Alexandra Bridge Club : Detailed data for Autumn Pairs (2021)

View by:

NS pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Autumn Pairs (2021) 5 July

NS pair 1

Section b

Lyn Buchanan
Joan Botting

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1	3	S	K	=	1	140	00.8 - 01
2	1	4	W	3	+1	1	-450	01 - 00.8
3	2					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
4	2					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
5	3	5	N	K	=	10	650	00.9 - 00.9
6	3	1 NT	W	9	-2	10	200	00.6 - 01.2
7	4	2	S	J	+1	9	110	01.4 - 00.4
8	4	2	W	5	+4	9	-170	01.6 - 00.2
9	5	3	W	A	-1	8	100	01.6 - 00.2
10	5	4	N	K	=	8	620	01.8 - 00
11	6	4	N	6	-1	7	-50	00.5 - 01.3
12	6	2	N	4	=	7	110	01.4 - 00.4
13	7	3 NT	N	3	-1	6	-100	00.4 - 01.4
14	7	2 NT	E	Q	+1	6	-150	00.1 - 01.7
15	8	5	N	2	-1	5	-100	00.8 - 01
16	8	2	S	A	+1	5	110	01.4 - 00.4
17	9	4	W	K	-2	4	100	01.8 - 00
18	9	5	N	A	=	4	650	01.7 - 00.1
19	10	4	S	2	-2	3	-100	00.4 - 01.4
20	10	2	N	7	=	3	110	01.8 - 00
21	11	1 NT	S	9	-3	2	-300	00.4 - 01.4
22	11	4	S	2	+1	2	450	00.9 - 00.9

NS pair 2

Section b

Lynda Hodge
Plony Belt

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	11	2	S	Q	+2	3	170	01.6 - 00.2
2	11	3 NT	E	3	+2	3	-460	00.4 - 01.4
3	1	6	N	3	+1	2	1010	01.4 - 00.4
4	1	4	W	9	=	2	-620	00.2 - 01.6
5	2	4	N	K	-2	1	-200	00 - 01.8
6	2	1 NT	W	2	-4	1	400	01.5 - 00.3
7	3					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
8	3					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
9	4	3	E	4	=	10	-110	00.7 - 01.1
10	4	1 NT	S	5	=	10	090	00.2 - 01.6
11	5	4	N	6	-2	9	-100	00.2 - 01.6
12	5	3	W	7	-1	9	050	01.2 - 00.6
13	6	3 NT	N	5	=	8	600	01.4 - 00.4
14	6	3 NT	E	Q	-2	8	100	01.7 - 00.1
15	7	4	S	A	-3	7	-300	00 - 01.8
16	7	2	E	A	-3	7	300	01.7 - 00.1
17	8	4	E	5	=	6	-420	00.2 - 01.6
18	8	5	W	5	-2	6	100	01.2 - 00.6
19	9	3 NT x	E	Q	-4	5	1100	01.8 - 00
20	9	4	N	8	-2	5	-200	00.9 - 00.9
21	10	3 NT	W	2	=	4	-400	00.1 - 01.7
22	10	4	S	J	+2	4	480	01.5 - 00.3

NS pair 3

Section b

Kathleen Hurr
Judy Henderson

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	10	2	S	2	+2	5	170	01.6 - 00.2
2	10	3 NT	W	3	-1	5	050	01.7 - 00.1
3	11	6 NT	S	5	+1	4	1020	01.7 - 00.1
4	11	4	W	4	=	4	-620	00.2 - 01.6
5	1	4	N	K	+2	3	680	01.3 - 00.5
6	1	2	E	2	-2	3	200	00.6 - 01.2
7	2	2	W	Q	=	2	-110	00.8 - 01
8	2	5	W	9	+2	2	-440	00.7 - 01.1
9	3	3 NT	W	J	=	1	-600	00 - 01.8
10	3	2	N	8	=	1	110	00.6 - 01.2
11	4					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
12	4					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
13	5	2 NT	N	5	+1	10	150	01.1 - 00.7
14	5	3	W	6	-1	10	050	01.4 - 00.4
15	6	4	S	Q	-2	9	-200	00.3 - 01.5
16	6	1 NT	W	5	-1	9	100	01.2 - 00.6
17	7	4	E	4	+1	8	-450	00 - 01.8
18	7	6	S	A	-2	8	-200	00.2 - 01.6
19	8	3	N	A	+2	7	200	01.2 - 00.6
20	8	4	N	2	-3	7	-300	00.2 - 01.6
21	9	1 NT	E	A	+3	6	-180	00.7 - 01.1
22	9	4	S	2	+2	6	480	01.5 - 00.3

NS pair 4

Section b

Susan Douglas
Bronwyn Greenwood

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	9	4	S	2	-1	7	-50	00 - 01.8
2	9	4	W	3	+1	7	-450	01 - 00.8
3	10	5 NT	S	5	+2	6	520	00.8 - 01
4	10	4	E	3	=	6	-620	00.2 - 01.6
5	11	4	N	5	+3	5	710	01.6 - 00.2
6	11	1 NT	W	2	-3	5	300	01.1 - 00.7
7	1	2	W	Q	=	4	-110	00.8 - 01
8	1	5	W	7	+1	4	-420	01 - 00.8
9	2	3	W	J	+1	3	-130	00.4 - 01.4
10	2	4	S	5	-1	3	-100	00 - 01.8
11	3	3	N	4	+1	2	170	01.6 - 00.2
12	3	3	N	5	-1	2	-100	00.6 - 01.2
13	4	3 NT	N	5	+2	1	660	01.8 - 00
14	4	4	W	6	-2	1	100	01.7 - 00.1
15	5					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
16	5					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
17	6	3	W	4	-1	10	050	01.6 - 00.2
18	6	5	W	A	-2	10	100	01.2 - 00.6
19	7	4	N	A	-1	9	-50	00.7 - 01.1
20	7	3	N	K	-2	9	-200	00.9 - 00.9
21	8	3 NT	W	2	-2	8	100	01.8 - 00
22	8	3	S	J	+2	8	200	00.5 - 01.3

NS pair 5

Section b

Annette Harris
Damian Hogue

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	8	2	S	6	+2	9	170	01.6 - 00.2
2	8	4	E	7	=	9	-420	01.4 - 00.4
3	9	3 NT	S	9	+3	8	490	00.1 - 01.7
4	9					8	-170	01.1 - 00.7
5	10	4	N	K	-1	7	-100	00.3 - 01.5
6	10	3 NT	N	4	+1	7	430	01.8 - 00
7	11	3	W	4	=	6	-140	00.2 - 01.6
8	11	6	W	9	+1	6	-940	00 - 01.8
9	1	3 NT	E	5	-2	5	200	01.8 - 00
10	1	2	N	4	+2	5	170	01.6 - 00.2
11	2	4	N	J	-1	4	-50	00.5 - 01.3
12	2	2	W	K	=	4	-90	00.9 - 00.9
13	3	2	N	K	+3	3	150	01.1 - 00.7
14	3	2	W	5	+1	3	-140	00.5 - 01.3
15	4	3	N	6	+1	2	130	01 - 00.8
16	4	2	W	4	+1	2	-110	00.2 - 01.6
17	5	3	W	J	+1	1	-170	00.4 - 01.4
18	5	5	W	K	-2	1	100	01.2 - 00.6
19	6					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
20	6					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
21	7	3 NT	E	6	=	10	-400	00.1 - 01.7
22	7	3	S	A	+2	10	200	00.5 - 01.3

NS pair 6

Section b

Ethel Bristow
Laetitia Robinson

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	7					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
2	7					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
3	8	6 NT	S	5	+1	10	1020	01.7 - 00.1
4	8	4	W	7	-1	10	100	01.8 - 00
5	9	4	N	K	-1	9	-100	00.3 - 01.5
6	9	1 NT	W	2	-3	9	300	01.1 - 00.7
7	10	3	W	4	=	8	-140	00.2 - 01.6
8	10	3 NT	E	Q	+2	8	-460	00.4 - 01.4
9	11	2	N	J	-1	7	-50	01.3 - 00.5
10	11	2	N	Q	=	7	110	00.6 - 01.2
11	1	5 x	N	5	-3	6	-500	00 - 01.8
12	1	3 NT	E	T	+3	6	-490	00 - 01.8
13	2	5	N	3	-2	5	-200	00.1 - 01.7
14	2	2	S	A	-2	5	-100	01 - 00.8
15	3	2	S	Q	+4	4	170	01.3 - 00.5
16	3	1 NT	W	5	=	4	-90	00.5 - 01.3
17	4	3	W	J	=	3	-140	01 - 00.8
18	4	5 x	N	J	-2	3	-500	00 - 01.8
19	5	4	N	A	+1	2	450	01.6 - 00.2
20	5	4	N	K	-3	2	-300	00.2 - 01.6
21	6	3	W	2	=	1	-140	01.2 - 00.6
22	6	4	S	J	+2	1	480	01.5 - 00.3

NS pair 7

Section b

Lorraine Robertson
Olwyn McKay

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	6	3	S	2	=	2	140	00.8 - 01
2	6	3 NT	E	5	+2	2	-460	00.4 - 01.4
3	7	3 NT	S	3	+3	1	490	00.1 - 01.7
4	7	3	E	3	=	1	-140	01.6 - 00.2
5	8					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
6	8					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
7	9	4	E	4	-3	10	300	01.7 - 00.1
8	9	3	W	4	+4	10	-190	01.4 - 00.4
9	10	2	N	K	-4	9	-200	00.2 - 01.6
10	10	2	N	T	=	9	110	00.6 - 01.2
11	11	3	N	Q	=	8	140	01.1 - 00.7
12	11	3	W	2	=	8	-110	00.3 - 01.5
13	1	3	S	2	-2	7	-200	00.1 - 01.7
14	1	3	W	6	=	7	-140	00.5 - 01.3
15	2	4	E	A	=	6	-130	00.6 - 01.2
16	2	1 NT	E	A	+1	6	-120	00 - 01.8
17	3	2	W	Q	+1	5	-140	01 - 00.8
18	3	3	N	6	-1	5	-100	00.6 - 01.2
19	4	3	N	A	-1	4	-50	00.7 - 01.1
20	4	2	N	8	-2	4	-200	00.9 - 00.9
21	5	3	W	2	=	3	-140	01.2 - 00.6
22	5	1	E	2	+1	3	-110	00 - 01.8

NS pair 8

Section b

Helen O'Donnell
Patti Lattimore

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	5	1 NT	S	2	+1	4	120	00.2 - 01.6
2	5	3 NT	E	5	-1	4	050	01.7 - 00.1
3	6	5 NT	S	5	+2	3	520	00.8 - 01
4	6	2 NT	E	3	+2	3	-180	00.6 - 01.2
5	7					2	600	00.6 - 01.2
6	7	2	E	2	-1	2	100	00 - 01.8
7	8	2	W	4	+1	1	-140	00.2 - 01.6
8	8	4	W	9	-3	1	150	01.8 - 00
9	9					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
10	9					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
11	10	3	N	J	+1	10	170	01.6 - 00.2
12	10	2	W	K	=	10	-90	00.9 - 00.9
13	11	3	S	T	=	9	110	00.7 - 01.1
14	11	3	S	9	-2	9	-100	01 - 00.8
15	1	2	S	3	+2	8	170	01.3 - 00.5
16	1	2	N	A	-1	8	-50	01 - 00.8
17	2	3	W	J	=	7	-140	01 - 00.8
18	2	4	N	2	-1	7	-100	00.6 - 01.2
19	3	4	S	A	-3	6	-150	00.2 - 01.6
20	3	3 NT	N	6	-2	6	-200	00.9 - 00.9
21	4	4	W	4	-1	5	050	01.6 - 00.2
22	4	3	N	9	+1	5	130	00.2 - 01.6

NS pair 9

Section b

Chris Rivers
Murray Kokich

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	4	2	S	9	+1	6	140	00.8 - 01
2	4	4	W	3	+1	6	-450	01 - 00.8
3	5	3 NT	S	5	+4	5	520	00.8 - 01
4	5	2	W	T	+2	5	-170	01.1 - 00.7
5	6	4	N	K	+2	4	680	01.3 - 00.5
6	6	1 NT	W	2	-4	4	400	01.5 - 00.3
7	7	2	E	3	=	3	-110	00.8 - 01
8	7	6	W	9	=	3	-920	00.2 - 01.6
9	8	2	N	K	-1	2	-50	01.3 - 00.5
10	8	1 NT	N	A	+1	2	120	01 - 00.8
11	9	2	N	J	+1	1	140	01.1 - 00.7
12	9	2	W	K	+1	1	-110	00.3 - 01.5
13	10					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
14	10					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
15	11	4	S	8	-2	10	-200	00.3 - 01.5
16	11	1	W	9	=	10	-80	00.8 - 01
17	1	3	E	2	=	9	-140	01 - 00.8
18	1	3	N	2	-1	9	-100	00.6 - 01.2
19	2	5	E	7	=	8	-600	00 - 01.8
20	2	2	N	K	-1	8	-100	01.5 - 00.3
21	3	3	W	J	=	7	-140	01.2 - 00.6
22	3	4	S	2	+2	7	480	01.5 - 00.3

NS pair 10

Section b

Ron Hallberg
Alan Chisholm

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	3	2	S	K	+1	8	140	00.8 - 01
2	3	3 NT	E	K	+3	8	-490	00 - 01.8
3	4	4 NT	S	5	+3	7	520	00.8 - 01
4	4	3	E	3	+1	7	-170	01.1 - 00.7
5	5	5	N	K	=	6	650	00.9 - 00.9
6	5	1	W	A	-2	6	200	00.6 - 01.2
7	6	3	E	9	-1	5	100	01.2 - 00.6
8	6	5	W	2	+2	5	-440	00.7 - 01.1
9	7	2	N	K	-2	4	-100	01 - 00.8
10	7	3	S	5	=	4	140	01.3 - 00.5
11	8	3	W	K	-1	3	050	00.8 - 01
12	8	2	N	5	+1	3	140	01.6 - 00.2
13	9	3	N	K	=	2	110	00.7 - 01.1
14	9	3	S	A	-3	2	-150	00.1 - 01.7
15	10	5	N	6	+1	1	620	01.6 - 00.2
16	10	2	E	A	-3	1	300	01.7 - 00.1
17	11					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
18	11					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
19	1	5	W	A	-1	10	100	01 - 00.8
20	1	3	N	K	-3	10	-300	00.2 - 01.6
21	2	2 NT	E	A	+2	9	-180	00.7 - 01.1
22	2	4	S	J	+1	9	450	00.9 - 00.9

NS pair 11

Section b

Malcolm Ealam
Lisa Harkness

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	2	2	S	2	+1	10	140	00.8 - 01
2	2	3 NT	E	5	+2	10	-460	00.4 - 01.4
3	3	3 NT	S	9	+4	9	520	00.8 - 01
4	3	3	E	Q	+1	9	-170	01.1 - 00.7
5	4	5 x	N	K	+1	8	1050	01.8 - 00
6	4	2	S	T	+3	8	150	00.2 - 01.6
7	5	1 NT	E	5	-3	7	300	01.7 - 00.1
8	5	5	W	9	=	7	-400	01.2 - 00.6
9	6	3	E	4	=	6	-110	00.7 - 01.1
10	6	2	N	K	+1	6	140	01.3 - 00.5
11	7	2	N	4	+2	5	170	01.6 - 00.2
12	7	3	N	4	+1	5	170	01.8 - 00
13	8	3 NT	S	9	+1	4	630	01.6 - 00.2
14	8	3	S	7	-2	4	-100	01 - 00.8
15	9	5 x	N	T	=	3	750	01.8 - 00
16	9	1 NT	W	5	=	3	-90	00.5 - 01.3
17	10	3	W	6	=	2	-140	01 - 00.8
18	10	4	N	4	+1	2	650	01.7 - 00.1
19	11	4	N	4	=	1	420	01.4 - 00.4
20	11	4	N	7	-1	1	-100	01.5 - 00.3
21	1					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
22	1					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9