Wanaka Bridge Club        

Back to event

---

View by:

board

NS pairs

EW pairs

---

Hand records



Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Hunter Pairs (2012) 27 September

EW pair 1 Section a Kirsty Hewitt Grant Fyfe	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 1 5 E A +1 1 -420 130 2 1 4 E K +1 1 -150 30 3 7 4 S A -1 7 -50 90 4 7 2 N W T -2 7 200 20 5 2 4 S 3 -1 2 -100 120 6 2 2 S 4 -1 2 -50 100 7 8 3 W 4 +1 8 -130 110 8 8 4 W 3 = 8 -420 70 9 3 4 x S A +1 3 690 0 10 3 2 x E A -2 3 500 40 11 9 3 N N 5 +1 9 430 10 12 9 4 x S 3 -2 9 -500 160 13 4 3 E K +2 4 -150 50 14 4 4 x S 8 = 4 590 0 15 11 3 N 6 -2 9 -200 40 16 11 3 S A +1 9 130 40 17 5 3 N W 2 = 5 -400 100 18 5 3 E A -1 5 050 70 19 10 1 N E 4 -1 1 100 10 20 10 2 N 2 +2 1 130 80 21 6 3 N A -1 6 -100 140 22 6 4 N N A +1 6 460 0
EW pair 2 Section a Vivienne Christie Bridget Rennie	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 6 5 E J = 7 -400 70 2 6 4 S 5 -2 7 -200 60 3 1 4 S 3 -1 2 -50 90 4 1 3 E K = 2 -140 140 5 7 4 W 9 -3 8 150 80 6 7 1 S 8 = 8 080 60 7 2 3 N A = 3 140 40 8 2 4 E A +1 3 -450 120 9 8 4 N K -1 9 -50 140 10 8 1 S 5 +2 9 140 100 11 3 2 N 6 +1 4 140 130 12 3 2 N E A = 4 -120 120 13 11 5 E K +1 8 -620 160 14 11 2 S 2 +2 8 170 50 15 4 3 N E J +2 5 -460 130 16 4 1 N W 5 -2 5 200 20 17 9 2 W 3 +2 1 -170 60 18 9 4 E A -2 1 100 40 19 5 2 S Q -2 6 -100 120 20 5 1 N N 3 = 6 090 100 21 10 2 N 7 +1 2 140 60 22 10 5 S 4 -1 2 -50 110
EW pair 3 Section a Ruth Coghill Blair Coghill	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 10 4 E A +2 3 -170 30 2 10 5 E A = 3 -400 110 3 6 1 N S 9 +2 8 150 40 4 6 2 E T = 8 -110 80 5 1 4 S Q = 3 620 20 6 1 2 S 4 -1 3 -50 100 7 7 3 W A +1 9 -130 110 8 7 4 E K = 9 -420 70 9 2 3 S 6 = 4 140 120 10 2 3 N S 6 +1 4 630 0 11 11 2 N A +1 7 140 130 12 11 4 E 3 -2 7 100 20 13 3 3 W 4 +2 5 -150 50 14 3 3 W J -2 5 100 140 15 8 3 N E 7 +1 1 -430 100 16 8 2 N 5 -2 1 -100 140 17 4 2 W A +1 6 -140 40 18 4 5 N 5 -3 6 -300 160 19 9 1 E K = 2 -80 60 20 9 3 N S 3 = 2 600 20 21 5 2 N A +1 7 140 60 22 5 3 S 4 +1 7 130 60
EW pair 4 Section a Don Buick Penny Rogers	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 5 4 E J -2 8 100 0 2 5 3 E K +1 8 -130 0 3 10 4 S A = 4 420 10 4 10 3 W 4 = 4 -110 80 5 6 3 S 2 +2 9 200 40 6 6 2 S 5 -1 9 -50 100 7 1 4 E 5 +1 4 -150 160 8 1 4 E A -1 4 050 0 9 11 4 S A +1 6 450 60 10 11 4 S A = 6 130 150 11 2 2 N 6 +2 5 170 60 12 2 4 S 8 -1 5 -100 80 13 7 5 E K = 1 -600 120 14 7 3 E K -4 1 200 20 15 3 4 N 4 -3 6 -300 80 16 3 5 x S 6 +1 6 650 0 17 8 3 N E 3 -1 2 050 0 18 8 5 N A -1 2 -100 110 19 4 3 N E A -1 7 100 10 20 4 2 S A -1 7 -100 120 21 9 2 N 7 +1 3 140 60 22 9 5 S 2 -1 3 -50 110
EW pair 5 Section a Jan Anderson Sherril Harries	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 9 5 W J +1 4 -420 130 2 9 5 E K = 4 -400 110 3 5 2 W Q +1 9 -140 160 4 5 4 x E A -2 9 500 0 5 10 4 S Q -1 5 -100 120 6 10 3 E A -2 5 200 20 7 11 4 W A = 5 -130 110 8 11 5 W A = 5 -400 20 9 1 4 S A +1 5 450 60 10 1 3 S 5 +1 5 130 150 11 6 3 N Q = 1 140 130 12 6 2 N E T -4 1 200 0 13 2 4 x S A -2 6 -500 80 14 2 2 N W J -2 6 100 140 15 7 3 N E J +3 2 -490 160 16 7 5 x S A -1 2 -100 140 17 3 4 E K +1 7 -450 160 18 3 2 E A = 7 -110 140 19 8 1 N E T = 3 -90 90 20 8 1 N S 3 -3 3 -300 160 21 4 4 N 3 -1 8 -100 140 22 4 3 N N 6 +1 8 430 20
EW pair 6 Section a Denise Bruns Pauline Davidson	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 4 5 E A +1 9 -420 130 2 4 4 E K +1 9 -150 30 3 9 3 S K = 5 140 60 4 9 2 E A = 5 -110 80 5 11 3 x S 3 = 4 730 0 6 11 3 E 9 -4 4 400 0 7 10 1 N 6 +1 6 110 60 8 10 5 x E A = 6 -650 160 9 5 4 S Q +1 1 450 60 10 5 2 S 5 +1 1 140 100 11 1 3 S A +1 6 170 60 12 1 3 S 8 -1 6 -100 80 13 6 2 S 8 = 2 110 20 14 6 2 S 7 +2 2 170 50 15 2 3 N 2 -2 7 -200 40 16 2 2 N 5 -2 7 -100 140 17 7 2 N W 3 = 3 -120 20 18 7 3 S T = 3 110 20 19 3 2 S J -1 8 -50 40 20 3 3 N S 3 = 8 600 20 21 8 3 N 7 = 4 140 60 22 8 4 N 7 -4 4 -200 160
EW pair 7 Section a John Cook John Smith	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 8 3 E J +1 5 -170 30 2 8 3 N W J = 5 -400 110 3 11 4 N 9 = 3 420 10 4 11 1 E A +2 3 -140 140 5 9 3 S 2 +1 6 170 60 6 9 3 N S J -3 6 -150 160 7 4 1 N 9 +3 1 170 20 8 4 4 E K = 1 -420 70 9 10 3 S 2 +2 7 200 100 10 10 2 S 4 +1 7 140 100 11 5 2 S 3 +2 2 170 60 12 5 4 S 9 -1 2 -100 80 13 1 2 S A +1 7 140 0 14 1 1 N W A -2 7 100 140 15 6 4 N E 7 -1 3 050 0 16 6 1 N E J = 3 -90 100 17 2 2 E 3 +3 8 -200 80 18 2 3 S T +1 8 130 0 19 7 1 N E 7 +1 4 -120 150 20 7 3 N S 3 = 4 600 20 21 3 4 N 8 -1 9 -100 140 22 3 5 S 2 +1 9 420 40
EW pair 8 Section a Clare Scurr Jean Stokes	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 11 5 E J +1 2 -420 130 2 11 5 E K = 2 -400 110 3 8 4 S A -2 6 -100 120 4 8 4 E K -1 6 100 40 5 3 4 S 8 -1 1 -100 120 6 3 2 E A -1 1 100 40 7 9 3 W A +1 7 -130 110 8 9 5 x N K -3 7 -500 140 9 4 4 N 5 -3 2 -150 160 10 4 3 N N 4 = 2 600 20 11 10 3 N N 6 +1 8 430 10 12 10 3 S Q -2 8 -200 140 13 5 5 E K = 3 -600 120 14 5 2 S 2 +1 3 140 90 15 1 3 N E J +2 8 -460 130 16 1 1 N S A +1 8 120 60 17 6 4 W 3 = 4 -420 130 18 6 3 E A -1 4 050 70 19 2 2 N E 5 = 9 -120 150 20 2 1 N S 3 +2 9 150 60 21 7 3 N 8 +1 5 170 0 22 7 6 S J -1 5 -50 110
EW pair 9 Section a Barbara Waterworth Kate Summers	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res NS   Score   MP 1 7 5 E A = 6 -400 70 2 7 5 x N A -3 6 -800 160 3 2 2 W Q = 1 -110 140 4 2 2 W A +1 1 -140 140 5 8 3 W A = 7 -140 160 6 8 2 S T -2 7 -100 140 7 3 4 N 9 +1 2 650 0 8 3 4 E K = 2 -420 70 9 9 3 x S 3 +1 8 630 20 10 9 2 E 7 -2 8 200 60 11 4 2 N 6 +1 3 140 130 12 4 4 W K -1 3 050 40 13 10 5 E K = 9 -600 120 14 10 2 S 2 +1 9 140 90 15 5 3 N 2 -2 4 -200 40 16 5 2 E 6 -1 4 100 80 17 1 4 E 2 = 9 -420 130 18 1 4 S T -1 9 -100 110 19 6 1 N E 4 = 5 -90 90 20 6 3 N S 2 -2 5 -200 140 21 11 3 N A = 1 140 60 22 11 3 N A -1 1 -50 110