Te Anau Bridge Club        

Back to event

---

View by:

board

NS pairs

EW pairs





Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

NZ Wide Pairs (2016) 4 November

EW pair 1 Section c Garth Stewart Alistair Baird	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 1 2 NT N 6 = 1 120 60 2 1 2 N 8 = 1 090 0 3 1 3 N 5 -1 1 -50 0 4 1 2 NT W 4 -3 1 300 20 5 1 1 NT N 6 +1 1 120 20 6 4 6 NT S 6 +1 4 1020 0 7 4 3 E A = 4 -140 40 8 4 3 E A -1 4 050 70 9 4 3 E 6 -1 4 100 20 10 4 1 NT E 3 +2 4 -150 40 11 2 3 N 4 -2 2 -100 30 12 2 3 N A +1 2 170 30 13 2 1 NT E T -3 2 300 40 14 2 3 N Q = 2 140 40 15 2 6 S K = 2 1430 20 16 5 2 N T -2 5 -100 60 17 5 3 W A +1 5 -130 40 18 5 6 x W A -1 5 100 20 19 5 4 W Q -1 5 100 0 20 5 4 x S 6 -2 5 -500 60 21 3 3 E J = 3 -110 60 22 3 3 N 9 = 3 140 60 23 3 2 S 7 +1 3 140 30 24 3 6 NT S 5 = 3 990 20 25 3 4 N A = 3 420 10
EW pair 2 Section c Brian McCandless Jill McChlery	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 3 2 NT N 4 +1 4 150 40 2 3 2 S A -2 4 -200 70 3 3 2 W 6 +2 4 -130 50 4 3 2 NT W A -1 4 100 70 5 3 1 NT N 2 +1 4 120 20 6 1 6 N A = 2 980 30 7 1 4 S A -1 2 -100 10 8 1 3 x W 9 -3 2 500 10 9 1 4 S A -1 2 -50 60 10 1 3 NT E 3 -1 2 100 0 11 4 4 S 3 -3 5 -150 80 12 4 2 NT S 5 -1 5 -100 80 13 4 3 x N K = 5 730 0 14 4 3 N Q +1 5 170 20 15 4 3 NT N 5 +3 5 690 60 16 2 2 W Q +1 3 -140 80 17 2 5 W A -1 3 050 0 18 2 6 E Q -3 3 150 0 19 2 4 x S A -2 3 -300 60 20 2 4 x E A = 3 -790 80 21 5 3 x N 2 -1 1 -200 80 22 5 2 N K +3 1 200 0 23 5 3 N A = 1 140 30 24 5 6 NT S 5 -1 1 -50 60 25 5 5 x N A -1 1 -100 50
EW pair 3 Section c Linda Brown Ros McClean	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 5 2 NT N 4 +2 2 180 20 2 5 2 NT N 3 -1 2 -100 30 3 5 2 W 6 +2 2 -130 50 4 5 3 W A -2 2 200 40 5 5 1 NT N 2 +1 2 120 20 6 3 4 N 6 +3 5 510 60 7 3 3 S 4 -1 5 -100 10 8 3 4 x E A -3 5 500 10 9 3 3 NT N 5 = 5 400 0 10 3 2 NT E 3 +2 5 -180 70 11 1 3 S 6 -2 3 -100 30 12 1 3 N K = 3 140 60 13 1 1 NT E 9 -1 3 100 80 14 1 1 NT E A -1 3 050 70 15 1 3 NT N 5 +3 3 690 60 16 4 1 NT N 5 +3 1 180 0 17 4 3 W 3 +1 1 -130 40 18 4 4 W 9 +1 1 -450 70 19 4 5 S A -2 1 -100 20 20 4 4 S T -2 1 -200 40 21 2 3 E J -2 4 100 20 22 2 2 N K +2 4 170 30 23 2 2 N 9 -1 4 -100 80 24 2 6 NT S 5 +1 4 1020 0 25 2 4 N A = 4 420 10
EW pair 4 Section c Kathleen Meredith June Birmingham	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 2 3 NT N 6 = 5 400 0 2 2 2 NT N J -2 5 -200 70 3 2 3 W K = 5 -110 20 4 2 3 W 5 -1 5 100 70 5 2 2 S 5 = 5 090 70 6 5 5 N A +1 3 480 80 7 5 4 S K -4 3 -400 60 8 5 3 W A -1 3 050 70 9 5 4 S A -1 3 -50 60 10 5 2 NT E 3 +2 3 -180 70 11 3 3 N J -2 1 -100 30 12 3 4 N 5 = 1 620 0 13 3 4 W 5 -4 1 400 20 14 3 5 S A = 1 400 0 15 3 3 NT N 5 +3 1 690 60 16 1 3 NT N 5 -1 4 -50 40 17 1 2 NT W 2 +1 4 -150 80 18 1 4 W A +1 4 -450 70 19 1 4 W 2 +1 4 -650 80 20 1 3 E A = 4 -140 20 21 4 3 N T = 2 140 0 22 4 1 N J +1 2 110 80 23 4 3 N A = 2 140 30 24 4 6 S 5 = 2 980 40 25 4 6 W A = 2 -1370 80
EW pair 5 Section c Marg Hughes David Fortune	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 4 3 W K -2 3 100 80 2 4 2 N 3 -1 3 -100 30 3 4 4 x E Q = 3 -790 80 4 4 4 W A -4 3 400 0 5 4 1 NT S 5 = 3 090 70 6 2 6 N A = 1 980 30 7 2 4 E A = 1 -620 80 8 2 3 W 9 -2 1 100 40 9 2 3 N J -1 1 -50 60 10 2 2 NT E 7 = 1 -120 20 11 5 3 S 6 -2 4 -100 30 12 5 2 N K +2 4 170 30 13 5 2 N A = 4 110 60 14 5 3 E J -1 4 050 70 15 5 6 NT N 5 = 4 1440 0 16 3 3 W 8 -1 2 100 20 17 3 2 W 2 +2 2 -130 40 18 3 2 W 3 +2 2 -170 40 19 3 3 W 2 +1 2 -170 40 20 3 5 x W 2 -1 2 200 0 21 1 3 N 6 -1 5 -100 40 22 1 3 N K +1 5 170 30 23 1 2 N A +1 5 140 30 24 1 6 NT S 6 -3 5 -150 80 25 1 5 x N A -1 5 -100 50