Te Anau Bridge Club : Detailed data for Murchison Pairs

View by:

NS pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Murchison Pairs 22 July

NS pair 1

Section b

Caryl Marshall
Shirley Whyte

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1	5	W	T	-3	1	150	5
2	1	4	W		+1	1	-450	0
3	1	2	S	K	-1	1	-50	0
4	1	2	E	Q	+2	1	-130	6
5	2	2	S	8	=	6	110	0
6	2	3	W	A	=	6	-140	2
7	2	2	E	K	+2	6	-170	3
8	2	3	N	5	+1	6	170	6
9	3	2	E	Q	+1	5	-140	4
10	3	6	N	9	+1	5	1460	6
11	3	3	E	J	-1	5	050	7
12	3	3	W	3	=	5	-110	4
13	4	2	E	7	+1	4	-140	0
14	4	2 NT	N	8	-1	4	-50	6
15	4	4	S	A	-1	4	-100	0
16	4	2	S	4	+3	4	200	0
17	5	2	E	K	=	3	-90	4
18	5	3 NT	N	T	+2	3	660	4
19	5	2	N	K	=	3	110	2
20	5	3	W	A	+1	3	-170	4
21	6	2 NT	S	A	-2	2	-200	0
22	6	4	S	J	=	2	420	8
23	6	3 NT	W	7	+2	2	-660	0
24	6	2 NT	W	T	=	2	-120	2

NS pair 2

Section b

Roy Reid
Adrienne Lush

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	6	6	W	T	-3	3	150	5
2	6	3 NT	W	T	=	3	-400	6
3	6	2	S	J	+2	3	130	2
4	6	3 NT	E	6	+1	3	-630	1
5	1	3 NT	S	3	+2	2	660	7
6	1	3	E	4	-1	2	100	6
7	1	2	E	Q	+2	2	-170	3
8	1	4	N	K	-2	2	-100	0
9	2	2	E	Q	+2	1	-170	0
10	2	4	N	8	+3	1	710	0
11	2	2	E	2	=	1	-110	3
12	2	1 NT	W	3	=	1	-90	6
13	3	1	E	T	-1	6	100	6
14	3	2	N	3	-3	6	-150	0
15	3	4	S	9	=	6	620	5
16	3	3 NT	N	6	+3	6	490	4
17	4	4	E	3	-1	5	050	8
18	4	3 NT	N	6	+2	5	660	4
19	4	3 NT	N	K	=	5	400	8
20	4	5	N	4	-3	5	-300	2
21	5	2 NT	N	3	-1	4	-100	4
22	5	4	S	3	-1	4	-50	1
23	5	4	E	Q	+1	4	-650	2
24	5	2	N	A	-2	4	-100	5

NS pair 3

Section b

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	5					5	–	-9999
2	5					5	–	-9999
3	5					5	–	-9999
4	5					5	–	-9999
5	6					4	–	-9999
6	6					4	–	-9999
7	6					4	–	-9999
8	6					4	–	-9999
9	1					3	–	-9999
10	1					3	–	-9999
11	1					3	–	-9999
12	1					3	–	-9999
13	2					2	–	-9999
14	2					2	–	-9999
15	2					2	–	-9999
16	2					2	–	-9999
17	3					1	–	-9999
18	3					1	–	-9999
19	3					1	–	-9999
20	3					1	–	-9999
21	4					6	–	-9999
22	4					6	–	-9999
23	4					6	–	-9999
24	4					6	–	-9999

NS pair 4

Section b

Linda Bolger
Bruce Campbell

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	3	4 NT	E	3	-5	2	250	8
2	3	4	W	A	=	2	-420	3
3	3	1 NT	E	3	-3	2	300	7
4	3	3	E	2	+3	2	-170	4
5	4	3	S	3	+2	1	150	2
6	4	3	N	K	-2	1	-100	4
7	4	2	N	4	=	1	110	8
8	4	4	S	4	+1	1	150	4
9	5	2	E	9	+1	6	-140	4
10	5	3 NT	N	9	+4	6	720	3
11	5	2	E	7	=	6	-110	3
12	5	2	E	9	+2	6	-170	2
13	6	1 NT	N	A	-1	5	-100	4
14	6	2	W	7	-1	5	050	8
15	6	4	S	3	=	5	620	5
16	6	4	S	4	+3	5	510	6
17	1	1 NT	W	Q	+1	4	-120	0
18	1	1 NT	N	3	+1	4	120	0
19	1	3	S	J	+1	4	130	4
20	1	2	W	Q	+1	4	-140	6
21	2	1	S	A	-1	3	-100	4
22	2	2	S	8	+1	3	140	4
23	2	6 NT	E	T	-5	3	500	8
24	2	2 NT	E	2	+1	3	-150	0

NS pair 5

Section b

Maria Young
Kylie Napier

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	2	3	W	T	=	4	-110	0
2	2	4	W	A	=	4	-420	3
3	2	2	W	8	-2	4	200	4
4	2	3 NT	W	5	+1	4	-630	1
5	3	3 NT	S	4	+1	3	630	4
6	3	4	W	5	=	3	-620	0
7	3	2	E	K	+2	3	-170	3
8	3	3	N	K	-1	3	-50	2
9	4	4	E	5	-1	2	100	8
10	4	3 NT	S	7	+4	2	720	3
11	4	4	W	A	-1	2	050	7
12	4	3 NT	W	A	+1	2	-430	0
13	5	2	E	8	=	1	-110	2
14	5	3	S	A	-2	1	-100	4
15	5	3	S	9	=	1	140	2
16	5	3 NT	N	6	+2	1	460	2
17	6	2	E	4	=	6	-90	4
18	6	3 NT	N	A	+3	6	690	8
19	6	2	S	9	-1	6	-50	0
20	6	2	N	Q	+1	6	110	8
21	1	2 NT	S	2	=	5	120	8
22	1	4	S	3	-1	5	-50	1
23	1	1	E	3	+2	5	-140	6
24	1	2	S	3	-2	5	-100	5

NS pair 6

Section b

Diana Burrows
Johnny Angell

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1	3	E	K	-1	6	050	2
2	1	3	W	J	-1	6	050	8
3	1	2	W	A	-3	6	300	7
4	1	3 NT	E	T	-4	6	400	8
5	2	3 NT	S	3	+2	5	660	7
6	2	1	N	3	+2	5	110	8
7	2	3	E	K	+1	5	-170	3
8	2	4	N	6	=	5	420	8
9	3	2	E	Q	+1	4	-140	4
10	3	6 NT	N	2	+1	4	1470	8
11	3	2	E	T	+1	4	-140	0
12	3	2 NT	W	J	-2	4	100	8
13	4	2	S	T	=	3	110	8
14	4	3	W	9	=	3	-140	2
15	4	4	S	3	+1	3	650	8
16	4	6 NT	N	K	=	3	990	8
17	5	2	E	4	=	2	-90	4
18	5	3 NT	N	T	+2	2	660	4
19	5	1 NT	S	J	+3	2	180	6
20	5	4	W	A	=	2	-620	0
21	6	3 NT	N	3	-1	1	-100	4
22	6	2	S	2	+2	1	170	6
23	6	3 NT	E	Q	=	1	-600	4
24	6	2	E	A	-1	1	050	8