Wanaka Bridge Club : Detailed data for Tuesday Bridge

View by:

EW pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Tuesday Bridge 12 May

EW pair 1

Section w

Jenny Calder
Julia Perry

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1	1 NT	W	6	+1	1	-120	00.1 - 01.3
2	1	1	S	J	+1	1	110	01.2 - 00.2
3	1	3 NT	W		+4	1	-720	00.9 - 00.5
4	5	4	N	5	+1	5	650	00.8 - 00.6
5	5	2 NT	N	9	-2	5	-200	00 - 01.4
6	5	5	W	7	+2	5	-640	01.2 - 00.2
7	2	2	N	Q	-2	2	-200	00 - 01.4
8	2	3 NT	N	3	=	2	400	00.2 - 01.2
9	2	4	N	2	=	2	420	00.8 - 00.6
10	6	2	S	3	=	6	110	01.3 - 00.1
11	6	3 NT	S	Q	+2	6	460	01 - 00.4
12	6	3	W	J	=	6	-110	00.2 - 01.2
13	3	3	S	J	+1	3	170	01.2 - 00.2
14	3	4	S	4	-2	3	-100	00.1 - 01.3
15	3	2	N	7	+1	3	140	01 - 00.4
16	7	3	N	5	-2	7	-100	00.6 - 00.8
17	7	2 NT	S	2	+4	7	240	01.4 - 00
18	7	4	E	A	+1	7	-450	00.6 - 00.8
19	4	1	S	J	+2	4	140	00.7 - 00.7
20	4	2	W	5	=	4	-110	00.1 - 01.3
21	4	2	S	7	=	4	110	01.2 - 00.2
22	8					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
23	8					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
24	8					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9

EW pair 2

Section w

Elizabeth Hansen
Deirdre Withers

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	4	3 NT	E	2	-2	5	100	00.9 - 00.5
2	4	2	S	K	+3	5	200	01.4 - 00
3	4	4	W	7	+2	5	-170	01.4 - 00
4	1	4	N	K	+1	2	650	00.8 - 00.6
5	1	3	S	A	+1	2	130	00.5 - 00.9
6	1	4	W	2	+1	2	-650	00.9 - 00.5
7	5	2	W	T	-1	6	100	00.7 - 00.7
8	5	4	N	9	=	6	420	00.6 - 00.8
9	5	4	N	K	=	6	420	00.8 - 00.6
10	2	3	S	A	-1	3	-100	00.5 - 00.9
11	2	2	N	K	+1	3	140	00 - 01.4
12	2	4	E	2	-2	3	100	01.3 - 00.1
13	6	2	S	T	+2	7	170	01.2 - 00.2
14	6	3	N	J	-1	7	-50	00.6 - 00.8
15	6	4	N	K	-1	7	-100	00 - 01.4
16	3	2	W	6	=	4	-110	00.2 - 01.2
17	3	1 NT	N	Q	+2	4	150	01.2 - 00.2
18	3	3	E	3	+1	4	-170	01.4 - 00
19	7	2	S	Q	+2	8	170	00.9 - 00.5
20	7	4	W		-4	8	400	01.4 - 00
21	7	2 NT	S	J	-3	8	-300	00.1 - 01.3
22	8					1	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
23	8					1	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
24	8					1	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9

EW pair 3

Section w

Louise Sincock
Kate O'Connell

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	8					2	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
2	8					2	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
3	8					2	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
4	4	4	N	7	+1	6	650	00.8 - 00.6
5	4	3	N	9	=	6	140	00.7 - 00.7
6	4	3 NT	E	8	+3	6	-690	00.5 - 00.9
7	1	2 NT	E		-3	3	300	01.3 - 00.1
8	1	4	N	7	=	3	420	00.6 - 00.8
9	1	4	N	4	=	3	420	00.8 - 00.6
10	5	3	N	2	-1	7	-100	00.5 - 00.9
11	5	5	S	3	+1	7	420	00.3 - 01.1
12	5	2 NT	E	J	-1	7	050	00.7 - 00.7
13	2	4	S	6	-1	4	-100	00 - 01.4
14	2	4	N	6	-1	4	-50	00.6 - 00.8
15	2	2	N	9	=	4	090	00.2 - 01.2
16	6	1	W	J	-1	8	100	01.2 - 00.2
17	6	2	N	T	-1	8	-50	00 - 01.4
18	6	4	E	3	+1	8	-450	00.6 - 00.8
19	7	2 NT	N	T	+2	1	180	01.2 - 00.2
20	7	2	W	Q	-1	1	100	00.7 - 00.7
21	7	4	S	6	-3	1	-300	00.1 - 01.3
22	3	2	S	3	=	5	110	01 - 00.4
23	3	1 NT	S	6	+1	5	120	00.8 - 00.6
24	3	3 NT	W	8	+4	5	-520	00 - 01.4

EW pair 4

Section w

Noeline Harridge
Sue Blake

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	3	2 NT	W	2	=	6	-120	00.1 - 01.3
2	3	1	E	A	-1	6	050	00.6 - 00.8
3	3	6 NT	W	Q	=	6	-1440	00.7 - 00.7
4	8					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
5	8					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
6	8					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
7	4	3	S	9	+1	7	130	00.9 - 00.5
8	4	4	N	9	-1	7	-50	00 - 01.4
9	4	4	N	4	=	7	420	00.8 - 00.6
10	1	2	S	5	=	4	110	01.3 - 00.1
11	1	3 NT	S	4	+3	4	490	01.3 - 00.1
12	1	2	E	J	+2	4	-170	00 - 01.4
13	5	2	S	K	+1	8	140	00.6 - 00.8
14	5	2	N	T	+2	8	170	01.4 - 00
15	5	2	N	J	+1	8	110	00.6 - 00.8
16	6	1 NT	S	8	+1	1	120	01.4 - 00
17	6	3	N	T	=	1	140	00.9 - 00.5
18	6	4	E	3	+1	1	-450	00.6 - 00.8
19	2	2	S	J	-1	5	-50	00.5 - 00.9
20	2	3	W	3	-2	5	200	01.2 - 00.2
21	2	2 NT	S	3	-2	5	-200	00.6 - 00.8
22	7	1	W	4	+1	2	-110	00 - 01.4
23	7	2	S	6	+1	2	110	00.4 - 01
24	7	3 NT	N	8	+4	2	520	01.2 - 00.2

EW pair 5

Section w

Richard Purdy
Carol Brewer

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	7	3	W	9	-1	3	050	00.7 - 00.7
2	7	2	E	6	-2	3	100	00.9 - 00.5
3	7	3 NT	W	5	+2	3	-660	01.2 - 00.2
4	3	4	N	5	=	7	620	00.2 - 01.2
5	3	4	N	7	=	7	620	01.2 - 00.2
6	3	4	W	5	+2	7	-680	00.7 - 00.7
7	8					4	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
8	8					4	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
9	8					4	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
10	4	1	S	3	-1	8	-100	00.5 - 00.9
11	4	3 NT	N	3	+3	8	490	01.3 - 00.1
12	4	2 NT	W	4	-1	8	050	00.7 - 00.7
13	5	3	S	2	=	1	140	00.6 - 00.8
14	5	2	N	6	+1	1	140	01.2 - 00.2
15	5	3	N	7	=	1	110	00.6 - 00.8
16	1	2 NT	W	2	=	5	-120	00 - 01.4
17	1	2 NT	N	A	=	5	120	00.6 - 00.8
18	1	4	E	A	+1	5	-450	00.6 - 00.8
19	6	2	S	J	-2	2	-100	00.1 - 01.3
20	6	3	W	3	-1	2	100	00.7 - 00.7
21	6	3	S	A	-2	2	-200	00.6 - 00.8
22	2	3	N	6	=	6	110	01 - 00.4
23	2	2	N	K	=	6	110	00.4 - 01
24	2	3 NT	N	2	+3	6	490	00.6 - 00.8

EW pair 6

Section w

Raewyn Shaw
Alistair Marris

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	2	3	W	T	=	7	-110	00.5 - 00.9
2	2	3	E	A	-1	7	050	00.6 - 00.8
3	2	6 NT	W	3	+1	7	-1470	00.4 - 01
4	7	4	N	3	+2	4	680	01.4 - 00
5	7	3	S	T	+2	4	200	00.9 - 00.5
6	7	4 NT	E	5	+3	4	-720	00.1 - 01.3
7	3	1 NT	E	3	=	8	-90	00.5 - 00.9
8	3	3 NT	N	9	+3	8	490	01.3 - 00.1
9	3	4	N	6	+1	8	450	01.4 - 00
10	4	3	W	K	-1	1	100	01 - 00.4
11	4	5	S	J	+1	1	420	00.3 - 01.1
12	4	4	E	K	-1	1	050	00.7 - 00.7
13	8					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
14	8					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
15	8					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
16	5	1 NT	N	3	=	2	090	00.9 - 00.5
17	5	1 NT	N	6	+1	2	120	00.6 - 00.8
18	5	4	E	3	+2	2	-480	00 - 01.4
19	1	3	W	A	-2	6	200	01.4 - 00
20	1	2	W	3	-1	6	100	00.7 - 00.7
21	1	1	W	3	=	6	-80	00.9 - 00.5
22	6	2	W	4	-1	3	100	00.6 - 00.8
23	6	2 NT	S	8	-1	3	-100	00 - 01.4
24	6	3 NT	N	8	+3	3	490	00.6 - 00.8

EW pair 7

Section w

Cathy Andrews
Viv Grant

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	6	5	E	6	-3	4	150	01.4 - 00
2	6	3	S	K	-1	4	-100	00.2 - 01.2
3	6	6 NT	W	3	+1	4	-1470	00.4 - 01
4	2	4	N	5	+1	8	650	00.8 - 00.6
5	2	2	W	A	-1	8	050	00.2 - 01.2
6	2	3 NT	E	5	+4	8	-720	00.1 - 01.3
7	3	1 NT	W	2	+1	1	-120	00.2 - 01.2
8	3	4	N	9	+2	1	480	00.9 - 00.5
9	3	4	W	A	-2	1	200	00 - 01.4
10	7	4	S	A	-2	5	-200	00 - 01.4
11	7	4	N	4	+1	5	450	00.7 - 00.7
12	7	3	E	8	-1	5	050	00.7 - 00.7
13	4	1 NT	N	5	+1	2	120	00.2 - 01.2
14	4	4	N	9	-2	2	-100	00.1 - 01.3
15	4	1	N	7	+2	2	140	01 - 00.4
16	8					6	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
17	8					6	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
18	8					6	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
19	5	2	S	J	-2	3	-100	00.1 - 01.3
20	5	2	W	3	=	3	-110	00.1 - 01.3
21	5	3	S	3	=	3	140	01.4 - 00
22	1	2	S	A	-1	7	-50	00.3 - 01.1
23	1	3	N	A	=	7	140	01.1 - 00.3
24	1	4 NT	N	2	+2	7	490	00.6 - 00.8

EW pair 8

Section w

Barbara Taylor
Jenny Dickie

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1	2	N	Q	+1	8	140	01.2 - 00.2
2	1	4	N	6	-2	8	-200	00 - 01.4
3	1	7 NT	W	3	=	8	-2220	00 - 01.4
4	2	3	N	7	+4	1	260	00 - 01.4
5	2	4	S	5	+2	1	680	01.4 - 00
6	2	3 NT	E	T	+1	1	-630	01.4 - 00
7	6	3	E	K	-3	5	300	01.3 - 00.1
8	6	3 NT	N	3	+3	5	490	01.3 - 00.1
9	6	3	N	2	+3	5	230	00.2 - 01.2
10	3	2	S	A	-1	2	-100	00.5 - 00.9
11	3	4	N	8	+1	2	450	00.7 - 00.7
12	3	3	E	Q	-2	2	100	01.3 - 00.1
13	7	2	S	6	+2	6	170	01.2 - 00.2
14	7	1	N	T	+1	6	110	00.9 - 00.5
15	7	3 NT	S	A	=	6	600	01.4 - 00
16	4	2	N	9	-2	3	-100	00.6 - 00.8
17	4	1 NT	E	3	-2	3	100	00.2 - 01.2
18	4	3	E	6	+2	3	-200	01.2 - 00.2
19	8					7	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
20	8					7	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
21	8					7	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
22	5	3	N	5	+1	4	130	01.4 - 00
23	5	3 NT	S	6	=	4	600	01.4 - 00
24	5	3 NT	N	8	+4	4	520	01.2 - 00.2