Taieri Bridge Club : Detailed data for Monday: Janefield Handicap Pairs (2014)

View by:

EW pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Monday: Janefield Handicap Pairs (2014) 3 November

EW pair 1

Section a

Rose Markby
Shirley Sheldon

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1	6	N	7	=	1	920	16 - 00
2	1	3	W	2	+1	1	-130	08 - 08
3	1	3 x	E	A	-2	1	500	16 - 00
4	6	4	N	5	+1	6	150	05 - 11
5	6	3	N	J	=	6	140	15 - 01
6	6	4	N	T	+1	6	450	11 - 05
7	2	4	E	J	+1	2	-650	05 - 11
8	2	3	W	A	-1	2	050	12 - 04
9	2	3	N	T	-1	2	-50	06 - 10
10	7	2	E	6	-1	7	100	08 - 08
11	7	3	S	J	=	7	140	07 - 09
12	7	1 N	E	3	-1	7	050	07 - 09
13	3	3 N	N	4	+2	3	660	12 - 04
14	3	5 x	S	7	=	3	550	16 - 00
15	3	2 N	W	6	+1	3	-150	07 - 09
16	8	3 N	E	T	=	8	-600	13 - 03
17	8	3 N	S	3	+1	8	430	15 - 01
18	8	2 N	W	2	-1	8	050	10 - 06
19	4	1 N	S	4	+1	4	120	10 - 06
20	4	3	W	Q	-2	4	200	16 - 00
21	4	2	S	3	-1	4	-100	16 - 00
22	9	4	S	K	=	9	420	02 - 14
23	9	4	S	A	-1	9	-100	04 - 12
24	9	2 N	S	6	-1	9	-50	07 - 09
25	5	3 N	E	3	-1	5	100	14 - 02
26	5	4	E	2	-1	5	100	16 - 00
27	5	1 x	N	K	+1	5	260	14 - 02

EW pair 2

Section a

Barbara Wilkes
Irene Morrison

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	5	5	N	3	+1	6	420	11 - 05
2	5	2	W	4	+2	6	-130	08 - 08
3	5	2 N	S	9	=	6	120	12 - 04
4	1	3 N	N	4	+2	2	660	13 - 03
5	1	2	N	J	-1	2	-100	05 - 11
6	1	3	S	A	-3	2	-150	02 - 14
7	6	4	E	3	+1	7	-650	05 - 11
8	6	3	W	3	=	7	-140	04 - 12
9	6	3	W	A	-1	7	100	10 - 06
10	2	3 N	S	5	-1	3	-100	05 - 11
11	2	3 N	S	J	-1	3	-50	03 - 13
12	2	3	N	K	=	3	140	15 - 01
13	7	3 N	N	4	+3	8	690	16 - 00
14	7	5 x	S	4	-3	8	-500	00 - 16
15	7	3 N	W	9	-1	8	050	15 - 01
16	3	6	E	T	-1	4	100	16 - 00
17	3	2	N	A	+3	4	150	08 - 08
18	3	2	N	9	=	4	110	14 - 02
19	8	4	E	Q	-2	9	200	14 - 02
20	8	1 N	E	2	=	9	-90	10 - 06
21	8	4	S	A	-3	9	-300	05 - 11
22	4	5	S	3	=	5	450	10 - 06
23	4	2	S	A	-1	5	-100	04 - 12
24	4	3 x	W	J	-1	5	100	13 - 03
25	9	3 N	E	3	+1	1	-630	02 - 14
26	9	4	E	6	+1	1	-650	08 - 08
27	9	1 N	S	2	=	1	090	03 - 13

EW pair 3

Section a

Shirley Bosworth
Pat Scanlan

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	9	3	N	4	+2	2	150	02 - 14
2	9	2	W	4	+2	2	-130	08 - 08
3	9	2	E	A	-1	2	100	09 - 07
4	5	3 N	N	2	+2	7	660	13 - 03
5	5	2	N	J	=	7	110	12 - 04
6	5	3	N	T	+2	7	200	04 - 12
7	1	4	E	3	-1	3	100	14 - 02
8	1	2	W	2	+2	3	-170	00 - 16
9	1	3 N	N	A	-2	3	-100	01 - 15
10	6	3 N	S	5	-3	8	-300	01 - 15
11	6	6	S	J	-3	8	-150	00 - 16
12	6	2	S	A	+1	8	140	15 - 01
13	2	3 N	N	4	+1	4	630	07 - 09
14	2	4 x	N	A	-1	4	-100	08 - 08
15	2	3 N	W	9	=	4	-400	02 - 14
16	7	3 N	E	T	+2	9	-660	01 - 15
17	7	3 N	S	J	-3	9	-150	02 - 14
18	7	3	N	Q	+1	9	170	16 - 00
19	3	2 N	W	7	-2	5	200	14 - 02
20	3	1 N	E	2	+1	5	-120	03 - 13
21	3	4	E	2	+1	5	-450	01 - 15
22	8	4	N	A	+1	1	450	10 - 06
23	8	5	W	8	-2	1	200	16 - 00
24	8	3 N	S	J	-3	1	-150	00 - 16
25	4	4	W	5	=	6	-620	06 - 10
26	4	3 N	E	2	+1	6	-630	12 - 04
27	4	2	S	2	=	6	090	03 - 13

EW pair 4

Section a

Sheila Fenton
Mavis Hastie

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	4	3	N	3	+2	7	150	02 - 14
2	4	5	W	T	=	7	-400	01 - 15
3	4	1	E	7	=	7	-80	06 - 10
4	9	6 N	N	A	-1	3	-100	02 - 14
5	9	4	N	J	-2	3	-200	01 - 15
6	9	5 x	E	2	-3	3	800	14 - 02
7	5	4	E	2	+2	8	-680	00 - 16
8	5	3	W	K	-1	8	050	12 - 04
9	5	3	N	T	-1	8	-50	06 - 10
10	1	3	S	4	-1	4	-100	05 - 11
11	1	1 N	S	6	+2	4	150	10 - 06
12	1	2	W	A	-1	4	050	07 - 09
13	6	3 N	N	4	+2	9	660	12 - 04
14	6	4	W	T	=	9	-420	02 - 14
15	6	2	E	T	=	9	-110	12 - 04
16	2	4	E	8	+1	5	-650	07 - 09
17	2	2	N	5	+2	5	130	06 - 10
18	2	4	N	K	-2	5	-200	00 - 16
19	7	2	E	2	-2	1	200	14 - 02
20	7	1 N	E	3	+1	1	-120	03 - 13
21	7	3	E	2	+2	1	-200	11 - 05
22	3	4	S	A	+1	6	450	10 - 06
23	3	2	S	A	=	6	110	08 - 08
24	3	1 N	S	8	=	6	090	10 - 06
25	8	3 N	E	3	+1	2	-630	02 - 14
26	8	3 N	W	3	+2	2	-660	04 - 12
27	8	2	S	2	=	2	090	03 - 13

EW pair 5

Section a

Alison Kerr
Alec Ansett

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	8	2	N	7	+3	3	150	02 - 14
2	8	4	W	3	=	3	-130	08 - 08
3	8	3 x	S	5	-4	3	-800	00 - 16
4	4	6 N	S	3	-3	8	-300	00 - 16
5	4	3	E	Q	-1	8	050	08 - 08
6	4	3	S	5	+3	8	230	06 - 10
7	9	4	E	J	=	4	-620	10 - 06
8	9	3	W	9	-1	4	050	12 - 04
9	9	3 N	S	Q	-1	4	-50	06 - 10
10	5	3	E	2	-2	9	200	16 - 00
11	5	4	S	K	-1	9	-50	03 - 13
12	5	2	N	4	-1	9	-100	03 - 13
13	1	4	N	3	-1	5	-100	03 - 13
14	1	3	W	T	-1	5	050	11 - 05
15	1	2 N	W	5	=	5	-120	10 - 06
16	6	4	E	9	+1	1	-650	07 - 09
17	6	3 N	N	2	=	1	400	12 - 04
18	6	3	E	K	=	1	-140	04 - 12
19	2	2	E	6	=	6	-110	00 - 16
20	2	1 N	E	2	-1	6	100	14 - 02
21	2	2	E	3	+3	6	-200	11 - 05
22	7	4	N	A	+1	2	450	10 - 06
23	7	4	S	A	-2	2	-200	00 - 16
24	7	3 N	N	3	-2	2	-100	03 - 13
25	3	3 N	E	3	-1	7	100	14 - 02
26	3	4	E	J	+2	7	-680	01 - 15
27	3	2	E	Q	-2	7	100	08 - 08

EW pair 6

Section a

Kim Stewart
Julie Kelly

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	3	5	N	9	=	8	400	06 - 10
2	3	3	W	2	+1	8	-130	08 - 08
3	3	2	S	T	-2	8	-100	04 - 12
4	8	3 N	N	2	+2	4	660	13 - 03
5	8	3	N	J	=	4	140	15 - 01
6	8	4	N	K	+1	4	450	11 - 05
7	4	4	E	3	+1	9	-650	05 - 11
8	4	2	W	A	+1	9	-140	04 - 12
9	4	3	N	T	+1	9	130	14 - 02
10	9	2	S	4	+1	5	110	12 - 04
11	9	3	S	J	=	5	140	07 - 09
12	9	1	N	K	=	5	080	10 - 06
13	5	3 N	N	4	+2	1	660	12 - 04
14	5	2	W	4	+1	1	-140	05 - 11
15	5	2	E	J	-1	1	050	15 - 01
16	1	4	E	5	+1	6	-650	07 - 09
17	1	3 N	S	3	+1	6	430	15 - 01
18	1	2	E	2	-1	6	050	10 - 06
19	6	2 N	W	7	-1	2	100	07 - 09
20	6	1 N	E	2	=	2	-90	10 - 06
21	6	4	S	4	-3	2	-300	05 - 11
22	2	4	S	3	+1	7	450	10 - 06
23	2	3	N	A	=	7	140	12 - 04
24	2	3	W	T	-2	7	100	13 - 03
25	7	2 N	E	3	+2	3	-180	10 - 06
26	7	4	W	8	+1	3	-650	08 - 08
27	7	3	S	J	=	3	110	10 - 06

EW pair 7

Section a

Linda Withers
Joan Robertson

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	7	5	N	3	+1	4	420	11 - 05
2	7	5	W	4	-1	4	050	14 - 02
3	7	3	E	7	-3	4	300	14 - 02
4	3	4	N	A	+1	9	150	05 - 11
5	3	3	N	2	-1	9	-100	05 - 11
6	3	4	S	A	=	9	420	08 - 08
7	8	4	E	7	+1	5	-650	05 - 11
8	8	2	W	K	=	5	-110	08 - 08
9	8	3	S	A	-2	5	-100	01 - 15
10	4	4	N	3	-3	1	-300	01 - 15
11	4	3	S	J	+1	1	170	13 - 03
12	4	4	N	4	-1	1	-100	03 - 13
13	9	3 N	N	4	+1	6	630	07 - 09
14	9	3	N	A	=	6	110	14 - 02
15	9	2	N	2	-3	6	-300	04 - 12
16	5	3 N	W	3	=	2	-600	13 - 03
17	5	3 N	N	3	-1	2	-50	04 - 12
18	5	1 N	W	6	+2	2	-150	02 - 14
19	1	1 N	E	3	=	7	-90	03 - 13
20	1	1 N	E	4	=	7	-90	10 - 06
21	1	2	E	5	+3	7	-200	11 - 05
22	6	6	S	6	-1	3	-50	00 - 16
23	6	4	S	A	-1	3	-100	04 - 12
24	6	3 N	S	8	=	3	400	16 - 00
25	2	3 N	E	T	=	8	-600	08 - 08
26	2	5	E	5	=	8	-650	08 - 08
27	2	2 N	S	2	=	8	120	12 - 04

EW pair 8

Section a

Alec Weavers
Michael Rombouts

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	2	5	N	3	+1	9	420	11 - 05
2	2	2	E	3	-2	9	100	16 - 00
3	2	2	E	7	-1	9	100	09 - 07
4	7	4	S	2	+1	5	650	08 - 08
5	7	3	N	J	-2	5	-200	01 - 15
6	7	4	S	3	-4	5	-200	00 - 16
7	3	6	E	2	-1	1	100	14 - 02
8	3	2	W	K	+1	1	-140	04 - 12
9	3	4	N	T	=	1	130	14 - 02
10	8	2	S	2	+1	6	110	12 - 04
11	8	2	S	Q	+2	6	170	13 - 03
12	8	3	W	7	+1	6	-130	00 - 16
13	4	5	S	4	-1	2	-100	03 - 13
14	4	2	E	8	+1	2	-140	05 - 11
15	4	1 N x	N	Q	-3	2	-800	00 - 16
16	9	3 N	E	2	+2	7	-660	01 - 15
17	9	3 N	S	4	-4	7	-200	00 - 16
18	9	2	E	8	+1	7	-110	06 - 10
19	5	3	W	K	-1	3	100	07 - 09
20	5	2	W	4	=	3	-110	06 - 10
21	5	3	S	A	-2	3	-200	11 - 05
22	1	5	S	K	=	8	450	10 - 06
23	1	3	S	A	=	8	140	12 - 04
24	1	3 N	S	J	-1	8	-50	07 - 09
25	6	3 N	E	T	-1	4	100	14 - 02
26	6	4	E	6	+2	4	-680	01 - 15
27	6	3 x	S	J	=	4	470	16 - 00

EW pair 9

Section a

Alice Thomson
Rosalie Douglas

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	6	5	N	9	+1	5	420	11 - 05
2	6	4	N	Q	-4	5	-400	01 - 15
3	6	2	N	8	-3	5	-150	02 - 14
4	2	3 N	N	4	+2	1	660	13 - 03
5	2	3 N	E	Q	-2	1	100	10 - 06
6	2	6 x	N	T	=	1	1210	16 - 00
7	7	4	E	6	-1	6	100	14 - 02
8	7	4	W	K	-2	6	100	16 - 00
9	7	3	N	T	+1	6	130	14 - 02
10	3	3	S	5	=	2	110	12 - 04
11	3	4	S	J	+1	2	450	16 - 00
12	3	3	W	A	-2	2	100	12 - 04
13	8	2	S	T	-2	7	-200	00 - 16
14	8	3	W	Q	-1	7	050	11 - 05
15	8	1 N	W	4	+2	7	-150	07 - 09
16	4	4	E	5	+1	3	-650	07 - 09
17	4	1 N	S	3	+3	3	180	10 - 06
18	4	3	E	2	-1	3	050	10 - 06
19	9	1 N	E	2	=	8	-90	03 - 13
20	9	2	W	4	+1	8	-140	00 - 16
21	9	4	E	2	+1	8	-450	01 - 15
22	5	4	S	7	+1	4	450	10 - 06
23	5	3	S	A	=	4	140	12 - 04
24	5	3 N	N	4	-2	4	-100	03 - 13
25	1	3 N	E	3	+1	9	-630	02 - 14
26	1	3 N	E	6	=	9	-600	14 - 02
27	1	2	S	2	=	9	090	03 - 13