Wanaka Bridge Club        

Back to event

---

View by:

board

NS pairs

EW pairs

---

Hand records



Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Lindis Pairs (2015) 10 June

NS pair 1 Section a Nicola McGregor Nan Ottrey	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 1 4 W 6 = 1 -420 60 2 1 1 N N Q = 1 090 20 3 1 2 N 4 +1 1 140 10 4 2 2 W J -2 9 200 120 5 2 4 S 6 +2 9 680 140 6 2 2 S 8 +2 9 130 40 7 3 6 N E 2 +1 8 -1470 0 8 3 2 N E 4 -3 8 150 130 9 3 1 N S 5 -1 8 -50 0 10 4 1 W 4 -1 7 100 100 11 4 3 E 8 +1 7 -170 80 12 4 3 N S 5 +1 7 630 120 13 5 3 x N K -1 6 -200 0 14 5 1 E 5 +1 6 -110 10 15 5 1 N S 9 +1 6 120 100 16 6 3 N W 6 +2 5 -660 70 17 6 2 N 6 = 5 110 120 18 6 2 S A -3 5 -300 20 19 7 2 N S 3 -2 4 -100 10 20 7 4 N 5 +1 4 650 100 21 7 4 S Q -1 4 -100 30 22 8 3 E 9 = 3 -140 40 23 8 2 W A +2 3 -170 20 24 8 3 N N Q -1 3 -50 10 25 9 3 S 2 = 2 140 120 26 9 3 N E 5 +1 2 -630 50 27 9 2 E A +1 2 -140 10
NS pair 2 Section a Blair Coghill Ruth Coghill	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 9 2 W 4 +2 3 -170 130 2 9 3 W A -3 3 150 40 3 9 2 N J +3 3 200 80 4 1 1 N N 6 -2 2 -200 30 5 1 4 S 2 = 2 620 40 6 1 2 S 6 +2 2 130 40 7 2 5 W 3 +2 1 -710 90 8 2 3 N W 5 -1 1 050 80 9 2 1 N S 5 = 1 090 50 10 3 3 N W 3 +1 9 -630 0 11 3 3 E 6 +2 9 -200 50 12 3 2 S 4 +1 9 140 10 13 4 2 E Q -2 8 200 80 14 4 2 N 9 +2 8 130 130 15 4 3 E 5 +1 8 -170 30 16 5 3 N W 3 +2 7 -660 70 17 5 2 W 5 +1 7 -140 10 18 5 2 S T -2 7 -200 40 19 6 2 N 2 -1 6 -50 70 20 6 2 N 7 +1 6 140 0 21 6 3 W A -2 6 100 60 22 7 4 E A -1 5 100 80 23 7 3 S 2 +1 5 130 80 24 7 2 N S 2 +2 5 180 40 25 8 2 E K +1 4 -140 0 26 8 3 N W A +2 4 -660 10 27 8 1 N N 3 -1 4 -50 70
NS pair 4 Section a Hans Limacher Clare Williams	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 7 3 W A +1 7 -170 130 2 7 4 N 6 +1 7 650 110 3 7 4 S 3 +1 7 450 130 4 8 2 N N A -2 6 -200 30 5 8 4 S 6 = 6 620 40 6 8 5 S 2 -1 6 -50 0 7 9 3 N E T +4 5 -720 60 8 9 2 N E K +1 5 -150 20 9 9 1 N S 3 +3 5 180 120 10 1 3 N W 3 -1 4 100 100 11 1 5 S T -3 4 -150 100 12 1 2 S J +1 4 140 10 13 2 2 N T +2 3 130 60 14 2 5 N 2 -2 3 -100 40 15 2 3 N 2 = 3 110 80 16 3 3 N W 3 +2 2 -660 70 17 3 2 N 6 = 2 110 120 18 3 3 N W 7 = 2 -400 0 19 4 3 S 3 -1 1 -50 70 20 4 2 N 2 +2 1 170 20 21 4 4 N 6 -1 1 -100 30 22 5 3 E 9 +1 9 -170 20 23 5 2 S 5 = 9 110 40 24 5 4 N T = 9 420 90 25 6 2 N 3 = 8 090 60 26 6 3 N E 3 +2 8 -660 10 27 6 3 E 3 = 8 -140 10
NS pair 5 Section a Dorothy McDonald Judy Muir	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 6 4 W 3 +1 9 -450 20 2 6 3 N S 5 = 9 600 60 3 6 2 N 6 +1 9 140 10 4 7 3 N E Q -1 8 100 90 5 7 4 S 2 +1 8 650 100 6 7 2 S K +2 8 130 40 7 8 4 E 4 = 7 -620 140 8 8 1 N E 4 +2 7 -150 20 9 8 1 N S 3 = 7 090 50 10 9 1 W 4 -1 6 100 100 11 9 4 W 2 = 6 -420 20 12 9 3 N S 4 = 6 600 100 13 1 1 x E A -5 5 1400 140 14 1 2 N 2 +1 5 110 90 15 1 2 W 5 +1 5 -140 60 16 2 3 N W 2 +1 4 -630 120 17 2 3 W 6 -1 4 050 70 18 2 2 E 5 = 4 -110 90 19 3 3 N J = 3 140 140 20 3 3 N S 6 +4 3 720 140 21 3 3 W A -3 3 150 80 22 4 4 E 9 -2 2 200 120 23 4 2 S 6 +2 2 130 80 24 4 3 N S 4 -1 2 -50 10 25 5 3 S Q = 1 140 120 26 5 3 N W 2 +1 1 -630 50 27 5 1 N N 3 -1 1 -50 70
NS pair 6 Section a David Brewer Lynne Feagn	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 5 3 W J +2 2 -200 90 2 5 4 N Q = 2 620 80 3 5 2 N 4 +3 2 200 80 4 6 4 x W A -2 1 500 140 5 6 4 S 2 = 1 620 40 6 6 3 S 3 +2 1 150 100 7 7 6 W 2 +1 9 -1460 30 8 7 2 N E 4 +1 9 -150 20 9 7 1 N S 5 +1 9 120 100 10 8 4 E 6 = 8 -620 20 11 8 5 x N A -4 8 -800 0 12 8 3 S J +1 8 170 50 13 9 2 N 2 = 7 110 40 14 9 2 N 4 +1 7 110 90 15 9 3 S J +1 7 130 120 16 1 3 N W 5 +2 6 -660 70 17 1 4 N Q -1 6 -50 40 18 1 2 N W 7 +1 6 -150 60 19 2 2 N 5 -1 5 -50 70 20 2 4 N 2 +1 5 650 100 21 2 3 N N 7 +1 5 630 120 22 3 3 E 9 -1 4 100 80 23 3 5 S 9 = 4 600 140 24 3 4 N 8 = 4 420 90 25 4 2 N T = 3 110 80 26 4 3 N Q -3 3 -300 80 27 4 1 N N J +3 3 180 140
NS pair 7 Section a Madeline Reverley Linda Hodge	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 4 2 W A +3 4 -200 90 2 4 4 S 8 +1 4 650 110 3 4 2 N S 7 +1 4 150 40 4 5 2 W 4 -1 3 100 90 5 5 5 S 2 -1 3 -100 0 6 5 2 N N Q +1 3 150 100 7 6 6 W 9 +1 2 -1460 30 8 6 1 N E 4 -1 2 050 80 9 6 1 N S 5 = 2 090 50 10 7 3 N W 3 -1 1 100 100 11 7 3 W K +2 1 -200 50 12 7 2 N x E 3 -4 1 800 140 13 8 3 W A -1 9 100 20 14 8 3 N A +1 9 130 130 15 8 2 E K +2 9 -170 30 16 9 5 E 6 -1 8 100 140 17 9 3 W 6 = 8 -140 10 18 9 3 N W 7 -1 8 050 120 19 1 1 N S 4 +1 7 120 120 20 1 4 N 2 +1 7 650 100 21 1 3 N N 7 +3 7 690 140 22 2 4 E 9 -1 6 100 80 23 2 2 S 2 +3 6 150 120 24 2 3 N S 2 +2 6 460 140 25 3 2 S 2 +1 5 140 120 26 3 1 E 3 -2 5 200 140 27 3 1 N N 2 = 5 090 110
NS pair 8 Section a Bryan Hensley Denise Bruns	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 3 4 W A +1 6 -450 20 2 3 3 N N 6 +2 6 660 140 3 3 4 S 3 +1 6 450 130 4 4 3 x W A +1 5 -930 0 5 4 4 S K +1 5 650 100 6 4 3 N N 3 +1 5 430 140 7 5 3 N W 6 +3 4 -690 120 8 5 3 N E 4 -1 4 050 80 9 5 1 N W A -3 4 300 140 10 6 3 N W 2 -1 3 100 100 11 6 3 N T -1 3 -50 120 12 6 1 N x E 8 -3 3 500 80 13 7 1 N x E A -2 2 500 120 14 7 1 N S 5 = 2 090 60 15 7 5 N 9 -2 2 -200 0 16 8 3 N W 2 +3 1 -690 10 17 8 3 N E 8 -1 1 050 70 18 8 2 S 7 = 1 110 140 19 9 3 S 5 -1 9 -50 70 20 9 4 N 7 = 9 620 50 21 9 4 N N 7 -2 9 -200 0 22 1 5 x N A -3 8 -500 0 23 1 5 x S K -1 8 -200 0 24 1 4 N 8 = 8 420 90 25 2 3 S 8 -2 7 -100 20 26 2 3 N E 5 -1 7 100 120 27 2 1 N N 3 = 7 090 110
NS pair 9 Section a Kay Ross Mark Harry	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 2 4 W 2 +1 8 -450 20 2 2 4 N 6 -1 8 -100 0 3 2 2 N 4 +3 8 200 80 4 3 2 W A = 7 -110 60 5 3 4 S 2 +1 7 650 100 6 3 4 S K +1 7 150 100 7 4 4 W 6 +3 6 -710 90 8 4 2 N E 4 -3 6 150 130 9 4 1 N S 5 = 6 090 50 10 5 2 N W 3 = 5 -120 40 11 5 2 N W 2 -1 5 050 140 12 5 2 S 4 +2 5 170 50 13 6 3 E A -3 4 300 100 14 6 2 E 4 = 4 -110 10 15 6 2 N S 9 +1 4 150 140 16 7 3 N W 4 +3 3 -690 10 17 7 3 S 7 = 3 110 120 18 7 3 E A = 3 -110 90 19 8 3 S 4 -2 2 -100 10 20 8 4 N 2 = 2 620 50 21 8 5 S A = 2 600 100 22 9 3 N W 2 -3 1 300 140 23 9 4 S K = 1 130 80 24 9 4 N 8 = 1 420 90 25 1 1 S 8 -1 9 -50 40 26 1 2 N E 3 +3 9 -210 100 27 1 1 N N 2 -2 9 -100 40