1 NT	E	3	=	2	-90	6
17	3	2	E	A	-1	2	050	6
18	3	2	W	2	+1	2	-140	8
19	3	4	N	A	-1	2	-50	5
20	3	4 x	E	A	=	2	-790	8
21	1	3	S	7	+1	5	130	0
22	1	3	N	7	=	5	140	8
23	1	3 NT	S	5	+2	5	660	1
24	1	3	W	J	-1	5	050	2
25	1	3	N	A	+2	5	150	5