Te Anau Bridge Club        

Back to event

---

View by:

board

NS pairs

EW pairs





Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Stuart Pairs (2022) 21 September

NS pair 1 Section b Brian McCandless Joan Cockburn	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 1 3 S Q = 1 140 8 2 1 5 W A -1 1 050 3 3 1 2 NT W J = 1 -120 6 4 1 2 NT W Q -1 1 100 2 5 1 3 E 8 -1 1 050 1 6 2 3 NT E 6 +4 5 -720 2 7 2 3 NT E 4 -1 5 100 7 8 2 5 x N A = 5 550 8 9 2 2 W A +2 5 -170 3 10 2 2 NT E 4 -1 5 100 4 11 3 4 N 4 -3 4 -150 1 12 3 3 NT N T +1 4 630 8 13 3 3 N 5 -2 4 -200 0 14 3 3 S 9 = 4 140 1 15 3 2 NT W T -3 4 150 8 16 4 4 S 8 -1 3 -50 1 17 4 3 E Q -2 3 100 8 18 4 3 NT W 2 -1 3 050 6 19 4 2 x E 6 = 3 -670 0 20 4 3 E A +1 3 -130 3 21 5 4 W 2 +1 2 -450 1 22 5 5 E 6 -1 2 100 8 23 5 2 E A +1 2 -140 6 24 5 3 E J -1 2 050 8 25 5 3 N 9 +1 2 130 2
NS pair 2 Section b David Fortune Bill Verrall	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 5 4 S Q -1 3 -50 5 2 5 4 S A = 3 620 7 3 5 4 W 2 -1 3 100 8 4 5 3 NT W 3 -4 3 400 8 5 5 1 W 6 -2 3 100 5 6 1 6 x W 2 = 2 -1660 0 7 1 3 NT E 4 -1 2 100 7 8 1 4 x E 2 = 2 -590 0 9 1 2 W A +2 2 -170 3 10 1 5 W A -1 2 100 4 11 2 4 S A -1 1 -50 6 12 2 5 NT N 5 -1 1 -100 1 13 2 3 NT S 2 -1 1 -100 2 14 2 5 x E Q -2 1 300 4 15 2 2 E 6 = 1 -110 2 16 3 3 S A +1 5 170 6 17 3 2 E 9 = 5 -110 6 18 3 3 NT W 2 = 5 -400 0 19 3 2 E 4 = 5 -110 6 20 3 3 W 3 +2 5 -150 0 21 4 2 W 7 +3 4 -200 6 22 4 3 NT W 8 +1 4 -630 1 23 4 3 NT W J +1 4 -630 0 24 4 3 S T -1 4 -50 6 25 4 2 N 9 +1 4 110 0
NS pair 3 Section b Garth Stewart Glenda Chalmers	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 4 3 S 6 -1 5 -50 5 2 4 5 W A -1 5 050 3 3 4 4 W A +1 5 -650 0 4 4 2 NT W 3 -1 5 100 2 5 4 2 S J +1 5 140 8 6 5 4 E 2 +1 4 -650 4 7 5 3 NT W 6 +1 4 -630 0 8 5 4 E 2 -1 4 050 4 9 5 3 W 6 +1 4 -170 3 10 5 3 NT W 8 +2 4 -660 0 11 1 4 N 4 -3 3 -150 1 12 1 3 NT N 4 = 3 600 5 13 1 1 NT N 2 = 3 090 4 14 1 3 S K = 3 140 1 15 1 2 E 7 -1 3 050 4 16 2 2 S K +2 2 170 6 17 2 4 E 9 = 2 -420 0 18 2 1 E 8 +1 2 -110 2 19 2 4 E K -1 2 100 8 20 2 4 E 8 -1 2 100 6 21 3 6 E J -1 1 050 8 22 3 1 NT W 7 +2 1 -150 6 23 3 2 E 2 +2 1 -170 3 24 3 2 E 8 +2 1 -130 2 25 3 3 NT N 9 +2 1 460 8
NS pair 4 Section b Shirl Dennison Linda Staunton	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 3 3 E 4 = 2 -110 2 2 3 4 S Q -1 2 -100 0 3 3 3 NT W 5 +1 2 -630 3 4 3 2 NT W A -1 2 100 2 5 3 2 E Q -1 2 050 1 6 4 6 E 2 -3 1 300 8 7 4 3 E 2 = 1 -110 4 8 4 4 E 2 = 1 -420 2 9 4 4 N T -2 1 -100 8 10 4 3 NT W A -1 1 100 4 11 5 4 S A -1 5 -50 6 12 5 4 S 3 -1 5 -100 1 13 5 2 W T -1 5 100 6 14 5 4 S Q = 5 420 7 15 5 3 NT E 9 -2 5 100 6 16 1 3 S T -1 4 -50 1 17 1 3 W A +1 4 -130 3 18 1 3 NT W Q -1 4 050 6 19 1 2 E 6 +1 4 -140 3 20 1 3 W 4 +1 4 -130 3 21 2 4 W A = 3 -420 4 22 2 2 NT E 4 +3 3 -210 4 23 2 2 E A +2 3 -170 3 24 2 4 S T -3 3 -150 0 25 2 3 NT N 9 +1 3 430 5
NS pair 5 Section b Natalie Harper Jill McChlery	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 2 4 x S Q -4 4 -800 0 2 2 4 S Q = 4 620 7 3 2 3 NT W 5 +1 4 -630 3 4 2 1 W Q -3 4 300 6 5 2 3 E K -2 4 100 5 6 3 3 NT W 4 +1 3 -630 6 7 3 3 NT E Q = 3 -600 2 8 3 6 x E 2 -3 3 500 6 9 3 3 W A +1 3 -170 3 10 3 3 NT W 2 -2 3 200 8 11 4 4 S A -1 2 -50 6 12 4 3 NT N T = 2 600 5 13 4 3 W A -3 2 300 8 14 4 4 S Q = 2 420 7 15 4 2 NT E 7 +1 2 -150 0 16 5 2 S 2 +2 1 170 6 17 5 3 W A +1 1 -130 3 18 5 3 E 7 -1 1 050 6 19 5 2 E 4 +1 1 -140 3 20 5 4 E J -2 1 200 8 21 1 4 W A +1 5 -450 1 22 1 3 NT W 5 +1 5 -630 1 23 1 3 S A -1 5 -100 8 24 1 3 S T -2 5 -100 4 25 1 3 NT N 9 +1 5 430 5