Te Anau Bridge Club : Detailed data for Stuart Pairs

View by:

NS pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Stuart Pairs 9 September

NS pair 1

Section b

David Fortune
Adrienne Lush

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1	4	N	J	-3	1	-150	0
2	1	4	W	A	-1	1	050	8
3	1	2	E	A	+3	1	-150	3
4	1	3 NT	E	5	+4	1	-720	0
5	2	3	S	K	=	6	110	0
6	2	3 NT	N	5	-3	6	-150	2
7	2	3	E	A	+2	6	-200	2
8	2	4	N	2	-2	6	-100	3
9	3	4	N	8	+1	5	450	4
10	3	3 NT	N	4	+2	5	660	6
11	3	2	W	3	=	5	-110	1
12	3	4	N	9	=	5	620	5
13	4	2	W	5	=	4	-110	0
14	4	2	W	2	+3	4	-200	5
15	4	3 NT	N	6	+1	4	630	7
16	4	2 NT	S	8	-1	4	-50	2
17	5	5	N	7	-2	3	-100	2
18	5	3	N	Q	=	3	140	3
19	5	2	N	5	-1	3	-50	0
20	5	4	E	A	+1	3	-650	6
21	6	5	N	K	+1	2	680	7
22	6	3	W	4	+1	2	-170	2
23	6	4	W	A	-3	2	300	2
24	6	4	N	A	+1	2	150	6

NS pair 2

Section b

Kylie Napier
Sue Chartres

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	6	4	N	J	-1	3	-50	7
2	6	2	W	A	+3	3	-200	6
3	6	2	E	A	+3	3	-150	3
4	6	3 NT	E	3	+2	3	-660	4
5	1	3 NT	S	Q	=	2	600	6
6	1	2 NT	N	7	+1	2	150	4
7	1	3 NT	E	5	-3	2	300	8
8	1	3	N	A	-2	2	-100	3
9	2	3 NT	N	2	+2	1	460	8
10	2	5 NT	N	2	-1	1	-100	1
11	2	4	W	4	-3	1	150	8
12	2	3	W	3	-2	1	100	2
13	3	4	W	5	-2	6	200	6
14	3	4	W	Q	+1	6	-450	0
15	3	2 NT	N	3	=	6	120	2
16	3	3 NT	E	A	-4	6	400	8
17	4	5	N	A	-2	5	-100	2
18	4	2	E	A	-3	5	150	8
19	4	2	E	J	-3	5	300	7
20	4	4	E	A	+1	5	-650	6
21	5	4	W	A	=	4	-420	0
22	5	2	S	A	-1	4	-50	6
23	5	2 NT	S	A	+1	4	150	0
24	5	4	E	6	-4	4	200	8

NS pair 3

Section b

Marg Cockburn
Maggie Stratford

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	5	4	N	J	-2	5	-100	3
2	5	4	W	A	=	5	-420	2
3	5	4 x	E	A	=	5	-710	0
4	5	3 NT	E	4	+1	5	-630	8
5	6	3 NT	S	7	+2	4	660	8
6	6	3 NT	N	4	=	4	400	6
7	6	3	W	3	=	4	-140	4
8	6	3	E	9	=	4	-110	0
9	1	4	N	9	=	3	420	0
10	1	6 NT	S	7	-1	3	-100	1
11	1	2	S	K	=	3	110	6
12	1	3 x	W	3	-4	3	800	8
13	2	1 NT	S	6	+2	2	150	4
14	2	3	W	Q	+2	2	-200	5
15	2	3 NT	S	8	+1	2	630	7
16	2	2 NT	S	Q	-2	2	-100	0
17	3	3	N	A	=	1	110	8
18	3	2	N	6	+1	1	140	3
19	3	2	E	J	-3	1	300	7
20	3	4	E	3	+3	1	-710	0
21	4	4	N	4	=	6	620	2
22	4	2	S	A	=	6	110	8
23	4	3 NT	S	A	=	6	600	5
24	4	3	N	A	+1	6	130	2

NS pair 4

Section b

Diana Burrows
Ruth Slee

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	3	4	N	J	-1	2	-50	7
2	3	4	W	3	=	2	-420	2
3	3	3	S	9	-1	2	-50	6
4	3	3 NT	E	5	+2	2	-660	4
5	4	2 NT	N	2	+2	1	180	4
6	4	4 NT	N	2	-4	1	-200	0
7	4	3 NT	E	5	+1	1	-630	0
8	4	4	E	6	-2	1	100	8
9	5	4	N	6	+1	6	450	4
10	5	3 NT	N	4	+2	6	660	6
11	5	3	N	5	-1	6	-50	4
12	5	4	N	9	=	6	620	5
13	6	2	E	8	-1	5	100	2
14	6	2	W	Q	+2	5	-170	8
15	6	3 NT	S	7	=	5	600	4
16	6	1 NT	S	3	=	5	090	4
17	1	5	N	2	-1	4	-50	6
18	1	2	N	T	+1	4	140	3
19	1	2	E	5	-1	4	100	2
20	1	4	E	3	+2	4	-680	2
21	2	5	N	K	+1	3	680	7
22	2	3	S	T	-3	3	-150	4
23	2	3 NT	S	Q	+1	3	630	8
24	2	3	N	A	+1	3	130	2

NS pair 5

Section b

Jill McChlery
Shirl Dennison

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	2	4	N	J	-2	4	-100	3
2	2	4	W	A	=	4	-420	2
3	2	3	S	9	=	4	140	8
4	2	3 NT	E	3	+2	4	-660	4
5	3	2	S	J	+2	3	130	2
6	3	3 NT	N	3	+2	3	460	8
7	3	2	S	T	-1	3	-100	6
8	3	3 NT	E	4	-1	3	050	6
9	4	4	N	J	+1	2	450	4
10	4	3 NT	N	K	+2	2	660	6
11	4	2	W	8	=	2	-110	1
12	4	6	N	Q	-1	2	-100	0
13	5	2 NT	E	2	-4	1	400	8
14	5	4	W	Q	=	1	-420	2
15	5	3 NT	N	3	-1	1	-100	0
16	5	2	E	3	-1	1	100	6
17	6	5	N	2	-2	6	-100	2
18	6	3	N	K	=	6	140	3
19	6	3	N	A	+1	6	130	4
20	6	4	E	3	+1	6	-650	6
21	1	4	N	J	+1	5	650	4
22	1	4	S	A	-5	5	-250	0
23	1	5	S	4	=	5	600	5
24	1	4	N	A	=	5	130	2

NS pair 6

Section b

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1					6	–	-9999
2	1					6	–	-9999
3	1					6	–	-9999
4	1					6	–	-9999
5	2					5	–	-9999
6	2					5	–	-9999
7	2					5	–	-9999
8	2					5	–	-9999
9	3					4	–	-9999
10	3					4	–	-9999
11	3					4	–	-9999
12	3					4	–	-9999
13	4					3	–	-9999
14	4					3	–	-9999
15	4					3	–	-9999
16	4					3	–	-9999
17	5					2	–	-9999
18	5					2	–	-9999
19	5					2	–	-9999
20	5					2	–	-9999
21	6					1	–	-9999
22	6					1	–	-9999
23	6					1	–	-9999
24	6					1	–	-9999