Wanaka Bridge Club        

Back to event

---

View by:

board

NS pairs

EW pairs

---

Hand records



Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Hunter Pairs (2012) 27 September

NS pair 1 Section a Peter Hewitt Marion Furneaux	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 1 5 E A +1 1 -420 30 2 1 4 E K +1 1 -150 130 3 2 2 W Q = 9 -110 20 4 2 2 W A +1 9 -140 20 5 3 4 S 8 -1 8 -100 40 6 3 2 E A -1 8 100 120 7 4 1 N 9 +3 7 170 140 8 4 4 E K = 7 -420 90 9 5 4 S Q +1 6 450 100 10 5 2 S 5 +1 6 140 60 11 6 3 N Q = 5 140 30 12 6 2 N E T -4 5 200 160 13 7 5 E K = 4 -600 40 14 7 3 E K -4 4 200 140 15 8 3 N E 7 +1 3 -430 60 16 8 2 N 5 -2 3 -100 20 17 9 2 W 3 +2 2 -170 100 18 9 4 E A -2 2 100 120 19 10 1 N E 4 -1 1 100 150 20 10 2 N 2 +2 1 130 80 21 11 3 N A = 9 140 100 22 11 3 N A -1 9 -50 50
NS pair 2 Section a Jenny Muir Ena Leckie	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 11 5 E J +1 8 -420 30 2 11 5 E K = 8 -400 50 3 1 4 S 3 -1 2 -50 70 4 1 3 E K = 2 -140 20 5 2 4 S 3 -1 1 -100 40 6 2 2 S 4 -1 1 -50 60 7 3 4 N 9 +1 9 650 160 8 3 4 E K = 9 -420 90 9 4 4 N 5 -3 8 -150 0 10 4 3 N N 4 = 8 600 140 11 5 2 S 3 +2 7 170 100 12 5 4 S 9 -1 7 -100 80 13 6 2 S 8 = 6 110 140 14 6 2 S 7 +2 6 170 110 15 7 3 N E J +3 5 -490 0 16 7 5 x S A -1 5 -100 20 17 8 3 N E 3 -1 4 050 160 18 8 5 N A -1 4 -100 50 19 9 1 E K = 3 -80 100 20 9 3 N S 3 = 3 600 140 21 10 2 N 7 +1 2 140 100 22 10 5 S 4 -1 2 -50 50
NS pair 3 Section a Daphne Stewart Karolyn Macandrew	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 10 4 E A +2 3 -170 130 2 10 5 E A = 3 -400 50 3 11 4 N 9 = 7 420 150 4 11 1 E A +2 7 -140 20 5 1 4 S Q = 3 620 140 6 1 2 S 4 -1 3 -50 60 7 2 3 N A = 2 140 120 8 2 4 E A +1 2 -450 40 9 3 4 x S A +1 1 690 160 10 3 2 x E A -2 1 500 120 11 4 2 N 6 +1 9 140 30 12 4 4 W K -1 9 050 120 13 5 5 E K = 8 -600 40 14 5 2 S 2 +1 8 140 70 15 6 4 N E 7 -1 7 050 160 16 6 1 N E J = 7 -90 60 17 7 2 N W 3 = 6 -120 140 18 7 3 S T = 6 110 140 19 8 1 N E T = 5 -90 70 20 8 1 N S 3 -3 5 -300 0 21 9 2 N 7 +1 4 140 100 22 9 5 S 2 -1 4 -50 50
NS pair 4 Section a David Brewer Jan Lyness	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 9 5 W J +1 5 -420 30 2 9 5 E K = 5 -400 50 3 10 4 S A = 4 420 150 4 10 3 W 4 = 4 -110 80 5 11 3 x S 3 = 6 730 160 6 11 3 E 9 -4 6 400 160 7 1 4 E 5 +1 4 -150 0 8 1 4 E A -1 4 050 160 9 2 3 S 6 = 3 140 40 10 2 3 N S 6 +1 3 630 160 11 3 2 N 6 +1 2 140 30 12 3 2 N E A = 2 -120 40 13 4 3 E K +2 1 -150 110 14 4 4 x S 8 = 1 590 160 15 5 3 N 2 -2 9 -200 120 16 5 2 E 6 -1 9 100 80 17 6 4 W 3 = 8 -420 30 18 6 3 E A -1 8 050 90 19 7 1 N E 7 +1 7 -120 10 20 7 3 N S 3 = 7 600 140 21 8 3 N 7 = 6 140 100 22 8 4 N 7 -4 6 -200 0
NS pair 5 Section a Boyd Ottrey John Lyness	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 8 3 E J +1 7 -170 130 2 8 3 N W J = 7 -400 50 3 9 3 S K = 6 140 100 4 9 2 E A = 6 -110 80 5 10 4 S Q -1 5 -100 40 6 10 3 E A -2 5 200 140 7 11 4 W A = 5 -130 50 8 11 5 W A = 5 -400 140 9 1 4 S A +1 5 450 100 10 1 3 S 5 +1 5 130 10 11 2 2 N 6 +2 4 170 100 12 2 4 S 8 -1 4 -100 80 13 3 3 W 4 +2 3 -150 110 14 3 3 W J -2 3 100 20 15 4 3 N E J +2 2 -460 30 16 4 1 N W 5 -2 2 200 140 17 5 3 N W 2 = 1 -400 60 18 5 3 E A -1 1 050 90 19 6 1 N E 4 = 9 -90 70 20 6 3 N S 2 -2 9 -200 20 21 7 3 N 8 +1 8 170 160 22 7 6 S J -1 8 -50 50
NS pair 6 Section a Shona Watt Freda A M Ryder	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 7 5 E A = 9 -400 90 2 7 5 x N A -3 9 -800 0 3 8 4 S A -2 8 -100 40 4 8 4 E K -1 8 100 120 5 9 3 S 2 +1 7 170 100 6 9 3 N S J -3 7 -150 0 7 10 1 N 6 +1 6 110 100 8 10 5 x E A = 6 -650 0 9 11 4 S A +1 4 450 100 10 11 4 S A = 4 130 10 11 1 3 S A +1 6 170 100 12 1 3 S 8 -1 6 -100 80 13 2 4 x S A -2 5 -500 80 14 2 2 N W J -2 5 100 20 15 3 4 N 4 -3 4 -300 80 16 3 5 x S 6 +1 4 650 160 17 4 2 W A +1 3 -140 120 18 4 5 N 5 -3 3 -300 0 19 5 2 S Q -2 2 -100 40 20 5 1 N N 3 = 2 090 60 21 6 3 N A -1 1 -100 20 22 6 4 N N A +1 1 460 160
NS pair 7 Section a Tess Hellebrekers Jane Hawkey	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 6 5 E J = 2 -400 90 2 6 4 S 5 -2 2 -200 100 3 7 4 S A -1 1 -50 70 4 7 2 N W T -2 1 200 140 5 8 3 W A = 9 -140 0 6 8 2 S T -2 9 -100 20 7 9 3 W A +1 8 -130 50 8 9 5 x N K -3 8 -500 20 9 10 3 S 2 +2 7 200 60 10 10 2 S 4 +1 7 140 60 11 11 2 N A +1 3 140 30 12 11 4 E 3 -2 3 100 140 13 1 2 S A +1 7 140 160 14 1 1 N W A -2 7 100 20 15 2 3 N 2 -2 6 -200 120 16 2 2 N 5 -2 6 -100 20 17 3 4 E K +1 5 -450 0 18 3 2 E A = 5 -110 20 19 4 3 N E A -1 4 100 150 20 4 2 S A -1 4 -100 40 21 5 2 N A +1 3 140 100 22 5 3 S 4 +1 3 130 100
NS pair 8 Section a Lesley Davies Terry Wilson	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 5 4 E J -2 4 100 160 2 5 3 E K +1 4 -130 160 3 6 1 N S 9 +2 3 150 120 4 6 2 E T = 3 -110 80 5 7 4 W 9 -3 2 150 80 6 7 1 S 8 = 2 080 100 7 8 3 W 4 +1 1 -130 50 8 8 4 W 3 = 1 -420 90 9 9 3 x S 3 +1 9 630 140 10 9 2 E 7 -2 9 200 100 11 10 3 N N 6 +1 8 430 150 12 10 3 S Q -2 8 -200 20 13 11 5 E K +1 2 -620 0 14 11 2 S 2 +2 2 170 110 15 1 3 N E J +2 8 -460 30 16 1 1 N S A +1 8 120 100 17 2 2 E 3 +3 7 -200 80 18 2 3 S T +1 7 130 160 19 3 2 S J -1 6 -50 120 20 3 3 N S 3 = 6 600 140 21 4 4 N 3 -1 5 -100 20 22 4 3 N N 6 +1 5 430 140
NS pair 9 Section a Nan Ottrey Jenny Pryde	Bd Rd Con Dc Ld Res EW   Score   MP 1 4 5 E A +1 6 -420 30 2 4 4 E K +1 6 -150 130 3 5 2 W Q +1 5 -140 0 4 5 4 x E A -2 5 500 160 5 6 3 S 2 +2 4 200 120 6 6 2 S 5 -1 4 -50 60 7 7 3 W A +1 3 -130 50 8 7 4 E K = 3 -420 90 9 8 4 N K -1 2 -50 20 10 8 1 S 5 +2 2 140 60 11 9 3 N N 5 +1 1 430 150 12 9 4 x S 3 -2 1 -500 0 13 10 5 E K = 9 -600 40 14 10 2 S 2 +1 9 140 70 15 11 3 N 6 -2 1 -200 120 16 11 3 S A +1 1 130 120 17 1 4 E 2 = 9 -420 30 18 1 4 S T -1 9 -100 50 19 2 2 N E 5 = 8 -120 10 20 2 1 N S 3 +2 8 150 100 21 3 4 N 8 -1 7 -100 20 22 3 5 S 2 +1 7 420 120