Te Anau Bridge Club : Detailed data for Lucky Dip (2018)

View by:

NS pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Lucky Dip (2018) 24 January

NS pair 1

Section a

Ken Hamilton
Garth Stewart

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1	3 NT	N	2	=	1	400	60
2	1	3 NT	W	2	-1	1	050	80
3	1	3	E	A	-1	1	100	40
4	1	5	W	A	-1	1	100	100
5	2	1 NT	S	J	+1	7	120	0
6	2	3 NT	E	5	+1	7	-630	80
7	2	4	S	J	-1	7	-100	10
8	2	4	E	A	-1	7	050	50
9	3	4	S	K	+3	6	510	70
10	3	1 NT	S	Q	+1	6	120	100
11	3	2	W	5	+1	6	-110	90
12	3	4 x	W	K	=	6	-590	10
13	4	5	E	6	-2	5	200	30
14	4	5 x	W	A	-3	5	500	90
15	4	2 NT	N	3	+1	5	150	60
16	4	3 NT	E	6	+1	5	-630	30
17	5	4	N	K	-1	4	-50	50
18	5	3 NT	S	J	+1	4	630	80
19	5	3 NT	N	4	+1	4	430	80
20	5	2	N	T	=	4	090	100
21	6	3 NT	N	8	+1	3	630	90
22	6	3 NT	S	2	-2	3	-100	20
23	6	1	E	2	+5	3	-230	50
24	6	2	W	4	-2	3	100	100
25	7	2 x	N	A	-1	2	-100	80
26	7	5	S	A	=	2	600	100
27	7	4	W	K	+1	2	-150	50
28	7	2 NT	E	3	=	2	-120	30

NS pair 2

Section a

Sue Chartres
Kathy Singleton

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	7	3 NT	S	5	=	3	400	60
2	7	4	E	3	+1	3	-450	0
3	7	3	S	3	=	3	140	70
4	7	3 NT	W	6	+2	3	-660	10
5	1	4	S	J	=	2	620	40
6	1	4	E	K	+2	2	-680	20
7	1	3 NT	N	3	=	2	600	60
8	1	2	E	8	+2	2	-170	0
9	2	2	N	A	+5	1	260	0
10	2	1 NT	W	4	=	1	-90	60
11	2	3 NT	E	3	+2	1	-460	0
12	2	3 NT	E	3	=	1	-400	80
13	3	4	N	A	+1	7	650	80
14	3	5	W	A	-3	7	150	10
15	3	1	N	2	=	7	080	40
16	3	3 NT	W	5	+1	7	-630	30
17	4	3	N	A	-1	6	-50	50
18	4	3 NT	S	4	=	6	600	40
19	4	2 NT	N	8	+3	6	210	60
20	4	3	N	T	-1	6	-100	70
21	5	3 NT	S	3	-2	5	-200	10
22	5	2	W	5	-2	5	200	100
23	5	4	E	2	=	5	-620	20
24	5	3 NT	E	A	=	5	-400	10
25	6	2 NT	E	A	+1	4	-150	40
26	6	5 x	S	T	-1	4	-200	40
27	6	2	E	A	+1	4	-140	80
28	6	1 NT	W	3	+1	4	-120	30

NS pair 3

Section a

Brian McCandless
Linda Brown

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	6	3 NT	N	2	=	5	400	60
2	6	4	E	K	-1	5	050	80
3	6	3	S	6	=	5	140	70
4	6	3 NT	E	3	+1	5	-630	40
5	7	4	S	4	+1	4	650	70
6	7	3	W	2	+2	4	-150	100
7	7	3	S	J	-1	4	-100	10
8	7	2 NT	E	6	-3	4	150	80
9	1	4	S	7	+3	3	510	70
10	1	3	N	4	-1	3	-100	40
11	1	2	W	7	+1	3	-110	90
12	1	4	W	K	=	3	-420	50
13	2	5	N	A	=	2	650	80
14	2	3	N	J	+4	2	260	40
15	2	3 NT	N	5	+1	2	630	100
16	2	3 NT	E	6	-1	2	100	90
17	3	4 x	N	A	=	1	590	100
18	3	3 NT	N	6	+3	1	690	100
19	3	3 NT	N	4	+2	1	460	100
20	3	2	N	T	-2	1	-200	10
21	4	3 NT	N	Q	-1	7	-100	40
22	4	3 NT	S	K	-2	7	-100	20
23	4	2	E	4	+3	7	-200	80
24	4	3 NT	E	6	=	7	-400	10
25	5	4 NT	E	9	-1	6	100	100
26	5	3	W	K	+1	6	-170	80
27	5	3	N	A	=	6	110	100
28	5	2 NT	W	3	-1	6	050	100

NS pair 4

Section a

Olwyn Brown
Tim Smith

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	5	1 NT	N	2	+2	7	150	20
2	5	2	E	8	+3	7	-200	20
3	5	4	S	6	-1	7	-50	20
4	5	3 NT	W	3	+2	7	-660	10
5	6	2 NT	N	7	+1	6	150	20
6	6	3 NT	W	3	+2	6	-660	50
7	6	2	S	J	+1	6	140	40
8	6	2	W	A	+1	6	-140	20
9	7	4	S	8	+3	5	510	70
10	7	2 NT	N	Q	-2	5	-200	0
11	7	3 NT	E	3	+1	5	-430	20
12	7	4 x	W	K	=	5	-590	10
13	1	5	E	4	-2	4	200	30
14	1	5	W	A	-3	4	150	10
15	1	1 NT	N	3	-1	4	-100	10
16	1	4	E	T	-1	4	100	90
17	2	5	W	7	-1	3	050	80
18	2	3 NT	S	4	=	3	600	40
19	2	4 x	S	5	-1	3	-100	0
20	2	2	W	A	=	3	-110	40
21	3	4	S	9	-2	2	-200	10
22	3	2	S	K	-1	2	-50	70
23	3	4	E	8	+1	2	-650	0
24	3	2 NT	W	4	-1	2	050	60
25	4	4	W	A	=	1	-620	0
26	4	3	W	A	+2	1	-200	40
27	4	5	W	4	=	1	-400	20
28	4	1	W	J	=	1	-80	80

NS pair 5

Section a

Margaret Henderson
David Fortune

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	4	3 NT	N	2	-1	2	-50	0
2	4	2 NT	W	2	+2	2	-180	40
3	4	4	S	3	-2	2	-100	0
4	4	3 NT	W	6	=	2	-600	70
5	5	4	S	2	+1	1	650	70
6	5	3 NT	E	3	+2	1	-660	50
7	5	4	S	J	=	1	620	80
8	5	4	E	A	-1	1	050	50
9	6	4	S	2	+1	7	450	20
10	6	2	E	J	=	7	-110	20
11	6	3 NT	E	3	=	7	-400	40
12	6	4	W	5	=	7	-420	50
13	7	5	N	A	-1	6	-100	0
14	7	5	N	5	+1	6	480	60
15	7	2	N	2	-1	6	-100	10
16	7	3 NT	W	5	+2	6	-660	0
17	1	5	W	4	=	5	-400	10
18	1	4 NT	S	4	-1	5	-100	0
19	1	3	S	5	+1	5	130	40
20	1	2	N	T	-1	5	-100	70
21	2	3 NT	N	8	=	4	600	60
22	2	4	S	K	-2	4	-100	20
23	2	2	E	2	+4	4	-230	50
24	2	3 NT	W	8	-1	4	050	60
25	3	3	E	8	=	3	-110	60
26	3	3	W	5	+2	3	-200	40
27	3	4	W	4	+1	3	-150	50
28	3	2 NT	W	3	=	3	-120	30

NS pair 6

Section a

June Birmingham
Kathleen Meredith

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	3	3 NT	S	7	+1	4	430	100
2	3	4	E	3	-1	4	050	80
3	3	2 x	S	6	+1	4	570	100
4	3	3 NT	W	7	=	4	-600	70
5	4	4	N	K	+2	3	680	100
6	4	3 NT	E	3	+3	3	-690	0
7	4	4	S	8	+1	3	650	100
8	4	4	E	A	-5	3	250	100
9	5	4	S	2	+3	2	510	70
10	5	2	N	6	=	2	090	80
11	5	2 NT	E	2	+1	2	-150	60
12	5	4	W	A	-2	2	100	100
13	6	5	N	A	=	1	650	80
14	6	5 x	W	A	-3	1	500	90
15	6	3 NT	N	3	=	1	600	80
16	6	2	E	6	+2	1	-170	60
17	7	3 NT	E	5	=	7	-400	10
18	7	3 NT	S	4	=	7	600	40
19	7	3 NT	N	J	-1	7	-50	20
20	7	2	N	T	-2	7	-200	10
21	1	3 NT	S	3	+1	6	630	90
22	1	3 NT	S	K	-1	6	-50	70
23	1	1	E	5	+3	6	-170	100
24	1	2	W	4	-1	6	050	60
25	2	3 NT	E	9	=	5	-600	20
26	2	3	W	8	+3	5	-230	0
27	2	5	W	4	+1	5	-420	0
28	2	2 NT	W	9	=	5	-120	30

NS pair 7

Section a

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	2					6	–	-9999
2	2					6	–	-9999
3	2					6	–	-9999
4	2					6	–	-9999
5	3					5	–	-9999
6	3					5	–	-9999
7	3					5	–	-9999
8	3					5	–	-9999
9	4					4	–	-9999
10	4					4	–	-9999
11	4					4	–	-9999
12	4					4	–	-9999
13	5					3	–	-9999
14	5					3	–	-9999
15	5					3	–	-9999
16	5					3	–	-9999
17	6					2	–	-9999
18	6					2	–	-9999
19	6					2	–	-9999
20	6					2	–	-9999
21	7					1	–	-9999
22	7					1	–	-9999
23	7					1	–	-9999
24	7					1	–	-9999
25	1					7	–	-9999
26	1					7	–	-9999
27	1					7	–	-9999
28	1					7	–	-9999