Te Anau Bridge Club : Detailed data for Franklin Pairs

View by:

EW pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Franklin Pairs 24 June

EW pair 1

Section b

Adrienne Lush
Wendy Holder

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1	2	N	4	+2	1	170	1
2	1	2	W	5	-3	1	150	1
3	1	2	E	K	+1	1	-110	0
4	1	3	W	3	-1	1	100	2
5	1	4	W	6	-2	1	100	0
6	4	2	E	5	-3	4	300	2
7	4	2	N	A	+1	4	140	2
8	4	2	S	8	+2	4	130	0
9	4	2	E	2	+4	4	-230	6
10	4	3	E	A	-2	4	200	0
11	2	3	N	2	=	2	110	1
12	2	3	W	A	=	2	-140	2
13	2	2	E	9	=	2	-90	2
14	2	3	N	Q	-2	2	-100	2
15	2	2 NT	W	Q	-2	2	100	0
16	5					5	–	-9999
17	5					5	–	-9999
18	5					5	–	-9999
19	5					5	–	-9999
20	5					5	–	-9999
21	3	3	S	A	=	3	110	3
22	3	3 NT	S	J	+2	3	460	2
23	3	3 NT	E	3	+1	3	-630	4
24	3	4	W	7	-2	3	100	0
25	3	4	N		-1	3	-50	6

EW pair 2

Section b

Maggie Stratford
Linda Bolger

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	3	5	W	A	-2	4	100	4
2	3	2 NT	N	A	+1	4	150	1
3	3	2 NT	E	2	+5	4	-270	4
4	3	2 NT	E	2	+3	4	-210	6
5	3	2	E	2	-1	4	050	3
6	1	2	N	K	+1	2	140	4
7	1	3	N	2	=	2	140	2
8	1	2	E	A	+2	2	-170	3
9	1	2	E	7	+3	2	-200	4
10	1	2	E	A	=	2	-110	4
11	4					5	–	-9999
12	4					5	–	-9999
13	4					5	–	-9999
14	4					5	–	-9999
15	4					5	–	-9999
16	2	4	W	9	-1	3	100	0
17	2	2 NT	S	9	=	3	120	0
18	2	3 NT	E	3	=	3	-400	4
19	2	3	S	T	-2	3	-100	4
20	2	3 NT	E	2	+1	3	-630	1
21	5	4	S	A	=	1	130	0
22	5	3 NT	S	J	+3	1	490	0
23	5	4	E	3	+2	1	-680	6
24	5	3	W	8	-1	1	050	2
25	5	4	N	K	+1	1	450	2

EW pair 3

Section b

Kathy Singleton
Margaret Henderson

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	5	4	N	9	-1	2	-50	6
2	5	3 NT	S	5	-2	2	-200	6
3	5	3 NT	E	7	+2	2	-660	6
4	5	3	W	K	-1	2	100	2
5	5	2	W	6	=	2	-110	6
6	3					5	–	-9999
7	3					5	–	-9999
8	3					5	–	-9999
9	3					5	–	-9999
10	3					5	–	-9999
11	1	2	N	9	=	3	090	6
12	1	5 x	W	4	=	3	-650	6
13	1	1 NT	W	8	+1	3	-120	6
14	1	3	W	6	=	3	-140	5
15	1	2	S	A	=	3	090	2
16	4	2	W	5	=	1	-110	2
17	4	2	W	4	-2	1	100	4
18	4	3 NT	W	7	+1	1	-430	6
19	4	1 NT	N	5	=	1	090	0
20	4	3 NT	E	7	+1	1	-630	1
21	2	3	S	A	-1	4	-100	6
22	2	4	N	2	-1	4	-50	6
23	2	3	W	K	+2	4	-150	2
24	2	2	W	3	+2	4	-170	4
25	2	4	N	K	+1	4	450	2

EW pair 4

Section b

Joan Cockburn
Diana Burrows

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	2					5	–	-9999
2	2					5	–	-9999
3	2					5	–	-9999
4	2					5	–	-9999
5	2					5	–	-9999
6	5	2	N	K	=	3	110	6
7	5	3	N	A	-1	3	-100	6
8	5	3	W	Q	+1	3	-170	3
9	5	3	E	3	+1	3	-170	1
10	5	3	N	5	-1	3	-100	2
11	3	2	S	J	=	1	110	1
12	3	4	W	A	=	1	-420	4
13	3	2	E	3	+1	1	-110	4
14	3	2	W	J	+1	1	-140	5
15	3	1 NT	E	Q	-1	1	050	5
16	1	2	W	2	+3	4	-200	4
17	1	2	N	5	=	4	110	2
18	1	2 NT	W	6	+2	4	-180	2
19	1	4	N	3	-3	4	-150	6
20	1	3 NT	E	2	+2	4	-660	5
21	4	3	S	A	=	2	110	3
22	4	5	N	3	=	2	450	4
23	4	3	E	8	=	2	-110	0
24	4	4 x	N	J	-2	2	-300	6
25	4	4	N	5	+1	2	450	2

EW pair 5

Section b

Jill McChlery
Linda Staunton

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	4	3	N	A	+1	3	170	1
2	4	1 NT	N	A	+1	3	120	4
3	4	2	W	9	+1	3	-140	2
4	4	3	W	3	-1	3	100	2
5	4	2	W	K	-1	3	050	3
6	2	3 x	E	A	-2	1	500	0
7	2	2	N	A	+1	1	140	2
8	2	4	E	A	=	1	-420	6
9	2	2	E	8	+2	1	-170	1
10	2	1 NT	E	3	+2	1	-150	6
11	5	2	E	2	-2	4	100	4
12	5	4	W	A	-1	4	050	0
13	5	3 NT	W	2	-1	4	100	0
14	5	3	W	2	-1	4	050	0
15	5	2	E	K	-1	4	050	5
16	3	4	W	5	+1	2	-650	6
17	3	2	W	A	=	2	-90	6
18	3	4	W	9	-1	2	050	0
19	3	2	N	A	-1	2	-50	2
20	3	3 NT	E	7	+2	2	-660	5
21	1					5	–	-9999
22	1					5	–	-9999
23	1					5	–	-9999
24	1					5	–	-9999
25	1					5	–	-9999