Te Anau Bridge Club        

Back to event

---

View by:

board

NS pairs

EW pairs

---

Hand records



Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Luxmore Pairs (2024) 24 April

EW pair 1 Section b Johnny Angell Sherron Tamatea-Scown	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 1 3 N Q -1 1 -50 4 2 1 2 NT N 2 -1 1 -100 11 3 1 3 S A = 1 140 6 4 5 2 E 3 +1 5 -110 4 5 5 2 E 3 = 5 -110 12 6 5 3 NT W 5 -2 5 200 0 7 2 4 S 5 +1 2 650 4 8 2 2 E Q +2 2 -170 5 9 2 2 N A +1 2 110 4 10 6 1 NT x W 8 -1 6 200 0 11 6 3 NT W 6 -2 6 100 7 12 6 2 W 7 -1 6 050 3 13 3 3 S 8 +1 3 130 0 14 3 4 W K -2 3 100 6 15 3 4 E J -2 3 100 1 16 7 5 W K = 7 -650 7 17 7 3 N 3 -1 7 -50 2 18 7 4 x E K -2 7 300 0 19 4 3 NT E 2 +1 4 -630 12 20 4 3 NT N Q +3 4 690 3 21 4 5 x N A -2 4 -500 11 22 8 8 – -9999 23 8 8 – -9999 24 8 8 – -9999
EW pair 2 Section b Janet Ciaffoni Bruce Campbell	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 4 4 W A -1 5 050 0 2 4 1 NT N 2 = 5 090 8 3 4 4 S 4 = 5 420 2 4 1 4 S A -2 2 -200 10 5 1 3 E 3 -1 2 050 8 6 1 3 NT E 2 = 2 -600 9 7 5 3 S 7 +1 6 170 10 8 5 3 E J = 6 -140 0 9 5 3 E J = 6 -140 11 10 2 1 NT W 8 +4 3 -210 3 11 2 4 E 3 -2 3 100 7 12 2 2 W A = 3 -110 9 13 6 3 W Q -1 7 100 4 14 6 3 W 6 -1 7 050 8 15 6 3 N A -2 7 -200 9 16 3 5 W K = 4 -650 7 17 3 1 NT W 3 = 4 -90 6 18 3 5 x N A -2 4 -500 12 19 7 8 – -9999 20 7 8 – -9999 21 7 8 – -9999 22 8 4 S 2 = 1 420 3 23 8 3 S 3 +1 1 130 12 24 8 1 NT W 3 +1 1 -120 4
EW pair 3 Section b Alan Jacobson Ken Hamilton	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 8 3 W A +1 2 -130 12 2 8 3 S 4 = 2 110 6 3 8 4 E K -1 2 100 8 4 4 4 W 6 = 6 -620 12 5 4 1 NT N 3 +1 6 120 0 6 4 4 W 9 -1 6 100 4 7 1 4 S 7 +1 3 650 4 8 1 2 E T +2 3 -170 5 9 1 3 N 4 = 3 110 4 10 5 4 E 8 = 7 -620 6 11 5 4 E 3 -3 7 150 1 12 5 4 W A -2 7 100 0 13 2 2 W Q = 4 -110 9 14 2 4 N 4 +1 4 150 2 15 2 3 W K -1 4 050 4 16 6 8 – -9999 17 6 8 – -9999 18 6 8 – -9999 19 7 3 NT W T -1 1 100 4 20 7 4 x S J +2 1 1190 0 21 7 1 NT N 3 +1 1 120 4 22 3 3 S 9 = 5 140 10 23 3 2 S 3 +4 5 170 10 24 3 1 NT W 3 = 5 -90 0
EW pair 4 Section b Marie Galland Caryl Marshall	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 3 2 W A +1 6 -110 10 2 3 2 NT N 2 +1 6 150 2 3 3 3 E 8 = 6 -140 12 4 8 3 NT E 9 -1 3 100 1 5 8 1 NT N 3 -1 3 -100 10 6 8 2 NT E 2 -1 3 100 4 7 4 4 S 9 +2 7 680 0 8 4 4 x S J -2 7 -300 10 9 4 3 S Q = 7 110 4 10 1 2 NT W 2 +3 4 -210 3 11 1 6 W 2 -3 4 150 1 12 1 2 W A +1 4 -140 12 13 5 8 – -9999 14 5 8 – -9999 15 5 8 – -9999 16 6 4 x S A -1 1 -100 1 17 6 3 N 3 -1 1 -50 2 18 6 4 N A -2 1 -200 7 19 2 4 W 4 -1 5 100 4 20 2 3 NT N 4 +1 5 630 8 21 2 5 x S A -2 5 -500 11 22 7 2 S J +2 2 170 8 23 7 3 NT S 3 +2 2 660 2 24 7 1 W K +3 2 -170 8
EW pair 5 Section b Jan Jacobson Marg Hughes	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 7 3 N Q -2 3 -100 8 2 7 1 NT N 2 +1 3 120 4 3 7 4 S 3 = 3 420 2 4 3 3 E 9 +1 7 -130 6 5 3 3 E 3 -2 7 100 4 6 3 3 NT E 5 +1 7 -630 12 7 8 4 S 9 = 4 620 8 8 8 2 E 7 +2 4 -170 5 9 8 3 S Q = 4 110 4 10 4 8 – -9999 11 4 8 – -9999 12 4 8 – -9999 13 5 3 W Q -1 1 100 4 14 5 2 W 4 = 1 -110 10 15 5 2 NT N A -1 1 -100 6 16 1 5 x S A -1 5 -100 1 17 1 3 N 3 -2 5 -100 8 18 1 3 N A -1 5 -100 4 19 6 4 W 4 -2 2 200 0 20 6 3 NT N Q +1 2 630 8 21 6 4 S J -2 2 -200 8 22 2 3 NT N 5 = 6 400 6 23 2 3 NT S 3 = 6 600 8 24 2 3 S A -2 6 -100 2
EW pair 6 Section b Jan Ludemann Bill Verrall	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 2 3 S A -1 7 -50 4 2 2 3 NT S 4 = 7 600 0 3 2 4 S 3 = 7 420 2 4 7 3 E 5 -1 4 100 1 5 7 3 E 3 -2 4 100 4 6 7 3 NT W 2 -1 4 100 4 7 3 8 – -9999 8 3 8 – -9999 9 3 8 – -9999 10 4 3 NT E 2 +1 1 -630 10 11 4 4 W 5 -2 1 100 7 12 4 3 S K -1 1 -100 6 13 8 2 W 3 +1 5 -140 12 14 8 4 N J = 5 130 4 15 8 1 NT E 7 -2 5 100 1 16 5 5 W K +1 2 -680 11 17 5 5 W K = 2 -400 12 18 5 3 N A = 2 140 2 19 1 4 W A -1 6 100 4 20 1 3 NT N 4 +3 6 690 3 21 1 1 NT x N 3 = 6 180 2 22 6 4 S 9 = 3 420 3 23 6 3 NT N 5 +2 3 660 2 24 6 1 W K +3 3 -170 8
EW pair 7 Section b Maggie Stratford David Fortune	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 6 3 N Q -1 4 -50 4 2 6 3 NT N 2 -1 4 -100 11 3 6 4 x S A -1 4 -100 10 4 2 8 – -9999 5 2 8 – -9999 6 2 8 – -9999 7 3 4 S 7 -1 1 -100 12 8 3 4 E Q = 1 -420 12 9 3 2 E K +1 1 -140 11 10 7 3 NT E 2 +1 5 -630 10 11 7 4 E 3 -2 5 100 7 12 7 3 W 7 -1 5 050 3 13 4 2 W K -1 2 100 4 14 4 3 W K = 2 -140 12 15 4 4 W A = 2 -420 12 16 8 5 E K +1 6 -680 11 17 8 4 W K +2 6 -170 10 18 8 4 W Q = 6 -420 10 19 5 1 W 4 +2 3 -140 8 20 5 3 NT N Q +1 3 630 8 21 5 1 NT x N 3 +2 3 580 0 22 1 4 x S 2 = 7 590 0 23 1 3 NT S 3 +1 7 630 6 24 1 4 W K = 7 -420 12
EW pair 8 Section b Brian McCandless Glenda Chalmers	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 1 8 – -9999 2 1 8 – -9999 3 1 8 – -9999 4 2 3 E 5 +2 1 -150 8 5 2 2 W 4 -2 1 100 4 6 2 3 NT E 2 = 1 -600 9 7 6 4 S 9 +1 5 650 4 8 6 1 E Q +3 5 -170 5 9 6 3 S Q = 5 110 4 10 3 3 NT E 2 +1 2 -630 10 11 3 3 NT W 2 = 2 -400 12 12 3 2 W A = 2 -110 9 13 7 2 W 8 = 6 -110 9 14 7 5 x N A = 6 550 0 15 7 3 N A -2 6 -200 9 16 4 5 x S A -2 3 -300 4 17 4 3 N 3 -1 3 -50 2 18 4 3 N 4 -2 3 -200 7 19 8 2 W 4 +2 7 -170 10 20 8 6 NT N Q -2 7 -200 12 21 8 3 S 2 -1 7 -100 6 22 5 4 S 2 -1 4 -50 12 23 5 3 NT N T +2 4 660 2 24 5 1 W K +3 4 -170 8