Wanaka Bridge Club : Detailed data for Roy Stakes (2024)

View by:

EW pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Roy Stakes (2024) 27 May

EW pair 1

Section w

Jenny Turnbull
Barbara Waterworth

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1	4	N	Q	+1	1	450	4
2	1	3 NT	S	Q	-3	1	-300	18
3	8	3	N	9	-1	8	-50	14
4	8	2	N	Q	+2	8	130	3
5	2	4	E	J	-3	2	150	0
6	2	3	S	K	-2	2	-100	6
7	9	3	S	K	+1	9	130	8
8	9	3 NT	W	5	+1	9	-430	10
9	3	2 NT	W	5	=	3	-120	15
10	3	4	S	K	-2	3	-200	20
11	10	4	E	K	+1	10	-450	17
12	10	3	S	A	-1	10	-100	14
13	4	1 NT	S	Q	-1	4	-100	5
14	4	2	N	2	-3	4	-150	12
15	11	2	W	4	-1	11	050	8
16	11	4 x	W	K	=	11	-790	20
17	5	2	S	5	+3	5	200	11
18	5	3 NT	E	4	-1	5	050	7
19	13	3	S	Q	-2	11	-100	12
20	13	3	S		-2	11	-200	16
21	6	3 NT	S	3	+2	6	660	9
22	6	3	S	A	=	6	140	18
23	12	3 NT	N	7	=	1	600	2
24	12	3 NT	N	6	-1	1	-50	19
25	7	3 x	E	K	-1	7	200	0
26	7	2	S	A	=	7	110	11

EW pair 2

Section w

Lynne Fegan
Jenny Pryde

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	7	4	N	Q	+1	8	450	4
2	7	2	E	A	-4	8	200	0
3	1	3	N	J	-2	2	-100	17
4	1	3	N	Q	=	2	140	0
5	8	4 x	E	J	=	9	-590	18
6	8	2	W	8	+1	9	-140	14
7	2	3	S	K	=	3	110	14
8	2	3 NT	W	5	+1	3	-430	10
9	9	2	W	5	+1	10	-140	19
10	9	4	N	A	+2	10	680	0
11	3	4	E	K	+1	4	-450	17
12	3	5	W	2	-1	4	050	9
13	10	2	W	2	+1	11	-140	12
14	10	3	N	2	-2	11	-100	8
15	4	2	W	4	+1	5	-140	17
16	4	4	W	K	=	5	-620	9
17	13	3	W	T	-3	10	150	17
18	13	3 NT	E	3	-1	10	050	7
19	5	4	S	Q	-3	6	-150	18
20	5	3 NT	N	7	+1	6	630	0
21	11	3 NT	S	3	+2	1	660	9
22	11	1 NT x	W	A	-4	1	1100	2
23	6	3 NT	S	7	=	7	600	2
24	6	2 x	E	K	-1	7	100	16
25	12	4	N	T	-1	2	-50	6
26	12	3	S	A	=	2	140	2

EW pair 3

Section w

Jen Milburn
John Milburn

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	12	4	N	A	+1	3	450	4
2	12	3 NT	S	Q	-2	3	-200	11
3	7	1	N	J	=	9	080	8
4	7	3	S	3	=	9	110	9
5	1	4 x	E	9	-1	3	100	2
6	1	2 x	W	J	+2	3	-1070	20
7	8	1 NT	W	3	-2	10	200	4
8	8	3 NT	W	5	+2	10	-460	17
9	2	1 NT	S	2	-1	4	-50	2
10	2	3	N	K	+2	4	200	10
11	9	2	W	J	-2	11	100	0
12	9	2	S	A	=	11	110	4
13	3	2 NT	S	T	-1	5	-100	5
14	3	3 NT	E	2	-1	5	050	2
15	13	3	W	4	=	9	-140	17
16	13	4	W	K	+1	9	-650	16
17	4	3 NT	N	4	+1	6	430	3
18	4	3 NT	E	7	-1	6	050	7
19	10	3 NT	N	7	=	1	400	1
20	10	1 NT	N	4	-2	1	-200	16
21	5	4	S	3	+2	7	680	2
22	5	2 NT	N	3	+2	7	180	14
23	11	3 NT	S	2	-2	2	-200	17
24	11	3 NT	S	2	=	2	400	9
25	6	3	S	A	=	8	140	2
26	6	2	S	4	+1	8	140	2

EW pair 4

Section w

Kate Coe
Tommie Munns

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	6	4	N	A	+2	9	480	0
2	6	3 NT	S	Q	-2	9	-200	11
3	12	2	N	A	=	4	110	2
4	12	3	N	Q	-1	4	-100	18
5	7	3	E	9	+1	10	-170	12
6	7	2	W	J	+1	10	-140	14
7	1	1 NT	W	3	-3	4	300	2
8	1	3 NT	W	5	=	4	-400	4
9	8	2	N	A	-2	11	-100	7
10	8	4	N	A	-1	11	-100	17
11	2	3	W	J	-1	5	050	3
12	2	2	S	T	+1	5	140	2
13	13	3	N	A	-2	8	-200	16
14	13	1 NT	E	4	+2	8	-150	12
15	3	4 x	W	4	-3	6	500	0
16	3	4	W	K	+1	6	-650	16
17	9	3	S	3	+2	1	150	17
18	9	3 NT	E	4	-1	1	050	7
19	4	4	S	Q	-3	7	-150	18
20	4	3	E	8	+1	7	-130	10
21	10	3 NT	S	3	+3	2	690	0
22	10	3 NT	S	3	+1	2	430	6
23	5	2	N	A	-2	8	-200	17
24	5	4	N	A	-1	8	-50	19
25	11	4	S	A	-1	3	-50	6
26	11	1 NT	S	2	=	3	090	15

EW pair 5

Section w

Marc Simmonds
Dorothy McDonald

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	11	4	N	Q	=	4	420	11
2	11	3 NT	S	J	-3	4	-300	18
3	6	1	N	J	=	10	080	8
4	6	1	N	Q	+1	10	090	14
5	12	3	E	J	+1	5	-170	12
6	12	2	W	J	=	5	-110	8
7	7	1 NT	W	3	-1	11	100	18
8	7	3	E	Q	+1	11	-170	2
9	1	3	E	Q	=	5	-110	11
10	1	4	S	A	=	5	620	8
11	13	4	E	K	+1	7	-450	17
12	13	5	W	A	-3	7	150	0
13	2	1 NT	S	Q	-2	6	-200	16
14	2	2	W	4	=	6	-90	6
15	8	4	W	4	-1	1	050	8
16	8	4	W	K	=	1	-620	9
17	3	3	S	3	-1	7	-50	20
18	3	3 NT	W	2	=	7	-400	18
19	9	4	S	9	-1	2	-50	8
20	9	3	S	2	=	2	110	2
21	4	3 NT	S	3	+2	8	660	9
22	4	4	S	K	=	8	420	8
23	10	3 NT	S	T	-1	3	-100	13
24	10	4	N	J	+1	3	450	0
25	5	4 x	N	3	-1	9	-100	13
26	5	1	S	A	+1	9	110	11

EW pair 6

Section w

Marion Furneaux
Jenny Muir

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	5	2	N	3	+2	10	170	18
2	5	2	E	A	-2	10	100	2
3	11	1	N	J	=	5	080	8
4	11	2 NT	N	Q	-1	5	-100	18
5	6	4	E	J	-1	11	050	5
6	6	4	S	K	-1	11	-50	3
7	12	3	S	K	=	6	110	14
8	12	3 NT	W	5	-1	6	050	0
9	13	2	W	Q	=	6	-110	11
10	13	4	N	A	+1	6	650	4
11	1	5	E	A	=	6	-450	17
12	1	4	W	6	-2	6	100	6
13	7	1 NT	S	Q	-1	1	-100	5
14	7	1 NT	E	4	+3	1	-180	18
15	2	3	W	4	=	7	-140	17
16	2	4	W	K	+1	7	-650	16
17	8	3 NT	N	2	+1	2	430	3
18	8	3 NT	E	T	-1	2	050	7
19	3	3	S	9	=	8	140	5
20	3	1 NT	N	4	-2	8	-200	16
21	9	6	S	Q	-1	3	-100	20
22	9	2	W	4	-3	3	300	12
23	4	2 NT	N	3	=	9	120	8
24	4	1	S	8	+2	9	110	14
25	10	3	E	A	+2	4	-200	18
26	10	1	E	K	=	4	-80	18

EW pair 7

Section w

Martin Unwin
Ken Saxby

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	10	4	N	6	=	5	420	11
2	10	3 NT	S	Q	-3	5	-300	18
3	5	1	N	J	=	11	080	8
4	5	1	N	Q	-1	11	-100	18
5	11	3 x	E	J	+1	6	-630	20
6	11	2	W	J	+1	6	-140	14
7	13	3	S	3	=	5	110	14
8	13	3 NT	W	5	+1	5	-430	10
9	12	2	E	7	+1	7	-140	19
10	12	2 NT	N	3	+1	7	150	12
11	6	5	E	K	+1	1	-420	11
12	6	3	W	3	-1	1	050	9
13	1	2	N	9	-1	7	-100	5
14	1	1 NT	E	4	+2	7	-150	12
15	7	4	W	4	-2	2	100	2
16	7	4	W	K	=	2	-620	9
17	2	4	S	3	=	8	420	7
18	2	3 NT	E	4	-1	8	050	7
19	8	4	S	A	-2	3	-100	12
20	8	3	S	Q	-2	3	-200	16
21	3	3 NT	S	3	+2	9	660	9
22	3	1 NT	W	9	-4	9	400	10
23	9	2	N	6	=	4	090	10
24	9	3 NT	S	7	+1	4	430	2
25	4	1 NT	S	2	-2	10	-100	13
26	4	1	S	T	-1	10	-100	20

EW pair 8

Section w

Andrew Shaw
Paul Cushnie

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	4	2	N		+2	11	170	18
2	4	2 NT	E	A	-1	11	050	4
3	10	2	N	9	-2	6	-100	17
4	10	3	N	Q	=	6	110	9
5	13	4	E	J	=	4	-420	16
6	13	2	W	2	+1	4	-140	14
7	11	2	W	3	=	7	-110	20
8	11	3 NT	W	5	+3	7	-490	20
9	5	2 NT	W	5	=	1	-120	15
10	5	3	S	K	-1	1	-100	17
11	12	5	W	J	-1	8	050	3
12	12	3	S	A	-1	8	-100	14
13	6	3	N	9	-3	2	-300	20
14	6	3 NT	E	Q	-1	2	050	2
15	1	4	W	4	-1	8	050	8
16	1	4	W	K	=	8	-620	9
17	7	2	S	5	+3	3	200	11
18	7	3 NT	W	5	=	3	-400	18
19	2	3 NT	N	6	=	9	400	1
20	2	2	W	A	-1	9	100	5
21	8	3	S	4	=	4	140	18
22	8	3	S	A	-1	4	-50	20
23	3	2	N	6	-1	10	-100	13
24	3	3	N	3	+2	10	200	12
25	9	4	E	K	+1	5	-650	20
26	9	2	S	A	+1	5	140	2

EW pair 9

Section w

Lesley Davies
Bob Menlove

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	9	4	N	A	=	6	420	11
2	9	4	S	4	-2	6	-200	11
3	13	1	N	J	=	3	080	8
4	13	1	N	Q	+2	3	110	9
5	10	2	W	2	+1	7	-110	8
6	10	1	S	6	+1	7	090	0
7	4	3 NT	W	3	-5	1	500	0
8	4	3 NT	W	2	+1	1	-430	10
9	11	1 NT	S	2	-1	8	-50	2
10	11	4	N	A	+1	8	650	4
11	5	3 NT	W	J	=	2	-400	8
12	5	5 x	S	A	-2	2	-500	20
13	12	1 NT	S	Q	-2	9	-200	16
14	12	2	W	J	-1	9	050	2
15	6	3	W	4	-1	3	050	8
16	6	3	N	T	-2	3	-100	4
17	1	4	S	K	=	9	420	7
18	1	3 NT	E	4	-1	9	050	7
19	7	3	S	8	=	4	140	5
20	7	3	W	A	-1	4	100	5
21	2	3 NT	S	7	+1	10	630	16
22	2	1 NT x	W	9	-4	10	1100	2
23	8	2	N	6	-3	5	-300	20
24	8	3 NT	S	8	=	5	400	9
25	3	5	S	A	-2	11	-100	13
26	3	1 NT	S	2	+1	11	120	7

EW pair 10

Section w

Liz Hawker
Trish Morris

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	13	4	N	Q	=	2	420	11
2	13	5	N	5	-2	2	-200	11
3	9	3	W	K	=	7	-140	20
4	9	3	N	3	+1	7	130	3
5	3	4	E	9	-1	1	050	5
6	3	3	W	2	=	1	-140	14
7	10	3	S	K	+1	8	130	8
8	10	3 NT	W	5	+1	8	-430	10
9	4	1 NT	S	4	-1	2	-50	2
10	4	4	N	A	+1	2	650	4
11	11	5 x	S	A	-1	9	-100	6
12	11	3	W	T	=	9	-110	18
13	5	2	N	9	-1	3	-100	5
14	5	1 NT	E	4	+3	3	-180	18
15	12	2	W	4	+1	10	-140	17
16	12	5	W	K	-1	10	100	2
17	6	2	S	5	+2	4	170	14
18	6	3 NT	E	4	=	4	-400	18
19	1	4	S	Q	-3	10	-150	18
20	1	1 NT	N	4	-2	10	-200	16
21	7	3 NT	S	3	+2	5	660	9
22	7	2	S	K	+2	5	170	16
23	2	2 NT	N	7	+1	11	150	6
24	2	4	N	J	=	11	420	5
25	8	4	N	T	-2	6	-100	13
26	8	1 NT	S	2	+1	6	120	7

EW pair 11

Section w

Sharon Wilson
Denise Bruns

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	8	3	N	2	+1	7	170	18
2	8	2 NT	S	3	-1	7	-100	6
3	2	1	N	J	+2	1	140	0
4	2	1	N	7	+2	1	110	9
5	9	2	E	J	+2	8	-170	12
6	9	1	S	7	-1	8	-50	3
7	3	3	S	3	+1	2	130	8
8	3	3 NT	E	4	+2	2	-460	17
9	10	1 NT	S	4	-2	9	-100	7
10	10	2	S	K	+2	9	130	14
11	4	4	E	K	=	3	-420	11
12	4	3	S	A	-1	3	-100	14
13	11	2	N	9	-1	10	-100	5
14	11	1 NT	E	4	+3	10	-180	18
15	5	4	W	4	-1	4	050	8
16	5	4	W	K	-2	4	200	0
17	12	3 NT	N	4	+2	11	460	0
18	12	3 NT	E	8	-1	11	050	7
19	6	4	S	Q	-2	5	-100	12
20	6	1 NT	N	4	-1	5	-100	8
21	1	3 NT	S	3	+2	11	660	9
22	1	1 NT x	W	9	-4	11	1100	2
23	7	3 NT	S	5	=	6	600	2
24	7	4	N	3	=	6	420	5
25	13	4	S	A	-1	1	-50	6
26	13	1 NT	S	2	=	1	090	15