Wanaka Bridge Club : Detailed data for Lindis Pairs

View by:

NS pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Lindis Pairs 7 May

NS pair 1

Section w

Michelle Van Hees
Sally Goodall

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	1	2	E		+1	1	-140	01.3 - 00.5
2	1	2	E	9	+2	1	-170	00.2 - 01.6
3	2	3	W	2	+2	11	-200	01.2 - 00.6
4	2	4	W	8	=	11	-620	01.2 - 00.6
5	3	2	E	T	+2	10	-170	00.6 - 01.2
6	3	4	W	Q	+2	10	-680	00.6 - 01.2
7	4	4	N	4	-1	9	-100	00.5 - 01.3
8	4	3 NT	S	4	+1	9	430	00.8 - 01
9	5	2	N	A	-2	8	-100	00.2 - 01.6
10	5	4	W	7	-1	8	100	01.6 - 00.2
11	6	3	S	K	-1	7	-50	00.6 - 01.2
12	6	4	W	3	=	7	-420	00.1 - 01.7
13	7	2	N	3	+2	6	130	00.7 - 01.1
14	7	2	W	9	=	6	-110	00.7 - 01.1
15	8	5	S	8	+1	5	620	00.9 - 00.9
16	8	4	E	A	=	5	-620	00.5 - 01.3
17	9	3 NT	E	9	+3	4	-490	00 - 01.8
18	9	2	S	A	+4	4	170	01.5 - 00.3
19	10	2	N	Q	+1	3	110	00.6 - 01.2
20	10	2	N	J	+1	3	140	01.1 - 00.7
21	11	2	W	T	-1	2	050	01.1 - 00.7
22	11	3 NT	E	2	=	2	-600	01 - 00.8

NS pair 2

Section w

Cathy Andrews
Jackie Knight

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	11	4	E	8	=	3	-420	00.2 - 01.6
2	11	2	W	7	=	3	-110	00.8 - 01
3	1	2	E	A	+1	2	-140	01.4 - 00.4
4	1	3	W	8	+1	2	-170	01.6 - 00.2
5	2	3	E	3	+1	1	-170	00.6 - 01.2
6	2	3 NT	E	4	+3	1	-690	00 - 01.8
7	3	4	S	8	-1	11	-100	00.5 - 01.3
8	3	2 NT	N	3	+1	11	150	00.4 - 01.4
9	4	1 NT	S	T	-1	10	-50	00.6 - 01.2
10	4	3	S	A	-2	10	-200	00.2 - 01.6
11	5	3	S	K	=	9	140	01.5 - 00.3
12	5	1 NT	W	T	+3	9	-180	00.4 - 01.4
13	6	5	N	5	-1	8	-100	00.1 - 01.7
14	6	2	W	3	-2	8	100	01.8 - 00
15	7	5	S	A	=	7	600	00.5 - 01.3
16	7	4	E	2	=	7	-620	00.5 - 01.3
17	8	3 NT	E	A	-1	6	050	01.6 - 00.2
18	8	4	S	Q	=	6	130	00.3 - 01.5
19	9	3	S		-2	5	-100	00 - 01.8
20	9	3	N	J	-1	5	-100	00.3 - 01.5
21	10	3	S	A	-2	4	-200	00 - 01.8
22	10	3 NT	W	3	=	4	-600	01 - 00.8

NS pair 3

Section w

Alistair Marris
Fiona Marris

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	10	3	E	J	+2	5	-200	00.6 - 01.2
2	10	2	W	Q	=	5	-110	00.8 - 01
3	11	4	W	K	=	4	-620	00.6 - 01.2
4	11	4	W	T	=	4	-620	01.2 - 00.6
5	1	2	E	T	+1	3	-140	01.1 - 00.7
6	1	4	W	Q	+2	3	-680	00.6 - 01.2
7	2	5 NT	S	4	-2	2	-200	00 - 01.8
8	2	3	S	A	+1	2	130	00.2 - 01.6
9	3	2	E	A	-2	1	200	01.8 - 00
10	3	3	W	7	=	1	-140	00.8 - 01
11	4	2	S	A	+1	11	140	01.5 - 00.3
12	4	4	W	9	=	11	-420	00.1 - 01.7
13	5	3 NT	N	5	+1	10	630	01.7 - 00.1
14	5	2	E	A	+1	10	-140	00.2 - 01.6
15	6	3 NT	S	8	+3	9	690	01.7 - 00.1
16	6	4	E	A	=	9	-620	00.5 - 01.3
17	7	3 NT	E	7	+1	8	-430	00.4 - 01.4
18	7	2	S	A	+2	8	130	00.3 - 01.5
19	8	3	N	3	-1	7	-50	00.2 - 01.6
20	8	1 NT	S	8	=	7	090	00.6 - 01.2
21	9	2	W	5	=	6	-90	00.7 - 01.1
22	9	3 NT	W	8	=	6	-600	01 - 00.8

NS pair 4

Section w

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	9					7	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
2	9					7	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
3	10					6	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
4	10					6	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
5	11					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
6	11					5	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
7	1					4	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
8	1					4	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
9	2					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
10	2					3	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
11	3					2	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
12	3					2	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
13	4					1	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
14	4					1	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
15	5					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
16	5					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
17	6					10	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
18	6					10	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
19	7					9	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
20	7					9	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
21	8					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
22	8					8	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9

NS pair 5

Section w

Barbara Galland
Robyn Gilchrist

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	8	3	E	J	=	9	-140	01.3 - 00.5
2	8	3 NT	W	Q	-5	9	250	01.8 - 00
3	9	4	W	K	-1	8	100	01.7 - 00.1
4	9	5 NT	W	8	-1	8	100	01.8 - 00
5	10	3 NT	E	3	+1	7	-430	00.1 - 01.7
6	10	4	W	Q	+2	7	-680	00.6 - 01.2
7	11	4	S	T	=	6	620	01.4 - 00.4
8	11	3 NT	N	4	+2	6	460	01.4 - 00.4
9	1	2 NT	S	T	-1	5	-50	00.6 - 01.2
10	1	3	W	7	=	5	-140	00.8 - 01
11	2	2	W	3	=	4	-90	00.2 - 01.6
12	2	3	E	8	-1	4	050	01.3 - 00.5
13	3	1 NT	S	6	+2	3	150	01.1 - 00.7
14	3	2	W	9	-1	3	050	01.4 - 00.4
15	4	3 NT	S	A	+2	2	660	01.3 - 00.5
16	4	3	E	T	+1	2	-170	01.4 - 00.4
17	5	3 NT	E	8	+1	1	-430	00.4 - 01.4
18	5	2	S	A	+4	1	170	01.5 - 00.3
19	6	2 NT	N	A	+2	11	180	01.5 - 00.3
20	6	2	N	K	+1	11	140	01.1 - 00.7
21	7	3	S	A	-1	10	-100	00.3 - 01.5
22	7	3 NT	W	Q	=	10	-600	01 - 00.8

NS pair 6

Section w

Barbara Taylor
Nancy Latham

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	7	3	W	6	+3	11	-230	00.4 - 01.4
2	7					11	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
3	8	4	W	6	=	10	-620	00.6 - 01.2
4	8	4	W	8	=	10	-620	01.2 - 00.6
5	9	3	E	2	+1	9	-170	00.6 - 01.2
6	9	4	E	6	-1	9	100	01.6 - 00.2
7	10	3	S	Q	+1	8	170	01 - 00.8
8	10	3 NT	S	2	+2	8	460	01.4 - 00.4
9	11	3	W	9	+1	7	-170	00 - 01.8
10	11	4	W	3	=	7	-620	00 - 01.8
11	1	4	S	T	-1	6	-50	00.6 - 01.2
12	1	1	S	9	=	6	070	01.6 - 00.2
13	2	3	N	T	+1	5	130	00.7 - 01.1
14	2	1	W	7	=	5	-70	01 - 00.8
15	3	3 NT	S	8	+3	4	690	01.7 - 00.1
16	3	4	E	A	=	4	-620	00.5 - 01.3
17	4	2 NT	E	8	+2	3	-180	01.2 - 00.6
18	4	3	S	A	+2	3	150	01 - 00.8
19	5	3	N	6	=	2	110	00.6 - 01.2
20	5	4	E	4	-3	2	300	01.6 - 00.2
21	6	2	W	7	=	1	-90	00.7 - 01.1
22	6	3 NT	W	5	=	1	-600	01 - 00.8

NS pair 7

Section w

Russell Bishop
Jacqui Roberts

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	6	3	W	A	+1	2	-170	00.9 - 00.9
2	6	2	N	A	=	2	090	01.3 - 00.5
3	7	4	W	2	=	1	-620	00.6 - 01.2
4	7	4	W	A	+1	1	-650	00.5 - 01.3
5	8	3 NT	E	9	-2	11	100	01.6 - 00.2
6	8	4	W	Q	+2	11	-680	00.6 - 01.2
7	9	4	S	5	=	10	620	01.4 - 00.4
8	9	3 NT	N	3	=	10	400	00.6 - 01.2
9	10	2	S	T	-1	9	-50	00.6 - 01.2
10	10	4	W	2	-2	9	200	01.8 - 00
11	11	4	S	A	-2	8	-100	00 - 01.8
12	11	3	W	2	=	8	-110	01 - 00.8
13	1	3 NT	S	Q	=	7	600	01.4 - 00.4
14	1	2	E	A	+1	7	-140	00.2 - 01.6
15	2	3	N	3	+2	6	150	00.2 - 01.6
16	2	4	E	A	-1	6	100	01.8 - 00
17	3	3 NT	E	9	-1	5	050	01.6 - 00.2
18	3	2	S	A	+2	5	130	00.3 - 01.5
19	4	2	S	7	=	4	110	00.6 - 01.2
20	4	3	N	2	+1	4	130	00.8 - 01
21	5	2	S	A	=	3	110	01.7 - 00.1
22	5	3 NT	W	7	=	3	-600	01 - 00.8

NS pair 8

Section w

Julia Petrie
Natalie Keenan

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	5	2	E	8	=	4	-110	01.6 - 00.2
2	5	2	W	Q	+2	4	-170	00.2 - 01.6
3	6	4	W	2	=	3	-620	00.6 - 01.2
4	6	4	W	7	+1	3	-650	00.5 - 01.3
5	7	2	E	T	+1	2	-140	01.1 - 00.7
6	7	4	E	6	=	2	-620	01.4 - 00.4
7	8	5	S	K	-1	1	-100	00.5 - 01.3
8	8	3 NT	N	3	+2	1	460	01.4 - 00.4
9	9	1 NT	S	3	+1	11	120	01.3 - 00.5
10	9	3	W	2	+1	11	-170	00.4 - 01.4
11	10	2	S	A	+1	10	140	01.5 - 00.3
12	10	4	E	4	-1	10	050	01.3 - 00.5
13	11	3	S	8	=	9	110	00.4 - 01.4
14	11	3	W	3	=	9	-140	00.2 - 01.6
15	1	3 NT	S	7	-4	8	-400	00 - 01.8
16	1	3	E	2	+1	8	-170	01.4 - 00.4
17	2	3 NT	E	7	=	7	-400	01 - 00.8
18	2	3	S	A	+2	7	150	01 - 00.8
19	3	2 NT	N	3	+2	6	180	01.5 - 00.3
20	3	4	N	2	=	6	620	01.8 - 00
21	4	3	N	J	-1	5	-100	00.3 - 01.5
22	4	3 NT	W	3	+1	5	-630	00.1 - 01.7

NS pair 9

Section w

Susannah Pinckney
Lyn Hill

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	4	3	E	J	-1	6	050	01.8 - 00
2	4					6	–	0-999.9 - 0-999.9
3	5	4	W	K	-1	5	100	01.7 - 00.1
4	5	5	W	A	=	5	-650	00.5 - 01.3
5	6	3 NT	W	2	+1	4	-430	00.1 - 01.7
6	6	4	W	Q	+1	4	-650	01.2 - 00.6
7	7	4	S	K	-1	3	-100	00.5 - 01.3
8	7	3 NT	N	4	+2	3	460	01.4 - 00.4
9	8	1 NT	S	T	+1	2	120	01.3 - 00.5
10	8	2	S	A	-1	2	-100	01.4 - 00.4
11	9	3	S	A	-1	1	-50	00.6 - 01.2
12	9	3	W	T	+1	1	-130	00.8 - 01
13	10	3 NT	N	T	+1	11	630	01.7 - 00.1
14	10	2	W	9	=	11	-110	00.7 - 01.1
15	11	3 NT	S	8	+2	10	660	01.3 - 00.5
16	11	2	E	5	+2	10	-170	01.4 - 00.4
17	1	3 NT	E	8	-1	9	050	01.6 - 00.2
18	1	3	S	A	+1	9	130	00.3 - 01.5
19	2	2 NT	N	4	+3	8	210	01.8 - 00
20	2	4	E	4	-2	8	200	01.4 - 00.4
21	3	3	E	A	-1	7	050	01.1 - 00.7
22	3	3 NT	W	6	+1	7	-630	00.1 - 01.7

NS pair 10

Section w

Sally Jackways
Nicole Meldrum

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	3	4	W	A	+1	8	-450	00 - 01.8
2	3	2	E	8	=	8	-110	00.8 - 01
3	4	4	W	K	+1	7	-650	00 - 01.8
4	4	4	W	A	+2	7	-680	00 - 01.8
5	5	2	E	T	-2	6	100	01.6 - 00.2
6	5	4	E	6	-2	6	200	01.8 - 00
7	6	4	S	K	+1	5	650	01.8 - 00
8	6	3 NT	N	4	+2	5	460	01.4 - 00.4
9	7	1 NT	S	T	=	4	090	01 - 00.8
10	7	2 NT	W	4	=	4	-120	01.2 - 00.6
11	8	2	S	A	+1	3	140	01.5 - 00.3
12	8	4	W	T	-3	3	150	01.8 - 00
13	9	5	S	5	-1	2	-100	00.1 - 01.7
14	9	2	W	9	-1	2	050	01.4 - 00.4
15	10	5	S	4	+1	1	620	00.9 - 00.9
16	10	4	E	2	=	1	-620	00.5 - 01.3
17	11	4	W	9	=	11	-420	00.8 - 01
18	11	5	S	A	+1	11	620	01.8 - 00
19	1	2	S	7	+2	10	130	01.1 - 00.7
20	1	5	N	K	-1	10	-100	00.3 - 01.5
21	2	2	S	Q	=	9	110	01.7 - 00.1
22	2	3 NT	W	5	-1	9	100	01.8 - 00

NS pair 11

Section w

Vicki Menzies
Jo Harry

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	EW	Score	MP
1	2	1	E	3	+3	10	-170	00.9 - 00.9
2	2	3 NT	E	3	-2	10	100	01.5 - 00.3
3	3	4	W	3	=	9	-620	00.6 - 01.2
4	3	4	W	8	+1	9	-650	00.5 - 01.3
5	4	3 NT	W	5	-2	8	100	01.6 - 00.2
6	4	4	E	6	+2	8	-680	00.6 - 01.2
7	5	4	S	K	=	7	620	01.4 - 00.4
8	5	2	S	4	+1	7	110	00 - 01.8
9	6	2 NT	S	K	+1	6	150	01.6 - 00.2
10	6	3	W	2	=	6	-140	00.8 - 01
11	7	3	W	3	-1	5	050	01 - 00.8
12	7	3	E	8	+1	5	-170	00.6 - 01.2
13	8	3	S	7	+2	4	150	01.1 - 00.7
14	8	2	W	9	-1	4	050	01.4 - 00.4
15	9	5	N	Q	=	3	600	00.5 - 01.3
16	9	4	E	A	=	3	-620	00.5 - 01.3
17	10	3 NT	W	6	+1	2	-430	00.4 - 01.4
18	10	4	S	Q	+1	2	150	01 - 00.8
19	11	2	N	3	+2	1	130	01.1 - 00.7
20	11	3	E	4	=	1	-110	00 - 01.8
21	1	1 NT	S	7	=	11	090	01.4 - 00.4
22	1	3 NT	W	3	=	11	-600	01 - 00.8