Te Anau Bridge Club : Detailed data for Murchison Pairs

View by:

EW pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Murchison Pairs 22 July

EW pair 1

Section b

Shirl Dennison
Jan Ludemann

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1	5	W	T	-3	1	150	3
2	1	4	W		+1	1	-450	8
3	1	2	S	K	-1	1	-50	8
4	1	2	E	Q	+2	1	-130	2
5	4	3	S	3	+2	4	150	6
6	4	3	N	K	-2	4	-100	4
7	4	2	N	4	=	4	110	0
8	4	4	S	4	+1	4	150	4
9	2	2	E	Q	+2	2	-170	8
10	2	4	N	8	+3	2	710	8
11	2	2	E	2	=	2	-110	5
12	2	1 NT	W	3	=	2	-90	2
13	5	2	E	8	=	5	-110	6
14	5	3	S	A	-2	5	-100	4
15	5	3	S	9	=	5	140	6
16	5	3 NT	N	6	+2	5	460	6
17	3					3	–	-9999
18	3					3	–	-9999
19	3					3	–	-9999
20	3					3	–	-9999
21	6	3 NT	N	3	-1	6	-100	4
22	6	2	S	2	+2	6	170	2
23	6	3 NT	E	Q	=	6	-600	4
24	6	2	E	A	-1	6	050	0

EW pair 2

Section b

Sue Chartres
Sherril Harries

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	3	4 NT	E	3	-5	4	250	0
2	3	4	W	A	=	4	-420	5
3	3	1 NT	E	3	-3	4	300	1
4	3	3	E	2	+3	4	-170	4
5	1	3 NT	S	3	+2	2	660	1
6	1	3	E	4	-1	2	100	2
7	1	2	E	Q	+2	2	-170	5
8	1	4	N	K	-2	2	-100	8
9	4	4	E	5	-1	5	100	0
10	4	3 NT	S	7	+4	5	720	5
11	4	4	W	A	-1	5	050	1
12	4	3 NT	W	A	+1	5	-430	8
13	2					3	–	-9999
14	2					3	–	-9999
15	2					3	–	-9999
16	2					3	–	-9999
17	5	2	E	4	=	6	-90	4
18	5	3 NT	N	T	+2	6	660	4
19	5	1 NT	S	J	+3	6	180	2
20	5	4	W	A	=	6	-620	8
21	6	2 NT	S	A	-2	1	-200	8
22	6	4	S	J	=	1	420	0
23	6	3 NT	W	7	+2	1	-660	8
24	6	2 NT	W	T	=	1	-120	6

EW pair 3

Section b

Glyn Saunders
Maggie Stratford

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	6	6	W	T	-3	2	150	3
2	6	3 NT	W	T	=	2	-400	2
3	6	2	S	J	+2	2	130	6
4	6	3 NT	E	6	+1	2	-630	7
5	3	3 NT	S	4	+1	5	630	4
6	3	4	W	5	=	5	-620	8
7	3	2	E	K	+2	5	-170	5
8	3	3	N	K	-1	5	-50	6
9	1					3	–	-9999
10	1					3	–	-9999
11	1					3	–	-9999
12	1					3	–	-9999
13	4	2	S	T	=	6	110	0
14	4	3	W	9	=	6	-140	6
15	4	4	S	3	+1	6	650	0
16	4	6 NT	N	K	=	6	990	0
17	5	2	E	K	=	1	-90	4
18	5	3 NT	N	T	+2	1	660	4
19	5	2	N	K	=	1	110	6
20	5	3	W	A	+1	1	-170	4
21	2	1	S	A	-1	4	-100	4
22	2	2	S	8	+1	4	140	4
23	2	6 NT	E	T	-5	4	500	0
24	2	2 NT	E	2	+1	4	-150	8

EW pair 4

Section b

Janet Ciaffoni
Margaret Henderson

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	2	3	W	T	=	5	-110	8
2	2	4	W	A	=	5	-420	5
3	2	2	W	8	-2	5	200	4
4	2	3 NT	W	5	+1	5	-630	7
5	6					3	–	-9999
6	6					3	–	-9999
7	6					3	–	-9999
8	6					3	–	-9999
9	3	2	E	Q	+1	6	-140	4
10	3	6 NT	N	2	+1	6	1470	0
11	3	2	E	T	+1	6	-140	8
12	3	2 NT	W	J	-2	6	100	0
13	4	2	E	7	+1	1	-140	8
14	4	2 NT	N	8	-1	1	-50	2
15	4	4	S	A	-1	1	-100	8
16	4	2	S	4	+3	1	200	8
17	1	1 NT	W	Q	+1	4	-120	8
18	1	1 NT	N	3	+1	4	120	8
19	1	3	S	J	+1	4	130	4
20	1	2	W	Q	+1	4	-140	2
21	5	2 NT	N	3	-1	2	-100	4
22	5	4	S	3	-1	2	-50	7
23	5	4	E	Q	+1	2	-650	6
24	5	2	N	A	-2	2	-100	3

EW pair 5

Section b

Dot McKay
Trevor Lyall

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	5					3	–	-9999
2	5					3	–	-9999
3	5					3	–	-9999
4	5					3	–	-9999
5	2	3 NT	S	3	+2	6	660	1
6	2	1	N	3	+2	6	110	0
7	2	3	E	K	+1	6	-170	5
8	2	4	N	6	=	6	420	0
9	3	2	E	Q	+1	1	-140	4
10	3	6	N	9	+1	1	1460	2
11	3	3	E	J	-1	1	050	1
12	3	3	W	3	=	1	-110	4
13	6	1 NT	N	A	-1	4	-100	4
14	6	2	W	7	-1	4	050	0
15	6	4	S	3	=	4	620	3
16	6	4	S	4	+3	4	510	2
17	4	4	E	3	-1	2	050	0
18	4	3 NT	N	6	+2	2	660	4
19	4	3 NT	N	K	=	2	400	0
20	4	5	N	4	-3	2	-300	6
21	1	2 NT	S	2	=	5	120	0
22	1	4	S	3	-1	5	-50	7
23	1	1	E	3	+2	5	-140	2
24	1	2	S	3	-2	5	-100	3

EW pair 6

Section b

Trish Rehutai
Kathy Singleton

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1	3	E	K	-1	6	050	6
2	1	3	W	J	-1	6	050	0
3	1	2	W	A	-3	6	300	1
4	1	3 NT	E	T	-4	6	400	0
5	2	2	S	8	=	1	110	8
6	2	3	W	A	=	1	-140	6
7	2	2	E	K	+2	1	-170	5
8	2	3	N	5	+1	1	170	2
9	5	2	E	9	+1	4	-140	4
10	5	3 NT	N	9	+4	4	720	5
11	5	2	E	7	=	4	-110	5
12	5	2	E	9	+2	4	-170	6
13	3	1	E	T	-1	2	100	2
14	3	2	N	3	-3	2	-150	8
15	3	4	S	9	=	2	620	3
16	3	3 NT	N	6	+3	2	490	4
17	6	2	E	4	=	5	-90	4
18	6	3 NT	N	A	+3	5	690	0
19	6	2	S	9	-1	5	-50	8
20	6	2	N	Q	+1	5	110	0
21	4					3	–	-9999
22	4					3	–	-9999
23	4					3	–	-9999
24	4					3	–	-9999