Wanaka Bridge Club : Detailed data for Lindis Pairs (2023)

View by:

NS pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Lindis Pairs (2023) 24 May

NS pair 1

Section b

Jeanette Gillies
Sally Jackways

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1	3	E	4	=	1	-110	0
2	1	3	E	T	-1	1	050	10
3	1	4	E	A	+1	1	-650	2
4	2	5	E	J	=	8	-600	1
5	2	4	N	J	=	8	620	10
6	2	3	E	J	-1	8	100	7
7	3	4	N	J	-2	7	-200	2
8	3	4	W	2	=	7	-420	0
9	3	2	S	5	-1	7	-50	0
10	4	4	W	7	+1	6	-650	2
11	4	1 NT	W	A	+1	6	-120	0
12	4	5	W	A	=	6	-400	7
13	5	1 NT	N	8	+2	5	150	12
14	5	3 NT	W	A	-2	5	100	9
15	5	4	S	6	=	5	620	11
16	6	2	S	2	+3	4	200	12
17	6	3 NT	N	5	-2	4	-100	0
18	6	2	E	A	+2	4	-170	2
19	7	1	W	2	+2	3	-140	0
20	7	3	W	A	-2	3	200	12
21	7	4	N	5	-2	3	-200	0
22	8	1 NT	N	5	+1	2	120	4
23	8	1 NT	W	6	+1	2	-120	3
24	8	1 NT	N	2	+1	2	120	5

NS pair 2

Section b

Noelene Raffills
Jacqui Roberts

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	8	4	N	A	+1	3	450	12
2	8	1	S	A	-1	3	-100	6
3	8	4	E	A	+1	3	-650	2
4	1	2	E	J	+3	2	-150	7
5	1	2	N	J	+3	2	200	6
6	1	2 x	E	J	-1	2	200	12
7	2	3	N	J	-1	1	-100	6
8	2	2	W	T	+1	1	-140	6
9	2	3	S	A	+1	1	170	12
10	3	3 NT	W	7	+2	8	-660	0
11	3	2 NT	W	3	-2	8	100	7
12	3	3 NT	E	Q	+3	8	-490	1
13	4	2 NT	N	9	-4	7	-400	0
14	4	5	E	9	-3	7	150	12
15	4	3	S	8	+1	7	170	0
16	5	4	S	A	-1	6	-50	5
17	5	3 NT	N	5	=	6	400	9
18	5	4	E	A	-1	6	050	7
19	6	1	W	4	=	5	-80	12
20	6	1	N	7	-2	5	-200	3
21	6	4	N	5	=	5	620	12
22	7	2	N	5	+1	4	140	6
23	7	2 NT	W	J	-1	4	100	11
24	7	1 NT	S	9	-1	4	-50	1

NS pair 3

Section b

Jacinta Hyslop
Pam Miller

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	7	2	N	A	+2	5	170	10
2	7	3	E	2	-1	5	050	10
3	7	2	E	A	+1	5	-140	9
4	8	3	E	J	+2	4	-150	7
5	8	4	N	8	=	4	620	10
6	8	3	E	K	+1	4	-170	4
7	1	3	N	9	-1	3	-100	6
8	1	2 NT	W	2	=	3	-120	9
9	1	2	S	A	=	3	110	4
10	2	2 NT	W	7	+3	2	-210	11
11	2	2 NT	E	5	-1	2	050	2
12	2	3 NT	E	Q	+3	2	-490	1
13	3	2	N	3	+2	1	130	10
14	3	1 NT	W	T	=	1	-90	2
15	3	1 NT	N	3	+3	1	180	2
16	4	4	E	K	+1	8	-650	0
17	4	4	N	A	-1	8	-50	2
18	4	3 NT	W	5	-1	8	050	7
19	5	2	W	2	=	7	-110	5
20	5	2	N	7	-3	7	-300	0
21	5	3 NT	S	A	=	7	600	10
22	6	1 NT	N	5	-1	6	-50	0
23	6	3	E	3	-1	6	100	11
24	6	2	S	6	-1	6	-50	1

NS pair 4

Section b

Neil Robinson
Jacquie Staley

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	6	5	E	J	-2	7	100	5
2	6	4	E	J	-1	7	050	10
3	6	4	E	A	+1	7	-650	2
4	7	5	E	J	-1	6	100	12
5	7	3	N	8	+1	6	170	4
6	7	3 NT x	N	4	-3	6	-500	0
7	8	1 NT x	W	3	+1	5	-380	0
8	8	1 x	W	2	+1	5	-260	2
9	8	3	S	7	=	5	140	8
10	1	4	E	8	=	4	-620	8
11	1	1 NT	N	3	=	4	090	4
12	1	4	W	A	+1	4	-150	10
13	2	2	N	K	-1	3	-100	6
14	2	4	E	J	-1	3	050	5
15	2	1	S	6	+4	3	200	6
16	3	2	N	Q	+1	2	140	9
17	3	3 NT	S	6	=	2	400	9
18	3	4	W	2	-2	2	100	12
19	4	1 NT	E	9	=	1	-90	9
20	4	2	N	7	-1	1	-100	6
21	4	3	S	A	=	1	110	7
22	5	2	E	A	-2	8	200	12
23	5	1 NT	W	6	+1	8	-120	3
24	5	1 NT	S	2	+1	8	120	5

NS pair 5

Section b

Lynne Millar
Emma Allwood

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	4	3	N	A	-1	2	-50	2
2	4	3 NT	W	3	=	2	-400	0
3	4	4	W	4	=	2	-620	6
4	5	3	E	J	+2	1	-150	7
5	5	3 NT	N	8	-3	1	-300	0
6	5	3	E	5	+2	1	-200	2
7	6	2	N	9	-1	8	-100	6
8	6	2	W	2	+3	8	-200	4
9	6	3	N	A	=	8	110	4
10	7	3 NT	W	4	+1	7	-630	5
11	7	3	W	A	-2	7	100	7
12	7	3 NT	W	2	+1	7	-430	4
13	8	3 NT	N	9	-3	6	-300	2
14	8	4	E	2	-1	6	050	5
15	8	2	N	T	+3	6	200	6
16	1	4	N		-1	5	-50	5
17	1	1	S	9	+2	5	110	4
18	1	4	E	A	=	5	-420	0
19	2	2	W	2	=	4	-110	5
20	2	2	N	7	-2	4	-200	3
21	2	3	S	K	=	4	110	7
22	3	1	S	A	+1	3	110	2
23	3	2	W	3	=	3	-110	6
24	3	2	N	Q	+1	3	140	9

NS pair 6

Section b

Natalie Keenan
Pauline Thomson

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	3	4	E	4	-2	4	100	5
2	3	2	E	2	=	4	-110	4
3	3	3	E	4	=	4	-140	9
4	4	5	E	3	=	3	-600	1
5	4	4	N	8	-1	3	-100	2
6	4	3	N	3	=	3	110	10
7	5	2	N	K	+1	2	110	10
8	5	2 NT	E	T	=	2	-120	9
9	5	3	N	A	=	2	110	4
10	6	3 NT	W	7	+1	1	-630	5
11	6	2	S	J	=	1	110	10
12	6	3	E	6	+1	1	-130	12
13	7	3	E	3	=	8	-140	4
14	7	3	N	A	-2	8	-100	0
15	7	4	N	T	=	8	620	11
16	8	3	E	3	+2	7	-200	2
17	8	2 NT	S	7	+1	7	150	6
18	8	4	E	2	-1	7	050	7
19	1	1 NT	E	8	=	6	-90	9
20	1	2	W	3	=	6	-90	8
21	1	4	N	9	-1	6	-100	3
22	2	2 NT	N	5	+1	5	150	9
23	2	1 NT	W	5	+2	5	-150	0
24	2	2	N	7	+1	5	140	9

NS pair 7

Section b

Janet Young
Marg Caldwell

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	2	5	E	K	-3	6	150	8
2	2	1	E	J	+3	6	-170	2
3	2	3 NT	E	A	-2	6	200	12
4	3	4	E	Q	+1	5	-150	7
5	3	4	N	8	=	5	620	10
6	3	3	E	8	-1	5	100	7
7	4	2	E	9	-3	4	300	12
8	4	1 NT	N	4	-1	4	-50	12
9	4	3	N	9	+2	4	150	10
10	5	2 NT	W	7	+3	3	-210	11
11	5	4	W	A	-3	3	150	12
12	5	5	W	A	=	3	-400	7
13	6	2	E	T	-1	2	100	8
14	6	2 NT	W	8	-2	2	100	9
15	6	3	N	2	+2	2	200	6
16	7	2	S	A	+1	1	140	9
17	7	3 NT	S	6	+1	1	430	12
18	7	4	E	8	-1	1	050	7
19	8	2 NT	W	2	=	8	-120	2
20	8	3 NT	E	K	-1	8	100	10
21	8	3 NT	N	8	-1	8	-100	3
22	1	1 NT	N	T	+2	7	150	9
23	1	1 NT	W	5	=	7	-90	8
24	1	1 NT	N	2	+2	7	150	12

NS pair 8

Section b

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1					8	–	-9999
2	1					8	–	-9999
3	1					8	–	-9999
4	2					7	–	-9999
5	2					7	–	-9999
6	2					7	–	-9999
7	3					6	–	-9999
8	3					6	–	-9999
9	3					6	–	-9999
10	4					5	–	-9999
11	4					5	–	-9999
12	4					5	–	-9999
13	5					4	–	-9999
14	5					4	–	-9999
15	5					4	–	-9999
16	6					3	–	-9999
17	6					3	–	-9999
18	6					3	–	-9999
19	7					2	–	-9999
20	7					2	–	-9999
21	7					2	–	-9999
22	8					1	–	-9999
23	8					1	–	-9999
24	8					1	–	-9999