Te Anau Bridge Club        

Back to event

---

View by:

board

NS pairs

EW pairs

---

Hand records



Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Luxmore Pairs (2025) 23 April

NS pair 1 Section b Marie Galland David Fortune	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 1 3 NT S 7 = 1 400 1 2 1 4 N A -1 1 -100 2 3 1 3 W T = 1 -140 5 4 1 4 E K = 1 -620 6 5 1 4 x W J +1 1 -690 0 6 2 4 N 9 = 5 420 8 7 2 5 S A -1 5 -100 1 8 2 4 x W A -3 5 500 6 9 2 4 N 8 = 5 420 6 10 2 4 S 8 +2 5 680 8 11 3 4 E 2 -2 4 100 6 12 3 2 NT W 2 +1 4 -150 2 13 3 4 E 8 = 4 -620 0 14 3 4 E 6 +1 4 -450 4 15 3 6 x E 5 -6 4 1400 8 16 4 2 S 7 -3 3 -150 6 17 4 1 NT E 5 -2 3 100 4 18 4 3 S 6 = 3 110 8 19 4 3 NT N 6 -1 3 -50 3 20 4 5 x W A -1 3 200 2 21 5 2 NT N 4 +2 2 180 8 22 5 5 x W A -2 2 500 8 23 5 4 N A +1 2 650 6 24 5 3 NT W 2 -5 2 250 8 25 5 3 NT W 4 -2 2 200 8
NS pair 2 Section b Joan Cockburn Caryl Marshall	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 5 4 N 3 +2 3 480 8 2 5 3 N T = 3 140 6 3 5 4 W Q -1 3 100 8 4 5 3 E K = 3 -140 8 5 5 3 W 4 -1 3 050 5 6 1 3 S A = 2 140 6 7 1 5 S A +1 2 620 8 8 1 5 W A -4 2 200 2 9 1 3 NT N 2 -2 2 -100 1 10 1 5 N A = 2 600 2 11 2 2 E 4 -1 1 050 2 12 2 2 E K = 1 -110 4 13 2 2 E J +3 1 -200 2 14 2 4 E 6 +1 1 -450 4 15 2 3 NT E 6 +1 1 -430 0 16 3 3 NT E 8 +1 5 -630 1 17 3 2 E 5 -2 5 100 4 18 3 3 E 8 +2 5 -200 0 19 3 2 NT S 2 -1 5 -50 3 20 3 5 W A -1 5 100 0 21 4 3 S 6 -2 4 -200 0 22 4 3 N T = 4 140 4 23 4 4 W A -3 4 300 0 24 4 3 N J = 4 110 4 25 4 2 E 6 +4 4 -170 1
NS pair 3 Section b Marg Cockburn Diana Burrows	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 4 3 NT S 3 +2 5 460 6 2 4 4 N K -2 5 -200 0 3 4 3 W T +2 5 -200 2 4 4 4 E K +1 5 -650 1 5 4 3 E A -3 5 150 8 6 5 2 N 9 -1 4 -50 2 7 5 3 S 2 +2 4 150 4 8 5 4 x S 6 -2 4 -300 0 9 5 3 NT N T +1 4 430 8 10 5 4 S T +1 4 650 5 11 1 3 N T = 3 110 8 12 1 2 NT N 7 -4 3 -400 0 13 1 2 E J +1 3 -140 7 14 1 4 E 2 +1 3 -450 4 15 1 3 NT W J = 3 -400 3 16 2 3 NT E 6 +1 2 -630 1 17 2 1 NT S 4 +2 2 150 8 18 2 3 S A -1 2 -100 4 19 2 2 NT S 4 = 2 120 8 20 2 4 N K +1 2 650 4 21 3 2 W 5 = 1 -110 2 22 3 5 S Q = 1 400 6 23 3 4 N 4 +1 1 650 6 24 3 4 E Q -1 1 050 0 25 3 3 NT W J -1 1 100 5
NS pair 4 Section b Roy Reid Jan Ludemann	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 3 3 NT S 4 +1 2 430 4 2 3 4 N A = 2 620 8 3 3 3 W T = 2 -140 5 4 3 3 NT W 5 +1 2 -630 4 5 3 3 NT W J -1 2 050 5 6 4 1 N 4 -1 1 -50 2 7 4 5 S A -1 1 -100 1 8 4 3 x S K = 1 530 8 9 4 3 NT N 8 -2 1 -100 1 10 4 6 S 2 -1 1 -100 0 11 5 2 W 3 -1 5 050 2 12 5 2 E K -1 5 050 6 13 5 2 E J +2 5 -170 4 14 5 4 E 6 = 5 -420 8 15 5 4 E 5 -5 5 250 6 16 1 3 NT E 8 = 4 -600 4 17 1 2 NT E 5 -2 4 100 4 18 1 3 S 5 -1 4 -100 4 19 1 2 W A -1 4 100 6 20 1 5 x N K +1 4 1050 8 21 2 3 N 2 +1 3 130 6 22 2 4 N T -1 3 -50 2 23 2 4 N J = 3 620 2 24 2 4 E Q -3 3 150 6 25 2 3 E 3 +1 3 -170 1
NS pair 5 Section b Janet Ciaffoni Margaret Henderson	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 2 3 NT S 4 = 4 400 1 2 2 1 NT E 4 -2 4 100 4 3 2 2 W T +4 4 -230 0 4 2 4 E K +1 4 -650 1 5 2 3 W J +1 4 -170 2 6 3 4 S A -1 3 -50 2 7 3 5 S 2 = 3 600 6 8 3 4 S 6 = 3 420 4 9 3 3 NT S T = 3 400 4 10 3 4 S 8 +1 3 650 5 11 4 2 E 4 -1 2 050 2 12 4 4 W A -2 2 100 8 13 4 2 E J +1 2 -140 7 14 4 3 NT W 3 +2 2 -460 0 15 4 5 W A = 2 -400 3 16 5 3 NT W 2 -1 1 100 8 17 5 3 E A = 1 -110 0 18 5 3 S K -1 1 -100 4 19 5 2 NT N 9 -2 1 -100 0 20 5 5 N K +1 1 680 6 21 1 2 W A -1 5 050 4 22 1 4 x N T -1 5 -100 0 23 1 4 N K +1 5 650 6 24 1 5 E Q -2 5 100 2 25 1 5 E A -1 5 100 5