Oamaru Bridge Club        

Back to event

---

View by:

board

NS pairs

EW pairs

---

Hand records



Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Oamaru IT Solutions Pairs (2018) 15 November

EW pair 1 Section a Liz Drew Junelle Edmonds	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 1 2 N 5 +2 1 170 130 2 1 3 E Q = 1 -110 180 3 8 3 NT S 7 -2 8 -100 200 4 8 3 E A +2 8 -200 40 5 2 3 NT N 4 +3 2 690 40 6 2 4 S J = 2 420 150 7 9 4 N A -4 9 -400 140 8 9 3 S 4 = 9 110 130 9 3 5 N A +1 3 480 40 10 3 3 E Q = 3 -110 130 11 10 4 W A = 10 -420 40 12 10 4 E A = 10 -420 90 13 4 3 W 8 -1 4 100 140 14 4 5 x W 2 -3 4 500 0 15 11 2 N 5 = 11 110 140 16 11 4 N 5 = 11 420 140 17 5 2 E 8 = 5 -110 40 18 5 3 E 6 +3 5 -170 20 19 13 3 NT N Q +1 11 430 40 20 13 2 S K -3 11 -300 200 21 6 2 N K -1 6 -100 50 22 6 4 N 6 -1 6 -50 160 23 12 4 N 5 -1 1 -100 120 24 12 2 S T +2 1 170 20 25 7 1 S 6 = 7 080 60 26 7 3 NT W 9 +1 7 -630 150
EW pair 2 Section a Valerie Simpson Marlene Caldwell	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 7 3 S +2 8 200 70 2 7 4 E 7 -1 8 050 100 3 1 3 N 8 +1 2 130 90 4 1 4 E 8 +1 2 -650 170 5 8 2 N A +1 9 140 180 6 8 4 S J +1 9 450 60 7 2 4 N A -2 3 -200 120 8 2 2 S T +2 3 130 90 9 9 4 N 2 +1 10 450 120 10 9 3 E Q = 10 -110 130 11 3 4 E A +1 4 -450 100 12 3 4 E 3 = 4 -420 90 13 10 4 x W 7 -2 11 500 50 14 10 3 N K -2 11 -100 130 15 4 2 N T +2 5 170 60 16 4 4 S 2 = 5 420 140 17 13 3 NT S A -4 10 -200 100 18 13 4 W 9 +1 10 -450 130 19 5 5 S 6 = 6 400 120 20 5 1 NT E 2 -1 6 100 30 21 11 2 N K -1 1 -100 50 22 11 3 N 2 = 1 140 100 23 6 1 NT W 4 -3 7 300 0 24 6 3 S T +1 7 170 20 25 12 4 E K = 2 -620 190 26 12 3 NT W 9 +2 2 -660 200
EW pair 3 Section a Ann Rooney Barbara McCone	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 12 2 N 2 +2 3 170 130 2 12 3 S Q = 3 140 60 3 7 2 N T +2 9 130 90 4 7 3 NT W 2 +1 9 -630 100 5 1 3 NT N 4 +4 3 720 0 6 1 4 S J +1 3 450 60 7 8 2 W 7 = 10 -110 90 8 8 1 NT W A -2 10 100 170 9 2 3 NT S 4 -1 4 -50 160 10 2 3 E 7 = 4 -110 130 11 9 2 E A +3 11 -200 20 12 9 4 E 9 = 11 -420 90 13 3 2 W 7 = 5 -110 160 14 3 2 E 2 +2 5 -130 170 15 13 1 NT S Q +3 9 180 0 16 13 4 S Q = 9 420 140 17 4 3 NT E 7 = 6 -400 150 18 4 4 W A = 6 -420 60 19 10 3 NT N 9 +1 1 430 40 20 10 1 W 7 -2 1 200 0 21 5 2 S 4 -2 7 -200 120 22 5 4 N 6 -1 7 -50 160 23 11 3 N 5 = 2 140 40 24 11 2 W A = 2 -90 180 25 6 4 E K -1 8 100 40 26 6 4 E A -1 8 100 40
EW pair 4 Section a Kerry Kelly Theo Jordens	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 6 4 N Q -1 9 -50 180 2 6 4 E Q -1 9 050 100 3 12 2 S +1 4 140 40 4 12 4 W J +1 4 -650 170 5 7 4 N J +1 10 650 100 6 7 4 S J +1 10 450 60 7 1 4 W 2 = 4 -620 180 8 1 3 NT S 2 +1 4 430 20 9 8 4 NT S J -2 11 -100 180 10 8 3 E Q = 11 -110 130 11 2 4 E A +2 5 -480 170 12 2 4 E 5 +1 5 -450 200 13 13 4 N 7 +1 8 650 0 14 13 5 W 7 -2 8 100 80 15 3 3 N T = 6 140 120 16 3 4 S 2 +1 6 450 40 17 9 3 NT E 7 = 1 -400 150 18 9 4 W 9 +1 1 -450 130 19 4 3 NT S 2 = 7 400 120 20 4 2 W 5 +2 7 -170 160 21 10 3 E 3 -2 2 100 0 22 10 4 N 6 -1 2 -50 160 23 5 3 N A = 8 140 40 24 5 4 S 5 -1 8 -50 160 25 11 2 S 6 = 3 110 10 26 11 3 NT W J = 3 -600 100
EW pair 5 Section a Louise Whitelock Janice McLaren	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 11 2 S +3 4 200 70 2 11 2 S Q +2 4 170 0 3 6 2 S 5 = 10 110 140 4 6 2 E 5 +2 10 -170 20 5 12 2 NT N 3 +2 5 180 140 6 12 3 S 9 +2 5 200 190 7 7 2 N A -1 11 -100 60 8 7 3 NT S 2 +2 11 460 0 9 1 4 N 5 +2 5 480 40 10 1 PASS N 5 0 60 11 13 4 N Q -2 7 -100 0 12 13 4 E A = 7 -420 90 13 2 3 S T +2 6 200 80 14 2 4 N 5 = 6 420 20 15 8 1 N T +3 1 170 60 16 8 4 N 5 +1 1 450 40 17 3 2 S A -1 7 -50 0 18 3 4 W 9 = 7 -420 60 19 9 3 NT N 2 +1 2 430 40 20 9 2 W 8 -1 2 100 30 21 4 3 N 7 -3 8 -300 190 22 4 4 S A = 8 420 30 23 10 2 S A -2 3 -200 180 24 10 2 S 5 +1 3 140 70 25 5 2 S 6 = 9 110 10 26 5 2 E A -1 9 100 40
EW pair 6 Section a Arthur Ruffell Arie Doppenberg	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 5 4 S 3 +1 10 450 0 2 5 3 E 7 -1 10 050 100 3 11 2 N Q = 5 090 160 4 11 3 NT W 6 = 5 -600 60 5 6 5 S T = 11 600 120 6 6 4 S J +1 11 450 60 7 12 4 W A -1 6 100 20 8 12 3 NT S 4 = 6 400 50 9 13 4 N 8 +2 6 480 40 10 13 4 E 7 -1 6 100 30 11 1 4 E A +2 6 -480 170 12 1 4 E 5 = 6 -420 90 13 7 4 x W 8 -2 1 500 50 14 7 3 S A +1 1 170 40 15 2 2 W 8 -2 7 100 170 16 2 5 E A -3 7 300 200 17 8 3 NT E 8 +1 2 -430 200 18 8 3 NT E 5 +3 2 -490 200 19 3 4 S 6 -2 8 -100 200 20 3 1 NT W 6 +1 8 -120 120 21 9 2 S 4 -2 3 -200 120 22 9 4 N 6 = 3 420 30 23 4 4 N A -1 9 -100 120 24 4 2 W 3 -1 9 050 130 25 10 4 E K = 4 -620 190 26 10 3 NT W +1 4 -630 150
EW pair 7 Section a Robyn Lockhart Klaus Steiner	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 10 2 W 3 = 5 -90 200 2 10 3 E Q = 5 -110 180 3 5 3 N K +1 11 130 90 4 5 4 E 5 +1 11 -650 170 5 11 4 N A -2 6 -200 200 6 11 4 S J = 6 420 150 7 13 2 E 3 +1 5 -110 90 8 13 3 S A +1 5 130 90 9 12 4 N 4 +2 7 480 40 10 12 3 E Q = 7 -110 130 11 6 4 E A +1 1 -450 100 12 6 4 E 9 = 1 -420 90 13 1 3 S K +1 7 170 110 14 1 2 N K = 7 110 60 15 7 2 W 8 -2 2 100 170 16 7 4 S Q = 2 420 140 17 2 3 NT E A = 8 -400 150 18 2 5 E A +1 8 -420 60 19 8 3 NT N Q +1 3 430 40 20 8 2 S K -2 3 -200 180 21 3 3 S 4 -2 9 -200 120 22 3 4 N 6 = 9 420 30 23 9 4 N 6 -1 4 -100 120 24 9 3 S = 4 140 70 25 4 3 S 6 -2 10 -100 120 26 4 2 E 7 -2 10 200 0
EW pair 8 Section a Ina Koevoet Neville Daniel	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 4 2 S 3 +3 11 200 70 2 4 5 E 4 -3 11 150 30 3 10 2 N T +3 6 150 20 4 10 4 E 3 -2 6 200 0 5 13 3 NT S +3 4 690 40 6 13 4 S +1 4 450 60 7 11 4 W A = 7 -620 180 8 11 2 W A -2 7 100 170 9 5 4 S J +1 1 450 120 10 5 3 S T = 1 140 0 11 12 3 x N A -3 8 -500 200 12 12 4 E 6 = 8 -420 90 13 6 3 W 8 = 2 -140 190 14 6 4 N K -3 2 -150 200 15 1 2 W T -1 8 050 200 16 1 4 S Q = 8 420 140 17 7 2 NT E 8 +1 3 -150 80 18 7 2 E 3 +2 3 -130 0 19 2 2 S 5 +3 9 150 160 20 2 2 W 5 = 9 -110 100 21 8 3 S 4 -3 4 -300 190 22 8 4 N 6 -1 4 -50 160 23 3 3 E 3 = 10 -110 160 24 3 3 S T +1 10 170 20 25 9 3 E K +1 5 -170 160 26 9 2 E A +1 5 -140 80
EW pair 9 Section a Patsy Rawson Elspeth Mitchell	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 9 3 S +2 6 200 70 2 9 5 E 5 -3 6 150 30 3 13 3 NT S 9 -1 3 -50 180 4 13 3 NT W 3 +1 3 -630 100 5 10 3 NT N 4 +2 7 660 80 6 10 4 S 9 +1 7 450 60 7 4 3 E 3 -1 1 100 20 8 4 2 N 5 +1 1 110 130 9 11 4 N 8 +2 8 480 40 10 11 3 E 8 = 8 -110 130 11 5 4 E K +1 2 -450 100 12 5 4 E T = 2 -420 90 13 12 1 W 3 +2 9 -140 190 14 12 4 N K -2 9 -100 130 15 6 2 N T +2 3 170 60 16 6 4 S 2 +1 3 450 40 17 1 3 E A = 9 -110 40 18 1 3 NT E 5 +2 9 -460 180 19 7 3 NT N 3 = 4 400 120 20 7 1 W 5 = 4 -80 60 21 2 3 S 4 -2 10 -200 120 22 2 4 N 6 = 10 420 30 23 8 2 N A +1 5 140 40 24 8 2 S 4 = 5 110 100 25 3 3 E K = 11 -140 140 26 3 3 NT W 9 +1 11 -630 150
EW pair 10 Section a Doug Appleby Ronald Leongson	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 13 4 S A = 2 420 20 2 13 3 S Q -1 2 -100 140 3 9 3 N 2 +1 7 130 90 4 9 3 NT W 3 +1 7 -630 100 5 3 4 NT N 7 +2 1 690 40 6 3 4 S J +1 1 450 60 7 10 3 E 3 -1 8 100 20 8 10 3 NT S 4 = 8 400 50 9 4 4 E 2 +1 2 -650 200 10 4 3 E 3 +1 2 -130 200 11 11 4 E A +1 9 -450 100 12 11 4 E A = 9 -420 90 13 5 3 S K +1 3 170 110 14 5 4 W 7 = 3 -130 170 15 12 3 N T +1 10 170 60 16 12 4 S Q +1 10 450 40 17 6 2 W T +1 4 -110 40 18 6 4 W 9 +1 4 -450 130 19 1 3 NT N Q +1 10 430 40 20 1 1 NT W 3 = 10 -90 80 21 7 1 NT N K = 5 090 20 22 7 4 N 2 -1 5 -50 160 23 2 1 NT W 7 -1 11 100 80 24 2 1 NT S 8 -4 11 -200 200 25 8 2 S 6 -1 6 -50 90 26 8 3 NT W 9 +1 6 -630 150
EW pair 11 Section a A <tony> Willetts Ian Williams	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 8 1 NT E T -3 7 150 160 2 8 3 E T = 7 -110 180 3 2 3 NT S 9 = 1 400 0 4 2 4 E A +1 1 -650 170 5 9 3 S 8 +2 8 150 160 6 9 3 S J +2 8 200 190 7 3 4 W 9 = 2 -620 180 8 3 2 S A = 2 090 200 9 10 4 N 5 +1 9 450 120 10 10 3 E Q -1 9 100 30 11 4 4 E A +1 3 -450 100 12 4 4 E 9 = 3 -420 90 13 11 4 S T = 10 620 20 14 11 4 N 5 -1 10 -50 100 15 5 2 N T +2 4 170 60 16 5 4 N 5 +1 4 450 40 17 12 3 NT E 9 = 11 -400 150 18 12 4 W 9 +1 11 -450 130 19 6 5 S J -1 5 -50 180 20 6 1 E 2 +2 5 -140 140 21 1 3 N K -2 11 -200 120 22 1 2 N 6 +2 11 170 80 23 7 3 NT S -3 6 -300 200 24 7 3 W A -1 6 050 130 25 13 3 S 6 -1 1 -50 90 26 13 3 NT E A -1 1 100 40