Te Anau Bridge Club        

Back to event

---

View by:

board

NS pairs

EW pairs

---

Hand records



Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Friday Bridge (2016) 11 November

EW pair 1 Section a Brian McCandless Jill McChlery	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 1 3 NT W 2 = 1 -400 20 2 1 4 E A +1 1 -450 50 3 1 4 N 4 -3 1 -150 80 4 1 2 S A = 1 110 60 5 1 1 NT N A +2 1 150 60 6 4 4 W A -1 4 100 30 7 4 2 E 4 -1 4 100 60 8 4 4 x N 4 -1 4 -100 80 9 4 4 W 9 +1 4 -650 60 10 4 4 x S 3 -2 4 -500 80 11 2 2 S 3 -1 2 -50 40 12 2 1 NT N Q +2 2 150 20 13 2 3 S 2 +1 2 130 60 14 2 1 E 2 +2 2 -110 30 15 2 5 x E A -3 2 500 0 16 5 2 S 5 = 5 110 30 17 5 3 NT N 2 -1 5 -50 50 18 5 3 NT E 2 -2 5 100 0 19 5 3 NT E 5 +2 5 -660 70 20 5 2 S 5 = 5 110 30 21 3 2 NT N K +1 3 150 60 22 3 6 E A -1 3 100 10 23 3 2 N J +1 3 140 0 24 3 4 W K +2 3 -480 40 25 3 3 x S A -1 3 -100 40
EW pair 2 Section a Joan Cockburn Garth Stewart	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 3 3 NT W 3 = 4 -400 20 2 3 4 E A +1 4 -450 50 3 3 4 x N A = 4 590 20 4 3 3 N J -1 4 -100 80 5 3 4 N T -3 4 -300 80 6 1 4 W A -1 2 100 30 7 1 2 S 7 = 2 110 40 8 1 3 N 9 -1 2 -50 40 9 1 4 W J = 2 -620 10 10 1 5 N A -1 2 -100 60 11 4 2 S 3 = 5 110 0 12 4 3 N Q = 5 110 40 13 4 1 N Q +2 5 140 40 14 4 2 NT E 5 = 5 -120 60 15 4 2 W 6 -2 5 100 50 16 2 5 N Q -2 3 -100 60 17 2 3 NT S 9 -1 3 -50 50 18 2 4 W T +1 3 -450 70 19 2 3 NT E 3 -3 3 300 0 20 2 5 x N A -4 3 -1100 80 21 5 2 E A -4 1 200 40 22 5 4 S A -2 1 -100 40 23 5 2 W A +1 1 -110 60 24 5 4 W K +1 1 -450 0 25 5 3 x S A -2 1 -300 80
EW pair 3 Section a Marijke Schofield Ken Hamilton	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 5 3 NT W 2 +2 2 -460 80 2 5 4 E A +1 2 -450 50 3 5 5 S T = 2 450 60 4 5 3 S A +1 2 170 0 5 5 3 NT N A +1 2 630 30 6 3 3 W A = 5 -140 70 7 3 2 NT N 2 = 5 120 20 8 3 4 N 4 -1 5 -50 40 9 3 4 W T = 5 -620 10 10 3 3 E K -1 5 100 40 11 1 2 NT S 3 -2 3 -100 80 12 1 1 NT N J +4 3 210 0 13 1 4 x S A = 3 710 0 14 1 3 W Q = 3 -110 30 15 1 3 N A +1 3 170 20 16 4 4 W A -4 1 400 0 17 4 3 NT S J = 1 400 10 18 4 4 W 2 = 1 -420 30 19 4 2 E 2 +3 1 -150 40 20 4 2 S T = 1 110 30 21 2 2 E A -5 4 250 20 22 2 5 E A = 4 -650 70 23 2 2 N J = 4 110 30 24 2 4 W 6 +3 4 -510 80 25 2 3 x S A -1 4 -100 40
EW pair 4 Section a Kathleen Meredith June Birmingham	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 2 3 NT W 2 +1 5 -430 60 2 2 3 W 9 +2 5 -150 0 3 2 5 S 5 +1 5 480 40 4 2 2 N +1 5 140 30 5 2 3 NT N T +2 5 660 0 6 5 2 S A +3 3 150 0 7 5 3 NT N 3 = 3 600 0 8 5 4 N 6 -1 3 -50 40 9 5 4 W 8 +1 3 -650 60 10 5 3 NT N 5 +1 3 630 0 11 3 3 S 5 -1 1 -50 40 12 3 3 NT N Q -1 1 -100 60 13 3 2 S 7 +3 1 150 20 14 3 5 x E A -2 1 300 0 15 3 2 E A = 1 -110 80 16 1 3 E 4 = 4 -140 80 17 1 3 NT S 7 = 4 400 10 18 1 4 W 2 +1 4 -450 70 19 1 3 NT E 5 +2 4 -660 70 20 1 2 S T +2 4 170 0 21 4 2 x E A -4 2 800 0 22 4 4 E A +1 2 -650 70 23 4 3 N K -3 2 -300 80 24 4 4 W K +2 2 -480 40 25 4 4 S A -2 2 -100 40
EW pair 5 Section a Diana Burrows Ann Carran	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 4 3 NT W 2 = 3 -400 20 2 4 4 E A +1 3 -450 50 3 4 5 x N 5 +1 3 750 0 4 4 2 N 4 +1 3 140 30 5 4 3 NT N A +1 3 630 30 6 2 3 W A = 1 -140 70 7 2 2 N K = 1 090 80 8 2 5 E K -2 1 100 0 9 2 4 E A +1 1 -650 60 10 2 2 S 3 = 1 110 20 11 5 1 NT S 9 -1 4 -50 40 12 5 4 N T -2 4 -200 80 13 5 3 E 5 -1 4 100 80 14 5 2 E 8 +2 4 -130 80 15 5 4 E A -2 4 100 50 16 3 2 S 2 +1 2 110 30 17 3 3 NT S 9 -2 2 -100 80 18 3 4 W 4 = 2 -420 30 19 3 3 NT E 4 -2 2 200 20 20 3 4 S T -3 2 -300 60 21 1 2 N K +1 5 110 80 22 1 6 E A -1 5 100 10 23 1 2 N K = 5 110 30 24 1 4 E K +2 5 -480 40 25 1 3 S Q = 5 140 0