Wanaka Bridge Club : Detailed data for Mt Barker Pairs

View by:

EW pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Mt Barker Pairs 2 March

EW pair 1

Section w

Marc Simmonds
Sherril Harries

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1	6	E	J	+1	1	-1010	18
2	1	3	E	J	+2	1	-150	6
3	8	2	N	Q	-1	8	-50	15
4	8	1 NT	S	8	=	8	090	10
5	2	2	N	9	+1	2	140	11
6	2	1 NT	N	7	-1	2	-50	16
7	9	1 NT	W	2	=	9	-90	7
8	9	3	W	A	-1	9	050	1
9	3	2	S	9	+1	3	140	5
10	3	2	E	4	+1	3	-110	18
11	10	1	N	A	+2	10	140	6
12	10	4	S	T	+2	10	680	9
13	4	3	N	A	=	4	140	3
14	4	3 NT	W	6	=	4	-400	15
15	11	2 N	W	Q	=	11	-120	3
16	11	3 NT	W	Q	-1	11	100	4
17	5	2 NT	N	T	-1	5	-50	11
18	5	4	E	Q	+1	5	-450	14
19	13	4	E	T	-1	11	100	8
20	13	2	E	7	=	11	-90	14
21	6	2	S	5	+1	6	140	1
22	6	3	E	A	-2	6	200	1
23	12	2	S	A	=	1	090	10
24	12	4	E	2	=	1	-420	13
25	7	2	E	A	-2	7	200	2
26	7	5	E	9	-1	7	100	4

EW pair 2

Section w

Heather Olsen
Brian McCandless

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	7	6	E	J	+1	8	-1010	18
2	7	2	E	3	+3	8	-200	15
3	1	1 NT	N	Q	=	2	090	10
4	1	2	S	8	+1	2	140	5
5	8	1 NT	N	8	=	9	090	18
6	8	1 NT	S	T	-1	9	-50	16
7	2	1 NT	W	9	=	3	-90	7
8	2	2	W	T	=	3	-110	7
9	9	1 NT	N	4	=	10	090	19
10	9	2	S	5	-2	10	-200	20
11	3	2	N	A	=	4	110	10
12	3	6	S	Q	-1	4	-100	20
13	10	1 NT	W	5	+1	11	-120	20
14	10	4	W	3	-3	11	150	0
15	4	3 NT	E	6	=	5	-400	20
16	4	4	W	Q	=	5	-620	19
17	13	3	E	4	-1	10	050	8
18	13	4	E	K	=	10	-420	6
19	5	4	S	Q	-2	6	-100	13
20	5	2	W	2	=	6	-110	20
21	11	2	S	9	=	1	110	5
22	11	3	E	A	-2	1	200	1
23	6	2 NT	N	3	+1	7	150	4
24	6	3	E	2	+1	7	-130	4
25	12	2	S	J	-1	2	-50	15
26	12	3	E	8	+1	2	-170	6

EW pair 3

Section w

Graham Wilkinson
Louise Wilkinson

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	12	4	E	4	+2	3	-480	0
2	12	3 NT	E	J	-2	3	100	0
3	7	2 NT	N	8	+2	9	180	4
4	7	4	S	A	-2	9	-200	17
5	1	2	N	Q	+1	3	140	11
6	1	2	N	T	+2	3	130	2
7	8	1 NT	E	6	+1	10	-120	13
8	8	2	W	T	=	10	-110	7
9	2	1 NT	S	2	+1	4	120	8
10	2	3	S	5	=	4	140	0
11	9	1 NT	S	3	=	11	090	14
12	9	5	S	Q	+1	11	680	9
13	3	2	E	A	=	5	-90	13
14	3	3 NT	E	2	+1	5	-430	19
15	13	2 NT	E	6	+1	9	-150	16
16	13	4	W	Q	-1	9	100	4
17	4	2	N	T	=	6	090	6
18	4	4	E	K	-1	6	050	0
19	10	4	E	3	=	1	-620	20
20	10	3	E	A	-1	1	100	11
21	5	1 NT	N	2	-2	7	-200	16
22	5	2	N	K	+1	7	140	12
23	11	2	N	A	-1	2	-100	17
24	11	4	E	K	+1	2	-450	18
25	6	1 NT	N	5	+2	8	150	5
26	6	4	E	8	=	8	-620	13

EW pair 4

Section w

Judy Briggs
Trish Morris

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	6	6	E	J	+1	9	-1010	18
2	6	3	E	J	+2	9	-150	6
3	12	2	S	A	+2	4	130	6
4	12	3 NT	S	3	=	4	600	0
5	7	4	S	K	=	10	620	0
6	7	2	N	7	=	10	090	9
7	1	1 NT	E	6	-1	4	100	3
8	1	2	W	T	=	4	-110	7
9	8	1 NT	S	2	+2	11	150	2
10	8	3	E	K	-1	11	100	5
11	2	3 NT x	S	3	-2	5	-300	20
12	2	4	S	T	+2	5	680	9
13	13	2	E	Q	=	8	-90	13
14	13	3	E	A	=	8	-110	8
15	3	2	W	Q	+1	6	-140	10
16	3	3 NT	W	Q	=	6	-600	15
17	9	2	E	5	-2	1	100	4
18	9	4	E	Q	=	1	-420	6
19	4	4 x	S	Q	-1	7	-100	13
20	4	3	W	6	-3	7	300	0
21	10	2	S	5	-3	2	-300	19
22	10	3	N	K	=	2	140	12
23	5	3	S	A	-1	8	-100	17
24	5	2	E	8	+4	8	-230	9
25	11	5	S	Q	-1	3	-50	15
26	11	4	E	8	=	3	-620	13

EW pair 5

Section w

Tracey Gieck
Lynne Ellis

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	11	4	E	J	+3	4	-510	6
2	11	3	E	3	=	4	-140	2
3	6	2 NT	N	Q	=	10	120	8
4	6	1	N	7	+1	10	110	8
5	12	3	S	K	=	5	140	11
6	12	2 NT	N	7	-1	5	-50	16
7	7	1 x	S	T	-1	11	-200	19
8	7	2	W	A	+1	11	-140	16
9	1	2	S	4	=	5	110	13
10	1	3	E	K	-1	5	100	5
11	13	2 NT	S	3	-1	7	-50	18
12	13	4	S	Q	+2	7	680	9
13	2	3	N	A	=	6	140	3
14	2	3 NT	W	6	+1	6	-430	19
15	8	1	W	Q	+2	1	-140	10
16	8	3 NT	W	Q	=	1	-600	15
17	3	2 NT	N	8	-2	7	-100	14
18	3	4	E	K	=	7	-420	6
19	9	2	S	3	=	2	110	5
20	9	3	E	3	-2	2	200	2
21	4	1 NT	N	2	-3	8	-300	19
22	4	2	E	9	=	8	-110	20
23	10	1 NT	W	3	-1	3	100	6
24	10	3	E	2	+2	3	-200	6
25	5	2	S	8	=	9	090	10
26	5	4	E	8	=	9	-620	13

EW pair 6

Section w

Helen Cornwell
Kate Coe

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	5	4	E	J	+3	10	-510	6
2	5	5 xx	E	J	=	10	-800	20
3	11	3 NT	N	3	+1	5	430	0
4	11	4	N	7	-2	5	-200	17
5	6	3	S	K	+2	11	200	2
6	6	2 NT	N	7	-1	11	-50	16
7	12	1 x	S	8	=	6	160	0
8	12	3	W	A	=	6	-140	16
9	13	4	S	A	=	6	420	0
10	13	3	E	9	-1	6	100	5
11	1	3	W	A	-3	6	150	2
12	1	4	S	T	+2	6	680	9
13	7	1 NT	N	8	-1	1	-100	17
14	7	5	E	A	-1	1	050	4
15	2	3	W	Q	=	7	-140	10
16	2	4	W	7	=	7	-620	19
17	8	1 NT	N	8	-1	2	-50	11
18	8	4	E	Q	+1	2	-450	14
19	3	3	E	9	=	8	-140	17
20	3	3	N	A	=	8	110	7
21	9	1	S	2	-1	3	-100	11
22	9	2	N	K	+2	3	170	6
23	4	2	S	K	=	9	090	10
24	4	4	E	K	+1	9	-450	18
25	10	3 NT	N	5	=	4	400	0
26	10	4	E	8	=	4	-620	13

EW pair 7

Section w

Martin Unwin
Brian Vass

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	10	4	E	J	+3	5	-510	6
2	10	1	E	7	+3	5	-170	11
3	5	3 NT	N	Q	-1	11	-50	15
4	5	1 NT	S	3	+2	11	150	2
5	11	4	W	A	-1	6	050	20
6	11	1 NT	S	T	+2	6	150	0
7	13	1 NT	W	2	+1	5	-120	13
8	13	2	W	T	+1	5	-140	16
9	12	1	S	8	+1	7	110	13
10	12	3	N	T	-1	7	-100	14
11	6	1 NT	E	3	-2	1	100	12
12	6	4	S	Q	+2	1	680	9
13	1	3	N	A	=	7	140	3
14	1	4	E	A	-1	7	050	4
15	7	2 NT	E	6	=	2	-120	3
16	7	3 NT	W	J	-2	2	200	0
17	2	3	W	4	=	8	-110	16
18	2	4	E	K	+1	8	-450	14
19	8	3 NT	W	Q	-2	3	200	1
20	8	3 NT	N	4	-1	3	-100	17
21	3	2	S	5	=	9	110	5
22	3	3	S	4	+1	9	170	6
23	9	2 NT	N	3	+2	4	180	2
24	9	4	N	A	-2	4	-100	2
25	4	3	N	J	-1	10	-50	15
26	4	5 x	N	A	-4	10	-1100	20

EW pair 8

Section w

George Foreman
John Schwarz

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	4	4	E	J	+3	11	-510	6
2	4	2	E	3	+2	11	-170	11
3	10	3 NT	S	3	-1	6	-50	15
4	10	3	N	7	-1	6	-100	12
5	13	3	S	A	=	4	140	11
6	13	1 NT	S	J	=	4	090	9
7	11	1 x	S	T	-1	7	-200	19
8	11	2	W	T	=	7	-110	7
9	5	2	S	8	=	1	110	13
10	5	2	E	K	=	1	-90	10
11	12	1 NT	E	3	-1	8	050	16
12	12	3 x	W	K	-4	8	800	0
13	6	1 NT	W	5	-1	2	100	9
14	6	5	E	A	-1	2	050	4
15	1	1	W	Q	+2	8	-140	10
16	1	4	E	9	-1	8	100	4
17	7	2	N	T	+1	3	110	2
18	7	4	E	K	+2	3	-480	19
19	2	3	E	2	=	9	-140	17
20	2	3	E	K	-1	9	100	11
21	8	3	S	2	-1	4	-100	11
22	8	3	N	Q	+1	4	170	6
23	3	2	N	T	=	10	090	10
24	3	5	W	A	+1	10	-420	13
25	9	1 NT	N	5	+2	5	150	5
26	9	4	E	8	=	5	-620	13

EW pair 9

Section w

Bridget McCaughan
Neil Marshall

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	9	6	E	J	=	6	-980	13
2	9	3	E	J	+2	6	-150	6
3	13	3 NT	N	T	=	3	400	2
4	13	4	N	T	-2	3	-200	17
5	10	3	N	9	=	7	140	11
6	10	2 NT	S	J	-1	7	-50	16
7	4	1 NT	W	A	+1	1	-120	13
8	4	3	W	A	-1	1	050	1
9	11	1 NT	S	2	=	8	090	19
10	11	2	N	K	-1	8	-100	14
11	5	2 NT	N	2	+1	2	150	2
12	5	4	S	Q	+1	2	650	18
13	12	3	E	A	-1	9	100	9
14	12	4	E	2	=	9	-130	11
15	6	3	W	3	=	3	-140	10
16	6	1 NT	W	Q	+2	3	-150	10
17	1	2	E	T	+2	9	-170	20
18	1	4	E	K	=	9	-420	6
19	7	4	E	3	-2	4	200	1
20	7	2	N	7	+1	4	110	7
21	2	2	S	9	+1	10	140	1
22	2	3	N	5	-1	10	-50	18
23	8	2	W	J	-2	5	200	0
24	8	3	N	A	-1	5	-50	0
25	3	2 NT	N	5	-1	11	-50	15
26	3	4	E	8	=	11	-620	13

EW pair 10

Section w

Murray Pryde
Jo Wallis

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	13	4	E	J	+3	2	-510	6
2	13	3 x	N	A	-1	2	-200	15
3	9	3 NT	N	Q	-1	7	-50	15
4	9	3	N	9	=	7	140	5
5	3	2	N	7	+1	1	140	11
6	3	1 NT	N	5	+1	1	120	4
7	10	2	E	Q	-1	8	100	3
8	10	2	W	A	+1	8	-140	16
9	4	2	S	8	=	2	110	13
10	4	3	E	K	-1	2	100	5
11	11	2	W	8	-3	9	150	2
12	11	4	S	Q	+2	9	680	9
13	5	2	N	A	+1	3	140	3
14	5	4	E	A	=	3	-130	11
15	12	2	E	A	=	10	-90	0
16	12	2 NT	W	4	=	10	-120	8
17	6	3 NT	W	2	-3	4	150	0
18	6	4	E	K	+2	4	-480	19
19	1	3	S	Q	-1	10	-50	10
20	1	3	N	A	-1	10	-100	17
21	7	2	S	5	-1	5	-100	11
22	7	2	N	4	+1	5	140	12
23	2	3 NT	N	3	-1	11	-100	17
24	2	3	E	K	+3	11	-230	9
25	8	2 NT	S	3	-2	6	-100	20
26	8	5	N	A	=	6	600	0

EW pair 11

Section w

Andrew Shaw
Paul Cushnie

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	8	6	E	J	=	7	-980	13
2	8	5	E	J	=	7	-400	18
3	2	3 NT	N	Q	-2	1	-100	20
4	2	4	S	7	-2	1	-200	17
5	9	3	S	K	+1	8	170	4
6	9	2	N	T	=	8	110	6
7	3	2 NT	W	4	=	2	-120	13
8	3	2	W	5	+1	2	-140	16
9	10	2	S	9	+1	9	140	5
10	10	3	N	K	-1	9	-100	14
11	4	2 NT	S	T	=	3	120	8
12	4	4	S	Q	+2	3	680	9
13	11	2 NT	S	T	-1	10	-100	17
14	11	3 NT	E	7	=	10	-400	15
15	5	1	W	Q	+3	4	-170	18
16	5	3 x	S	A	-2	4	-300	12
17	12	3	E	4	=	11	-140	18
18	12	4	E	K	=	11	-420	6
19	6	2	S	Q	=	5	110	5
20	6	2 NT	N	A	+1	5	150	4
21	1	2	S	5	-1	11	-100	11
22	1	2	E	5	-1	11	100	16
23	7	1	N	9	-1	6	-100	17
24	7	4	E	K	+1	6	-450	18
25	13	3	N	J	+1	1	130	8
26	13	5 x	E	8	-1	1	200	2