Te Anau Bridge Club        

Back to event

---

View by:

board

NS pairs

EW pairs





Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Stuart Pairs (2022) 21 September

EW pair 1 Section b Margaret Henderson Bruce Campbell	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 1 3 S Q = 1 140 0 2 1 5 W A -1 1 050 5 3 1 2 NT W J = 1 -120 2 4 1 2 NT W Q -1 1 100 6 5 1 3 E 8 -1 1 050 7 6 4 6 E 2 -3 4 300 0 7 4 3 E 2 = 4 -110 4 8 4 4 E 2 = 4 -420 6 9 4 4 N T -2 4 -100 0 10 4 3 NT W A -1 4 100 4 11 2 4 S A -1 2 -50 2 12 2 5 NT N 5 -1 2 -100 7 13 2 3 NT S 2 -1 2 -100 6 14 2 5 x E Q -2 2 300 4 15 2 2 E 6 = 2 -110 6 16 5 2 S 2 +2 5 170 2 17 5 3 W A +1 5 -130 5 18 5 3 E 7 -1 5 050 2 19 5 2 E 4 +1 5 -140 5 20 5 4 E J -2 5 200 0 21 3 6 E J -1 3 050 0 22 3 1 NT W 7 +2 3 -150 2 23 3 2 E 2 +2 3 -170 5 24 3 2 E 8 +2 3 -130 6 25 3 3 NT N 9 +2 3 460 0
EW pair 2 Section b Alan Jacobson Ken Hamilton	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 3 3 E 4 = 4 -110 6 2 3 4 S Q -1 4 -100 8 3 3 3 NT W 5 +1 4 -630 5 4 3 2 NT W A -1 4 100 6 5 3 2 E Q -1 4 050 7 6 1 6 x W 2 = 2 -1660 8 7 1 3 NT E 4 -1 2 100 1 8 1 4 x E 2 = 2 -590 8 9 1 2 W A +2 2 -170 5 10 1 5 W A -1 2 100 4 11 4 4 S A -1 5 -50 2 12 4 3 NT N T = 5 600 3 13 4 3 W A -3 5 300 0 14 4 4 S Q = 5 420 1 15 4 2 NT E 7 +1 5 -150 8 16 2 2 S K +2 3 170 2 17 2 4 E 9 = 3 -420 8 18 2 1 E 8 +1 3 -110 6 19 2 4 E K -1 3 100 0 20 2 4 E 8 -1 3 100 2 21 5 4 W 2 +1 1 -450 7 22 5 5 E 6 -1 1 100 0 23 5 2 E A +1 1 -140 2 24 5 3 E J -1 1 050 0 25 5 3 N 9 +1 1 130 6
EW pair 3 Section b Olwyn Brown Kathy Singleton	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 5 4 S Q -1 2 -50 3 2 5 4 S A = 2 620 1 3 5 4 W 2 -1 2 100 0 4 5 3 NT W 3 -4 2 400 0 5 5 1 W 6 -2 2 100 3 6 3 3 NT W 4 +1 5 -630 2 7 3 3 NT E Q = 5 -600 6 8 3 6 x E 2 -3 5 500 2 9 3 3 W A +1 5 -170 5 10 3 3 NT W 2 -2 5 200 0 11 1 4 N 4 -3 3 -150 7 12 1 3 NT N 4 = 3 600 3 13 1 1 NT N 2 = 3 090 4 14 1 3 S K = 3 140 7 15 1 2 E 7 -1 3 050 4 16 4 4 S 8 -1 1 -50 7 17 4 3 E Q -2 1 100 0 18 4 3 NT W 2 -1 1 050 2 19 4 2 x E 6 = 1 -670 8 20 4 3 E A +1 1 -130 5 21 2 4 W A = 4 -420 4 22 2 2 NT E 4 +3 4 -210 4 23 2 2 E A +2 4 -170 5 24 2 4 S T -3 4 -150 8 25 2 3 NT N 9 +1 4 430 3
EW pair 4 Section b Jan Jacobson Diana Burrows	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 2 4 x S Q -4 5 -800 8 2 2 4 S Q = 5 620 1 3 2 3 NT W 5 +1 5 -630 5 4 2 1 W Q -3 5 300 2 5 2 3 E K -2 5 100 3 6 5 4 E 2 +1 3 -650 4 7 5 3 NT W 6 +1 3 -630 8 8 5 4 E 2 -1 3 050 4 9 5 3 W 6 +1 3 -170 5 10 5 3 NT W 8 +2 3 -660 8 11 3 4 N 4 -3 1 -150 7 12 3 3 NT N T +1 1 630 0 13 3 3 N 5 -2 1 -200 8 14 3 3 S 9 = 1 140 7 15 3 2 NT W T -3 1 150 0 16 1 3 S T -1 4 -50 7 17 1 3 W A +1 4 -130 5 18 1 3 NT W Q -1 4 050 2 19 1 2 E 6 +1 4 -140 5 20 1 3 W 4 +1 4 -130 5 21 4 2 W 7 +3 2 -200 2 22 4 3 NT W 8 +1 2 -630 7 23 4 3 NT W J +1 2 -630 8 24 4 3 S T -1 2 -50 2 25 4 2 N 9 +1 2 110 8
EW pair 5 Section b Lathee Verrall Linda Brown	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 4 3 S 6 -1 3 -50 3 2 4 5 W A -1 3 050 5 3 4 4 W A +1 3 -650 8 4 4 2 NT W 3 -1 3 100 6 5 4 2 S J +1 3 140 0 6 2 3 NT E 6 +4 1 -720 6 7 2 3 NT E 4 -1 1 100 1 8 2 5 x N A = 1 550 0 9 2 2 W A +2 1 -170 5 10 2 2 NT E 4 -1 1 100 4 11 5 4 S A -1 4 -50 2 12 5 4 S 3 -1 4 -100 7 13 5 2 W T -1 4 100 2 14 5 4 S Q = 4 420 1 15 5 3 NT E 9 -2 4 100 2 16 3 3 S A +1 2 170 2 17 3 2 E 9 = 2 -110 2 18 3 3 NT W 2 = 2 -400 8 19 3 2 E 4 = 2 -110 2 20 3 3 W 3 +2 2 -150 8 21 1 4 W A +1 5 -450 7 22 1 3 NT W 5 +1 5 -630 7 23 1 3 S A -1 5 -100 0 24 1 3 S T -2 5 -100 4 25 1 3 NT N 9 +1 5 430 3