Alexandra Bridge Club : Detailed data for Mixed Pairs M

View by:

EW pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Mixed Pairs M 12 February

EW pair 1

Section b

Ethel Bristow
Damian Hogue

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1	4	N	2	=	1	420	01.2 - 00
2	1	4	W	Q	-3	1	150	01.1 - 00.1
3	1	3	S	3	-1	1	-50	00 - 01.2
4	5					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
5	5					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
6	5					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
7	2	3	S	4	+1	2	130	00.7 - 00.5
8	2	3 NT	S	5	=	2	400	00.4 - 00.8
9	2	3	E	9	-2	2	200	01 - 00.2
10	6	1	W	A	+3	6	-170	00.6 - 00.6
11	6	2	E	5	+1	6	-140	00.3 - 00.9
12	6	3	E	2	=	6	-140	00.6 - 00.6
13	3	2 NT	S	4	+1	3	150	01.2 - 00
14	3	3 NT	W	T	=	3	-400	00.2 - 01
15	3	1 NT	E	3	=	3	-90	00.8 - 00.4
16	7	2	N	A	=	7	110	00.5 - 00.7
17	7	5	W	3	=	7	-400	00.2 - 01
18	7	2	E	4	+1	7	-140	00.1 - 01.1
19	4	3 NT	S	6	+2	4	460	00.5 - 00.7
20	4	1 NT	W	9	=	4	-90	00.2 - 01
21	4	2	E	Q	+2	4	-170	00.3 - 00.9
22	8	2	S	3	+4	8	230	00.2 - 01
23	8	3	W	A	+1	8	-130	00.1 - 01.1
24	8	3	E	A	=	8	-140	00.2 - 01

EW pair 2

Section b

Julie Scurr
Lynda Hodge

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	4					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
2	4					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
3	4					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
4	1	2	W	A	-2	2	200	01 - 00.2
5	1	3 NT	S	7	-3	2	-300	00 - 01.2
6	1	2	N	4	=	2	110	00.1 - 01.1
7	5	3	N	3	=	6	110	00.4 - 00.8
8	5	3 NT	S	5	+1	6	430	00.9 - 00.3
9	5	3	S	2	=	6	110	00.8 - 00.4
10	2	3	W	J	+1	3	-170	00.6 - 00.6
11	2	2	E	5	=	3	-110	00.7 - 00.5
12	2	2	E	6	+2	3	-170	00.1 - 01.1
13	6	1 NT	N	Q	=	7	090	00.7 - 00.5
14	6	3 NT	W	2	=	7	-400	00.2 - 01
15	6	1 NT	E	3	=	7	-90	00.8 - 00.4
16	3	2	N	7	+1	4	140	01 - 00.2
17	3	4	W	Q	+1	4	-150	00.7 - 00.5
18	3	1	S	6	=	4	080	01 - 00.2
19	7	3 NT	S	6	+2	8	460	00.5 - 00.7
20	7	2	E	A	-1	8	100	00.6 - 00.6
21	7	4	E	A	-2	8	100	01.1 - 00.1
22	8	4	N	T	+2	1	480	01.1 - 00.1
23	8	2	E	3	-3	1	300	01 - 00.2
24	8	3	E	A	=	1	-140	00.2 - 01

EW pair 3

Section b

Jean Bonsor
Kathleen Hurr

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	8	3 NT	S	6	-3	2	-150	00 - 01.2
2	8	3 NT	E	5	-2	2	100	00.7 - 00.5
3	8	2	S	Q	=	2	090	00.3 - 00.9
4	4	2	W	A	-1	6	100	00.8 - 00.4
5	4	1 NT	S	J	-1	6	-100	00.4 - 00.8
6	4	2	N	T	=	6	110	00.1 - 01.1
7	1	5	S	Q	-1	3	-100	00.1 - 01.1
8	1	3 NT	S	Q	=	3	400	00.4 - 00.8
9	1	5	S	Q	-1	3	-50	00.4 - 00.8
10	5	2	W	A	+2	7	-170	00.6 - 00.6
11	5	2	E	K	=	7	-110	00.7 - 00.5
12	5	2	E	3	+1	7	-140	00.6 - 00.6
13	2	1 NT	S	4	=	4	090	00.7 - 00.5
14	2	3 NT	W	3	=	4	-400	00.2 - 01
15	2	1 NT	E	3	+1	4	-120	00.3 - 00.9
16	6	2	N	A	=	8	110	00.5 - 00.7
17	6	4	W	2	=	8	-130	01.1 - 00.1
18	6	2	E	4	=	8	-110	00.6 - 00.6
19	7	3 NT	S	9	+3	1	490	01 - 00.2
20	7	3	E	A	-1	1	100	00.6 - 00.6
21	7	1 NT	W	3	+1	1	-120	00.7 - 00.5
22	3					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
23	3					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
24	3					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9

EW pair 4

Section b

Lorraine Robertson
Olwyn McKay

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	3	3	N	2	=	6	110	00.7 - 00.5
2	3	2	N	K	-2	6	-200	00 - 01.2
3	3	1	S	T	+1	6	090	00.3 - 00.9
4	8	2 NT	S	9	-2	3	-200	00.1 - 01.1
5	8	4 x	N	2	=	3	790	01.2 - 00
6	8	3 NT	S	9	=	3	400	01.2 - 00
7	4	4	S	7	+1	7	150	01.1 - 00.1
8	4	3	N	4	+1	7	130	00 - 01.2
9	4	3 NT	N	3	-1	7	-50	00.4 - 00.8
10	1	3	W	J	+1	4	-170	00.6 - 00.6
11	1	4	W	9	-1	4	050	01.1 - 00.1
12	1	2	E	6	=	4	-110	01 - 00.2
13	5	1 NT	N	3	+1	8	120	01 - 00.2
14	5	1	W	2	+1	8	-110	00.6 - 00.6
15	5	2	W	4	-2	8	100	01.2 - 00
16	6	2	N	6	+1	1	140	01 - 00.2
17	6	3	W	2	+2	1	-150	00.7 - 00.5
18	6	4	E	J	-3	1	150	01.2 - 00
19	2					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
20	2					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
21	2					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
22	7	4	N	7	+1	2	450	00.6 - 00.6
23	7	3	W	A	+1	2	-130	00.1 - 01.1
24	7	3	E	A	-1	2	050	00.9 - 00.3

EW pair 5

Section b

Lyn Taylor
Annette Beattie

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	7	2	N	9	+1	3	110	00.7 - 00.5
2	7	2 NT x	E	5	-1	3	100	00.7 - 00.5
3	7	3	S	3	+1	3	130	01.1 - 00.1
4	3	1	W	A	=	7	-80	00.6 - 00.6
5	3	4	N	J	-2	7	-200	00.2 - 01
6	3	2	N	4	+2	7	170	01 - 00.2
7	8	2	S	9	+2	4	130	00.7 - 00.5
8	8	3 NT	N	2	+2	4	460	01.2 - 00
9	8	3	N	A	-2	4	-100	00 - 01.2
10	4	1	W	A	+3	8	-170	00.6 - 00.6
11	4	3	E	K	+1	8	-170	00 - 01.2
12	4	2	E	6	+2	8	-170	00.1 - 01.1
13	5	1 NT	N	Q	-1	1	-100	00.2 - 01
14	5	4	E	7	-1	1	050	01 - 00.2
15	5	1 NT	E	5	=	1	-90	00.8 - 00.4
16	1					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
17	1					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
18	1					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
19	6	3 NT	S	6	+2	2	460	00.5 - 00.7
20	6	2	E	A	-1	2	100	00.6 - 00.6
21	6	2	E	Q	+2	2	-170	00.3 - 00.9
22	2	2	N	A	+3	6	200	00 - 01.2
23	2	1 NT	E	Q	+1	6	-120	00.4 - 00.8
24	2	3	E	A	-1	6	050	00.9 - 00.3

EW pair 6

Section b

Kaye Rowell
Terrie Gillaly

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	2	3	E	A	-2	7	100	00.2 - 01
2	2	4	W	A	-3	7	150	01.1 - 00.1
3	2	2	S	3	+1	7	110	00.7 - 00.5
4	7	4 x	W	8	-4	4	1100	01.2 - 00
5	7	4	N	2	=	4	620	01 - 00.2
6	7	2	N	4	+1	4	140	00.6 - 00.6
7	3	3	S	4	-1	8	-100	00.1 - 01.1
8	3	3 NT	N	2	+1	8	430	00.9 - 00.3
9	3	5	S	2	-1	8	-50	00.4 - 00.8
10	4	3	W	J	+1	1	-170	00.6 - 00.6
11	4	4	E	4	-1	1	050	01.1 - 00.1
12	4	3	E	3	-1	1	050	01.2 - 00
13	8					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
14	8					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
15	8					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
16	5	2	N	4	-1	2	-50	00.2 - 01
17	5	5	W	3	=	2	-400	00.2 - 01
18	5	4	W	A	-1	2	050	00.8 - 00.4
19	1	5	S	8	-1	6	-50	00 - 01.2
20	1	3 NT x	W	2	-2	6	500	01.2 - 00
21	1	4	E		=	6	-420	00 - 01.2
22	6	4	S	2	+1	3	450	00.6 - 00.6
23	6	4	E	Q	-3	3	300	01 - 00.2
24	6	2	W	A	+1	3	-140	00.2 - 01

EW pair 7

Section b

Lyn Buchanan
Jean Checketts

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	6	2	N	7	+1	4	110	00.7 - 00.5
2	6	2 NT	E	5	-1	4	050	00.3 - 00.9
3	6	2	S	3	+1	4	110	00.7 - 00.5
4	2	3	N	T	-1	8	-100	00.4 - 00.8
5	2	3 NT	S	9	=	8	600	00.8 - 00.4
6	2	3	N	5	=	8	140	00.6 - 00.6
7	3	3	S	7	+2	1	150	01.1 - 00.1
8	3	3 NT	N	6	=	1	400	00.4 - 00.8
9	3	3 x	E	6	-2	1	500	01.2 - 00
10	7					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
11	7					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
12	7					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
13	4	PASS	N			2	0	00.4 - 00.8
14	4	3 NT	W	T	-1	2	050	01 - 00.2
15	4	2	N	T	-2	2	-200	00 - 01.2
16	8	3	S	3	-2	6	-100	00 - 01.2
17	8	3	W	3	+1	6	-130	01.1 - 00.1
18	8	1 NT	W	A	+1	6	-120	00.4 - 00.8
19	5	6 NT	S	6	=	3	990	01.2 - 00
20	5	3	E	A	=	3	-140	00 - 01.2
21	5	1 NT	W	3	-2	3	100	01.1 - 00.1
22	1	4	N	T	+2	7	480	01.1 - 00.1
23	1	2	E	2	-2	7	200	00.6 - 00.6
24	1	2	E	A	=	7	-110	00.6 - 00.6

EW pair 8

Section b

Morag Chisholm
Annette Meyer

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1	2	N	3	+1	8	110	00.7 - 00.5
2	1	2 NT	E	5	-1	8	050	00.3 - 00.9
3	1	3	S	3	+1	8	130	01.1 - 00.1
4	2	4	N	Q	-2	1	-200	00.1 - 01.1
5	2	2 NT	S	K	+1	1	150	00.6 - 00.6
6	2	3	N	4	=	1	140	00.6 - 00.6
7	6					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
8	6					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
9	6					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
10	3	1	W	A	+3	2	-170	00.6 - 00.6
11	3	2	E	5	+1	2	-140	00.3 - 00.9
12	3	2	E	A	+1	2	-140	00.6 - 00.6
13	7	3	S	A	-2	6	-200	00 - 01.2
14	7	3 NT	E	3	-1	6	050	01 - 00.2
15	7	1 NT	E	3	+1	6	-120	00.3 - 00.9
16	4	2	N	Q	+1	3	140	01 - 00.2
17	4	5	W	5	=	3	-400	00.2 - 01
18	4	2	E	4	+1	3	-140	00.1 - 01.1
19	8	3 NT	S	6	+2	7	460	00.5 - 00.7
20	8	2	N	J	=	7	110	01 - 00.2
21	8	1 NT	W	3	+1	7	-120	00.7 - 00.5
22	5	5	N	A	=	4	450	00.6 - 00.6
23	5	2	E	3	-3	4	300	01 - 00.2
24	5	3	E	A	-2	4	100	01.2 - 00