Wanaka Bridge Club : Detailed data for Lindis Pairs (2018)

View by:

EW pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Lindis Pairs (2018) 30 May

EW pair 1

Section a

Eddie Lowe
Robyn Gilchrist

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1	3	S	Q	=	1	140	120
2	1	4	E	2	-1	1	050	50
3	8	2 NT	E	A	-1	8	100	0
4	8	3	S	A	-3	8	-300	220
5	2	3	W		=	2	-140	190
6	2	3	W	2	-2	2	200	30
7	9	3	S	J	=	9	140	60
8	9	3	N	A	=	9	110	140
9	3					3	–	-9999
10	3					3	–	-9999
11	10	1 NT	E	4	-2	10	100	40
12	10	4	S	A	+1	10	650	50
13	4	4	E	8	+1	4	-650	120
14	4	1 NT	E	T	-3	4	150	10
15	11	3	W	A	+3	11	-230	90
16	11	3 NT	N	8	-1	11	-50	110
17	5	3 NT	S	4	+4	5	520	50
18	5	3 NT	S	4	-4	5	-400	220
19	12	3	N	A	-1	12	-50	200
20	12	4	E	4	+1	12	-650	140
21	6	2 NT	N	7	=	6	120	110
22	6	3 NT	N	6	-1	6	-50	180
23	13	3 NT	W	T	+1	13	-630	180
24	13	4	N	A	-2	13	-100	60
25	7	3	E	Q	=	7	-140	170
26	7	3 NT	S	3	+2	7	660	170

EW pair 2

Section a

Jude Gunn
Jason Benton

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	7	3	S	8	=	8	140	120
2	7	4	E	7	=	8	-420	170
3	1	1 NT	S	8	-1	2	-50	70
4	1	3	N	7	-1	2	-100	150
5	8	2	W	A	=	9	-110	110
6	8	3	N	A	+1	9	130	80
7	2					3	–	-9999
8	2					3	–	-9999
9	9	2	W	T	-1	10	100	160
10	9	3	E	2	-2	10	200	50
11	3	1 NT	E	2	+1	4	-120	200
12	3	4	S	A	+1	4	650	50
13	10	6	W	A	-2	11	200	20
14	10	4	N	3	-3	11	-150	220
15	4	4	W	A	+1	5	-450	180
16	4	3 NT	N	2	-1	5	-50	110
17	11	3	N	K	+4	12	190	200
18	11	2 NT	S	8	-2	12	-200	130
19	5	2	N	A	+1	6	140	30
20	5	4	E	4	+1	6	-650	140
21	12	3 NT	S	3	-1	13	-100	180
22	12	2	S	8	+1	13	140	80
23	6	3 NT	W	3	+1	7	-630	180
24	6	2	E	T	=	7	-110	80
25	13	2	N	Q	=	1	090	90
26	13	2 NT	S	3	+4	1	240	200

EW pair 3

Section a

Mark Harry
Rosemary Boswell

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	13	3	S	Q	=	2	140	120
2	13	4	E	4	-1	2	050	50
3	7	1 NT	S	J	-1	9	-50	70
4	7	3	N	6	-1	9	-100	150
5	1					3	–	-9999
6	1					3	–	-9999
7	8	3	S	T	-1	10	-100	150
8	8	1	N	5	=	10	080	200
9	2	2	W	T	-1	4	100	160
10	2	3	E	A	-2	4	200	50
11	9	2	E	9	-1	11	050	140
12	9	5	W	K	-2	11	100	130
13	3	4 NT	W	3	+1	5	-660	160
14	3	2	W	T	-1	5	050	180
15	10	4	W	A	+1	12	-450	180
16	10	4	N	A	-2	12	-100	190
17	4	3 NT	S	4	+4	6	520	50
18	4	3 NT	S	8	-3	6	-300	180
19	11	2	N	A	=	13	110	100
20	11	3 NT	E	Q	-2	13	200	0
21	5	2	N	5	=	7	110	140
22	5	3 NT	S	9	-1	7	-50	180
23	12	3 NT	W	5	=	1	-600	90
24	12	5 x	S	Q	-3	1	-500	220
25	6	3	E	Q	=	8	-140	170
26	6	3 NT	N	4	+2	8	660	170

EW pair 4

Section a

Carole Turner
Lesley Hook

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	6	3	S	K	+1	9	170	50
2	6	4	E	4	-1	9	050	50
3	13					3	–	-9999
4	13					3	–	-9999
5	7	2	W	A	=	10	-110	110
6	7	4	E	K	-2	10	200	30
7	1	3	S	8	=	4	140	60
8	1	1	N	3	+2	4	110	140
9	8	2	W	T	-1	11	100	160
10	8	2	E	7	-2	11	200	50
11	2	2	N	8	=	5	090	80
12	2	3	W	K	+1	5	-130	190
13	9	4	W	A	=	12	-620	70
14	9	1 NT	E	5	-1	12	050	180
15	3	4	W	K	+1	6	-450	180
16	3	3 NT	N	2	-1	6	-50	110
17	10	6 NT	S	2	=	13	990	0
18	10	2 NT	S	3	-2	13	-200	130
19	4	1 NT	S	4	+1	7	120	80
20	4	4	W	A	+1	7	-650	140
21	11	2 NT	N	7	=	1	120	110
22	11	1	S	5	+2	1	140	80
23	5	4	W	4	-3	8	300	20
24	5	1 NT	N	A	=	8	090	0
25	12	2	E	Q	+1	2	-140	170
26	12	2	S	7	+4	2	170	220

EW pair 5

Section a

Bridget McCaughan
Sonya Adams

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	12					3	–	-9999
2	12					3	–	-9999
3	6	2	S	T	-1	10	-50	70
4	6	3	W	7	-1	10	100	80
5	13	4	W	A	-2	4	100	50
6	13	2 NT	E	Q	-1	4	100	150
7	7	3 x	S	8	=	11	730	0
8	7	1	N	8	+3	11	170	0
9	1	3	S	4	=	5	110	100
10	1	2	E	9	-2	5	200	50
11	8	2	N	2	=	12	090	80
12	8	4	S	2	+2	12	680	0
13	2	4	E		+3	6	-710	190
14	2	1 NT	E	5	-2	6	100	120
15	9	4	W	K	=	13	-420	130
16	9	3	S	6	=	13	110	40
17	3	3 NT	S	2	+4	7	520	50
18	3	3 NT	S	2	-1	7	-100	70
19	10	1 NT	E	J	=	1	-90	220
20	10	5	W	A	=	1	-600	80
21	4	3 NT	S	9	-1	8	-100	180
22	4	3	S	8	=	8	140	80
23	11	3 NT	E	7	=	2	-600	90
24	11	2	E	Q	+1	2	-140	140
25	5	3	E	Q	=	9	-140	170
26	5	3 NT	S	5	+3	9	690	0

EW pair 6

Section a

Denise Bunn
Ruth Coghill

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	5	2	S	5	=	10	110	180
2	5	5	S	A	-3	10	-300	120
3	12	1 NT	S	2	-1	4	-50	70
4	12	3	N	6	-1	4	-100	150
5	6	2	N	3	=	11	110	10
6	6	2	E	Q	+2	11	-130	220
7	13	3	S	T	-1	5	-100	150
8	13	1 NT	N	5	+1	5	120	70
9	7	3	W	5	-3	12	300	10
10	7	2	E	3	-2	12	200	50
11	1	1 NT	E	2	+1	6	-120	200
12	1	5	W	K	-1	6	050	160
13	8	4	E	4	+1	13	-650	120
14	8	2	N	7	+1	13	140	40
15	2	4	W	A	=	7	-420	130
16	2	4	S	A	-1	7	-50	110
17	9	3 NT	S	9	+3	1	490	130
18	9	2 NT	S	T	=	1	120	30
19	3	2	N	Q	+1	8	140	30
20	3	4	W	A	+1	8	-650	140
21	10	4	S	T	-2	2	-200	220
22	10	3 NT	N	6	-1	2	-50	180
23	4	3 NT	W	7	=	9	-600	90
24	4	3	E	J	=	9	-140	140
25	11					3	–	-9999
26	11					3	–	-9999

EW pair 7

Section a

Jen Milburn
John Milburn

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	11	4	S	Q	=	4	420	0
2	11	4	E	7	=	4	-420	170
3	5	2	W	Q	+1	11	-110	190
4	5	2	N	8	=	11	110	50
5	12	4	W	6	-2	5	100	50
6	12	2	E	6	-2	5	200	30
7	6	3	S	J	-1	12	-100	150
8	6	1 NT	E	9	=	12	-90	220
9	13	1	W	2	=	6	-80	220
10	13	2	E	3	-2	6	200	50
11	7	2	W	A	-1	13	050	140
12	7	5	S	A	=	13	650	50
13	1	6 NT	W	A	-3	7	300	0
14	1	1 NT	E	5	-3	7	150	10
15	8	2	W	A	+4	1	-230	90
16	8	3	S	7	=	1	110	40
17	2	3 NT	S	5	+3	8	490	130
18	2	2 NT	S	9	-3	8	-300	180
19	9	2	N	A	+1	2	140	30
20	9	4	W	A	+2	2	-680	220
21	3	2 NT	N	7	+1	9	150	80
22	3	4	S	7	=	9	420	20
23	10					3	–	-9999
24	10					3	–	-9999
25	4	3	E	Q	-1	10	100	30
26	4	4	N	Q	+2	10	680	80

EW pair 8

Section a

Dorothy McDonald
Jude George

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	4	3	S	5	=	11	140	120
2	4	3	E	K	=	11	-140	100
3	11	1 NT	S	8	-1	5	-50	70
4	11	3	S	5	-1	5	-100	150
5	5	2	W	A	+1	12	-140	190
6	5	3	E	6	-2	12	200	30
7	12	3	S	T	-1	6	-100	150
8	12	2 NT	N	Q	+1	6	150	20
9	6	2 NT	S	A	=	13	120	80
10	6	2	E	9	-1	13	100	140
11	13	3	E	9	-1	7	050	140
12	13	4	S	J	=	7	620	100
13	7	4	E	8	+3	1	-710	190
14	7	1 NT	E	3	-1	1	050	180
15	1	3	W	K	=	8	-140	20
16	1	3 NT	N	2	-2	8	-100	190
17	8	3	E	8	-3	2	150	220
18	8	3	W	2	=	2	-140	100
19	2	3 NT	E	K	-1	9	100	150
20	2	3	E	Q	+2	9	-200	50
21	9					3	–	-9999
22	9					3	–	-9999
23	3	4 NT	E	7	-1	10	100	40
24	3	3	E	Q	=	10	-140	140
25	10	2	W	A	-1	4	100	30
26	10	4	N	2	+2	4	680	80

EW pair 9

Section a

Kay Ross
Bruce Cathie

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	10	3	E	A	=	5	-110	220
2	10	4 x	N	K	-2	5	-500	220
3	4	2	W	4	+1	12	-110	190
4	4	3	N	6	-1	12	-100	150
5	11	2	W	K	+1	6	-140	190
6	11	2	N	6	+1	6	110	110
7	5	3	S	8	-1	13	-100	150
8	5	2	N	5	=	13	110	140
9	12	2	W	8	-1	7	100	160
10	12	1	E	9	-1	7	100	140
11	6	2 NT	W	3	-3	1	150	0
12	6	4 x	W	4	=	1	-510	220
13	13	4	W	A	=	8	-620	70
14	13	2	W	K	-2	8	100	120
15	7	2 x	W	A	+3	2	-770	220
16	7	3 NT	N	2	-2	2	-100	190
17	1	3 NT	S	9	+3	9	490	130
18	1	2 NT	S	9	-1	9	-100	70
19	8					3	–	-9999
20	8					3	–	-9999
21	2	4	S	3	=	10	620	10
22	2	3 NT	S	5	-1	10	-50	180
23	9	3 NT	W	7	+1	4	-630	180
24	9	3	E	5	+1	4	-170	200
25	3	2	N	5	-1	11	-50	120
26	3	4	N	2	+2	11	680	80

EW pair 10

Section a

Noeline Turner
Jill Millar

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	3	2	N	A	+4	12	230	20
2	3	4	E	K	-2	12	100	0
3	10	2	N	T	-2	6	-100	150
4	10	2	N	6	+1	6	140	10
5	4	2	W	A	=	13	-110	110
6	4	2	N	A	+1	13	110	110
7	11	3	S	9	+2	7	200	20
8	11	1	N	A	+2	7	140	40
9	5	2	W	8	-2	1	200	50
10	5	1	E	8	=	1	-70	180
11	12	2	N	A	=	8	110	20
12	12	5 x	W	K	-1	8	100	130
13	6	4	W	3	+1	2	-650	120
14	6	2	W	2	-2	2	100	120
15	13	3	S	K	-1	9	-100	0
16	13	3 NT	S	A	=	9	400	0
17	7					3	–	-9999
18	7					3	–	-9999
19	1	2	N	A	+1	10	140	30
20	1	3	N	A	-1	10	-100	20
21	8	4	S	A	-1	4	-100	180
22	8	2	S	7	+1	4	140	80
23	2	4 x	W	7	-3	11	800	0
24	2	2	N	A	-1	11	-50	30
25	9	3	W	8	-1	5	100	30
26	9	4	N	8	+2	5	680	80

EW pair 11

Section a

Claire Romeril
Sandy Bryan

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	9	4	S	8	-2	6	-100	200
2	9	4	E	3	=	6	-420	170
3	3	2 NT	E	A	=	13	-120	220
4	3	2	N	7	+1	13	140	10
5	10	2	W	A	=	7	-110	110
6	10	3	N	A	-2	7	-100	190
7	4	3	S	8	=	1	140	60
8	4	2 NT	N	Q	=	1	120	70
9	11	3	W	T	-1	8	100	160
10	11	2 NT	W	2	=	8	-120	210
11	5	1 NT	E	4	+1	2	-120	200
12	5	3	W	K	+1	2	-130	190
13	12	6 NT	E	5	=	9	-1440	220
14	12	2	S	7	+2	9	130	60
15	6					3	–	-9999
16	6					3	–	-9999
17	13	3 NT	S	9	+3	10	490	130
18	13	3	W	T	-3	10	150	0
19	7	3 NT	E	5	-1	4	100	150
20	7	3 NT	E	4	+2	4	-660	200
21	1	4	N	8	=	11	620	10
22	1	3 NT	S	J	+1	11	430	0
23	8	3 NT	W	5	+1	5	-630	180
24	8	3	E	5	=	5	-140	140
25	2	3	E	Q	-1	12	100	30
26	2	4	N	2	+2	12	680	80

EW pair 12

Section a

Pam Miller
Suzanne Ewing

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	2	3	S	2	=	13	140	120
2	2	4	E	K	=	13	-420	170
3	9	1 NT	S	3	-2	7	-100	150
4	9	2	N	Q	-1	7	-100	150
5	3	2	W	A	+1	1	-140	190
6	3	3	E	7	-1	1	100	150
7	10	4	S	J	-2	8	-200	220
8	10	2	N	Q	=	8	110	140
9	4	2	W	2	-2	2	200	50
10	4	1 NT	W	2	+1	2	-120	210
11	11	2	N	9	=	9	090	80
12	11	4	S	2	+1	9	650	50
13	5					3	–	-9999
14	5					3	–	-9999
15	12	2	W	A	+3	10	-200	60
16	12	3 NT	N	T	-2	10	-100	190
17	6	3 NT	S	5	+4	4	520	50
18	6	2 NT	S	9	=	4	120	30
19	13	3 NT	E	5	-1	11	100	150
20	13	4	E	Q	+1	11	-650	140
21	7	3 NT	S	3	=	5	600	40
22	7	3 NT	N	J	-1	5	-50	180
23	1	3 NT	W	J	+1	12	-630	180
24	1	1 NT	N	A	-1	12	-50	30
25	8	2	N	K	=	6	090	90
26	8	4	N	2	+2	6	680	80

EW pair 13

Section a

Brian Stewart
Diane Stewart

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	8	2	S	8	+2	7	170	50
2	8	4	E	8	-1	7	050	50
3	2	1 NT	S	Q	-1	1	-50	70
4	2	2	N	3	=	1	110	50
5	9	2	N	3	=	8	110	10
6	9	2	S	9	-2	8	-100	190
7	3	3	S	J	-1	2	-100	150
8	3	2	N	3	+1	2	110	140
9	10	2 NT	E	8	-3	9	300	10
10	10	1	E	A	-1	9	100	140
11	4					3	–	-9999
12	4					3	–	-9999
13	11	3	W	7	+2	10	-200	40
14	11	1 NT	N	3	+1	10	120	80
15	5	2	W	A	+2	4	-170	40
16	5	3	S	9	=	4	110	40
17	12	3 NT	S	3	=	11	400	180
18	12	3 NT	S	9	-3	11	-300	180
19	6	1 NT	E	4	-1	5	100	150
20	6	4	N	2	-2	5	-200	50
21	13	2 NT	N	7	+2	12	180	60
22	13	2	S	3	+1	12	140	80
23	7	3 NT	W	T	=	6	-600	90
24	7	3	E	5	=	6	-140	140
25	1	2	E	Q	+2	13	-170	220
26	1	4	N	2	+2	13	680	80