Alexandra Bridge Club : Detailed data for Mixed Pairs M

View by:

NS pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Mixed Pairs M 19 February

NS pair 1

Section b

Francis Bastiaansen
Joan Botting

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1	2	N	6	=	1	090	01.2 - 00.2
2	1	4	W	A	+1	1	-450	00.9 - 00.5
3	1	2	N	6	-3	1	-150	00.3 - 01.1
4	2	2	E	K	-2	8	200	00.6 - 00.8
5	2	4	W	J	=	8	-420	00 - 01.4
6	2	4	W	K	=	8	-620	00.2 - 01.2
7	3	3 NT	N	J	=	7	600	01.2 - 00.2
8	3	5	E	J	=	7	-400	00.6 - 00.8
9	3	3	S	Q	+3	7	170	00.2 - 01.2
10	4	2	N	6	-4	6	-400	00 - 01.4
11	4	4	S	J	+1	6	450	01 - 00.4
12	4	1 NT	W	A	+1	6	-120	00.1 - 01.3
13	5	4	S	9	+1	5	650	01.1 - 00.3
14	5	4	S	9	+1	5	450	01.4 - 00
15	5	4	W	4	-2	5	100	00.2 - 01.2
16	6	2 NT	S	3	+1	4	150	00.4 - 01
17	6	3	E	3	+1	4	-170	01 - 00.4
18	6	3	N	3	=	4	140	00.9 - 00.5
19	7	3	S	A	-1	3	-50	00.5 - 00.9
20	7	3	S	2	+1	3	170	01.4 - 00
21	7	4	E	5	-1	3	050	01.4 - 00
22	8	3 NT	S	T	+2	2	460	01.4 - 00
23	8	3	N	A	+1	2	130	01 - 00.4
24	8	4 x	S	K	-1	2	-100	00.5 - 00.9

NS pair 2

Section b

Joy Sinclair
Plony Belt

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	8	3	E	6	=	3	-140	00.3 - 01.1
2	8	4	W	A	-1	3	050	01.4 - 00
3	8	2	S	7	-1	3	-50	01.3 - 00.1
4	1	2	E	K	-1	2	100	00.2 - 01.2
5	1	4	W	8	-1	2	050	01.2 - 00.2
6	1	3	N	J	-1	2	-50	01.2 - 00.2
7	2	3 NT	N	A	+2	1	660	01.4 - 00
8	2	4	E	J	=	1	-420	00.2 - 01.2
9	2	4	N	A	+2	1	480	01.3 - 00.1
10	3	3	W	K	-2	8	200	01.4 - 00
11	3	5	S	J	=	8	450	01 - 00.4
12	3	1 NT	W	3	-1	8	050	00.9 - 00.5
13	4	4	S	T	+1	7	650	01.1 - 00.3
14	4	3	S	6	=	7	140	00.5 - 00.9
15	4	4 x	N	K	=	7	790	01.4 - 00
16	5	3 NT	S	A	+1	6	430	01.2 - 00.2
17	5	4	E	A	-1	6	050	01.3 - 00.1
18	5	1 NT	N	3	=	6	090	00.4 - 01
19	6	3	W	4	-1	5	100	01 - 00.4
20	6	2 NT	S	T	-1	5	-100	00.2 - 01.2
21	6	3	E	5	+1	5	-170	01.2 - 00.2
22	7	3 NT	S	2	=	4	400	00.5 - 00.9
23	7	2 x	N	J	+1	4	380	01.4 - 00
24	7	5	S	T	-2	4	-100	00.5 - 00.9

NS pair 3

Section b

John Sanford
Bev Walker

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	7	2	S	K	-2	5	-100	00.8 - 00.6
2	7	4	W	A	=	5	-420	01.2 - 00.2
3	7	2	W	6	=	5	-110	00.8 - 00.6
4	8	2 NT	S	4	+1	4	150	00.4 - 01
5	8	4	E	A	-1	4	050	01.2 - 00.2
6	8	3	W	A	+1	4	-170	00.7 - 00.7
7	1	2	W	A	+1	3	-140	00.2 - 01.2
8	1	6	E	A	-2	3	100	01.4 - 00
9	1	4	N	A	=	3	420	00.8 - 00.6
10	2	2 NT	S	7	-2	2	-200	00.2 - 01.2
11	2	4	S	3	+1	2	450	01 - 00.4
12	2	1 NT	W	A	+1	2	-120	00.1 - 01.3
13	3	4	S	A	+1	1	650	01.1 - 00.3
14	3	2 NT	N	Q	-4	1	-200	00 - 01.4
15	3	4	W	4	-1	1	050	00 - 01.4
16	4	2	N	7	+1	8	140	00.1 - 01.3
17	4	4	E	6	=	8	-420	00.4 - 01
18	4	2	N	8	-1	8	-100	00.2 - 01.2
19	5	4	W	3	-2	7	200	01.4 - 00
20	5	2	S	2	-1	7	-100	00.2 - 01.2
21	5	4	E	5	+1	7	-450	00.4 - 01
22	6	3 NT	S	A	+1	6	430	01.1 - 00.3
23	6	2	W	8	+1	6	-140	00 - 01.4
24	6	5	S	K	-4	6	-200	00.2 - 01.2

NS pair 4

Section b

Terrie Gillaly
Judy Henderson

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	6	2	E	Q	+1	7	-140	00.3 - 01.1
2	6	4	W	A	+2	7	-480	00.5 - 00.9
3	6	2 NT	S	A	-1	7	-50	01.3 - 00.1
4	7	3 NT	S	2	=	6	600	01.1 - 00.3
5	7	3	W	7	=	6	-140	00.7 - 00.7
6	7	3	W	A	+1	6	-170	00.7 - 00.7
7	8	3	N	9	+1	5	170	00.6 - 00.8
8	8	2	E	5	+2	5	-170	01 - 00.4
9	8	4	N	A	+1	5	450	01 - 00.4
10	1	1 NT	S	3	-1	4	-100	00.9 - 00.5
11	1	4	S	3	+2	4	480	01.4 - 00
12	1	1 NT	W	7	=	4	-90	00.4 - 01
13	2	4	S	T	+1	3	650	01.1 - 00.3
14	2	3 NT	E	Q	=	3	400	00.8 - 00.6
15	2	2	N	5	+2	3	170	00.5 - 00.9
16	3	3	N	J	=	2	140	00.1 - 01.3
17	3	4	E	3	=	2	-420	00.4 - 01
18	3	1 NT	N	3	+1	2	120	00.6 - 00.8
19	4	2 NT x	W	3	=	1	-690	00 - 01.4
20	4	2	N	Q	+2	1	130	00.8 - 00.6
21	4	4	E	3	+1	1	-450	00.4 - 01
22	5	3 NT	S	A	+1	8	430	01.1 - 00.3
23	5	2	W	A	=	8	-110	00.3 - 01.1
24	5	5 x	S	K	-3	8	-500	00 - 01.4

NS pair 5

Section b

Nigel Hinton
Elisabeth Hinton

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	4	3	E	6	=	2	-140	00.3 - 01.1
2	4	4	N	7	-5	2	-500	00.2 - 01.2
3	4	2	S	2	-2	2	-100	01 - 00.4
4	5	3 NT	S	2	=	1	600	01.1 - 00.3
5	5	3	W	8	=	1	-140	00.7 - 00.7
6	5	4	W	A	=	1	-620	00.2 - 01.2
7	6	2 NT	N	9	+3	8	210	01 - 00.4
8	6	3	E	J	+1	8	-170	01 - 00.4
9	6	4	N	A	+2	8	480	01.3 - 00.1
10	7	2	W	K	+1	7	-140	00.5 - 00.9
11	7	4 NT	N	2	-1	7	-50	00.2 - 01.2
12	7	4	E	2	-3	7	150	01.3 - 00.1
13	8	2	S	7	+2	6	170	00.2 - 01.2
14	8	4	N	Q	=	6	420	01.1 - 00.3
15	8	5 x	W	K	-2	6	300	00.8 - 00.6
16	1	3 NT	S	T	+1	5	430	01.2 - 00.2
17	1	4	E	3	-1	5	050	01.3 - 00.1
18	1	1 NT	N	8	+2	5	150	01.3 - 00.1
19	2	3	W	4	-1	4	100	01 - 00.4
20	2	3	N	8	+2	4	150	01.1 - 00.3
21	2	1 x	E	5	+4	4	-560	00 - 01.4
22	3	4	N	5	-1	3	-50	00 - 01.4
23	3	1 NT	E	J	=	3	-90	00.6 - 00.8
24	3	4	S	K	-1	3	-50	00.9 - 00.5

NS pair 6

Section b

Bernice Hamilton
Jill Massey

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	3	1 NT	S	9	-1	4	-50	01 - 00.4
2	3	4 x	W	A	=	4	-590	00 - 01.4
3	3	2	S	K	-3	4	-150	00.3 - 01.1
4	4	3 NT	S	2	=	3	600	01.1 - 00.3
5	4	3	W	5	+1	3	-170	00.3 - 01.1
6	4	4	W	A	-2	3	200	01.4 - 00
7	5	2	E	5	-2	2	200	00.8 - 00.6
8	5	4	E	5	=	2	-420	00.2 - 01.2
9	5	3	S	Q	+1	2	170	00.2 - 01.2
10	6	3	E	3	=	1	-140	00.5 - 00.9
11	6	6	S	A	-2	1	-100	00 - 01.4
12	6	2 NT	W	3	-1	1	050	00.9 - 00.5
13	7	4	S	T	=	8	620	00.6 - 00.8
14	7	4	S	6	=	8	420	01.1 - 00.3
15	7	4	N	K	=	8	620	01.1 - 00.3
16	8	3 NT	S	8	=	7	400	00.8 - 00.6
17	8	4	E	4	=	7	-420	00.4 - 01
18	8	4	N	3	-2	7	-200	00 - 01.4
19	1	3	W	3	+2	6	-200	00.2 - 01.2
20	1	2	N	Q	+1	6	110	00.6 - 00.8
21	1	4	E	5	=	6	-420	00.9 - 00.5
22	2	1 NT	N	7	+3	5	180	00.2 - 01.2
23	2	4	W	8	-2	5	200	01.2 - 00.2
24	2	4	S	T	=	5	130	01.2 - 00.2

NS pair 7

Section b

Olwyn McKay
Jean Checketts

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	2	1 NT	S	K	+1	6	120	01.4 - 00
2	2	4	W	3	+2	6	-480	00.5 - 00.9
3	2	3 NT	S	A	-3	6	-150	00.3 - 01.1
4	3	5	N	A	-3	5	-300	00 - 01.4
5	3	4	W	5	-1	5	050	01.2 - 00.2
6	3	4	W	A	=	5	-620	00.2 - 01.2
7	4	3	N	9	-1	4	-100	00.4 - 01
8	4	2	E	3	+2	4	-170	01 - 00.4
9	4	3	N	K	+2	4	200	00.6 - 00.8
10	5	2	N	7	-1	3	-100	00.9 - 00.5
11	5	3	S	J	+1	3	170	00.4 - 01
12	5	1	W	3	=	3	-70	00.6 - 00.8
13	6	5	E	5	-3	2	300	00.4 - 01
14	6	3	S	6	=	2	140	00.5 - 00.9
15	6	4	N	K	=	2	620	01.1 - 00.3
16	7	2	N	5	+2	1	170	00.6 - 00.8
17	7	4	E	4	=	1	-420	00.4 - 01
18	7	1 NT	N	A	+2	1	150	01.3 - 00.1
19	8	4	W	4	-1	8	100	01 - 00.4
20	8	1 NT	N	Q	+2	8	150	01.1 - 00.3
21	8	4	E	5	+1	8	-450	00.4 - 01
22	1	3 NT	S	A	=	7	400	00.5 - 00.9
23	1	2	W	8	=	7	-110	00.3 - 01.1
24	1	4	E	A	-4	7	200	01.4 - 00

NS pair 8

Section b

Damian Hogue
Alan Chisholm

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1	1	E	3	+2	8	-140	00.3 - 01.1
2	1	4	W	A	+1	8	-450	00.9 - 00.5
3	1	3	S	A	-3	8	-150	00.3 - 01.1
4	2	3 NT	S	2	=	7	600	01.1 - 00.3
5	2	3	E	A	+1	7	-170	00.3 - 01.1
6	2	3	W	A	=	7	-140	01 - 00.4
7	3	4	N	5	-3	6	-300	00 - 01.4
8	3	4	E	5	=	6	-420	00.2 - 01.2
9	3	2	S	8	+2	6	170	00.2 - 01.2
10	4	2	N	A	=	5	110	01.2 - 00.2
11	4	4	S	A	=	5	420	00.6 - 00.8
12	4	1	W	5	-3	5	150	01.3 - 00.1
13	5	3	E	T	=	4	-110	00 - 01.4
14	5	4	S	6	-1	4	-50	00.2 - 01.2
15	5	2	N	J	+2	4	170	00.5 - 00.9
16	6	3 NT	N	4	+1	3	430	01.2 - 00.2
17	6	4	E	4	=	3	-420	00.4 - 01
18	6	2	N	3	+1	3	140	00.9 - 00.5
19	7	3	S	A	-1	2	-50	00.5 - 00.9
20	7	4	S	A	-1	2	-100	00.2 - 01.2
21	7	4	E	5	=	2	-420	00.9 - 00.5
22	8	4	N	4	=	1	420	00.8 - 00.6
23	8	3	W	A	-1	1	100	00.8 - 00.6
24	8	4	S	T	-1	1	-50	00.9 - 00.5