Te Anau Bridge Club        

Back to event

---

View by:

board

NS pairs

EW pairs

---

Hand records



Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Kepler Pairs (2022) 26 October

NS pair 1 Section b Brian McCandless Ken Hamilton	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 1 PASS N 1 0 01 - 00.2 2 1 2 N T = 1 110 00.9 - 00.3 3 1 4 E K -1 1 100 01.1 - 00.1 4 2 1 S K +1 7 110 01 - 00.2 5 2 1 N A +3 7 170 00.7 - 00.5 6 2 3 S 5 -3 7 -150 00.2 - 01 7 3 3 NT N 3 -1 6 -100 00.4 - 00.8 8 3 4 W 5 -1 6 050 00.8 - 00.4 9 3 3 NT N 3 +2 6 460 01 - 00.2 10 4 3 NT N K +1 5 630 00.5 - 00.7 11 4 3 E 6 = 5 -110 00.8 - 00.4 12 4 3 N A -4 5 -400 00 - 01.2 13 5 3 W Q -4 4 400 01.2 - 00 14 5 3 NT N 3 +1 4 430 00.9 - 00.3 15 5 3 NT S 5 -1 4 -100 00.2 - 01 16 6 4 S J = 3 420 00 - 01.2 17 6 1 N 5 +2 3 140 01.1 - 00.1 18 6 PASS N 3 0 00.7 - 00.5 19 7 4 x N K +1 2 690 01.2 - 00 20 7 3 E 2 -3 2 300 01.2 - 00 21 7 4 S A = 2 620 00.9 - 00.3
NS pair 2 Section b Glenda Chalmers Jill McChlery	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 7 2 E Q +2 3 -130 00.5 - 00.7 2 7 1 W 6 = 3 -80 00.6 - 00.6 3 7 2 E 3 +2 3 -170 00.3 - 00.9 4 1 2 W 5 = 2 -90 00.1 - 01.1 5 1 1 S A +4 2 200 01 - 00.2 6 1 3 NT W 9 -3 2 300 01.2 - 00 7 2 2 N 3 = 1 110 00.9 - 00.3 8 2 4 W 5 -1 1 050 00.8 - 00.4 9 2 4 N 9 +1 1 450 00.4 - 00.8 10 3 3 NT S 4 = 7 600 00.1 - 01.1 11 3 3 E 5 -1 7 050 01 - 00.2 12 3 4 W T -2 7 100 00.8 - 00.4 13 4 2 NT W K -1 6 100 00.8 - 00.4 14 4 6 NT S 4 -3 6 -150 00.1 - 01.1 15 4 3 N T +2 6 150 00.6 - 00.6 16 5 3 NT N Q +4 5 520 01 - 00.2 17 5 3 N J -1 5 -50 00 - 01.2 18 5 3 NT E 3 -3 5 150 01.1 - 00.1 19 6 4 N 2 +3 4 510 01 - 00.2 20 6 2 S 4 = 4 110 00.5 - 00.7 21 6 4 S A +2 4 680 01.2 - 00
NS pair 3 Section b Garth Stewart Richard Mundie	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 6 3 NT W 5 +2 5 -460 00 - 01.2 2 6 1 W 5 +1 5 -110 00.1 - 01.1 3 6 4 W K -1 5 100 01.1 - 00.1 4 7 2 W 5 -2 4 200 01.2 - 00 5 7 4 S 8 +1 4 650 01.2 - 00 6 7 2 W 9 -1 4 100 00.9 - 00.3 7 1 3 S 2 -1 3 -100 00.4 - 00.8 8 1 4 W 2 = 3 -420 00.1 - 01.1 9 1 3 NT S 8 +2 3 460 01 - 00.2 10 2 3 NT S 4 +2 2 660 01 - 00.2 11 2 2 NT W 2 = 2 -120 00.6 - 00.6 12 2 3 NT S 5 +1 2 630 01.2 - 00 13 3 3 E Q -1 1 100 00.8 - 00.4 14 3 3 NT S 4 +1 1 430 00.9 - 00.3 15 3 4 N 2 -3 1 -300 00 - 01.2 16 4 3 NT N 5 +2 7 460 00.3 - 00.9 17 4 1 NT N 2 +1 7 120 00.8 - 00.4 18 4 4 W 2 -3 7 150 01.1 - 00.1 19 5 4 N T +1 6 450 00.6 - 00.6 20 5 1 NT S 3 = 6 090 00 - 01.2 21 5 4 S A -1 6 -100 00 - 01.2
NS pair 4 Section b Roy Reid Bruce Campbell	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 5 3 NT W 3 +1 7 -430 00.2 - 01 2 5 2 N T +1 7 140 01.2 - 00 3 5 2 NT W 4 +4 7 -240 00 - 01.2 4 6 2 W J -1 6 100 00.8 - 00.4 5 6 3 S 6 -2 6 -200 00 - 01.2 6 6 1 NT W J -1 6 100 00.9 - 00.3 7 7 3 S 4 = 5 110 00.9 - 00.3 8 7 4 W 5 = 5 -420 00.1 - 01.1 9 7 4 N 2 +1 5 450 00.4 - 00.8 10 1 4 NT S 3 = 4 630 00.5 - 00.7 11 1 2 W 3 +2 4 -130 00.4 - 00.8 12 1 2 S 7 = 4 090 00.6 - 00.6 13 2 3 NT W 3 -1 3 100 00.8 - 00.4 14 2 5 N Q -2 3 -100 00.4 - 00.8 15 2 5 S 5 = 3 600 00.8 - 00.4 16 3 6 NT N A = 2 990 01.2 - 00 17 3 2 N A +1 2 140 01.1 - 00.1 18 3 2 NT E 3 = 2 -120 00.1 - 01.1 19 4 4 N 6 +2 1 480 00.8 - 00.4 20 4 2 N 4 +1 1 110 00.5 - 00.7 21 4 5 E A -1 1 050 00.3 - 00.9
NS pair 5 Section b Linda Staunton Marg Hughes	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 4 3 E Q +1 2 -130 00.5 - 00.7 2 4 2 N Q -1 2 -100 00.4 - 00.8 3 4 2 E 3 +2 2 -170 00.3 - 00.9 4 5 2 E A = 1 -90 00.1 - 01.1 5 5 3 S A +1 1 170 00.7 - 00.5 6 5 2 S 5 -3 1 -150 00.2 - 01 7 6 3 x S A = 7 670 01.2 - 00 8 6 4 W 5 -1 7 050 00.8 - 00.4 9 6 4 N 9 +1 7 450 00.4 - 00.8 10 7 3 NT S A +2 6 660 01 - 00.2 11 7 3 E K +1 6 -170 00 - 01.2 12 7 3 S 2 -2 6 -200 00.2 - 01 13 1 3 NT E 3 = 5 -600 00.3 - 00.9 14 1 3 NT S 4 +1 5 430 00.9 - 00.3 15 1 2 S 9 +2 5 130 00.4 - 00.8 16 2 3 NT S J +3 4 490 00.7 - 00.5 17 2 2 N 5 = 4 110 00.4 - 00.8 18 2 1 NT W 7 +1 4 -120 00.1 - 01.1 19 3 3 N K = 3 140 00 - 01.2 20 3 2 S 4 = 3 110 00.5 - 00.7 21 3 4 S A = 3 620 00.9 - 00.3
NS pair 6 Section b Linda Brown Janet Ciaffoni	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 3 2 NT W 6 -2 4 100 01.2 - 00 2 3 1 W 6 +1 4 -110 00.1 - 01.1 3 3 2 E 3 +1 4 -140 00.7 - 00.5 4 4 PASS N 3 0 00.5 - 00.7 5 4 2 S 5 = 3 110 00.4 - 00.8 6 4 2 S 5 -3 3 -150 00.2 - 01 7 5 4 x N 9 -3 2 -800 00 - 01.2 8 5 4 W 5 -1 2 050 00.8 - 00.4 9 5 3 NT S 8 +2 2 460 01 - 00.2 10 6 3 NT S 2 = 1 600 00.1 - 01.1 11 6 2 E 5 +1 1 -140 00.2 - 01 12 6 2 E 8 = 1 -90 00.4 - 00.8 13 7 3 NT W 6 +1 7 -630 00 - 01.2 14 7 3 NT N 4 +1 7 430 00.9 - 00.3 15 7 3 NT S 9 +2 7 660 01.1 - 00.1 16 1 3 NT S J +2 6 460 00.3 - 00.9 17 1 2 N T = 6 110 00.4 - 00.8 18 1 1 NT W 7 = 6 -90 00.4 - 00.8 19 2 3 N K +1 5 170 00.2 - 01 20 2 2 N 8 = 5 110 00.5 - 00.7 21 2 5 x E A -1 5 100 00.6 - 00.6
NS pair 7 Section b Diana Burrows Jan Jacobson	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 2 3 E Q = 6 -110 00.8 - 00.4 2 2 2 N 6 = 6 110 00.9 - 00.3 3 2 2 W K +1 6 -140 00.7 - 00.5 4 3 PASS N 5 0 00.5 - 00.7 5 3 3 E A -2 5 100 00.2 - 01 6 3 3 S 5 -2 5 -100 00.6 - 00.6 7 4 3 NT N A -1 4 -100 00.4 - 00.8 8 4 4 W 5 -1 4 050 00.8 - 00.4 9 4 6 N A -1 4 -50 00 - 01.2 10 5 3 NT S 4 +2 3 660 01 - 00.2 11 5 3 NT W 7 -2 3 100 01.2 - 00 12 5 2 W T -3 3 150 01 - 00.2 13 6 3 NT W 6 = 2 -600 00.3 - 00.9 14 6 6 NT N Q -3 2 -150 00.1 - 01.1 15 6 3 NT N A +2 2 660 01.1 - 00.1 16 7 3 NT N 7 +3 1 490 00.7 - 00.5 17 7 2 N A = 1 110 00.4 - 00.8 18 7 PASS N 1 0 00.7 - 00.5 19 1 3 N A +3 7 230 00.4 - 00.8 20 1 1 NT S 6 +3 7 180 01 - 00.2 21 1 5 E A -1 7 050 00.3 - 00.9