Wanaka Bridge Club : Detailed data for Friday Bridge

View by:

NS pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Friday Bridge 23 February

NS pair 1

Section w

Lynne Fegan
David Brewer

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1	5	W	T	+2	1	-440	00.6 - 00.6
2	1	4	S	A	=	1	620	01.1 - 00.1
3	1	4	N	J	+1	1	150	00.2 - 01
4	2	3 NT	W	7	=	7	-600	00.3 - 00.9
5	2	4	W	4	=	7	-420	00.4 - 00.8
6	2	2 NT	E	Q	-3	7	300	00.8 - 00.4
7	3	4	N	4	=	6	620	01.1 - 00.1
8	3	4	N	3	+3	6	510	00.9 - 00.3
9	3	3 NT	S	7	+3	6	490	01.2 - 00
10	4	3	E	3	=	5	-110	01 - 00.2
11	4	1	N	A	+1	5	110	01.2 - 00
12	4	2	N	Q	+3	5	200	00.7 - 00.5
13	5	2	N	A	+1	4	140	00.8 - 00.4
14	5	4	E	4	-1	4	050	01.2 - 00
15	5	5 x	N	6	-2	4	-500	00 - 01.2
16	6	2	E	5	+1	3	-110	00 - 01.2
17	6	4	S	Q	-1	3	-50	00.7 - 00.5
18	6	5	W	J	-1	3	050	00.7 - 00.5
19	7	5	E	J	=	2	-650	00.5 - 00.7
20	7	5	S	5	-2	2	-200	00 - 01.2
21	7	3 NT	W	2	+2	2	-460	00.1 - 01.1

NS pair 2

Section w

Peter Recordon
Michael Chapman-Smith

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	7	5	W	Q	+2	3	-440	00.6 - 00.6
2	7	5	E	A	=	3	-400	00 - 01.2
3	7	3 N	S	Q	+2	3	460	00.8 - 00.4
4	1	2 NT	W	7	+1	2	-150	00.7 - 00.5
5	1	4	W	7	=	2	-420	00.4 - 00.8
6	1	2 NT	E	Q	-3	2	300	00.8 - 00.4
7	2	3 NT	S	9	=	1	600	00.8 - 00.4
8	2	4	N	9	+3	1	510	00.9 - 00.3
9	2	4	S	8	+2	1	480	01 - 00.2
10	3					7	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
11	3					7	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
12	3					7	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
13	4					6	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
14	4					6	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
15	4					6	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
16	5					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
17	5					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
18	5					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
19	6					4	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
20	6					4	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
21	6					4	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9

NS pair 3

Section w

Sheryl Strudwick
Nan Ottrey

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	6	5	E	A	+1	5	-420	01 - 00.2
2	6	6	S	A	-2	5	-200	00.3 - 00.9
3	6	3 NT	S	Q	+3	5	490	01.2 - 00
4	7	2 NT	W	7	+1	4	-150	00.7 - 00.5
5	7	4	W	4	=	4	-420	00.4 - 00.8
6	7	2 NT	E	Q	-1	4	100	00.3 - 00.9
7	1	2	N	4	+2	3	170	00 - 01.2
8	1	6	S	T	=	3	980	01.2 - 00
9	1	6	S	T	-1	3	-50	00.1 - 01.1
10	2	4	S	6	-2	2	-200	00.1 - 01.1
11	2	4	S	A	-3	2	-150	00 - 01.2
12	2	6	N	8	-1	2	-100	00 - 01.2
13	3	3	S	K	=	1	140	00.8 - 00.4
14	3	3 NT	W	4	+1	1	-430	00.6 - 00.6
15	3	5	N	6	-3	1	-300	00.6 - 00.6
16	4	2	N	A	-1	7	-50	00.6 - 00.6
17	4	3	E	A	-1	7	050	01.1 - 00.1
18	4	4	S	A	+2	7	680	01.2 - 00
19	5	5	E	A	=	6	-650	00.5 - 00.7
20	5	4	W	A	-1	6	100	00.6 - 00.6
21	5	3 NT	E	7	=	6	-400	00.7 - 00.5

NS pair 4

Section w

Ken Roberts
Murray Pryde

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	5	6	E	A	+1	7	-940	00 - 01.2
2	5	4	S		=	7	620	01.1 - 00.1
3	5	1	S	K	+2	7	110	00 - 01.2
4	6	3	E	K	+1	6	-130	01.1 - 00.1
5	6	4	W	4	=	6	-420	00.4 - 00.8
6	6	3 NT	E	Q	-4	6	400	01.2 - 00
7	7	2 NT	S	Q	+2	5	180	00.2 - 01
8	7	5 x	W	A	-3	5	500	00.6 - 00.6
9	7	6	S	Q	-1	5	-50	00.1 - 01.1
10	1	3	S	6	-1	4	-100	01.2 - 00
11	1	1 NT	S	K	-1	4	-50	00.4 - 00.8
12	1	3	N	T	+2	4	200	00.7 - 00.5
13	2	3	S	J	=	3	140	00.8 - 00.4
14	2	3 NT	W	4	+2	3	-460	00.1 - 01.1
15	2	4	W	K	=	3	-420	00.2 - 01
16	3	2	N	A	-1	2	-50	00.6 - 00.6
17	3	3	W	A	+2	2	-150	00.1 - 01.1
18	3	3	S	A	-1	2	-100	00.5 - 00.7
19	4	4	E	A	+1	1	-650	00.5 - 00.7
20	4	3	W	K	=	1	-140	00.2 - 01
21	4	4	E	7	-2	1	100	01.2 - 00

NS pair 5

Section w

Pam Miller
Sally Welch

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	4	5	W	Q	+2	2	-440	00.6 - 00.6
2	4	5	E	A	-1	2	050	00.6 - 00.6
3	4	3 NT	S	4	+2	2	460	00.8 - 00.4
4	5	3 NT	W	7	=	1	-600	00.3 - 00.9
5	5	4	W	4	=	1	-420	00.4 - 00.8
6	5	2 NT	E	2	=	1	-120	00 - 01.2
7	6	3	N	3	+2	7	200	00.5 - 00.7
8	6	3	W	Q	-1	7	050	00 - 01.2
9	6	3 NT	S	T	=	7	400	00.6 - 00.6
10	7	4	S	6	-2	6	-200	00.1 - 01.1
11	7	3	E	6	-1	6	050	00.7 - 00.5
12	7	4	N	Q	+1	6	650	01.2 - 00
13	1	3	S	K	=	5	140	00.8 - 00.4
14	1	1	E	4	+1	5	-110	01 - 00.2
15	1	3	W	A	-1	5	050	01 - 00.2
16	2	3	W	K	-3	4	300	01.2 - 00
17	2	3	W	J	+2	4	-150	00.1 - 01.1
18	2	2 NT	S	6	-2	4	-200	00.2 - 01
19	3	4	E	5	+1	3	-650	00.5 - 00.7
20	3	4	W	A	-2	3	200	01.1 - 00.1
21	3	3 NT	E	2	+2	3	-460	00.1 - 01.1

NS pair 6

Section w

Marcelline Harald
Peter Hart

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	3	4	E	A	+3	4	-190	01.2 - 00
2	3	4	S	A	-2	4	-200	00.3 - 00.9
3	3	2 NT	S	Q	+3	4	210	00.4 - 00.8
4	4	3 NT	W	7	+2	3	-660	00 - 01.2
5	4	4	W	9	-1	3	050	01 - 00.2
6	4	2	E	5	-1	3	100	00.3 - 00.9
7	5	3	N	J	+2	2	200	00.5 - 00.7
8	5	3 x	W	J	-1	2	100	00.2 - 01
9	5	2	S	T	+4	2	230	00.4 - 00.8
10	6	1 NT	W	T	+1	1	-120	00.7 - 00.5
11	6	2	N	A	-1	1	-50	00.4 - 00.8
12	6	3	N	Q	+2	1	200	00.7 - 00.5
13	7	4	N	A	-1	7	-100	00.2 - 01
14	7	3 NT	W	4	+1	7	-430	00.6 - 00.6
15	7	5	N	6	-3	7	-300	00.6 - 00.6
16	1	1	E	A	-2	6	200	01 - 00.2
17	1	2	E	9	-1	6	050	01.1 - 00.1
18	1	4	S	K	=	6	620	01 - 00.2
19	2	5	N	A	=	5	400	01.2 - 00
20	2	4	W	A	-2	5	200	01.1 - 00.1
21	2	3 NT	E	8	=	5	-400	00.7 - 00.5

NS pair 7

Section w

Jill Paxman
Barbara Waterworth

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	2	5 NT	W	5	+2	6	-520	00.2 - 01
2	2	3	S	A	+2	6	200	00.8 - 00.4
3	2	3 NT	N	6	+2	6	460	00.8 - 00.4
4	3	3	E	7	+1	5	-130	01.1 - 00.1
5	3	2	S	9	=	5	110	01.2 - 00
6	3	2 NT	E	Q	-3	5	300	00.8 - 00.4
7	4	4	N	K	=	4	620	01.1 - 00.1
8	4	4	N	9	+1	4	450	00.4 - 00.8
9	4	4	S	T	+1	4	450	00.8 - 00.4
10	5	4	E	6	=	3	-130	00.5 - 00.7
11	5	3 NT	E	6	-2	3	100	01 - 00.2
12	5	3	N	Q	=	3	140	00.2 - 01
13	6	3	E	5	+1	2	-170	00 - 01.2
14	6	3 NT	W	J	+2	2	-460	00.1 - 01.1
15	6	5	W	J	-3	2	150	01.2 - 00
16	7	3	N	A	-2	1	-100	00.2 - 01
17	7	3	W	5	+1	1	-130	00.5 - 00.7
18	7	4	E	A	+1	1	-450	00 - 01.2
19	1	4	E	A	+1	7	-650	00.5 - 00.7
20	1	3	W	A	-1	7	100	00.6 - 00.6
21	1	3 NT	E	9	=	7	-400	00.7 - 00.5