Te Anau Bridge Club : Detailed data for Livingstone Pairs

View by:

NS pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Livingstone Pairs 19 August

NS pair 1

Section b

Maggie Stratford
Janet Ciaffoni

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1	3 NT	N	3	+2	1	460	8
2	1	5 x	N	J	-2	1	-500	0
3	1	2	E	Q	+1	1	-140	4
4	1	4	S	9	=	1	620	6
5	1	4	W	T	-4	1	200	8
6	2	2	E	9	=	5	-110	2
7	2	1 NT	S	3	=	5	090	8
8	2	3	E	A	+2	5	-200	2
9	2	3 NT	E	2	+1	5	-630	0
10	2	1 NT	E	T	+2	5	-150	4
11	3	2	E	A	-2	4	100	2
12	3	1	S	A	-2	4	-200	2
13	3	1	S	A	+1	4	110	8
14	3	3 NT	N	5	+2	4	460	5
15	3	1	E	4	=	4	-80	6
16	4	2	N	5	-2	3	-100	0
17	4	2	N	A	+2	3	170	8
18	4	1 NT	W	5	-1	3	050	7
19	4	4	S	5	=	3	420	8
20	4	3	N	J	=	3	110	6
21	5	3	W	A	-1	2	050	1
22	5	3 NT	N	7	+1	2	430	6
23	5	3 NT	N	9	+2	2	660	7
24	5	3	W	A	-1	2	050	6
25	5	5	N	A	=	2	400	8

NS pair 2

Section b

Roy Reid
Tania Ward

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	5	3 NT	N	K	+1	3	430	6
2	5	3	W	K	+2	3	-200	8
3	5	2 NT	W	4	-4	3	400	7
4	5	2	E	T	-3	3	300	4
5	5	1	E	3	=	3	-80	4
6	1	1 NT	E	4	-1	2	100	7
7	1	1 NT	W	3	=	2	-90	4
8	1	3	E	A	+1	2	-170	4
9	1	3 NT	E	2	=	2	-600	3
10	1	3 NT	E	Q	=	2	-600	2
11	2	3 NT	W	Q	-2	1	100	2
12	2	1	S	A	-2	1	-200	2
13	2	1 NT	W	K	=	1	-90	4
14	2	4	S	J	+1	1	450	1
15	2	2 NT	W	2	-2	1	100	8
16	3	1 NT	E	3	=	5	-90	2
17	3	2	E	A	-1	5	050	2
18	3	2	W	2	+1	5	-140	0
19	3	4	N	A	-1	5	-50	3
20	3	4 x	E	A	=	5	-790	0
21	4	3	W	A	-2	4	100	6
22	4	2	W	A	-4	4	400	2
23	4	3 NT	S	9	+1	4	630	3
24	4	2	W	A	=	4	-110	2
25	4	2	W	K	-1	4	100	0

NS pair 3

Section b

Bruce Campbell
Sue Chartres

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	4	5 NT	N	K	-2	5	-100	0
2	4	4	E	A	+1	5	-450	3
3	4	3 NT	E	5	-4	5	400	7
4	4	4	S	T	+1	5	650	8
5	4	2	N	A	-1	5	-100	2
6	5	2	S	J	-3	4	-150	0
7	5	2	W	3	=	4	-110	2
8	5	5	S	A	-3	4	-150	6
9	5	3	E	2	+2	4	-200	6
10	5	4	E	T	=	4	-620	0
11	1	2	E	A	-2	3	100	2
12	1	2	W	5	-1	3	050	6
13	1	1 NT	W	3	+1	3	-120	1
14	1	3 NT	N	J	+2	3	460	5
15	1	3	S	6	-1	3	-100	0
16	2	2 NT	E	T	-2	2	200	8
17	2	5	S	J	-2	2	-100	0
18	2	2	W	2	=	2	-110	3
19	2	3	S	5	-1	2	-50	3
20	2	5 x	N	A	-2	2	-500	2
21	3	2	S	7	=	1	090	4
22	3	3 NT	N	7	+1	1	430	6
23	3	1	S	J	+1	1	110	0
24	3	2	W	3	+1	1	-140	0
25	3	3	W	J	-3	1	300	6

NS pair 4

Section b

Joan Cockburn
Marg Hughes

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	3	3 NT	N	9	-1	2	-50	3
2	3	4	E	4	+1	2	-450	3
3	3	3 NT	E	5	=	2	-600	0
4	3	4	S	8	-1	2	-100	2
5	3	1 NT	W	4	+1	2	-120	0
6	4	1 NT	E	4	-1	1	100	7
7	4	2	W	5	+1	1	-140	0
8	4	5 x	S	A	-3	1	-500	0
9	4	4	W	8	=	1	-130	8
10	4	2	W	K	+1	1	-140	6
11	5	2	S	2	+1	5	140	7
12	5	2	N	K	-2	5	-200	2
13	5	1 NT	W	K	-1	5	100	6
14	5	3 NT	N	4	+3	5	490	8
15	5	1 NT	E	3	=	5	-90	3
16	1	1 NT	E	A	-1	4	100	5
17	1	2	N	A	+1	4	140	5
18	1	1	E	4	+1	4	-110	3
19	1	4	N	T	-1	4	-50	3
20	1	3	W	A	+2	4	-200	4
21	2	3	W	A	-1	3	050	1
22	2	3 NT	N	Q	+1	3	430	6
23	2	3 NT	S	4	+1	3	630	3
24	2	3	W	A	-1	3	050	6
25	2	2 NT	N	K	+1	3	150	3

NS pair 5

Section b

Jan Ludemann
Marie Galland

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	2	4 NT	N	7	-1	4	-50	3
2	2	4	W	K	=	4	-420	6
3	2	2	E	5	+2	4	-170	2
4	2	4	S	4	-2	4	-200	0
5	2	3	E	3	-3	4	150	6
6	3	1 NT	S	3	-2	3	-100	4
7	3	1	S	4	=	3	070	6
8	3	1	S	2	+1	3	090	8
9	3	3 NT	W	6	=	3	-600	3
10	3	3	N	K	-1	3	-100	8
11	4	2	S	7	+1	2	140	7
12	4	3 NT	W	7	-2	2	100	8
13	4	1 NT	W	K	+1	2	-120	1
14	4	4	S	6	+1	2	450	1
15	4	1 NT	E	3	=	2	-90	3
16	5	2 NT	E	A	-1	1	100	5
17	5	3	S	A	=	1	140	5
18	5	1 NT	W	5	-1	1	050	7
19	5	4	N	T	-1	1	-50	3
20	5	5 x	N	A	=	1	750	8
21	1	3	S	7	+1	5	130	8
22	1	3	N	7	=	5	140	0
23	1	3 NT	S	5	+2	5	660	7
24	1	3	W	J	-1	5	050	6
25	1	3	N	A	+2	5	150	3