Te Anau Bridge Club        

Back to event

---

View by:

board

NS pairs

EW pairs

---

Hand records



Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Milford Pairs (2023) 15 February

EW pair 1 Section b Sue Chartres Johnny Angell	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 1 3 NT N 3 -1 1 -50 00.4 - 00.8 2 1 4 S K -1 1 -100 00 - 01.2 3 1 3 NT N 4 -2 1 -100 00.1 - 01.1 4 5 3 S 3 -2 5 -200 00.1 - 01.1 5 5 2 NT W 6 +1 5 -150 00.4 - 00.8 6 5 4 S J -1 5 -50 00.4 - 00.8 7 2 2 S 9 -1 2 -100 00.9 - 00.3 8 2 2 S J = 2 110 01.2 - 00 9 2 4 S Q +1 2 450 00.3 - 00.9 10 6 2 E 6 -2 6 200 00.8 - 00.4 11 6 1 NT N 3 +1 6 120 00.9 - 00.3 12 6 2 NT E 3 -1 6 050 00.9 - 00.3 13 3 2 W K +3 3 -200 00.5 - 00.7 14 3 3 N 4 +1 3 130 00.5 - 00.7 15 3 2 S K -2 3 -200 00.1 - 01.1 16 7 3 NT S 7 -4 7 -200 00 - 01.2 17 7 4 NT W 2 +2 7 -490 00.2 - 01 18 7 3 N 5 -1 7 -100 00.8 - 00.4 19 4 4 S 4 +2 4 480 01.2 - 00 20 4 3 NT W 2 -2 4 200 01.2 - 00 21 4 3 N 4 = 4 140 00.8 - 00.4 22 8 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 23 8 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 24 8 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9
EW pair 2 Section b Olwyn Brown Ken Hamilton	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 4 4 N 4 -2 5 -100 00 - 01.2 2 4 3 W 2 -1 5 050 00.2 - 01 3 4 1 NT W 4 = 5 -90 00.4 - 00.8 4 1 3 E A -2 2 200 01.2 - 00 5 1 1 NT W 9 = 2 -90 00.8 - 00.4 6 1 4 S 3 -2 2 -100 00.1 - 01.1 7 5 2 W 4 = 6 -110 00.5 - 00.7 8 5 1 NT N 2 = 6 090 01 - 00.2 9 5 5 S Q +1 6 480 00.8 - 00.4 10 2 3 N 9 -2 3 -200 00 - 01.2 11 2 3 NT N 6 -3 3 -150 00 - 01.2 12 2 1 W Q = 3 -80 00.3 - 00.9 13 6 4 W 5 = 7 -620 00.1 - 01.1 14 6 4 x N J = 7 510 01.2 - 00 15 6 2 x S 5 -1 7 -200 00.1 - 01.1 16 3 3 S 9 -1 4 -50 01.1 - 00.1 17 3 4 W 7 +1 4 -450 01.2 - 00 18 3 4 E A -1 4 050 01.1 - 00.1 19 7 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 20 7 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 21 7 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 22 8 3 NT W 5 +1 1 -630 00.4 - 00.8 23 8 4 W A -2 1 200 01.1 - 00.1 24 8 3 NT S 2 +1 1 430 01 - 00.2
EW pair 3 Section b Norma McDonald David Fortune	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 8 3 NT N 6 +1 2 430 01.2 - 00 2 8 3 S K = 2 140 00.5 - 00.7 3 8 2 N 2 = 2 110 01 - 00.2 4 4 1 NT S T +1 6 120 01 - 00.2 5 4 2 E 5 +2 6 -130 00.6 - 00.6 6 4 2 S 3 +1 6 140 00.9 - 00.3 7 1 3 E A = 3 -110 00.5 - 00.7 8 1 3 W 3 = 3 -110 00.3 - 00.9 9 1 4 S Q +1 3 450 00.3 - 00.9 10 5 2 NT W A +2 7 -180 00.2 - 01 11 5 2 N 3 -1 7 -50 00.5 - 00.7 12 5 2 W A -1 7 050 00.9 - 00.3 13 2 5 W 3 -1 4 100 01 - 00.2 14 2 5 N 5 -1 4 -50 00.1 - 01.1 15 2 2 S 5 -1 4 -100 00.4 - 00.8 16 6 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 17 6 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 18 6 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 19 7 3 NT N 8 +1 1 430 00.6 - 00.6 20 7 2 N A -2 1 -200 00.4 - 00.8 21 7 3 N A = 1 140 00.8 - 00.4 22 3 3 NT E 3 +1 5 -630 00.4 - 00.8 23 3 4 W 2 = 5 -620 00 - 01.2 24 3 2 S 2 +2 5 130 00.5 - 00.7
EW pair 4 Section b Linda Brown Bill Verrall	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 3 3 NT S 5 -1 6 -50 00.4 - 00.8 2 3 2 S 3 +2 6 170 00.8 - 00.4 3 3 2 S A -1 6 -50 00.6 - 00.6 4 8 2 N J -1 3 -100 00.4 - 00.8 5 8 1 NT W K +3 3 -180 00.1 - 01.1 6 8 2 S 4 +1 3 140 00.9 - 00.3 7 4 2 x S 8 -4 7 -1100 00 - 01.2 8 4 1 E 4 -1 7 050 00.8 - 00.4 9 4 4 S 2 +1 7 450 00.3 - 00.9 10 1 4 x E J -3 4 800 01.2 - 00 11 1 2 NT S 6 +1 4 150 01.2 - 00 12 1 3 E 3 -1 4 050 00.9 - 00.3 13 5 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 14 5 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 15 5 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 16 6 3 NT S 7 -1 1 -50 01.1 - 00.1 17 6 3 NT W 4 +3 1 -490 00.2 - 01 18 6 3 E 7 -1 1 050 01.1 - 00.1 19 2 3 NT N 8 +1 5 430 00.6 - 00.6 20 2 3 N A -3 5 -300 00.2 - 01 21 2 2 E 2 +2 5 -170 00.2 - 01 22 7 3 NT E 3 +1 2 -630 00.4 - 00.8 23 7 4 E 5 -2 2 200 01.1 - 00.1 24 7 2 S 2 +2 2 130 00.5 - 00.7
EW pair 5 Section b Jan Jacobson Roy Reid	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 7 3 NT S 2 -1 3 -50 00.4 - 00.8 2 7 4 N 9 = 3 620 01.2 - 00 3 7 2 S A = 3 110 01 - 00.2 4 3 2 S 6 -2 7 -200 00.1 - 01.1 5 3 1 NT W 6 +3 7 -180 00.1 - 01.1 6 3 2 S J +1 7 140 00.9 - 00.3 7 8 2 NT E K +2 4 -180 00.2 - 01 8 8 4 x S Q -2 4 -300 00 - 01.2 9 8 6 x E A -2 4 500 01 - 00.2 10 4 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 11 4 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 12 4 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 13 5 3 W Q +2 1 -200 00.5 - 00.7 14 5 4 NT S A +1 1 460 01 - 00.2 15 5 3 NT S 2 +1 1 630 01.2 - 00 16 1 3 NT S 6 -2 5 -100 00.7 - 00.5 17 1 3 NT W 4 +3 5 -490 00.2 - 01 18 1 1 W Q +1 5 -110 00.5 - 00.7 19 6 3 NT S 7 +2 2 460 01 - 00.2 20 6 2 NT W J +2 2 -180 00.6 - 00.6 21 6 4 N A -1 2 -100 00.4 - 00.8 22 2 3 NT W T +2 6 -660 00 - 01.2 23 2 2 W K = 6 -110 00.5 - 00.7 24 2 1 NT S 2 +1 6 120 00.1 - 01.1
EW pair 6 Section b Brian McCandless Glenda Chalmers	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 2 2 S 8 +1 7 110 00.8 - 00.4 2 2 2 S K +1 7 140 00.5 - 00.7 3 2 2 S 7 -2 7 -100 00.1 - 01.1 4 7 1 W 4 -1 4 100 00.8 - 00.4 5 7 3 NT W 7 -4 4 200 01.2 - 00 6 7 2 S J +1 4 140 00.9 - 00.3 7 3 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 8 3 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 9 3 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 10 4 2 W 9 -1 1 100 00.5 - 00.7 11 4 1 NT N 3 -1 1 -50 00.5 - 00.7 12 4 2 W J -1 1 050 00.9 - 00.3 13 8 3 S T = 5 140 01.2 - 00 14 8 3 N 4 +1 5 130 00.5 - 00.7 15 8 2 NT S K +1 5 150 00.7 - 00.5 16 5 4 N 4 -3 2 -150 00.3 - 00.9 17 5 3 NT E 5 +2 2 -460 00.8 - 00.4 18 5 3 E A = 2 -140 00.2 - 01 19 1 1 NT N J +2 6 150 00.2 - 01 20 1 3 E K +1 6 -170 00.8 - 00.4 21 1 3 N 7 = 6 140 00.8 - 00.4 22 6 3 NT E 3 = 3 -600 00.9 - 00.3 23 6 4 E 5 -1 3 100 00.8 - 00.4 24 6 1 NT S 6 +1 3 120 00.1 - 01.1
EW pair 7 Section b Trevor Lyall Richard Mundie	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 6 3 S T +1 4 130 01 - 00.2 2 6 2 S K +3 4 200 01 - 00.2 3 6 2 S 5 = 4 110 01 - 00.2 4 2 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 5 2 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 6 2 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 7 3 3 N A -1 1 -100 00.9 - 00.3 8 3 2 E Q +1 1 -110 00.3 - 00.9 9 3 5 x E A -3 1 800 01.2 - 00 10 7 1 NT W 9 -1 5 100 00.5 - 00.7 11 7 2 NT N T -2 5 -100 00.2 - 01 12 7 1 W A = 5 -80 00.3 - 00.9 13 4 3 W 5 = 2 -140 00.8 - 00.4 14 4 5 N 4 -1 2 -50 00.1 - 01.1 15 4 3 NT N J = 2 600 01 - 00.2 16 8 3 NT S 7 -3 6 -150 00.3 - 00.9 17 8 3 NT W T +2 6 -460 00.8 - 00.4 18 8 2 E A = 6 -110 00.5 - 00.7 19 5 3 NT N 8 -1 3 -50 00 - 01.2 20 5 3 NT W A +2 3 -660 00 - 01.2 21 5 1 NT S T -3 3 -300 00 - 01.2 22 1 3 NT E 3 -2 7 200 01.2 - 00 23 1 2 E 8 +1 7 -140 00.2 - 01 24 1 3 NT N 5 = 7 400 00.8 - 00.4
EW pair 8 Section b Alan Jacobson Joan Cockburn	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 1 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 2 1 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 3 1 8 – 0-999.9 - 0-999.9 4 2 1 NT S A = 1 090 00.6 - 00.6 5 2 3 NT W A -2 1 100 01 - 00.2 6 2 4 S 3 -2 1 -100 00.1 - 01.1 7 6 3 NT E 3 -1 5 100 01.2 - 00 8 6 3 S J -1 5 -50 00.6 - 00.6 9 6 5 S Q = 5 450 00.3 - 00.9 10 3 1 NT W 3 -4 2 400 01 - 00.2 11 3 2 NT N T = 2 120 00.9 - 00.3 12 3 1 N T -1 2 -100 00 - 01.2 13 7 4 W Q = 6 -620 00.1 - 01.1 14 7 2 NT S A +2 6 180 00.8 - 00.4 15 7 3 E 4 -3 6 150 00.7 - 00.5 16 4 3 x S 7 -1 3 -100 00.7 - 00.5 17 4 3 NT W Q +2 3 -460 00.8 - 00.4 18 4 4 N K -2 3 -200 00 - 01.2 19 8 3 NT N J +1 7 430 00.6 - 00.6 20 8 4 E 8 -1 7 100 01 - 00.2 21 8 5 x E K -2 7 300 01.2 - 00 22 5 3 NT E 3 = 4 -600 00.9 - 00.3 23 5 2 E T = 4 -110 00.5 - 00.7 24 5 3 NT S 2 +2 4 460 01.2 - 00