Te Anau Bridge Club        

Back to event

---

View by:

board

NS pairs

EW pairs





Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

NZ Wide Pairs (2016) 4 November

NS pair 1 Section c Jan Ludemann Glenda Chalmers	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 1 2 NT N 6 = 1 120 20 2 1 2 N 8 = 1 090 80 3 1 3 N 5 -1 1 -50 80 4 1 2 NT W 4 -3 1 300 60 5 1 1 NT N 6 +1 1 120 60 6 2 6 N A = 5 980 50 7 2 4 E A = 5 -620 0 8 2 3 W 9 -2 5 100 40 9 2 3 N J -1 5 -50 20 10 2 2 NT E 7 = 5 -120 60 11 3 3 N J -2 4 -100 50 12 3 4 N 5 = 4 620 80 13 3 4 W 5 -4 4 400 60 14 3 5 S A = 4 400 80 15 3 3 NT N 5 +3 4 690 20 16 4 1 NT N 5 +3 3 180 80 17 4 3 W 3 +1 3 -130 40 18 4 4 W 9 +1 3 -450 10 19 4 5 S A -2 3 -100 60 20 4 4 S T -2 3 -200 40 21 5 3 x N 2 -1 2 -200 0 22 5 2 N K +3 2 200 80 23 5 3 N A = 2 140 50 24 5 6 NT S 5 -1 2 -50 20 25 5 5 x N A -1 2 -100 30
NS pair 2 Section c Roy Reid Johnny Angell	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 5 2 NT N 4 +2 3 180 60 2 5 2 NT N 3 -1 3 -100 50 3 5 2 W 6 +2 3 -130 30 4 5 3 W A -2 3 200 40 5 5 1 NT N 2 +1 3 120 60 6 1 6 N A = 2 980 50 7 1 4 S A -1 2 -100 70 8 1 3 x W 9 -3 2 500 70 9 1 4 S A -1 2 -50 20 10 1 3 NT E 3 -1 2 100 80 11 2 3 N 4 -2 1 -100 50 12 2 3 N A +1 1 170 50 13 2 1 NT E T -3 1 300 40 14 2 3 N Q = 1 140 40 15 2 6 S K = 1 1430 60 16 3 3 W 8 -1 5 100 60 17 3 2 W 2 +2 5 -130 40 18 3 2 W 3 +2 5 -170 40 19 3 3 W 2 +1 5 -170 40 20 3 5 x W 2 -1 5 200 80 21 4 3 N T = 4 140 80 22 4 1 N J +1 4 110 0 23 4 3 N A = 4 140 50 24 4 6 S 5 = 4 980 40 25 4 6 W A = 4 -1370 0
NS pair 3 Section c Norma McDonald Ruth Slee	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 4 3 W K -2 5 100 0 2 4 2 N 3 -1 5 -100 50 3 4 4 x E Q = 5 -790 0 4 4 4 W A -4 5 400 80 5 4 1 NT S 5 = 5 090 10 6 5 5 N A +1 4 480 0 7 5 4 S K -4 4 -400 20 8 5 3 W A -1 4 050 10 9 5 4 S A -1 4 -50 20 10 5 2 NT E 3 +2 4 -180 10 11 1 3 S 6 -2 3 -100 50 12 1 3 N K = 3 140 20 13 1 1 NT E 9 -1 3 100 0 14 1 1 NT E A -1 3 050 10 15 1 3 NT N 5 +3 3 690 20 16 2 2 W Q +1 2 -140 0 17 2 5 W A -1 2 050 80 18 2 6 E Q -3 2 150 80 19 2 4 x S A -2 2 -300 20 20 2 4 x E A = 2 -790 0 21 3 3 E J = 1 -110 20 22 3 3 N 9 = 1 140 20 23 3 2 S 7 +1 1 140 50 24 3 6 NT S 5 = 1 990 60 25 3 4 N A = 1 420 70
NS pair 4 Section c Ann Carran Diana Burrows	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 3 2 NT N 4 +1 2 150 40 2 3 2 S A -2 2 -200 10 3 3 2 W 6 +2 2 -130 30 4 3 2 NT W A -1 2 100 10 5 3 1 NT N 2 +1 2 120 60 6 4 6 NT S 6 +1 1 1020 80 7 4 3 E A = 1 -140 40 8 4 3 E A -1 1 050 10 9 4 3 E 6 -1 1 100 60 10 4 1 NT E 3 +2 1 -150 40 11 5 3 S 6 -2 5 -100 50 12 5 2 N K +2 5 170 50 13 5 2 N A = 5 110 20 14 5 3 E J -1 5 050 10 15 5 6 NT N 5 = 5 1440 80 16 1 3 NT N 5 -1 4 -50 40 17 1 2 NT W 2 +1 4 -150 0 18 1 4 W A +1 4 -450 10 19 1 4 W 2 +1 4 -650 0 20 1 3 E A = 4 -140 60 21 2 3 E J -2 3 100 60 22 2 2 N K +2 3 170 50 23 2 2 N 9 -1 3 -100 0 24 2 6 NT S 5 +1 3 1020 80 25 2 4 N A = 3 420 70
NS pair 5 Section c Heather Donald Marie Galland	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 2 3 NT N 6 = 4 400 80 2 2 2 NT N J -2 4 -200 10 3 2 3 W K = 4 -110 60 4 2 3 W 5 -1 4 100 10 5 2 2 S 5 = 4 090 10 6 3 4 N 6 +3 3 510 20 7 3 3 S 4 -1 3 -100 70 8 3 4 x E A -3 3 500 70 9 3 3 NT N 5 = 3 400 80 10 3 2 NT E 3 +2 3 -180 10 11 4 4 S 3 -3 2 -150 0 12 4 2 NT S 5 -1 2 -100 0 13 4 3 x N K = 2 730 80 14 4 3 N Q +1 2 170 60 15 4 3 NT N 5 +3 2 690 20 16 5 2 N T -2 1 -100 20 17 5 3 W A +1 1 -130 40 18 5 6 x W A -1 1 100 60 19 5 4 W Q -1 1 100 80 20 5 4 x S 6 -2 1 -500 20 21 1 3 N 6 -1 5 -100 40 22 1 3 N K +1 5 170 50 23 1 2 N A +1 5 140 50 24 1 6 NT S 6 -3 5 -150 0 25 1 5 x N A -1 5 -100 30