Te Anau Bridge Club        

Back to event

---

View by:

board

NS pairs

EW pairs

---

Hand records



Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Manapouri Pairs (2025) 28 May

EW pair 1 Section b Marg Hughes Sue Chartres	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 1 5 S A -2 1 -100 8 2 1 3 S A -3 1 -300 4 3 1 4 W 9 +1 1 -150 2 4 1 3 NT N 8 -2 1 -200 7 5 4 4 N Q -1 4 -100 6 6 4 2 N T +2 4 170 6 7 4 2 S K -2 4 -200 8 8 4 2 NT E 3 = 4 -120 2 9 2 4 E Q +1 2 -650 5 10 2 5 S 2 = 2 600 4 11 2 4 S 2 +1 2 450 4 12 2 2 W J -1 2 050 7 13 5 4 W A = 5 -620 7 14 5 2 N Q +1 5 140 3 15 5 2 E Q +1 5 -110 4 16 5 3 NT E 7 = 5 -600 8 17 3 3 S A -1 3 -50 2 18 3 3 NT N 3 = 3 600 6 19 3 4 NT E J -4 3 400 0 20 3 3 NT W 5 +1 3 -630 7 21 6 6 – -9999 22 6 6 – -9999 23 6 6 – -9999 24 6 6 – -9999
EW pair 2 Section b Ruth Slee Bruce Campbell	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 3 3 S A -1 4 -50 6 2 3 3 NT E 3 +1 4 -430 7 3 3 3 NT E 4 = 4 -600 6 4 3 2 S 4 = 4 110 4 5 1 4 N 6 -2 2 -200 8 6 1 3 S 3 +2 2 200 3 7 1 2 E K -2 2 200 1 8 1 3 NT E J = 2 -400 6 9 4 2 E Q +3 5 -200 0 10 4 5 S 4 -1 5 -100 8 11 4 4 S 3 +1 5 450 4 12 4 3 E 3 -2 5 100 3 13 2 3 W 3 -1 3 100 2 14 2 2 N A +1 3 140 3 15 2 1 NT E 7 +3 3 -180 7 16 2 2 NT E 2 = 3 -120 2 17 5 6 – -9999 18 5 6 – -9999 19 5 6 – -9999 20 5 6 – -9999 21 6 2 N J -2 1 -200 8 22 6 4 N A -1 1 -50 7 23 6 3 S 3 +1 1 170 5 24 6 4 W 2 = 1 -420 5
EW pair 3 Section b Jan Ludemann Tim Smith	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 6 3 NT S A +1 2 430 3 2 6 3 NT E 3 +1 2 -430 7 3 6 3 NT E 4 = 2 -600 6 4 6 3 NT N 2 -2 2 -200 7 5 3 2 NT N 6 = 5 120 2 6 3 2 S T +3 5 200 3 7 3 3 W 4 -2 5 200 1 8 3 4 W T +1 5 -450 8 9 1 3 NT E Q +2 3 -660 8 10 1 3 NT N 4 +1 3 630 0 11 1 4 S 8 +1 3 450 4 12 1 3 E 3 -1 3 050 7 13 4 6 – -9999 14 4 6 – -9999 15 4 6 – -9999 16 4 6 – -9999 17 5 4 S A -3 1 -150 6 18 5 3 NT N 4 +3 1 690 0 19 5 4 E 3 = 1 -620 6 20 5 4 E 6 -1 1 100 0 21 2 2 E T = 4 -90 4 22 2 2 N A +1 4 140 3 23 2 3 S 4 -1 4 -100 8 24 2 4 W 7 = 4 -420 5
EW pair 4 Section b Caryl Marshall Adrienne Lush	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 2 3 NT S 7 +2 5 460 0 2 2 2 S A -1 5 -100 0 3 2 5 E Q = 5 -600 6 4 2 3 NT S 3 = 5 600 2 5 6 2 N J +1 3 140 0 6 6 3 NT N 3 = 3 400 0 7 6 2 N 2 -1 3 -100 5 8 6 3 W Q +1 3 -170 4 9 3 6 – -9999 10 3 6 – -9999 11 3 6 – -9999 12 3 6 – -9999 13 4 2 N 4 +1 1 140 0 14 4 2 N 9 = 1 110 6 15 4 1 NT E 8 +3 1 -180 7 16 4 2 NT E 3 +1 1 -150 6 17 1 2 W 8 +2 4 -170 8 18 1 3 N 5 +1 4 130 8 19 1 3 W Q +2 4 -200 4 20 1 3 E 2 = 4 -140 2 21 5 2 NT E 2 -2 2 100 1 22 5 4 N A -1 2 -50 7 23 5 4 S 3 +2 2 680 1 24 5 3 NT E K -3 2 150 0
EW pair 5 Section b Wendy Holder Dot McKay	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 5 3 NT S T +1 3 430 3 2 5 3 S J -2 3 -200 2 3 5 5 E Q -1 3 100 0 4 5 3 NT S A +1 3 630 0 5 2 6 – -9999 6 2 6 – -9999 7 2 6 – -9999 8 2 6 – -9999 9 3 4 E Q +1 1 -650 5 10 3 5 S A = 1 600 4 11 3 4 S K +1 1 450 4 12 3 3 S 9 +1 1 130 0 13 6 3 W 5 +1 4 -170 4 14 6 2 E 3 = 4 -110 8 15 6 2 W 2 = 4 -90 1 16 6 1 E A +2 4 -140 4 17 4 2 S A +1 2 140 0 18 4 3 NT N 5 +1 2 630 4 19 4 3 NT W 2 +2 2 -660 8 20 4 3 NT W 5 +1 2 -630 7 21 1 2 E J +1 5 -110 6 22 1 2 NT S 3 +1 5 150 0 23 1 2 S K +2 5 170 5 24 1 2 NT E 9 +1 5 -150 2
EW pair 6 Section b Linda Bolger Kathy Singleton	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 1 6 – -9999 2 1 6 – -9999 3 1 6 – -9999 4 1 6 – -9999 5 2 2 N 9 = 1 110 4 6 2 2 N K +3 1 150 8 7 2 3 S K -1 1 -100 5 8 2 3 W 9 -2 1 100 0 9 5 4 E Q = 4 -620 2 10 5 5 N Q = 4 600 4 11 5 4 S 3 +1 4 450 4 12 5 3 E 5 -2 4 100 3 13 3 4 W 4 = 2 -620 7 14 3 2 NT W 2 -5 2 250 0 15 3 2 E 7 = 2 -90 1 16 3 1 NT E 2 -1 2 100 0 17 6 1 W A +2 5 -110 4 18 6 3 NT N J +2 5 660 2 19 6 4 W T -1 5 100 2 20 6 2 NT W J +1 5 -150 4 21 4 3 W A -2 3 100 1 22 4 3 N K = 3 140 3 23 4 4 S 9 +2 3 680 1 24 4 3 x W 6 +1 3 -630 8