Alexandra Bridge Club : Detailed data for Autumn Pairs (2021)

View by:

EW pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Autumn Pairs (2021) 21 June

EW pair 1

Section b

Shona Watt
Morag Chisholm

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1	3 NT	S	4	-3	1	-150	00.1 - 01.7
2	1	2	S	9	+1	1	110	00.5 - 01.3
3	7	2	E	2	-1	7	100	01.1 - 00.7
4	7	2	E	6	+1	7	-140	00.9 - 00.9
5	2	4	N	K	=	2	620	01.7 - 00.1
6	2	3	S	6	-1	2	-50	00.8 - 01
7	8	6	S	T	-2	8	-200	00 - 01.8
8	8	1 NT	S	8	=	8	090	01.7 - 00.1
9	3					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
10	3					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
11	9	3 NT	E	2	=	9	-400	00.5 - 01.3
12	9	3	W	3	-1	9	050	01.1 - 00.7
13	4	3 NT	S	4	-1	4	-100	00 - 01.8
14	4	2	E	Q	+2	4	-170	00.3 - 01.5
15	10	3 NT	E	3	+1	10	-430	01.4 - 00.4
16	10	4	W	5	-2	10	200	01.8 - 00
17	5	3 NT	S	6	-3	5	-150	00.1 - 01.7
18	5	2	S	8	+1	5	140	01.5 - 00.3
19	11	2 NT	W	6	-2	11	200	01.5 - 00.3
20	11	3 NT	N	5	+1	11	630	01.6 - 00.2
21	6	4	N	K	-2	6	-200	00.3 - 01.5
22	6	3	S	A	+1	6	130	00.2 - 01.6

EW pair 2

Section b

Jean Bonsor
Jon Morris

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	6	3	W	T	-2	7	100	01.6 - 00.2
2	6	3	S	2	-1	7	-100	00 - 01.8
3	1	2	W	9	-1	2	100	01.1 - 00.7
4	1	2	E	J	+2	2	-170	00.4 - 01.4
5	7	3	N	K	+1	8	170	01 - 00.8
6	7	3	S	6	=	8	140	01.6 - 00.2
7	2					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
8	2					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
9	8	3	N	A	-3	9	-150	00.2 - 01.6
10	8	4	E	J	-1	9	100	01.6 - 00.2
11	3	3	W	9	+1	4	-130	01.2 - 00.6
12	3	4	W	T	-3	4	150	01.8 - 00
13	9	3	S	4	+1	10	130	00.4 - 01.4
14	9	3	N	A	-2	10	-100	01.2 - 00.6
15	4	4	W	A	+1	5	-450	00.8 - 01
16	4	1	W	6	+1	5	-110	01.3 - 00.5
17	10	1 NT	N	Q	+2	11	150	01.8 - 00
18	10	2	S	J	+1	11	140	01.5 - 00.3
19	5	1	W	2	=	6	-70	01 - 00.8
20	5	3	S	3	+1	6	170	00.5 - 01.3
21	11	4	N	K	-2	1	-200	00.3 - 01.5
22	11	4	N	J	=	1	420	01.1 - 00.7

EW pair 3

Section b

Susan Douglas
Bronwyn Greenwood

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	11	3 NT	S	A	+2	2	460	01.8 - 00
2	11	3 NT	N	3	=	2	600	01.4 - 00.4
3	6	1 NT	E	7	+3	8	-180	00 - 01.8
4	6	2	E	J	-1	8	100	01.5 - 00.3
5	1					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
6	1					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
7	7	4 NT	S	5	+3	9	720	01.6 - 00.2
8	7	1 NT	N	3	-1	9	-50	01.2 - 00.6
9	2	2	E	J	=	4	-110	00.7 - 01.1
10	2	1 NT	E	5	+2	4	-150	00.5 - 01.3
11	8	4	E	K	=	10	-420	00.1 - 01.7
12	8	3	N	Q	-2	10	-200	00 - 01.8
13	3	4	S	4	=	5	620	01.5 - 00.3
14	3	2	E	5	+2	5	-170	00.3 - 01.5
15	9	3 NT	E	3	+3	11	-490	00 - 01.8
16	9	1	W	A	+2	11	-140	00.6 - 01.2
17	4	3	N	Q	-2	6	-100	00.4 - 01.4
18	4	4	S	9	-1	6	-100	00.3 - 01.5
19	10	3	E	3	+1	1	-170	00 - 01.8
20	10	3	S	2	+1	1	170	00.5 - 01.3
21	5	2	N	5	+2	7	170	01.1 - 00.7
22	5	4	N	J	=	7	420	01.1 - 00.7

EW pair 4

Section b

Murray Kokich
Chris Rivers

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	5	5	N	T	-1	8	-50	01.1 - 00.7
2	5	3 NT	N	K	=	8	600	01.4 - 00.4
3	11					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
4	11					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
5	6	2	W	4	-1	9	050	00.3 - 01.5
6	6	3	S	6	-1	9	-50	00.8 - 01
7	1	5	S	9	=	4	650	00.9 - 00.9
8	1	2	N	T	-2	4	-100	00.5 - 01.3
9	7	PASS	N			10	0	01.2 - 00.6
10	7	3	W	T	-1	10	100	01.6 - 00.2
11	2	3 NT	E	K	=	5	-400	00.5 - 01.3
12	2	3	W	6	=	5	-110	00.6 - 01.2
13	8	3 NT	S	8	=	11	600	01.1 - 00.7
14	8	2	W	J	+1	11	-140	00.6 - 01.2
15	3	4	W	A	+1	6	-450	00.8 - 01
16	3	1	W	6	+2	6	-140	00.6 - 01.2
17	9	1 NT	N	Q	+1	1	120	01.5 - 00.3
18	9	2	S	J	+1	1	140	01.5 - 00.3
19	4	1 NT	W	6	=	7	-90	00.8 - 01
20	4	2	S	2	+2	7	170	00.5 - 01.3
21	10	2	N	3	+2	2	170	01.1 - 00.7
22	10	4	N	4	-1	2	-50	00 - 01.8

EW pair 5

Section b

John Bates
Jocelyn Evans

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	10					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
2	10					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
3	5	1 NT	E	7	+2	9	-150	00.2 - 01.6
4	5	2	E	J	+2	9	-170	00.4 - 01.4
5	11	3	W	A	-1	4	050	00.3 - 01.5
6	11	3	S	6	-1	4	-50	00.8 - 01
7	6	6	S	T	-1	10	-100	00.3 - 01.5
8	6	2	E	Q	+1	10	-140	00.2 - 01.6
9	1	3 NT	N	J	-5	5	-250	00 - 01.8
10	1	2	E	K	+2	5	-170	00.1 - 01.7
11	7	4	E	K	=	11	-420	00.1 - 01.7
12	7	2	E	5	-1	11	050	01.1 - 00.7
13	2	4	S	A	=	6	620	01.5 - 00.3
14	2	4	E	5	=	6	-420	00 - 01.8
15	8	4	E	8	+1	1	-450	00.8 - 01
16	8	1	W		+2	1	-140	00.6 - 01.2
17	3	3	N	Q	-3	7	-150	00.1 - 01.7
18	3	2	S	J	=	7	110	01 - 00.8
19	9	3	E	T	=	2	-140	00.2 - 01.6
20	9	4	S	2	=	2	620	01.3 - 00.5
21	4	4	S	2	-2	8	-200	00.3 - 01.5
22	4	3	N	4	+1	8	170	00.4 - 01.4

EW pair 6

Section b

Helen O'Donnell
Patti Lattimore

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	4	5 x	N	T	-1	9	-100	00.5 - 01.3
2	4	2	S	6	=	9	090	00.2 - 01.6
3	10	1	N	3	-2	4	-100	00.4 - 01.4
4	10	3	W	4	-2	4	200	01.8 - 00
5	5	3 NT	S	2	=	10	600	01.4 - 00.4
6	5	3	S	6	=	10	140	01.6 - 00.2
7	11	6	S	3	-1	5	-100	00.3 - 01.5
8	11	1 NT	S	8	-2	5	-100	00.5 - 01.3
9	6	2	E	J	=	11	-110	00.7 - 01.1
10	6	2	W	A	+2	11	-170	00.1 - 01.7
11	1	4	W	K	+2	6	-170	00.8 - 01
12	1	3	E	5	-1	6	050	01.1 - 00.7
13	7	2 NT	S	8	+1	1	150	00.6 - 01.2
14	7	3 NT	W	T	-1	1	050	01.7 - 00.1
15	2	4	W	5	+1	7	-450	00.8 - 01
16	2	1	W	3	+2	7	-140	00.6 - 01.2
17	8	1 NT	N	7	=	2	090	00.6 - 01.2
18	8	1 NT	W	5	-1	2	050	00.6 - 01.2
19	3	2 NT	W	7	-2	8	200	01.5 - 00.3
20	3	3	S	2	+1	8	170	00.5 - 01.3
21	9					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
22	9					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9

EW pair 7

Section b

Olwyn McKay
Lorraine Robertson

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	9	3 NT	S	3	-2	4	-100	00.5 - 01.3
2	9	2 NT	N	4	+3	4	210	01 - 00.8
3	4	2	E	A	-1	10	100	01.1 - 00.7
4	4	3	E	J	+1	10	-170	00.4 - 01.4
5	10	3	W	A	-2	5	100	00.6 - 01.2
6	10	2	S	6	+1	5	140	01.6 - 00.2
7	5	5	S	2	=	11	650	00.9 - 00.9
8	5	2	W	2	=	11	-90	00.8 - 01
9	11	2	S	7	=	6	110	01.6 - 00.2
10	11	3	W	A	-1	6	100	01.6 - 00.2
11	6	2	W	3	+1	1	-110	01.6 - 00.2
12	6	1 NT	E	Q	+1	1	-120	00.4 - 01.4
13	1	2	S	2	+2	7	170	00.8 - 01
14	1	3	E	5	=	7	-110	00.9 - 00.9
15	7	4	W	T	+1	2	-450	00.8 - 01
16	7	1	W	6	=	2	-80	01.6 - 00.2
17	2	2	E	3	-2	8	100	01 - 00.8
18	2	4	W	2	-2	8	100	00.8 - 01
19	8					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
20	8					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
21	3	4	N	3	=	9	620	01.5 - 00.3
22	3	4	N	4	=	9	420	01.1 - 00.7

EW pair 8

Section b

Jean Checketts
Pat Hart

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	3	5	N	6	-1	10	-50	01.1 - 00.7
2	3	3	S	5	=	10	110	00.5 - 01.3
3	9	2 NT	E	7	-1	5	100	01.1 - 00.7
4	9	4	N	A	-1	5	-100	01.2 - 00.6
5	4	3	N	K	+2	11	200	01.2 - 00.6
6	4	4	S	5	-1	11	-50	00.8 - 01
7	10	4	S	3	+2	6	680	01.3 - 00.5
8	10	4	S	5	-4	6	-200	00 - 01.8
9	5	1 NT	S	5	+3	1	180	01.8 - 00
10	5	2	W	K	=	1	-110	01 - 00.8
11	11	3	W	5	+1	7	-130	01.2 - 00.6
12	11	4	E	2	-2	7	100	01.6 - 00.2
13	6	3 NT	S	3	+1	2	630	01.8 - 00
14	6	PASS	N			2	0	01.4 - 00.4
15	1	3 NT	E	3	=	8	-400	01.8 - 00
16	1	1	W	3	+1	8	-110	01.3 - 00.5
17	7					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
18	7					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
19	2	1 NT	W	3	+1	9	-120	00.5 - 01.3
20	2	4	S	2	=	9	620	01.3 - 00.5
21	8	4	N	3	+1	4	650	01.8 - 00
22	8	4	N	3	+1	4	450	01.8 - 00

EW pair 9

Section b

Robyn Peel
Vivien Haig

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	8	3 NT	S	4	-3	5	-150	00.1 - 01.7
2	8	3 NT	N	5	+1	5	630	01.8 - 00
3	3	2	N	Q	-1	11	-50	00.6 - 01.2
4	3	3	E	6	-1	11	100	01.5 - 00.3
5	9	3	S	9	+2	6	150	00.8 - 01
6	9	4	S	6	-2	6	-100	00.1 - 01.7
7	4	6	S	5	=	1	1430	01.8 - 00
8	4	1 NT	N	6	=	1	090	01.7 - 00.1
9	10	2	E	A	=	7	-110	00.7 - 01.1
10	10	1 NT	E	2	+2	7	-150	00.5 - 01.3
11	5	4	W	5	=	2	-130	01.2 - 00.6
12	5	4	W	4	-1	2	050	01.1 - 00.7
13	11	3 NT	S	4	=	8	600	01.1 - 00.7
14	11	4	E	Q	-1	8	050	01.7 - 00.1
15	6					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
16	6					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
17	1	2	E	3	-2	9	100	01 - 00.8
18	1	2	S	9	+1	9	140	01.5 - 00.3
19	7	2 NT	W	J	=	4	-120	00.5 - 01.3
20	7	3 NT	E	6	-2	4	200	01 - 00.8
21	2	4	N	3	=	10	620	01.5 - 00.3
22	2	4	N	J	=	10	420	01.1 - 00.7

EW pair 10

Section b

Ethel Bristow
Laetitia Robinson

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	2	6	N	4	-1	11	-50	01.1 - 00.7
2	2	3 NT	N	3	=	11	600	01.4 - 00.4
3	8	3 NT	W	6	-2	6	200	01.7 - 00.1
4	8	4	S	Q	-2	6	-200	00 - 01.8
5	3	4	N	K	=	1	620	01.7 - 00.1
6	3	3	S		-1	1	-50	00.8 - 01
7	9	2	S	T	+2	7	170	00.6 - 01.2
8	9	1 NT	N	3	-1	7	-50	01.2 - 00.6
9	4	2	E	A	=	2	-110	00.7 - 01.1
10	4	2	W	9	+1	2	-140	00.8 - 01
11	10	3 NT	W	5	-1	8	050	01.8 - 00
12	10	3	W	6	+1	8	-130	00.2 - 01.6
13	5					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
14	5					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
15	11	4	E	2	+2	9	-480	00.2 - 01.6
16	11	1	W	5	+3	9	-170	00 - 01.8
17	6	1 NT	N	7	+1	4	120	01.5 - 00.3
18	6	3	W	J	=	4	-110	00 - 01.8
19	1	2 NT	W	6	-2	10	200	01.5 - 00.3
20	1	4	S	2	+1	10	650	01.8 - 00
21	7	2	N	5	+1	5	140	00.8 - 01
22	7	4	N	4	=	5	420	01.1 - 00.7

EW pair 11

Section b

Damian Hogue
Annette Harris

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	7	5	N	6	-1	6	-50	01.1 - 00.7
2	7	3	N	5	=	6	140	00.8 - 01
3	2	3	E	T	-2	1	200	01.7 - 00.1
4	2	2	E	J	+1	1	-140	00.9 - 00.9
5	8	2	W	A	=	7	-110	00 - 01.8
6	8	4	S	6	-2	7	-100	00.1 - 01.7
7	3	4	S	3	+2	2	680	01.3 - 00.5
8	3	1 NT	N	6	-1	2	-50	01.2 - 00.6
9	9	2	E	8	-1	8	100	01.4 - 00.4
10	9	1 NT	E	5	=	8	-90	01.2 - 00.6
11	4					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
12	4					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
13	10	2 NT	S	4	=	9	120	00.2 - 01.6
14	10	2	W	7	+1	9	-110	00.9 - 00.9
15	5	4	W	4	=	4	-420	01.6 - 00.2
16	5	1	W	9	+2	4	-140	00.6 - 01.2
17	11	2	E	3	-2	10	100	01 - 00.8
18	11	3	S	2	-1	10	-100	00.3 - 01.5
19	6	2 NT	W	6	-2	5	200	01.5 - 00.3
20	6	3 NT	S	2	-1	5	100	00 - 01.8
21	1	1 NT	N	5	-2	11	-200	00.3 - 01.5
22	1	4	N	4	=	11	420	01.1 - 00.7