Te Anau Bridge Club : Detailed data for Stuart Pairs

View by:

EW pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Stuart Pairs 9 September

EW pair 1

Section b

Marie Galland
Joan Cockburn

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1	4	N	J	-3	1	-150	8
2	1	4	W	A	-1	1	050	0
3	1	2	E	A	+3	1	-150	5
4	1	3 NT	E	5	+4	1	-720	8
5	4	2 NT	N	2	+2	4	180	4
6	4	4 NT	N	2	-4	4	-200	8
7	4	3 NT	E	5	+1	4	-630	8
8	4	4	E	6	-2	4	100	0
9	2	3 NT	N	2	+2	2	460	0
10	2	5 NT	N	2	-1	2	-100	7
11	2	4	W	4	-3	2	150	0
12	2	3	W	3	-2	2	100	6
13	5	2 NT	E	2	-4	5	400	0
14	5	4	W	Q	=	5	-420	6
15	5	3 NT	N	3	-1	5	-100	8
16	5	2	E	3	-1	5	100	2
17	3	3	N	A	=	3	110	0
18	3	2	N	6	+1	3	140	5
19	3	2	E	J	-3	3	300	1
20	3	4	E	3	+3	3	-710	8
21	6					6	–	-9999
22	6					6	–	-9999
23	6					6	–	-9999
24	6					6	–	-9999

EW pair 2

Section b

Trish Rehutai
Dot McKay

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	3	4	N	J	-1	4	-50	1
2	3	4	W	3	=	4	-420	6
3	3	3	S	9	-1	4	-50	2
4	3	3 NT	E	5	+2	4	-660	4
5	1	3 NT	S	Q	=	2	600	2
6	1	2 NT	N	7	+1	2	150	4
7	1	3 NT	E	5	-3	2	300	0
8	1	3	N	A	-2	2	-100	5
9	4	4	N	J	+1	5	450	4
10	4	3 NT	N	K	+2	5	660	2
11	4	2	W	8	=	5	-110	7
12	4	6	N	Q	-1	5	-100	8
13	2	1 NT	S	6	+2	3	150	4
14	2	3	W	Q	+2	3	-200	3
15	2	3 NT	S	8	+1	3	630	1
16	2	2 NT	S	Q	-2	3	-100	8
17	5					6	–	-9999
18	5					6	–	-9999
19	5					6	–	-9999
20	5					6	–	-9999
21	6	5	N	K	+1	1	680	1
22	6	3	W	4	+1	1	-170	6
23	6	4	W	A	-3	1	300	6
24	6	4	N	A	+1	1	150	2

EW pair 3

Section b

Tania Ward
Linda Bolger

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	6	4	N	J	-1	2	-50	1
2	6	2	W	A	+3	2	-200	2
3	6	2	E	A	+3	2	-150	5
4	6	3 NT	E	3	+2	2	-660	4
5	3	2	S	J	+2	5	130	6
6	3	3 NT	N	3	+2	5	460	0
7	3	2	S	T	-1	5	-100	2
8	3	3 NT	E	4	-1	5	050	2
9	1	4	N	9	=	3	420	8
10	1	6 NT	S	7	-1	3	-100	7
11	1	2	S	K	=	3	110	2
12	1	3 x	W	3	-4	3	800	0
13	4					6	–	-9999
14	4					6	–	-9999
15	4					6	–	-9999
16	4					6	–	-9999
17	5	5	N	7	-2	1	-100	6
18	5	3	N	Q	=	1	140	5
19	5	2	N	5	-1	1	-50	8
20	5	4	E	A	+1	1	-650	2
21	2	5	N	K	+1	4	680	1
22	2	3	S	T	-3	4	-150	4
23	2	3 NT	S	Q	+1	4	630	0
24	2	3	N	A	+1	4	130	6

EW pair 4

Section b

Bruce Campbell
Wendy Holder

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	2	4	N	J	-2	5	-100	5
2	2	4	W	A	=	5	-420	6
3	2	3	S	9	=	5	140	0
4	2	3 NT	E	3	+2	5	-660	4
5	6	3 NT	S	7	+2	3	660	0
6	6	3 NT	N	4	=	3	400	2
7	6	3	W	3	=	3	-140	4
8	6	3	E	9	=	3	-110	8
9	3					6	–	-9999
10	3					6	–	-9999
11	3					6	–	-9999
12	3					6	–	-9999
13	4	2	W	5	=	1	-110	8
14	4	2	W	2	+3	1	-200	3
15	4	3 NT	N	6	+1	1	630	1
16	4	2 NT	S	8	-1	1	-50	6
17	1	5	N	2	-1	4	-50	2
18	1	2	N	T	+1	4	140	5
19	1	2	E	5	-1	4	100	6
20	1	4	E	3	+2	4	-680	6
21	5	4	W	A	=	2	-420	8
22	5	2	S	A	-1	2	-50	2
23	5	2 NT	S	A	+1	2	150	8
24	5	4	E	6	-4	2	200	0

EW pair 5

Section b

Lathee Verrall
Trevor Lyall

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	5	4	N	J	-2	3	-100	5
2	5	4	W	A	=	3	-420	6
3	5	4 x	E	A	=	3	-710	8
4	5	3 NT	E	4	+1	3	-630	0
5	2					6	–	-9999
6	2					6	–	-9999
7	2					6	–	-9999
8	2					6	–	-9999
9	3	4	N	8	+1	1	450	4
10	3	3 NT	N	4	+2	1	660	2
11	3	2	W	3	=	1	-110	7
12	3	4	N	9	=	1	620	3
13	6	2	E	8	-1	4	100	6
14	6	2	W	Q	+2	4	-170	0
15	6	3 NT	S	7	=	4	600	4
16	6	1 NT	S	3	=	4	090	4
17	4	5	N	A	-2	2	-100	6
18	4	2	E	A	-3	2	150	0
19	4	2	E	J	-3	2	300	1
20	4	4	E	A	+1	2	-650	2
21	1	4	N	J	+1	5	650	4
22	1	4	S	A	-5	5	-250	8
23	1	5	S	4	=	5	600	3
24	1	4	N	A	=	5	130	6

EW pair 6

Section b

Maria Young
Margaret Henderson

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1					6	–	-9999
2	1					6	–	-9999
3	1					6	–	-9999
4	1					6	–	-9999
5	2	3	S	K	=	1	110	8
6	2	3 NT	N	5	-3	1	-150	6
7	2	3	E	A	+2	1	-200	6
8	2	4	N	2	-2	1	-100	5
9	5	4	N	6	+1	4	450	4
10	5	3 NT	N	4	+2	4	660	2
11	5	3	N	5	-1	4	-50	4
12	5	4	N	9	=	4	620	3
13	3	4	W	5	-2	2	200	2
14	3	4	W	Q	+1	2	-450	8
15	3	2 NT	N	3	=	2	120	6
16	3	3 NT	E	A	-4	2	400	0
17	6	5	N	2	-2	5	-100	6
18	6	3	N	K	=	5	140	5
19	6	3	N	A	+1	5	130	4
20	6	4	E	3	+1	5	-650	2
21	4	4	N	4	=	3	620	6
22	4	2	S	A	=	3	110	0
23	4	3 NT	S	A	=	3	600	3
24	4	3	N	A	+1	3	130	6