Te Anau Bridge Club        

Back to event

---

View by:

board

NS pairs

EW pairs

---

Hand records



Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Stuart Pairs (2013) 18 September

EW pair 1 Section a Richard Mundie Ken Hamilton	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 1 3 NT N 6 +1 1 430 40 2 1 4 x N A +2 1 1190 0 3 7 3 NT S 4 -1 7 -50 200 4 7 1 E A +3 7 -170 170 5 2 5 x N K -2 2 -500 200 6 2 1 NT E 2 +2 2 -150 150 7 8 4 S A = 8 620 170 8 8 4 N 6 -2 8 -100 200 9 3 3 E A = 3 -110 170 10 3 4 x N A -2 3 -500 200 11 9 3 S A +1 9 170 160 12 9 6 NT S 6 -1 9 -100 180 13 4 2 W Q +2 4 -170 180 14 4 3 NT W T = 4 -400 150 15 10 3 NT E 6 +1 10 -430 160 16 10 5 E A = 10 -650 140 17 5 4 x S A -1 5 -100 200 18 5 3 NT E K -2 5 100 10 19 11 3 N A -1 11 -50 70 20 11 2 S 5 = 11 110 30 21 6 2 NT E 6 -1 6 050 60 22 6 4 N 3 -1 6 -50 200
EW pair 2 Section a Linda Bolger Nat McLean	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 6 5 N 7 -1 7 -50 200 2 6 4 N A +1 7 650 110 3 1 4 S 4 +2 2 480 50 4 1 2 S 2 -1 2 -100 70 5 7 4 S 2 -1 8 -100 140 6 7 2 W K +1 8 -140 90 7 2 4 S 9 +2 3 680 80 8 2 2 NT S 3 = 3 120 130 9 8 2 N 8 -1 9 -50 120 10 8 2 N A = 9 110 110 11 3 1 S 5 +3 4 170 160 12 3 3 NT N 7 +3 4 690 0 13 9 2 N 8 = 10 110 50 14 9 2 N J -1 10 -50 40 15 4 2 W 7 +2 5 -130 0 16 4 5 S 8 -4 5 -200 20 17 10 2 S 4 +1 11 140 90 18 10 3 NT E K = 11 -400 100 19 5 3 NT N 9 -2 6 -100 110 20 5 3 N Q -2 6 -200 180 23 12 6 S 9 -2 1 -200 200 24 12 6 N 5 -1 1 -50 180
EW pair 3 Section a Linda Brown John Angell	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 12 3 NT N 6 = 2 400 140 2 12 5 N A +1 2 680 50 3 6 4 S T +1 8 450 130 4 6 4 x E A -1 8 200 10 5 1 4 N K -2 3 -200 180 6 1 3 NT E 2 -3 3 300 0 7 7 4 S A = 9 620 170 8 7 2 N A +1 9 140 70 9 2 1 S A -1 4 -50 120 10 2 2 NT N 7 -2 4 -200 160 11 8 4 S A = 10 420 60 12 8 6 NT S T -1 10 -100 180 13 3 2 W 5 -1 5 100 100 14 3 3 NT W 5 = 5 -400 150 15 9 5 W 2 +1 11 -420 120 16 9 3 NT W Q +1 11 -630 80 17 4 2 S A +1 6 140 90 18 4 3 x S K -2 6 -500 200 21 11 2 NT N 5 -2 1 -200 150 22 11 4 N A +2 1 480 30 23 5 4 N 2 = 7 620 100 24 5 4 N T = 7 420 160
EW pair 4 Section a Jan Ludemann Lee Cameron	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 5 3 NT N 6 +1 8 430 40 2 5 4 N A +1 8 650 110 3 12 4 S 2 +2 3 480 50 4 12 4 W 6 -1 3 100 40 5 6 5 W A -5 9 250 80 6 6 2 W J +3 9 -150 150 7 1 5 x S 9 = 4 850 20 8 1 1 N 6 +2 4 140 70 9 7 2 W J -3 10 300 0 10 7 2 N 5 +2 10 170 10 11 2 4 S 7 +1 5 450 10 12 2 3 NT N 2 +2 5 660 40 13 8 4 x W A -4 11 1100 0 14 8 2 W A +1 11 -110 70 15 3 3 NT W 9 = 6 -400 60 16 3 4 E A = 6 -620 50 19 10 2 N 7 = 1 090 30 20 10 2 W J = 1 -110 100 21 4 4 N 5 -7 7 -700 200 22 4 1 NT N 3 +2 7 150 170 23 11 4 S T +1 2 650 30 24 11 4 N 2 +2 2 480 50
EW pair 5 Section a Allan Wright Roy Reid	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 11 3 NT N Q = 3 400 140 2 11 5 W A -2 3 100 170 3 5 4 S A +1 9 450 130 4 5 2 E A +1 9 -140 120 5 12 2 S 2 +1 4 140 120 6 12 2 W Q +1 4 -140 90 7 6 4 S A +1 10 650 130 8 6 4 N A -1 10 -50 170 9 1 3 E A = 5 -110 170 10 1 2 W A +2 5 -170 140 11 7 4 S A = 11 420 60 12 7 3 NT N 2 +1 11 630 110 13 2 3 S J -1 6 -100 140 14 2 3 NT W 6 +1 6 -430 190 17 9 2 S A +1 1 140 90 18 9 4 W 6 = 1 -420 140 19 3 1 W 3 +3 7 -170 200 20 3 4 N Q -3 7 -300 200 21 10 2 NT E A -2 2 100 20 22 10 4 N K +2 2 480 30 23 4 4 S T = 8 620 100 24 4 3 NT S 3 +3 8 490 10
EW pair 6 Section a Brian McCandless Alan Youldon	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 4 3 NT N Q +1 9 430 40 2 4 5 N A = 9 650 110 3 11 4 S A +1 4 450 130 4 11 4 W 4 = 4 -620 200 5 5 5 x W A -4 10 800 10 6 5 3 W J +2 10 -150 150 7 12 5 S 9 = 5 650 130 8 12 3 NT S 3 -1 5 -50 170 9 6 2 W 2 -1 11 100 80 10 6 3 N T +1 11 130 80 11 1 4 S A = 6 420 60 12 1 4 NT N 2 -1 6 -100 180 15 8 3 NT W 6 +2 1 -460 200 16 8 4 E A +1 1 -650 140 17 2 3 S K = 7 140 90 18 2 4 E K +1 7 -450 180 19 9 1 W 8 +2 2 -140 170 20 9 2 W A +2 2 -170 160 21 3 2 S 4 -1 8 -100 80 22 3 4 N 4 = 8 420 80 23 10 4 S 2 = 3 620 100 24 10 3 N S 2 +2 3 460 90
EW pair 7 Section a Olwyn Brown Hilda Speight	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 10 3 NT N 4 +1 4 430 40 2 10 4 N A -1 4 -100 200 3 4 4 S 9 +2 10 480 50 4 4 3 E A = 10 -140 120 5 11 5 x W A -4 5 800 10 6 11 1 W J -1 5 100 20 7 5 4 S 2 +2 11 680 80 8 5 3 NT S 3 = 11 400 0 9 12 2 N 8 +1 6 140 30 10 12 2 N 7 +3 6 150 40 13 7 3 E K -2 1 200 20 14 7 3 E 2 = 1 -110 70 15 1 3 NT W 6 = 7 -400 60 16 1 4 E A = 7 -620 50 17 8 1 NT N 2 = 2 090 180 18 8 3 E J = 2 -140 80 19 2 2 E K -2 8 200 0 20 2 3 NT S T +2 8 660 0 21 9 3 N 8 -2 3 -200 150 22 9 4 S 6 +2 3 480 30 23 3 5 x W A -3 9 800 0 24 3 3 NT S 5 +2 9 460 90
EW pair 8 Section a June Birmingham Betty Dodds	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 3 3 NT N 6 +1 10 430 40 2 3 5 W A -2 10 100 170 3 10 5 S 2 +1 5 480 50 4 10 4 x W J -1 5 200 10 5 4 4 N K = 11 620 40 6 4 3 E 2 +1 11 -130 60 7 11 5 x E A -3 6 800 40 8 11 1 NT S 3 +1 6 120 130 11 6 2 S A +3 1 200 100 12 6 3 NT N 2 +2 1 660 40 13 12 3 W A -1 7 100 100 14 12 2 NT W A +3 7 -210 120 15 7 3 NT W 7 +1 2 -430 160 16 7 4 E 2 +1 2 -650 140 17 1 2 S A +1 8 140 90 18 1 3 NT E K -1 8 050 50 19 8 2 W A +1 3 -140 170 20 8 3 N A = 3 110 30 21 2 1 NT N 8 = 9 090 40 22 2 4 N A +2 9 480 30 23 9 4 N 2 -1 4 -100 170 24 9 ** 4 0 -9999
EW pair 9 Section a Heather Donald Pip Macgibbon	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 9 3 NT N 6 = 5 400 140 2 9 4 x N A = 5 790 20 3 3 4 S A +1 11 450 130 4 3 3 W 6 = 11 -140 120 5 10 1 S 2 +3 6 170 100 6 10 1 NT E 5 +3 6 -180 200 9 5 2 N 8 = 1 110 60 10 5 4 N A -4 1 -400 180 11 11 1 S A +3 7 170 160 12 11 4 N 9 +1 7 650 80 13 6 3 N A -2 2 -200 200 14 6 3 NT W 6 +1 2 -430 190 15 12 3 NT E 5 +1 8 -430 160 16 12 4 E A +1 8 -650 140 17 7 2 NT N 8 = 3 120 160 18 7 4 W 8 = 3 -420 140 19 1 3 N A -1 9 -50 70 20 1 2 E A +1 9 -140 130 21 8 2 NT E 7 +1 4 -150 100 22 8 3 N 3 +1 4 170 130 23 2 6 S T -1 10 -100 170 24 2 4 N Q +2 10 480 50
EW pair 10 Section a Helen Meredith Lorna Bradley	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 2 3 NT N 6 = 11 400 140 2 2 4 N A +1 11 650 110 3 9 4 S 4 +3 6 510 0 4 9 3 W 6 +1 6 -170 170 7 4 3 S 9 +3 1 230 200 8 4 2 N 6 +2 1 170 20 9 10 3 E 4 +1 7 -130 200 10 10 2 N 3 = 7 110 110 11 5 4 S 5 +1 2 450 10 12 5 3 NT N 2 +2 2 660 40 13 11 2 N A = 8 110 50 14 11 3 NT W 6 -1 8 050 10 15 6 3 NT W = 3 -400 60 16 6 4 x E A +1 3 -990 200 17 12 2 NT N 8 +1 9 150 20 18 12 5 E A +1 9 -420 140 19 7 2 N 5 -2 4 -100 110 20 7 3 N K -1 4 -100 70 21 1 2 S 4 -2 10 -200 150 22 1 3 N 3 +3 10 230 100 23 8 4 S T +1 5 650 30 24 8 4 N T +1 5 450 130
EW pair 11 Section a Norma Macdonald Joan Cockburn	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 8 3 NT S 6 = 6 400 140 2 8 4 N A +2 6 680 50 5 3 3 NT S 5 = 1 600 60 6 3 2 E 2 +3 1 -150 150 7 9 4 S 9 +2 7 680 80 8 9 2 N 5 +1 7 140 70 9 4 2 N 8 +1 2 140 30 10 4 2 N 5 +2 2 170 10 11 10 3 S T +1 8 170 160 12 10 3 NT S 6 = 8 600 140 13 5 2 E K -1 3 100 100 14 5 2 NT W 6 = 3 -120 100 15 11 3 NT E 3 = 9 -400 60 16 11 4 E A -1 9 100 0 17 6 3 N N A = 4 400 0 18 6 3 N E 7 -1 4 050 50 19 12 2 N A = 10 090 30 20 12 4 S 7 -1 10 -100 70 21 7 3 N 2 -2 5 -200 150 22 7 2 NT N 3 +1 5 150 170 23 1 4 S K = 11 620 100 24 1 4 N 2 +1 11 450 130
EW pair 12 Section a Rex Cockburn Trevor Scott Smith	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 3 2 4 S 4 = 1 420 180 4 2 2 S 2 -1 1 -100 70 5 8 3 W 4 = 7 -110 160 6 8 1 NT W K +1 7 -120 40 7 3 6 S A = 2 1430 0 8 3 3 N 6 = 2 140 70 9 9 2 N 8 -1 8 -50 120 10 9 3 N 5 = 8 140 60 11 4 2 S A +2 3 170 160 12 4 3 NT N 2 +1 3 630 110 13 10 2 W A = 9 -110 160 14 10 2 W 6 -1 9 050 10 15 5 5 W 6 = 4 -400 60 16 5 5 E A = 4 -650 140 17 11 2 S T +1 10 140 90 18 11 3 NT E K -2 10 100 10 19 6 2 E T = 5 -110 140 20 6 2 E J +1 5 -140 130 21 12 2 NT E 6 -5 11 250 0 22 12 2 N A +2 11 170 130 23 7 4 S T = 6 620 100 24 7 3 NT S 3 +3 6 490 10